• Aucun résultat trouvé

Profile of First Nations People in Correctional Services 2018-2019Ministère de la Sécurité publique

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Profile of First Nations People in Correctional Services 2018-2019Ministère de la Sécurité publique"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Profile of First Nations People in Correctional Services

2018-2019

Ministère

de la Sécurité

publique

(2)

| Ministère de la Sécurité publique 2

NOTES

1. 2018- 2019 data.

Information in square brackets indicates variation from 2015-2016 data.

Percentage variation is calculated in percentage points (pt. or pts.).

629 people

In detention centres [+ 5%]

406 people

In the community [+ 40%]

322 people

Both of the above [- 11%]

17%

are women

Four nations

are disproportionately representeds:

• Cree

• Montagnais (Innus) • Algonquins

• Atikamekw

Number of people 1,357

accused or convicted First Nations people were taken in charge by Québec Correctional Services 

[+ 9% ]1

Social integration

These people show poor social integration, including a high pro-

portion of single people, a low rate of schooling, and a low proportion with employment income. Just under

half have a criminal record.

Health

One in eight First Nations people has physical health problems and one in fifteen has mental health problems. More than a quarter take prescription drugs.

Profile of First Nations People in Correctional Services 2018-2019

77% OF FIRST NATIONS PEOPLE AGED 25 TO 54

The proportion of young adults

fell by eight percentage points compared to 2015-2016 Average age

(3)

18 First Nations people

DETAINED

/1,000 inhabitants Single First Nations people and

those without a diploma have higher incarceration rates.

Number of sentences and of individuals

Types of sentences

Average daily count

Incarcerated individuals

813

new prison sentences [+ 27%]

1,035

First Nations people were detained

for at least one day [+ 17%]

Average length of detention

45 days

[- 7 days]

Intermittent sentences

28 days

[+ 5 days]

Remand detention

24 days

Continuous sentences

49% 28%

in pre-trial detention [+  6 pts.], mostly held in two detention facilities:

• Amos

• Roberval

are serving a long sentence [- 6 pts.] ,

entre autres dans les établissements de détention de :

• Amos

• Montréal

• Roberval

160

Incarcerated First Nations people  [+ 12 % ]

Incarceration rate

81% 13%

short

sentences [+ 5 pts. ]

long sentences

Detention-related offences

The most common such offences are failure to comply with a probation

order, breach of an undertaking or a recognizance order,

and assault.

(4)

| Ministère de la Sécurité publique 4

Number of follow-ups and of individuals

2

356

follow-ups of hours of community service

[+ 64 files]

536

probation follow-ups

[+ 175 files]

Professional Correctional Services Directorate (PCSD)

Follow-ups for a sentencing measure4 are provided by the Nord-du-Québec, Abitibi- Témiscamingue, and Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean PCSDs.

Three PCSDs carried out most follow-ups for a correctional measure: Côté-Nord, Saguenay- Lac-Saint-Jean et Abitibi Témiscamingue.

44%

of monitoring results from an order of community service hours  [- 6 pts.]

43%

of monitoring stems from probation with supervision  [+ 8 pts.]

follow-ups in

999

the community

[+ 20%]

First Nations people

728

were monitored in the community for at least one day

[+ 11 % ]

Caseload

3

AVERAGE LENGTH OF FOLLOW-UPS

530

days [+ 45 days]

317

days [+ 42 days]

253

days [- 32 days]

206

days [+ 17 days]

Probation Hours of community

service Conditional

sentence Parole

Less than a quarter of the follow-ups

to conditional sentences and parole releases were revoked.

Three offences stand out:

OFFENCES LEADING TO SENTENCING

55

follow-ups for other measures

Assault

Assault with a weapon or causing bodily harm

1 2

Failure to comply with a probation order

3

Sentencing follow-up rate

• Singles

• Men

• First Nations people without a diploma

Follow-up for

10

First Nations people Nations /1,000 inhabitants

have higher follow-up rates

NOTES

2. A person may have been the subject of several follow-ups during the year (e.g. detention followed by probation).

3. A person may have been the subject of several follow-ups during the year (e.g. detention followed by probation).

4. Sentencing measure: probation, conditional sentence, or hours of community service. Correctional measure: temporary absence and parole.

Community monitoring

(5)

Références

Documents relatifs

It is possible due to employing two approaches, namely the phrasal search for the retrieving of candidates and using sentence similarity measure for the filtering of the

there are lot of things that I don’t think that we can measure properly enough yet… it would cause too much work to get really really good measurement that would be our

An understanding of the role of food in correctional settings and effective management of food systems may improve outcomes for incarcerated people and help

Clinical guidelines or pain management algo- rithms for the correctional setting should include guidance for dealing with difficult situations such as hording and

Schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis, for instance, are persistent helminthic infections that may cause significant morbidity, particularly in patients co-infected with HIV, hepatitis

The Ministry has not regularly analyzed the rea- sons behind these numbers. So, to understand why accused persons remain in remand, we selected and interviewed a sample of 24

› Respondents with higher levels of education are also more likely than their counterparts to be aware of harm reduction strategies related to drug and alcohol use (47 per cent

Engaging in a co-ordinated approach and working with community partners, stakeholders and other ministers, consider mental health and substance abuse issues when delivering