C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
N. B. S LATER
Distribution problems and physical applications
Compositio Mathematica, tome 16 (1964), p. 176-183
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1964__16__176_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1964, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions gé- nérales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
176
by N. B. Slater
Introduction
This paper describes some
problems
ofasymptotic
distribution with relations tophysical theory.
In section 1, results aregiven
for the
asymptotic frequency
with which atrigonometric
sum passesthrough
aspecified
value. Section 2begins
with a brief account ofthe
application
of these results to determine the rate of unimolec- ulardecomposition
of a gas; the section continuesby indicating
how a refinement of the
physical theory
poses the more difficultproblem
of the distribution of the gaps or recurrence times of thetrigonometric
sum. In section 3 asimpler
form of thisproblem
isexamined, namely
the nature of the gaps between theintegers
Nfor which the
point
with coordinates the fractionalparts
ofvi N (i
= 1, 2 ...,n-1)
lies in aspecified region
of the unit cube of(xl ,
...,xn-1)
space.1. The
frequency
of zeros of atrigonometric
sumConsider the finite
trigonometric
sumwhere ai
>0, vi
> 0,0 ~ 03C8i 1 and y
denotes the set yi, ..., 03C8n.This sum may
represent
a sum ofdynamical vibrations,
or ofalternating
currents, with t the timeelapsed
and ai , viand Vi
theamplitude, frequency
and"phase"
of acomponent. Alternatively f(0; 1p)
is theprojection
of a random walk ofsteps ai
on to thedirection 03C8i
= 0. In the former cases there is interest in the aver-age behaviour of
f(t; y )
over along
time-interval. Attention will be confined to the case where 03BD1, 03BD2, ..., 03BDn arelinearly independent
in the
field o f rationals;
then thelong-time
average behaviour of*) Nijenrode lecture.
177
f(t; 1p)
is the same as that off(t; 0),
and may berepresented
alsoby
thephase-average,
over anequidistribution
in(0, 1)
of thephases
1pi’ of the behaviour off(t; 1p)
orequally
off(0; 03C8).
Forexample, M(q),
theasymptotic proportion
of time for whichf(t; 0)
q, is also theprobability
that theprojection f(0; 1p)
ofa random walk has a value not
exceeding
q. For this there is the well-known formulawhich may be
replaced by
a Fourier series[1]
which also leads toextensions of Nielsen’s
identity
for Bessel functions[2].
As a more relevant
example,
letGq(T; 1jJ)
be the number of up-zeros(that is,
zeros withdf/dt positive)
off(t; 1jJ)-q
in therange 0 t T. The
asymptotic frequency
of these up-zeros isThe v,
being linearly independent, L,,
does notdepend
on the ip,, andequals
thephase-averaged frequency
for any fixedT, namely
For this M. Kac found
3)
where Z2 i
=x2+403C02 03BD2i y2.
This also may beput
as a Fourier series[5] .
An
approxtrùate f ormula
for(3)
had been found[4, 5]
for the casewhere q
isnear i
ai. This case will be of interest in a latersection,
and so will be
briefly
sketched here. Astime-averaging
will beused,
thephases Vi
in(1)
will be set zero. Letwhere h2 is small. Zeros of
f(t; 0)-q
thenrequire
all the cosines in(1 )
to be nearunity,
so that we make here the basicapproximation
of
replacing
cos2nv, t by 1-203C02{vit}2,
where{x}
denotes x minusthe nearest
integer,
sothat -1 2 {x} 1.
To thisapproximation,
f(t; 0)-q
ispositive only
whenFor convenience let the
largest of the v, be ’Vn
= 1; also let{t}
= y,so that t =
N+y
with N the nearestinteger
to t. Then where(7)
issatisfied the left hand side is
For
given N,
the minimum of(8)
occurs when y =-A-1 03A3n-11 aivi{viN}
whereA = 03A3n1 aiv2i;
and the minimumis ~({vN})
whereand x,
{vN}
are abbreviations for the sets(xl,
...,xn-1)
and({v1N}, ..., {vn-1N}).
To theapproximation represented by (7),
there is now seen to be one up-zero of
f(t; 0)-q
near each N forwhich the
point {vN}
lies in thehyperellipsoid
where
(x)
are cartesian coordinates in n-1 dimensions.The linear
independence
of vl, ..., Vn-l’vn(= 1) implies
thatthe
points {vN}
areasymptotically uniformly
distributed in the(n-1)-dimensional
"cube"{xi} ~ J.
Thus theasymptotic
propor- tion of values of Nsatisfying ~({vN})
h2 is the content V of thehyperellipsoid (19),
which from(9)
isSince each such N is close to one up-zero
of f(t; 0 )-q,
therequired
formula for
Lq (approximate
because of the cosineapproximation in(7))is
The result
(12), (11)
isformally
unaffectedby
the restriction 03BDn = 1.2. The relation of distribution
problems
to unimoleculardécomposition
theoriesFormulas
(5)
and(11), (12)
have been used to calculate rates ofunimolecular
decomposition
of gases on classical[6]
andquantum
mechanical[7]
models. It will be a sufficient illustration here to summarize onecalculation, namely
that of classicalhigh-pressure decomposition,
and then to pass to atheory
which involves newdistribution
problems.
179
A
polyatomic
molecule ispictured
as avibrating system
ofatoms which
decomposes
when some internal coordinate(such
as an interatomic
stretch)
reaches acritically high
value q. This internal coordinate behaves to a fairapproximation
as a sum of"normal-mode" vibrations like
f(t; 03C8)
in(1),
sothat Lq
definedas in
(3)
or(4) represents
thedecomposition probability
persecond,
for vibrations ofgiven amplitudes
ai. Theseamplitudes
are of the form
where the oci are calculable constants
and ei
is the energy in the ith mode ofvibration;
the molécule is thuscapable
ofdecomposition
(or "energised" ) if f(t; 1p)
can reach thevalue q,
that is ifAt
high
pressures, theproportion
of molecules with energy(03B5i, 03B5i+d03B5i)
in the ith mode haseffectively
theequilibrium
value03B2 exp(-03B203B5i)d03B5i,
where1/03B2
isproportional
to the absolutetemper-
ature of the gas. Thus the
high-pressure
rate constantk~ (the proportion decomposing
per unittime)
isthe
integral being
overpositive ei satisfying (14).
If Kac’s formula
(5)
is used in(15),
we find the exact resultwhere v =
(y oc 2v2/1 OC2)i
is a meanfrequency,
andEo
=q2/03A3 a2
is the minimurri total energy
satisfying (14).
Theapproximation (11), (12)
has been used to extend this result tolower-pressure
rates
[8],
on theassumption
that thedecomposition
process occursrandomly in
time - thatis,
that the zerosof f(t; 0)-q are randomly spaced.
Further
problems.
New distributionproblems
arise in a morecareful formulation
[9]
oflow-pressure decomposition
rates. Let cvbe the number of
energy-transferring
collisions per molecule persecond;
03C9 isproportional
to the pressure of the gas.Although
atlow pressures collisions are not
sufficiently frequent
to maintainthe
equilibrium
distribution ofenergised
molecules(as
used in(15)),
it is still reasonable to assume that theproportion
ofmolecules raised
by
collisions(in
unittime)
toenergized
states(êi, ei+dei)
withphases (Vi, 03C8i+d03C8i) is
A molecule
energised
at time t = 0 willdecompose
if it suffers node-energising
collision before the time t =t,
of the first up-zero off(t; 1p)-q (when
it isready
todecompose).
Theprobability
of no collision in the interval
(0, tl)
ise-wtl,
the incidence of collisionsbeing
assumed random. Thus the rate constant k(the proportion decomposing
persecond)
is theintegral
of e-1111 times theexpression (17),
over the range(14).
This may be writtenwhere
This
phase-average
of tl, the time to the first up-zeroof 1(t; y) -q,
may be
replaced by
theasymptotic
average ofs(t),
the timefrom
t to the next up-zero of
f(t; 0)-q, namely
With a
slight change
ofnotation,
iftl ,
t2 , t3 , ... are now the up-zeros of
f(t; 0)-q
thenfor tr ~
ttr+1
we haves(t)
=tr+1-t;
soby dividing
theintegral
in(20)
into ranges(tr, tr+1)
we findwhere L.
=limm~~ (m/tm)
is as in(3),
andwhere Ír =
tr+1-tr
is a gap between successive up-zeros. Theaveraging
in(22)
is over gaps, so thatsimilarly
The
general decomposition
rate is nowgiven by (18)
and(21);
as m - oo it tends to the
previous
formula(15).
The distribution
problem posed
in(22)
is the determination ofan
asymptotic
distribution functionh(r), namely
theproportion
of gaps up to
length
r. If we assumed the up-zeros occurred"randomly"
like collisions in the gas, we should have(compare
(23))
181
so that in
(21) g(m)
=Lq03C9/(Lq+03C9);
thisputs
the rate(18)
in aform like that of standard theories based on "random"
decomposi-
tion.
A related
assumption (again leading
to tractable forms of(18))
is that the gaps have a
Gamma-type
distribution withparameter
u,
namely
The case
(24)
is the extreme, u = 1, of(25);
the other extreme,namely u ~
oo,corresponds
toregular (equal)
gaps. Somefairly
extensive calculations of the zeros of
f(t; 0)-q
for the case ofn = 7 vibrations showed distributions well
represented by
theform
(25).
It wasfound, however,
that thebest-fitting parameter
u decreases
steadily
from a value 6.7for q
= 0 to a value near 2for q > -1 Y
a,; this indicates anincreasing
"randomness" of gaps withincreasing
q.3. Problems of gaps
The
preceding general problem
of the distribution of gaps between up-zeros off(t; 0 ) -q
will be examined here in thesimpler
case where q is as in
(6)
with h2 small.Up-zeros t,.
are thenwidely separated,
and are very near thoseintegers
N forwhich ~({03BDN})
h2
(compare (9): {vN} again
stands for the set{v1N},
...,{vn-1N}
with vl , ..., vn-1 and
1 linearly independent).
We thereforereplace
the
problem
of the gapstr+1-tr by
theproblem:
what are the gaps Li between the successiveintegers
N for which{vN}
lies in thehyperellipsoid (10)?
There is somefairly
extensive numericalevidence for cases up to n = 7. In these cases the calculations show
n basic gaps Li =
Dl,
...,Dn
and others which can all be ex-pressed
in the formwhere the
Âsu
are zero orpositive integers [9].
General
theory.
Ageneralization
of the aboveproblem
is to seekthe
gaps d
between the successive N for which thepoint {vN}
liesin a closed convex
region
S within the "unit cube"|xi| ~ 1 2
(i
= 1, 2, ...,n-1).
Somesimple
notes will begiven
here on this.For a
given positive ô,
there exists aninteger N’ (depending only
on v1, ..., vn-1
and 03B4)
such that for anypoint x
in the unit cubethere is an N N’ making |{viN+xi}|
03B4 for all i = 1, ..., n -1.This result
implies
that the gaps L1(for
agiven S)
arebounded;
suppose
they
are(in increasing size) 03941, d2, ..., dm. (The
con-vexity
and extent of S affect the 4’s and theirrelations;
for ex-ample
a gapL1s
cannot be amultiple kL1r
of another unless k is at least of the order[1 /h’]
where h’ is the minimum diameter of S for coordinate directions x1, ...,xn-1).
We may now subdivide S into distinct
subregions Sr correspond- ing
tothe dr
and such that for x inS,.
thepoint {xi+pvi}
is not in Sfor p = 1, 2, ...,
dr-1
but is for p =0394r;
so if{vN}
lies inSr
the next gap
is dr.
For alarge
range N ~M,
the numbers ofpoints {vN}
in Sand Sr
areasymptotic
to MV andMV,.,
where Vand V,.
are the contents of S and
S, respectively.
Thus the numbers of gaps oflengths 03941,
...,0394m
areasymptotic
toMV1,
...,MVm.
The mean gap
length
is1 j V ( V
=03A3m1Vr),
so thatThe case n = 2 has been solved in terms of continued fractions
[10]
but asimpler approach
has been indicatedby
Florek[11].
The
problem
is of the gaps between Nsatisfying
where we shall take h
1.
If a and b are the smallestpositive integers
such thatthen the
only
gaps areand these occur with relative
frequencies
respectively.
Thesequantities (31 )
are theV,
for this one-dimen-sional
S;
and here(27)
takes the formThe result
(30)
is seen to agree with theempirical
formula(26).
The result
(30)
leads in factby
induction to the formula(26)
for
general
n,although
this method does not prove that theAs"
are all
non-negative.
Without this condition the theoretical result is of course very weak. It would seem that the "basic" gapsDu
183 for
(26)
should be chosen to be the smallest gaps L1 for which thereare identities
with all the 03BCu > 0. The
corresponding
sets03BBsu
in(26)
would thenbe
expected
to bepredominantly positive;
theexperimental suggestion
thatthey
are allpositive
is open tosuspicion.
I am indebted to Mr. A. J. Mitchell for
doing
most of thecalculations
mentioned,
and to Dr. J. W. S. Cassels forhelpful correspondence.
REFERENCES W. R. BENNETT
[1] Quart. Appl. Math. 5, 385 (1947).
N. B. SLATER
[2] Quart. J. Math. (2), 13, 111 (1962).
M. KAC
[3] Amer. J. Math. 65, 609 (1943).
N. B. SLATER
[4] Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 35, 56 (1939).
N. B. SLATER
[5] Theory of Unimolecular Reactions (Ithaca: Cornell University Press and
London: Methuen), Chap. 4 (1959).
[6] Ref. 5, Chap. 5.
[7] Ref. 5, Chap. 10.
[8] Ref. 5, Chap. 7.
[9] Ref. 5, Chap. 9.
N. B. SLATER
[10] Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 46, 525 (1950).
K. FLOREK
[11] Colloquium Math. Wroclaw 2, 323 (1951).
(Oblatum 29-5-63). The University, Hull, England.