Review
The contribution of virtual reality to the diagnosis of spatial navigation disorders and to the study of the role of navigational aids: A systematic literature review
M. Cogne´
a,b,*, M. Taillade
a, B. N’Kaoua
a,c, A. Tarruella
a,d, E. Klinger
e, F. Larrue
f, H. Sauze´on
a,c, P.-A. Joseph
a,b, E. Sorita
a,daEA4136handicapetsyste`menerveux,universite´ deBordeaux,33076Bordeaux,France
bServicedeme´decinephysiqueetdere´adaptation,centrehospitalieruniversitaire,33076Bordeaux,France
cInstitutnationalderechercheeninformatiqueetautomatique(INRIA),33405Talencecedex,France
dInstitutdeformationenergothe´rapie,centrehospitalieruniversitaire,33076Bordeaux,France
eLaboratoireinteractionsnume´riquessante´ handicap,ESIEA,53000Laval,France
fLaboratoireBordelaisderechercheeninformatique(LaBRI),universite´ deBordeaux,33045Bordeaux,France
1. Introduction
Findingone’swayaroundanenvironment,whetherornotitis familiar,isacommonsituationforhumans.Peoplefrequentlyneed tomovefromonepointtoanother,accordingtoatrajectorythat mayormaynotbeknowninadvance,usingdifferentelements– externalaids,landmarksorothersourcesofrelevantinformation.
This ability is essential, because it underpins the person’s autonomyandhisorherparticipationinsociety.Spatialnavigation hasraisedinterest,andhasbeenthesubjectofmuchresearchin mammals (including humans) on account of its particular integrativeroleinlinkingfunctionsintheareasofneurophysiolo- gy,learning,memoryandcognition[1].
Foranumberofyears,numerousclinicaldescriptionsofbrain- injuredpatients presentingselectivelossesoftheabilitytofind theirwayhavebeenundertaken.Thisdisorderhasbeentermed
‘‘topographicaldisorientation’’[2].Butthereiswidediversityin the types of topographical disorientation observed in these ARTICLE INFO
Articlehistory:
Received9April2015 Accepted23December2015 Keywords:
Spatialnavigation Virtualreality Brain-damagedpatients Ageing
Stimuli Aid
ABSTRACT
Introduction:Spatialnavigation,whichinvolveshighercognitivefunctions,isfrequentlyimplementedin dailyactivities,andiscriticaltotheparticipationofhumanbeingsinmainstreamenvironments.Virtual realityisanexpandingtool,whichenablesononehandtheassessmentofthecognitivefunctions involvedinspatialnavigation,andontheothertherehabilitationofpatientswithspatialnavigation difficulties.Topographicaldisorientationisafrequentdeficitamongpatientssufferingfromneurological diseases. The use of virtual environments enables the information incorporated into the virtual environmenttobemanipulatedempirically.Buttheimpactofmanipulationsseemsdifferaccordingto theirnature(quantity,occurrence,andcharacteristicsofthestimuli)andthetargetpopulation.
Methods:Weperformedasystematicreviewofresearchonvirtualspatialnavigationcoveringtheperiod from2005to2015.Wefocusedfirstonthecontributionofvirtualspatialnavigationforpatientswith braininjuryorschizophrenia,orinthecontextofageinganddementia,andthenontheimpactofvisual orauditorystimulionvirtualspatialnavigation.
Results:Onthebasisof6521abstractsidentifiedin2databases(PubmedandScopus)withthekeywords
«navigation»and«virtual»,1103abstractswereselectedbyaddingthekeywords‘‘ageing’’,‘‘dementia’’,
‘‘braininjury’’,‘‘stroke’’,‘‘schizophrenia’’,‘‘aid’’,‘‘help’’,‘‘stimulus’’and‘‘cue’’;Amongthese,63articles wereincludedinthepresentqualitativeanalysis.
Conclusion: Unlikepencil-and-paper tests, virtual reality is useful to assess large-scalenavigation strategiesinpatientswithbraininjuryorschizophrenia,orinthecontextofageinganddementia.Better knowledgeaboutboththeimpactofthedifferentaidsandthecognitiveprocessesinvolvedisessential fortheuseofaidsinneurorehabilitation.
ß2016PublishedbyElsevierMassonSAS.
* Correspondingauthor.EA4136handicapetsyste`menerveux,universite´ de Bordeaux,33076Bordeaux,France.
E-mailaddress:melaniecogne@hotmail.fr(M.Cogne´).
Availableonlineat
ScienceDirect
www.sciencedirect.com
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2015.12.004 1877-0657/ß2016PublishedbyElsevierMassonSAS.
patients, and also in the type of brain injury incurred [3]. In addition,theevaluationsusedtocharacterisethedisordershave beendiverseandnon-standardised[4].
Tostartwith,testsofspatialcognitiononasmallscalewere elaborated,intheformof‘‘pencil-and-paper’’tests,suchasthe Rotation Mental Test [5] or the Guilford and Zimmermann spatialorientation test. Hegartyet al. [6]showed onlypartial correlation between paper-and-pencil visuo-spatial tests on a smallscaleandtestsinlarge-scalevirtualorrealenvironments.
Spatialnavigationin large spaces thusseems torequire skills otherthanthoseassessedinpaper-and-penciltests.Thisstudy concludedtopoorecologicalvalidityofpencil-and-papertests, andconfirmedtheusefulnessofassessingspatialnavigationina large-scaleenvironment,whetherrealofvirtual.Indeed,several authors, among whom Cushman et al. [7], have shown a correlationinnavigationperformancesbetweenrealandvirtual environments.
The progressincomputing andits widespread usefromthe 1990shaveenabledthemodellingofsimulatedenvironmentsthat areclosetoreality,knownasvirtualrealityenvironments.Virtual realityrapidly demonstrated its potentialusefulness in clinical practice,in particular in the areas of cognitiveevaluation and rehabilitation,andwellasforthestudyofcognitiveprocessesin humans[4].Theevaluationofnavigationinavirtualenvironment hasvariousadvantages overevaluation inrealsituations [8]: it enablesbetterscientificmonitoring,itcanallowfordeficitsand disabilitiesthatsometimesmake evaluationproblematicinreal situations,itislesscostly,andalsosafer.Fromafunctionaland behaviouralviewpoint,itenablesimmediatefeedbackonperfor- mancesinvarioussensoryformsandmodes,controlledadminis- tration of cues so as to improve performances in a learning approach, and it also enables ‘‘time-out’’ to make room for discussionandtheinclusionofdifferentmethods.
Followingthepublicationofnumerousstudiesthathaveshown theadvantagesofthevirtualsettingintheareaofspatialcognition, itseemedimportanttoustoperformanup-to-datereviewonthe contributionsof the useof virtualreality in theexploration of spatial navigation, especially in populations with cognitive impairments. These patients are particularly likely to present spatialcognitiondisorders,whicharehighlydamagingforsocial participationintheirordinaryenvironments[2,3].Inaddition,the clinicaluseofvirtualenvironments,becauseitenablesmorestrict experimentalcontrolthanworkinginarealenvironment,makesit possibletomeasuretheinfluenceofdifferentcomponentsbrought intoplayonspatialnavigationperformances.Thusenvironmental cuesareusedassensorycuesofthebottom-uptype,andprovide scopeforinvestigation,wheretheuseofvirtualrealityhasmuchto contribute.Thereviewpresentedherehastwoobjectives:thefirst istodetailtheclinicaluseofvirtualrealityinspatialnavigationin populationswithcognitivedisorders;thesecondistoprovidean updateontheliteratureontheimpactonvirtualspatialnavigation ofusingvisualandauditoryenvironmentalcues.
2. Methods
Thisreviewwasconductedontwomedicaldatabases,PubMed andScopus(fortheScopusdatabase,onlyarticlesintheareaofthe health sciences were searched). The following Mesh keywords wereused:‘‘navigation’’, ‘‘virtual’’, ‘‘ageing’’,‘‘dementia’’,‘‘brain injury’’, ‘‘schizophrenia’’, ‘‘stroke’’, ‘‘cue’’, ‘‘help’’, ‘‘aid’’, and
‘‘stimulus’’. The basic search algorithm was ‘‘navigation AND virtual’’towhichalltheotherkeywordswereassociatedinturn.
The processing of results was performed according to Prisma guidelines.Articles publishedin English in the area of the life sciencesfrom2005toJune2015wereretained.Thearticleswere
selectedonthebasisoftitleandabstract.Thefinalselectionwas discussedbythethreeauthorsofthepresentarticle(MC,PAJ,ES) withrespecttothetwoobjectivesdefinedabove.Aflowdiagram (Fig.1)illustratesthearticleselectionprocedure.
Inall,44articlescomplyingwiththefirstobjectiveand19with thesecondobjective wereretained. Themaincharacteristics of thesearticlesaresummedupinTables1and2usingthefollowing characteristics:firstauthor,virtualenvironmentused,population (numbersandtype)studyobjectiveandmainresult.
3. Results
3.1. Contributionsofspatialnavigationinvirtualrealityindifferent populationspresentingcognitivedisturbances
3.1.1. Spatialnavigationandnormalageing
Theeffectofageingonnavigationskillsinlargespaceshasbeen widely described [9]. Generally speaking, the remembrance of spatial configurations and landmarks during navigation loses precisionwithage[10],whileparadoxically,learningaroutefrom an aerial view appears, according to certain authors, to be preserved [11]. More specifically, different studies in virtual realitysettinghaveshownalterationsintheallocentricprocessing ofinformation(i.e.spatialconfigurations)amongelderlysubjects usingavirtualwatermaze[12],othermazemodels(wallmaze, radial maze)[13–16],or virtualcity districts [17,18].Similarly, otherstudiesusingmazesorothervirtualenvironmentsevidence difficultiesinacquiringspatialrepresentationsthoughttoresult from an age-linked decline in hippocampus function, which appears to spontaneously direct elderly subjects towards the useofegocentricstrategies[19–23].Arecentstudycomparinga virtualandarealcitydistricthowevershowedthatelderlysubjects encountergreaterdifficultiesthanyoungsubjectsinfindingtheir way,thisbeingrelatedtodeclineinexecutivefunctions,whilethe spatial knowledgeacquired in the virtualenvironment didnot significantly differ between the two groups. This age-linked executivedecline,affectingplanningandthechoiceofappropriate navigationstrategies,isconfirmedbydifferentstudies[9,12].How- evercertainelderlysubjectsretainbetterabilitiestoadapttheir strategies[14].Thisobservationisnothoweverconfirmedinthe studybyCarellietal.[13].Finally,forcertainauthors,failureto efficiently integrate sensory-motor information could also be implicated in the deterioration of spatial navigation skills [25–28]. Overall,virtual realitystudies indicatethat navigation disturbancesinthecourseofnormalageingismulti-determined, and has origins that can be mnesic (allocentric processing associated with hippocampus function), executive (strategic processing associated with front-lobe function) or related to sensory-motorintegration(integrationoftheitineraryassociated withtheretrosplenialcortex).
3.1.2. SpatialnavigationandAlzheimer-typedementia
Alteredlarge-scalespatialcognitioninAlzheimer-typedemen- tia (ATD) has been described in differentstudies using virtual reality[7,17,29,30].ThestudybyBallassenetal.[31]suggeststhat memoryofthetemporaltypeinthecourseofanavigationtask, whichtendstoberelatedtoallocentricstrategies,is aselective behaviouralmarkerforATD.Topographicaldisorientationisoften consideredtobeaprodromalsignofthispathology,andhasled authorstousevirtualenvironmentsinordertoobjectifytheearly signs and evidence the underlying neurological correlates [32–34].Wenigeretal.[30]retrospectivelycomparedthespatial navigationperformancesofagroupofpatientswithmildcognitive impairment(MCI)thatevolvedtowardsATDandagroupofMCI patients whodidnot evolvetowards ATD.Theauthors didnot
evidence any differences between these two populations in virtualrealitynavigationperformances,whatevertheconditions (allocentricoregocentric).Theydidhoweverobservethatthesize of the hippocampus was significantly smaller in the MCI-ATD groupthanintheMCIgroupthatdidnotprogresstodementia.In thisstudy,thelackofspecificityofthedifferentnavigationtasks assigned with respect to the different navigation strategies (allocentricoregocentric)possiblypreventedthedifferentiation ofthetwogroups.
Cushmanet al. [7] compared navigation in real and virtual environmentin populationsof young, healthy elderly,MCIand ATD subjects, and they found strong correlations between the resultsobtainedinthetwoenvironmentsforthefourgroups,thus demonstratingthe robustecologicalvalidity of virtualenviron- ments.Thisstudy,andalsothatbyZakzanietal.[17],showedthat ATDpatients,andtoalesserdegreeMCIpatients,exhibiteddeficits in recalling landmarks, itineraries and the configuration of the environmentexplored.However,incomplementarymanner,ina
more recent study, Kessels et al. [35] observed that implicit memory of objects placed at decisional locations in the path- findingtaskwasnotimpairedinATDpatientspresentingatrophy ofthemiddletemporallobeincomparisonwithhealthysubjects.
Inaddition,Burgessetal.[36]earliernotedselectiveimpairmentof theallocentriccomponentofspatialmemoryinATD,andDrzezga etal.[37],amongATDorMCIpatients,observedgreaterdifficulty ininhibitingtheinterventionofcerebralprocessesnon-relevantto thenavigationtaskcomparedtohealthysubjects.Theauthorsthus concludedthatspatialnavigationdisturbancesarerobustclinical signsforATDandMCI.Betterunderstandingoftheirmanifesta- tions,andtheelaborationoftasksspecifictoallocentricnavigation in virtual environments, could improve prognosisfor progress fromearlycognitiveimpairmenttodementia.Theuseofvirtual environmentsisinthisrespectaparticularlyvaluableapproachfor the understanding and evaluation of these phenomena that generallyshowthemselvesonalargescaleandinordinaryliving settings.
6521 records idenfied throughdatabase searchingPubmed and Scopus with the key words «navigaon» and«virtual»
85 recordsidenfiedby adding the key words 1018 records idenfiedby adding the key words
«ageing», «demena», «brain injury», «help », « aid», « smulus» and« cue»
« stroke» and« schizophrenia»
54 records screened aer duplicates 967 records screened aer duplicates removed removedand selecon of the period and selecon of the period 2005-2015 2005-2015
54 full-text arcles assessed for eligibility 90 full-text arcles assessed for eligibility
63studiesincludedin qualitave synthesis 10 arcles
excluded
71 arcles excluded
Fig.1.Flowdiagram.
Table1
Articlesselectedwiththekeywords‘‘ageing’’and‘‘dementia’’.
Authors/year Mainaim n HC VE
setting*
Other investigation
Mainresult
Normalaging Normalagingeffectsonlargescalespatial cognition
Konishi(2013)[16] Toexaminetheeffectsofagingonthe hippocampusandcaudatenucleusduring navigation
Virtual maze
fRMI Agingprocessinvolvesashiftfrom usingthehippocampustowardthe caudatenucleusduringnavigation Taillade(2013)[24] Toassesswayfindingandspatiallearningin
relationtoexecutiveetmemorydecline
Virtual district
Memoryandexecutivedeclines hamperspatialnavigationinolder people
Adamo(2012)[26] Toexaminetheimpactofagingonpath integrationfromavalaiblesensorimotor informations
Virtual path
Agingimpactspathintegration.Result inVE*ispoorerthaninrealsetting Harris(2012)[25] Toexploreagedifferencesinpathintegration
bothwithandwithoutlandmarkinformation
Virtual landscape
InaVE*thatprovidedonlyopticflow information,olderparticipants exhibiteddeficitsinpathintegration Wiener(2012)[22] Toinvestigateage-relateddifferencesin
repeatingandretracingalearnedroute
Virtual maze
Theolderparticipantshadgreater problemsduringrouteretracingthan duringrouterepetition
Yamamotoetal.
(2012)[11]
Toinvestigatewhetherincreasingagehasequal consequencesforalltypesofspatiallearning
Virtual town
spatiallearningthroughexploratory navigationisparticularlyvulnerableto adverseeffectsofaging,whereas elderlyadultsmaybeabletomaintain theirmapreading
Head(2010)[10] Toexploreageeffectsonspatialnavigation abilitiesconsideringthemultiplecognitiveand neuralfactorsthatcontributetosuccessful navigation
Virtual maze
TDM Agedifferencesareobservedinboth wayfindingandroutelearning
Mahmood (2009)[27]
Toinvestigateage-relateddifferencesin participants’abilitytodeterminelineardistances, angularrotations,andangulardisplacement exclusivelyfromvisualinput
Virtual path
Thereareage-relateddeficitsinthe abilitytoperformvisualreturn-to- origintasks
Moffat(2007)[12] Toexamineagedifferencesinvirtual environmentnavigationandtoassesspossible relationshipsbetweennavigationandstructural integrityofhippocampalandextrahippocampal brainregions
Virtual maze
fMRI Individualdifferencesinregionalbrain volumesaswellasperformanceonthe testsofmemoryandexecutive functionscontributedtoagedifferences Moffat(2006)[23] toexamineagedifferencesinfunctionalbrain
activationduringvirtualenvironmentnavigation
Virtual maze
fMRI Thereisanagespecificneuralnetworks supportingspatialnavigation Lo¨vde´n(2005)[28] Toexaminetheimpactofimprovedsensorimotor
demandsonspatialnavigationamongelderly subjects
Virtual maze
Walkingsupportattenuatedage- relateddecrementsinnavigational learning
Normalaging Navigationalstrategiesadaptation
Harris(2014)[18] Totesttheabilityofyoungandoldparticipantsto switchfromlearnedroutestofindingnovel shortcuts
Virtual town
Olderparticipantsareimpairedinbothstrategyswitchingand allocentricprocessinginformations
Morganti(2014)[14] Totesttheabilitytoswitchfromallocentricto egocentricprocessing
Virtual maze
Virtualperformanceissignificativelyrelatedtotheoverall cognitivelevelandage
Bohbot(2012)[21] Toinvestigatenavigationalstrategiesacrossthelife span
Virtual maze
Theproportionofsubjectsusingspatialstrategydecreasesacross thelifespan,infavorofresponsestrategies
Harris(2012)[15] Toexploretheeffectsofageonstrategyswitching duringspatialnavigation
Virtual maze
Elderlysubjectsshowaspecific‘‘switch-to-place’’deficitthat couldaccountforapparentimpairmentsinbothnavigational strategyswitchingandallocentricprocessing
Rodgers(2012)[19] Toassessagedifferencesinstrategypreferencein humans
Virtual maze
Elderlypatientspreferentiallyuseegocentricstrategy Liu(2011)[20] Todeterminetheeffectofageandgenderupon
differentorientationstrategiesinvirtual environments
Virtual town
Age-relateddeclinesinnavigationarecommonacrossall orientationstrategiesandconfirmgender-specificeffectsin differentspatialdomains
Pathologicalaging Pathologicalagingonspatialcognition HC Tarnanas(2015)[34] Toinvestigatedeficitsinspatialnavigation,
prospectivememory,andexecutivefunction inMCI
25 Yes Virtual museum
EEG TheVEdiscriminatethepresenceofMCI
Bellassen(2012)[31] Tocomparetemporalmemoryamongvarious groupsfollowinganavigationtask
27 Yes Virtual maze
Temporalordermemorytestedinaspatial navigationtaskmayprovideaselective behavioralmarkerofAD*
Caffo` (2012)[33] Toinvestigatecategoricalspatialmemory deficitsusingavirtualnavigation-based reorientationtask
51 Yes VE* VEmayrepresentanevaluationsupplementfor spatialmemorydeficitsinprodromalstagesof Alzheimer’sdementia
Nedelska(2012)[29] Todeterminewhetherallocentricspatial navigationimpairmentwouldbeproportional torighthippocampalvolumelossirrespective ofgeneralbrainatrophy
42 Yes Virtual maze
Therighthippocampusplaysacriticalrolein allocentricnavigation,particularlywhen cognitiveimpairmentispresent
3.1.3. Spatialnavigationandacquiredbraininjuryinadults Evaluationandrehabilitationusingvirtualrealityaretwomajor clinicalorientationsthathavebeenexploredinresearchonspatial navigation disturbances among subjects in the aftermath of acquired brain injury. Better comprehension of the navigation strategiesaffectedintheirrelationshipwiththebrainlesionsis likewiseanimportantlineofresearchinthispopulation.Different authors have thus shown that among adult patients having sustainedheadtrauma,therearedifficultiesinacquiringallocen- tricspatialrepresentationsorrepresentationsoftheconfiguration ofanenvironment[38,39].Thevirtualenvironmentsusedbythese authorstodissociateallocentricandegocentricspatialrepresen- tationsarebasedontheMorriswatertaskparadigm[40,41].More recently, among amnesic patients presenting hippocampus lesions,thesameteamconfirmedthatthesubjectswereassisted in their navigation towards a target by proximal landmarks (egocentricstrategy)butnotifthesemarkersweredistantfrom thetarget(allocentricstrategy)[42].Ontheotherhand,inarecent study,Wenigeretal.[43]demonstratedthatpatientswithleftor rightfocalparietallesionsfailedtolearnanitineraryinavirtual maze(egocentricstrategiescomingintoplayinalearningtaskof the route type), while their performance in a virtual park (allocentric strategies deployed to learn an itinerary of the configurationoftheenvironmenttype)wasnormal.Theseauthors alsoshowedthat subjects’rightprecuneus volumewassignifi- cantly predictive of performance in the virtual maze, and suggested that the parietal cortex could underpin egocentric strategies in spatial learningskills in large-scale environments.
Carellietal.[13]fortheirpartshowedthata groupof8brain- injuredpatients(3withalefthemispherelesion,2witha right hemisphere lesion, 2 with bilateral lesions) had difficulty implementingefficient spatialnavigation strategiesin a virtual mazefromamapofthemazeonwhichtheyhadpreviouslyplotted the way to the exit, suggesting difficulties in the transfer of knowledgeoftheconfigurationoftheenvironmenttypetofollow anitineraryoftheroutetype.VanderHammetal.[44],inacase- basedapproach,demonstratedadualdissociationbycomparing the spatial navigation performances between two patients presentingrightparietal-occipitallesions.Inthesetwopatients, thespatialstrategieswerenotaffectedinthesamemanner,since
onehaddifficultyinthetemporalorganisationoftheitinerarybut notintherecognitionofthescenes,andthereversewastruefor theother.Theseauthorsalsoconfirmedthatthemaincomplaints from thepatients concerning their topographicaldisorientation werenotdetectedbythetraditionalneuropsychologicaltestsas efficientlyaswiththevirtualnavigationtests.Inanoriginalstudy, Slobounov et al. [45] compared a group of athletes who had sustained mild braininjury witha matched controlgroup ina virtualnavigationtaskcallingonspatialmemory.Theseauthors observed that while performances did not show significant differencesbetweenthetwogroups,thebrainactivationrecorded undermagneticresonanceimagery(MRI)inthebraininjurygroup showedanincreaseinbrainactivity(significantlygreaterthanin thecontrolgroup)intheparietalcortex,therightdorsal-lateral prefrontalcortexandtherighthippocampus.Accordingtothese authors,differenttypesoflesionassociatedwithneuronelosses and local changes in cellular metabolism couldexplain certain focalhyperactivationsandtherecruitmentofadditionalcerebral resources.
Theevaluation ofpatients followinga strokeand presenting unilateral spatial neglect affecting navigationwas recently the subjectofworkbyBuxbaumetal.[46,47].Intheirfirststudy[46], theseauthorsevidencedthesensitivityofthevirtualtesttodetect unilateral spatial neglectproblemsthat that werenotdetected using the traditional neglect battery, and they showed strong correlationswithanavigationtaskinrealenvironment.Thesecond study [47]confirmed themetric qualities of thevirtual reality navigationteston70patientspresentingrightcerebralvascular lesions.
Fewstudiestodatehaveexploredtheuseofvirtualrealityin rehabilitationprogrammesfor patientsexhibiting topographical disorientation. In a very recent study, the feasibility of a rehabilitation programme using virtual reality among patients followingastrokewastested[48].Therehabilitationapproachwas of the top-down type, and showed that the use of virtual environments enabled patients to learn alternative navigation strategiessuitedtotheirparticularcognitivedeficits.
Caglio et al. [49] used simulatednavigation tasks in virtual environmenttoimprovemnesicfunctionsinayounghead-trauma patient, thus using the multimodal cognitive nature of spatial Table1(Continued)
Pathologicalaging Pathologicalagingonspatialcognition HC Kessel(2011)[35] Toexaminememoryforobjectsrelevantfor
navigationinpatientswithAlzheimer’s dementia
21 Yes Virtual maze
SubjectswithAD*showimplicitmemoryfor directionallandmarks
Weniger(2011)[30] Tocomparespatialperformanceaccordingto corticalareasinvolvedinnavigationamong MCI*subjects
29 Yes Parkand maze
fMRI Variouscorticalareasarereducedamong patientsinrelationtospatialperformance Carelli(2011)[13] Toinvestigatehowthetransferfromsurvey
(map-like)torouterepresentationsisaffected afterabrainlesion
8 Yes Virtual
maze
Executivefunctionsandvisuo-spatialabilities deficitsappearedtobemorerelevantfor predictingpatients’resultsinperformingtheVR Mazetask
Pengas(2010)[32] Tocomparetopographicalmemorybetween variouspopulationofpatientswithAD*or MCI*
69 Yes Virtual town
Virtualtestdiscriminatesbetweenpatients withAD*,MCIandhealthysubjects Zakzanis(2009)[17] Toexamineage-andAlzheimer’sdisease-
relateddifferencesinroutelearningand memoryusingVR
2 Yes Virtual
town
Nodifferenceexistsinthelandmakrecognizing taskbetweenoldersubjectsandsubjectswith dementia
Cushman(2008)[7] Tocompareareal-worldnavigationtestwith aVEversionsimulatingthesamenavigational environment
26 Yes Virtual corridor
Closecorrelationsexistbetweenreal-worldand virtualnavigationaldeficitsthatincreased acrossgroups
Burgess(2006)[36] Toexplorethecaseofapatientthoughttobe intheveryearlystagesofAD
1 Yes Virtual
town
Thiscaseindicatesanewcategoryof topographicaldisorientationwithimpaired allocentricspatialmemory
Drzezga(2005)[37] Toevaluatebothcerebralactivationand deactivationinvariouspopulationincluding HC,MCI,andAD
21 Yes Virtual maze
PETsca DevelopmentofADappearstobecharacterized byaprogressiveimpairmentofcross-modal cerebraldeactivationfunctions
VE:virtualenvironment;AD:Alzheimerdementia;MCI:mildcognitiveimpairment;fMRI:functionalmagneticresonanceimaging.
navigation to improve impaired functions. In this single-case study,onthebasisoffunctionalMRIimagery,theauthorssuggest that this type of intensive training using virtual tasks might increasetheactivationofthehippocampusandpara-hippocampus regions.
3.1.4. Spatialnavigationinschizophrenia
Spatialnavigationdisordersamongschizophrenicpatientshave beenthefocusofspecificinterestintheliterature.Thesepatients present alteredspatial cognition,in particularregarding spatial strategiesoftheallocentrictype,whileegocentricstrategiesbased Table2
Articlesselectedwiththekeywords‘‘braininjury’’,‘‘stroke’’and‘‘schizophrenia’’.
Authors/year Mainaim n HC VE
setting*
Other investigation
Mainresult Braininjury&
stroke
Descriptionofprocessandbehavioral assessment
Buxbaum (2012)[48]
Toassessalargesampleofpatientswith theaimofdevelopingaclinicallyuseful versionoftheVirtualRealityLateralized AttentionTest(VRLAT)
70 Yes Virtual path
TheVRLATisasensitive,valid,andreliablemeasureof hemispatialneglect
Carelli(2011) [13]
Toinvestigatehowthetransferfrom survey(map-like)torouterepresentations isaffectedafterabrainlesion
8 Yes Virtual maze
Effectofbrainlesionsonthetransfermap/navigation
VanderHam (2010)[45]
Presentationoftwocaseswithnavigation problemsresultingfromparieto-occipital righthemispheredamage
2 X VE* Adoubledissociationbetweenspatialandtemporal deficitswasfound
Slobounov (2010)[46]
Toinvestigatethepossibilityofresidual functionaldeficitsinrecentlyconcussed butasymptomaticindividuals
15 Yes Virtual corridor
fMRI Concussedathletesshowedlargercorticalnetworks duringencodingthanHC
Goodrich-Hunsaker (2010)[43]
Toevaluatetheimportanceofthe hippocampusinspatiallearningand memory
5 Yes Virtual maze
fMRI Resultsconfirmtheroleofhippocampusinhuman navigationandprovideanewlinkbetweenits mnemonicandnavigationalroles
Weniger (2009)[44]
Tocomparesubjectswithbraininjuryand healthycontrolontwovirtualrealitytasks affordingtolearnavirtualpark(allocentric memory)andavirtualmaze(egocentric memory)
24 Yes Virtual maze andpark
fMRI Left-andright-sidedlesionedsubjectsdidnotdifferon taskperformancebutcomparedwithHC,subjectswith parietalcortexlesionswereimpairedlearningthe virtualmaze
Buxbaum (2008)[47]
Toreportdatafromparticipantswithright hemispherestrokeonanewVRnavigation test
9 X Virtual
path
TheVRtestdetectedlateralizedattentiondeficitsin participantswhoseperformancewaswithinthenormal rangeonotherneglecttests
Livingstone (2007)[40]
ToassessamongsubjectswithTBIwhat arethespatialstrategiesimpaired
11 Yes Virtual maze
NavigationofTBIsurvivorswasnotimpairedwhenthe proximalcueswerepresentbutwasimpairedwhen proximalcueswereabsent
Skelton (2006)[41]
TotestsubjectswithTBIinavirtualMorris watermaze
17 Yes Virtual maze
TBIsurvivorsnavigatedtoavisibleplatformbutcould notlearnthelocationoftheinvisibleplatform BrainInjury
&Stroke
Interventionprograms
Claessen(2015)[49] Toinvestigatethefeasibilityofavirtual navigationtrainingtoinstructchronicstroke patientstoadoptanalternativenavigation strategy
6 X VE* Thenavigationstrategythatpatient
usecanbeinfluencedafterashort trainingprocedure
Caglio(2012)[50] Todescribeandevaluatetheefficacyofa navigationaltrainingprograminamawithTBI
1 X VE* fMRI Intensivetraininginvirtual
navigationaltasksmayresultinan enhancementofmemoryfunction inbrain-damagedadults Schizophrenia Descriptionofprocessandbehavioralassessment
Ledoux(2013)[53] Toscanpeoplewithschizophreniaandhealthy patientswhilebeingtestedonnavigatingina virtualtown
28 Yes Virtual
town
fMRI Between-groupcomparisons revealedsignificantlylessactivation amongpatientsrelativetocontrols intheleftmiddlefrontalgyrus,and rightandlefthippocampi Wilkins(2013)[52] Toinvestigatethestrategiesusedbypatients
withschizophreniatosolvenavigationtasks
21 Yes Virtual
maze
Importanceofconsidering individualstrategieswhen investigatingmemoryand navigationperformanceamong variousgroupsofpatientswith schizophrenia
Siemerkus(2012)[54] ToobserveinfMRIpatientswithpositive symptomswhilefindingtheirwayinavirtual maze
16 Yes Virtual
maze and park
fMRI Lesactivationsdesre´gionspertinentes sontplusmarque´esdanslegroupe controˆle
Weniger(2008)[51] Tocomparesubjectswithrecent-onset schizophreniawithhealthysubjectsontwo virtualrealitytasksaffordingthenavigationand learningofavirtualpark(allocentricmemory) andavirtualmaze(egocentricmemory)
25 Yes Virtual
maze and park
Themoreglobalneuralnetwork supportingegocentricspatial learningseemstobelessaffected thanthedeclarativehippocampal memorysysteminearlystagesof schizophrenia
VE:virtualenvironment;TBI:traumaticbraininjury.
onlandmark-directionassociationsappeartobepreserved,with normaltosubnormalperformancesincomparison withhealthy subjects[50–52].Theauthorsofthesestudiesusedvirtualmazes with landmarks outside the laze derived from the real world (buildings,trees,mountainsetc.)toobjectifythedissociationson navigationstrategies. Ledoux et al. [53],under functional MRI, observeda decrease on hippocampus and middle frontalgyrus activityinthesepatientsinaway-findingtask.Theysuggestedthat thesepatientshaddifficultyassociatingspatialinformationwith contextsinwhichitappeared,affectingtheformationofcognitive maps. A study by Simierkus et al. [54] under functional MRI however showed than in some of these patients specifically presentingpositivesymptoms,therewasdifficultyinrecruiting the brain areas required for egocentric learning of spatial information. The authorsindicate that this couldbe related to altered consciousness that these patients with positive schizo- phreniasymptomshaveof themselvesand oftheir relationship withtheenvironment.
3.1.5. Overview
Recentstudiesonlarge-scalespatialcognitionamongsubjects presentingcognitivedisturbancesshowfirstofalltheinterestof using virtual reality to assess navigation strategies, hitherto inadequatelyexploredusingtheclassicpencil-and-papertestson small scale. This research confirms that large-scale navigation requirestheconcurrentprocessingbythebrainofdifferenttypesof informationinthecourseofnavigation,enablingasubjecttofindhis orherwaytowardsagivendestination[55].Itshowscomplemen- tarilybetweenspatialrepresentationsoftheallocentrictype[55,56]
andthoseof the egocentrictype[57,58], andthe wayinwhich navigationstrategiescanbeselectivelyaffecteddependingonthe brainnetworksthathavebeendamaged(forareviewoftheneuro- anatomical determinants of large-scale spatial navigation see Chrastil [59]). One perspective afforded by the use of virtual environmentssimulatingrealityandappearinginthemostrecent researchconcerns thescope forimprovingthe specificity ofthe virtual tasks assigned to patients for diagnostic and predictive purposes. Large-scale spatial cognition is in itself an excellent integrativemodelofglobalbrainfunctioningthatisdirectlylinked tocomplexnavigationbehavioursineverydaylife[60].
3.2. Theimpactofvisualorauditoryenvironmentalcuesonvirtual spatialnavigation
Oneofthecentralquestionswhenusingvirtualenvironments toassessspatialnavigationfunctionsisthatofthedifferencesin thesensory-motorcuesbetweenrealandvirtualsettings.Indeed, themotorcontrolinvolvedinthemanagementofnavigationusing akeyboardorajoystickisnotthesameasthatimplementedin actuallywalking.Theproprioceptiveand vestibularinformation involvedinthesetwotypesofnavigationisalsodifferent.Grant andMagee[61]thusshowedthatparticipantsguidedalongareal routefoundtheplacesmoreeasilyinthereal-environmenttest thanthosethathadlearnttherouteinvirtualsetting(i.e.actually walking in situ, or navigating with a joystick). This was not however evidenced in another study [62]. Williamset al. [63]
observedthatjudgementerrorsinperspectiveweregreaterand latencieslongerinrepositioningandrotationtasksforsubjectsin virtual environment compared to those in real environment.
Walletetal.[64]showedthatpoorer-qualityvisualinformation (textured versus non-textured environment) in a virtual city districtledtoadeficitinthetransferofinformationinthesame, realcitysetting,independentlyfromwhethertheinitiallearning situationfortheitinerarywasactiveorpassive,whichisinfavour of the preponderance of visual processing of information over motorinformation.
One of the lines of research concerns the delivery of complementarysensory-motorinformation thatis poorerwhen virtualenvironmentsareused.Ruddleetal.[65]thusshowedthat theuseofatreadmillexerciserassociatedwithataskconsistingin localisingitemsinasupermarketdecreasedthedistancescovered andimprovedtheprecisionoftheestimatesofdistancesbetween products.Larrueetal.[66]demonstratedthatthereconstructionof atrajectoryinarealenvironmentwasperformedbetterwhenthe trajectoryhadbeenlearntineitherrealorvirtualsituationusinga treadmill and rotationsof theupper body, in comparisonwith learninginvirtualenvironmentwithajoystickorwithatreadmill butwithoutupperbodyrotation.However,arecentstudyonatask involvingasearchforgoodsinashoppingmallalsoshowedthat amongelderlypeopledifficultiesgeneratedbythecombinationof thevirtualenvironmentandthetreadmillhadanegativeimpact onperformance,wherethetaskrequiredfrequentshiftsinfieldof visioninordertomovetowardstheobjects[67].Indeed,adding sensory-motor information or walking during navigation puts elderlyorbrain-injuredsubjectsinadouble-tasksituation(motor taskinmovingaroundandbalancingandcognitivetaskforthe navigation parameters) [28], which may have reduced perfor- mances.Itdoeshoweverseemthatactivenavigation(motorand cognitive)isbeneficialfornavigationamongyoungsubjects[68].
Despite these differences in terms of sensory-motor cues, a certainnumber of studiesarein favourofthesimilarity ofthe processesinvolvedinlearningandfindingatrajectoryinrealand virtualenvironments[7,69,70].Theredoesindeedappeartobea compensationforthelossofidiotheticinformationinnavigationin virtualenvironments[71].
Nevertheless, whilevirtual reality enables the simulation of certainaspectsoftherealworld,it alsomakesitpossibletogo beyondreality[72].Thisisthecaseinparticularwhenstimuliare addedtoavirtualenvironmentinthesoftware.Thesestimulican be defined as additional information provided by the virtual systemthatincreasestheamountofinformationpresentinthe environment.Howevertheirabsencefromtheenvironmentdoes not prevent completion of the task. These stimuli can be contextual,thatistosaylinkedtotheperformanceofthetask, ornon-contextual,thatistosaytheybearnorelationshiptothe tasktobeperformed.
Thesesensorystimulicanbeofdifferenttypes–auditory,visual, tactile or olfactory. They can be administered separately or in combinationinthecourseoftheperformanceofthetask.
Differentstudieshaveassessedtheimpactofvisualorauditory environmentalcuesdeliveredbythevirtualsystemonnavigation orspatiallearningtasks.
3.2.1. Visualcuesandvirtualspatialnavigation(Table3)
Thevisualcuesusedwerefirstofallcreatedinamannerthat wasanalogouswithaidsavailablefornavigationinanunfamiliar realenvironment.Forinstance,DarkenandSibert[73]proposeda virtualmap,andtheyreportedasignificantimpactofthiselement on navigation performance in a virtual environment among healthy subjects.Sjo¨linder et al.[74]showed thatthe useofa mapinavirtualenvironmentwasusefultoimprovecomprehen- sionofthespatiallayoutofinformation,butitslowedparticipants in their progression on account of the mobilisation of greater cognitivecapacities, and also becauseof therepeated switches between the egocentric perspective of the participant and the allocentric perspective of the map. Parush and Berman [75]
showed that at theoutset of their test navigation witha map provedmoredifficultthannavigationwithalistofinstructionsfor movement,butthatthisdifferencebecamenon-significantasthe durationofnavigationwasprolonged.Likewise,theexistenceof landmarksmadethenavigationmoredifficultattheoutset,butthe difficultylessenedasthenavigationwenton.Thedeteriorationin