C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
M ARIA C RISTINA P EDICCHIO On the category of topological topologies
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 25, n
o1 (1984), p. 3-13
<
http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1984__25_1_3_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1984, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (
http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
ON THE CATEGORY OF TOPOLOGICAL TOPOLOGIES by
Maria Cristina PEDICCHIOCAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET
GÉOMÉTR1E D1FFÉRENT1ELLE
CATÉGOR1QUES
Vol. XXV - 1 (1984)
SUMMARY.
We
study
the mainproperties
of thecategory 9
of allpairs ( Y, Y* )
with Y a
topological
space and Y4’ atopological topology
on the lattice of open sets of Y .By q,
it ispossible
toclassify
monoidal closed andmonoidal biclosed structures on
Top .
INTRO DUCTION.
Isbell in
[8]
gave thefollowing classification
foradjoint
endofunc-tors of the category
Top
oftopological
spaces. Apair F -1
G :Top ~ TQp
is
completely
determinedby
apair ( Y, Y*)
oftopological
spaces wherewith 2
a Sierpinski
space ; furthermore the setunderlying
Y *is,
up to iso-morphism, just
the lattice of open sets ofY ,
and thetopology
of Y * is atopological topology,
thatis,
it makes finite intersection andarbitrary
un-ion continuous
operations.
It is natural then to define a
category 9
whoseobjects
are allpairs
( Y , Y*) ,
and whosemorphisms
are all continuous mapsf :
X -Y ,
suchthat
f-1 : Y* ~
X" is continuous too.Our aim is to
study
the mainproperties
of such acategory 9 .
Section 1 is
completely
devoted to recall definitions andproperties
about
topological
functors andinitially complete categories drawing mainly
on Herrlich
[6, 7 1.
In Section
2,
first we provethat !
is asmall-fibred, initially
com-plete
category onTop ,
in order toapply
theprevious results;
then weconstruct a monoidal closed (also
biclosed)
structureon 9 .
4
Section 3 is devoted to the
problem
of classification of monoidal closed structures on the category oftopological
spaces[2, 3]).
As a gen- eralization of our results about structures inducedby adjoining
systems of filters[10],
wegive
acomplete description
both of all monoidal closedstructures and of all monoidal biclosed structures on
Top, relating
themto opportune functors
from -1
toTop .
The author isgreatly
indebted toG. M.
Kelly
for manyhelpful
conversations and advices.1. For a concrete categor y over a base category
X,
we mean apair A , 11
where U: A - X is aforgetful functor,
thatis,
afaithful,
amnesticand
transportable
functor.A
X-morphism
c : X ~ Y is said to be a constantmorphism provided th at,
for each Z in X and forall u , v E
X ( Z ,.Y ) ,
c . u = c . v . If X is Set orTop
this definition isjust
the classical one.D EF INITION 1.1. A concrete category
( A , 11 )
over X is called atopolo- gical
category iff thefollowing
hold :( i )
U : A - X is atopological
functor in the sense of[6
;( ii)
A issmall-fibred;
( iii)
every constantmorphism U ( A ) --> U ( B)
underlies some A-mor -phism
A--> B .If the base
category X
is Set orTop
then condition( iii )
isequi-
valent to the
following
( iv )
For any X withcardinality
one, the fibre (J’( X )
is asingleton.
We shall say that a concrete category is a
small- fibred, initially completes
category iff it verifies(i)
and(11)
of Definition 1.1 (see[1, 11] ).
If
( A , U )
and(B,V)
are concretecategories
overX ,
for afunc-
tor F over
X ,
F(
A,U ) --7 ( B , V ) ,
we mean any functor F i A - B with V.F = 11 ,D EF INITION 1.2. A functor F over
X, F: (A, U) --> (B, V),
is calledan extension (of (
A , U ))
if F is full and faithful.DEFINITION 1.3. An extension
E: ( A, U ) --> (B, V )
is called a small-fibred,
initialcompletion (o f ( A , U ) )
if(B, V)
is small-fibred and ini -tially complete.
The
following
list exhibits someproperties
ofsmall-fibred, initially complete categories
over the categoryTop
oftopological
spaces ; the same results are well known fortopological categories
over Set[7].
PROPOSITION 1.4.
I f ( A, U )
is asmall- fihred, initially complete
categoryover
Top,
then thefollowing
hold :( 1 )
A isfinally complete ;
( 2 )
A iscomplete
andcocomplete
and U : A 4Top
preserves limits andcolimits ;
( 3 )
AnA-morphism
is amonomorphism (epimorpbism) iff
it isinjec-
tive
(surjective),’
( 4)
A iswellpowered
andcowellpowered;
( 5)
U: A --+Top
has afull
andfaithful left adjoint
D( =
discretestructure) ;
( 6 )
U : A 4Top
has afull
andfaith ful right adjoint
K( =
indiscretestructure)
,( 7)
For anyA-morphism f, f
is arzembedding i f f f
is an extremalmonomorphism i f f f
is aregular monomorphism
,f
is aquotient
mapiff f
is an extremalepimorphism i f f f
is aregular epimorphism
;( 8 )
For anytopological
space X , thefibre U -1 ( X ) of
X is a smallcomplete lattice ;
.
( 9 ) Any A-object A ,
with UA 1:- ø
and A = D UA,
is aseparator;
( 10 )
AnA-object
A is a coseparatoriff
there exists anembedding of
an indiscreteobject
with twopoints
intoA ;
( 11 )
AnA-object
A isprojective i f f
A = D UA ,
( 12 )
AnA-object
A isinjective iff
U A AO
and A = K U A .P ROO F.
( 1 ), ( 2 ) and ( 3 )
follow from[6 ],
Sections 5 and 6.( 4 )
is true forTop
is well- andcowellpowered.
( 5 )
and( 6 )
followby
Th eorem 7.1 of[6 ] .
( 7 )
followseasily by
the definition ofregular
and extremalmorphism.
( R)
For anypair Ax , Ax
ofobjects
inU-1 ( X ) ,
let us putA x
l1x
iff there is aA-morphism g: A x ,7C’
withU(g) = IX ;
with this order
relation, U-1 (X)
forms a smallcomplete
latticeand,
forany
family ( Ai x )i
E in thefibre, inf ( A ix )
is the 11-initiallifting
of thesource
( 9 ), ( 10 ), ( 11 )
and12 )
followby properties
of discrete and indiscretestructures. 0
2. Let us recall the
following
definition from[8].
A
topology
7’ on the lattice 0 Y of the open sets of atopological
space Y is a
topological topology
iff it makes finite intersection and ar-bitrary
union continuous maps (we use thesymbol
Y" for the set O Y top-ologized by T ).
Isbell[8, 12 ]
hasproved
that anypair
ofadjoint
endo-functors
F j
G ofTop
is determined(up
to functorialisomorphism) by
apair ( Y, Y*,),
whereY = F ( { * })
andY*=G(2),with 2 aSierpinski
space ;
furthermore G(2) has,
asunderlying
set,just
O Y(up
tobijec- tion)
and Y* is atopological topology
on this lattice.We define a
category 9
t = Isbellcategory)
as follows :Objects of 9
are allpairs (X, X*),
withX c Top
and X * atopological topology
on OX. Ang-morphism f : (X, X * )--+ ( Y , Y *)
is a continuous mapf :
X--+ Y such thatf-1 :
0 Y --> OX is continuous from Y * to X *(we
shall write
f *
forf-1 ). We
call V theforgetful
functorV : 9--+ Topo
def-ined
by
and we call U the
forgetful
functorU:9--+ Top
definedby
Then,
ifAdj
denotes the category whoseobjects
are thepairs F U
CT ofadjoint
endofunctors ofTop ,
and whosemorphisms
are thepairs
of nat-ural transformations
(a,B ): ( F, G)--> ( F’ G ’ ) ,
with a: F % F’ andB:
G’ -->G Isbell’s resultimplies
thefollowing
theorem :THEOREM 2.1. T’he
categories Adj and 9
areequivalent.
P ROP OSITION 2.2.
( 9,
LI ) is astitall-libred, initially complete
cat-egory over
Top .
P ROO F. If
( Xi , X*i) is
afamily
ofI-objects
andis a sink in
Top ,
we denoteby
X* the set OX with the initialtopology
with respect to
( f*i )i E I .
To show that X* is atopological topology,
itsuffices to consider the
following
commutativediagram
and to
apply properties
of the initialtopology
to the continuouscomposite
r i X f*i )
(the sameapplies
to the unionmap).. Since,
for anyh *: Y* -> X* is continuous iff
f*i . h *
is continuous for anyi , then h
isan
9-morphism
iff h.fi
is anq-morphism (for
anyi ).
This shows that(X, X*)
is the
q-final
structure on X with respect to(fi)i E I
.Any finally complete
category isinitially complete ;
ifis a source in
Top
and 4) denotes thefollowing
set:is a
topological topology
on0.B,
andis an
4-morphism
for anyi }
then the
9-initial
structure on X with respect to( gi )i E I
is the4-final
structure on X with respect to all the functions 1 :
(X,
X*)--> X,X*E O.
0
REMARK 2.3. If S is an open set of a
topological topology
X* and r, s,are
objects
of X * such that r( Sand s 2
r , then s c s . Consider the cont- inuous map ; sinceU-1 ( S )
is open in thetopological
product
, then there ex-ists a
neighborhood
U cU-1 ( S)
of( rn )
withand
7"7
,15.;:; h
open sets of X*containing
r. The sequencen E N’ with tn = r if n = l1 , l2 , ... , lh
andtn = s otherwise
is in
U r ’
so 5 is in S.Note that a construction of
9-initial
structuresby Top-final
struc-tures
generally
fails.As an
example,
consider a constant map k : 2 --+U ( X , XI),
with(X,X*)E g,
and denoteby
3 =0 , 1, 2}
the ordered set O 2 . Since theset
10, 2
is open in the finaltopology 2 *f
on 3 with re spect to the map k t: X--+3 ,
itfollows, by
Remark2.3,
that2 *f
is not atopological topol-
ogy, so, if
(2,2*) is
theg-initial
structure with respect to k ,2* 2f* .
By
Theorem2.2, Proposition
1.4 can beapplied,
hencecomplete-
ness and
cocompleteness of q follow,
where limits and colimits are ob- tained from limits and colimits inTop by q-initial
andg-final
structuresrespectively,
with respect to the maps of the limit (orcolimit)
cone ofTop.
Again by Proposition 1.4, U: g --+ Top
has a leftadjoint
D and aright
ad-joint
K with thefollowing properties :
for any
X E Top
and( Y, Y * ) E g.
If we denoteby ( X , X*D )
the discretestructure
D ( X )
andby (X, X*)
the indiscrete structureK ( X ) ,
thenX* and X4, D K
determine,
resp., the coarsest and the finesttopological
top-ology
definable on OX . For X =1* 1,
the fibre(where 2 denotes an indiscrete space with two
objects), hence I
is nottopological.
SinceTop
istopological
over Set with theforgetful
functorU :
Top 7 Set , then I
issmall-fibred, initially complete
over Set with theforgetful
functor W =U .
U . We write D and K for the left andright
ad-joints
to FJ and D and K for thecomposite
functors D . D and K . K .For
X , Z E Top
and( Y, Y* ) E g ,
thesymbol
X ø Y denotes theset
U ( X ) X U ( Y )
with thetopology O ( XO Y ) = Top ( X , Y*),
and thesymbol [ Y, Z]
denotes the setTop(
Y,Z )
with the initialtopology
withrespect to the maps
defined
by
[8, 10]. Furthermore,
from now on, we shall use letters A , B , C to de-note
g-objects
J
will be theg-object D ({ * }) = ({ *} , 2)
and I theg-object
THEOREM 2.4. The
category I
admits a structureo f
monoidal closedcategory [4 ] (q,
o , 1,{-, -})
with’wherp [Y, Z * ]
is the set tO [ Y, Z I
with thefinal topological topology
with
respect
to the maps{ PS:
Z*--+0[ Y,
Z!SfOY*’ defined by
P ROO F. Since the initial
topology
onTop( X, Y*)
with respect to all the maps{lS} S E O Y* is a topological topology
(see Theorem2.2),
then thetensor
product object
isin 9.
Forg-morphisms f
A --+ A’ and g : 9 4 B’we define
as the
product f X
g . If r : X’ --> Y’4’ is an open set of X’ O Y’ , thenhence
f X g:
X O Y --+ X’ O Y’ iscontinuous ;
to prove thecontinuity
of( f X g ) *: [ X’, Y’* ]--> [X, Y *] ,
it suffices toapply properties
of the initialtopology.
I= ( { *} 2 ) ,
soThe
associativity
of o follows fromProposition
2.3of []0],
forAs for the internal hom we get the final
topological topology [ Y,Z]*as
inTheorem 2.3 and the
4-morphism {f, g}: {B, C}--+ {B’, C’ j }
ishom ( f , g ) ,
for any
f :
B ’ --+ B and g : c » C’ . If B =(
Y ,Y*) 6 q ,
it is knownby [8] ,
that
Let us denote
by k: X --+ [ Y, Z]
themap o ( h ),
forany h:X O Y--+ Z.
h * is continuous iff the
following composite
mapsts
are
continuous,
forany S E
0Y" , but,
for the commutativediagram
and, by properties
of the finaltopological topology, ts
is continuous (for anyS )
iff k * iscontinuous;
henceand - o B - {B, -} for any R f g,
oWe end this section with two further comments on Theorem 2.4.
The tensor o is not
symmetric,
for there exist nonsymmetric
monoidalclosed structures over
Top (for example
Greve structures[5 ]),
inducedby
(g , - o -, I, { -, - })
(see Section3).
A o - preservescoproducts
and co-equalizers
for any .4f g,
thenby Freyd’s Special Adjoint
FunctorTheorem,
it has a
right adjoint,
hence theg-structure
is biclosed.3. Consider
Top
as a concrete category overTop
itself :PROPOSITION 3. 1 (see
also [10}). A
monoidal closed structure onTop,
is
equivalent
to afunctor
overTop,
F :( Top ,
1 ) --+(g,
U ) such thatPROOF.
By [8) ]
(or[12 ]) ,
for X,
Y,
Z fTop .
FromProposition
2.3 of[10], ( i )
and( ii ) are equi-
valen t to
monoidality
of( To p , - D -, {*}).
0Then,
for any monoidal closed structurethe associated functor F is strict monoidal and the
pair (g,
F :Top --+)
is a
small-fibred,
initialcompletion
of( Top , 7 ).
Further the monoidalstructure
(g, - 0 - , I)
restricted to the fullsubcategory F ( Top) = Top ,
is
just (ToP, - D-, {*}) .
EXAMPLES. The canonical
symmetric
monoidal closed structure onTop (separate continuity
andpointwise convergence)
is determinedby F ( Y ) = ( Y, Y4)
where thetopology
of Y* isgenerated by
thefamily
of allprin- cipal
ultrafilters of open sets.Similarly
thea-structures
of Booth and Til- lotson[2 ]
and Greve5]
are obtainedassociating
toany Y E Top
the top-ological topology generated by
thefamily
where
h ( X) >
denotes the set of all open sets of I’containing h ( X ) .
PROP OSITION
3.2. A
monoidal biclosed structure overTop
isequivalent
to a
pair of functors
overTop, ( F, G ): Top--+ g,
such that Fsatisfies ( i ) and ( ii ) of Proposition
3. 1 andV.F -l
V °. G °:Top 4 Top ° .
PROOF. If
is a monoidal biclosed structure , F and G are defined
by
Sin c e,
for X ,Y , Z c Top,
then if Z= 2,
so V . F -l
V ° . G ° .Conversely,
F determines a monoidal closed structureand G determines an
adjunction -DY -l Y, - >>
withV .
F -l
V ° . G °implies
Since
and
(2,2)
is a strong cogenerator ofTop ,
then YDX =YD X,
for any X, henceY 0- -t «Y,"», for. any Y.
0Observe that a
symmetric
monoidal closed structure overTop
isdetermined
by
apair ( F, G )
with G = F.REFERENCES.
1. J. ADAMEK, H. HERRLICH & G. E. STRECKER, Least and
largest
initial completions, Gen. Top. Appl, 4 ( 1974), 125- 142.2. P. BOOTH & J. TILLOTSON, Monoidal closed, cartesian closed and convenient
categories of topological
spaces, Pacific J. Math. 88 (1980), 35- 53.3. J.
010CIN010CURA,
Tensor product in the category oftopological
spaces, Comment.Math. Univ. Carol. 20 ( 1979), 431- 446.
4. S. EILENBERG & G. M. KELLY. Closed
categories,
Proc. Conf. Cat.Algebra
(LaJolla),
Springer,1966,
421-562.5. G. GREVE, How many monoidal closed structures are there in Top? Arch.
Math. 34, Basel (1980), 538-539.
6. H. HERRLICH,
Topological
functors, Gen. Top.Appl.
4 (1974), 125-142.7. H. HERRLICH, Cartesian closed
topological categories,
Math.Colloq.,
Univ.Cape Town 9 (1974), 1- 16.
8.
J. R. ISBELL,
Function spaces andadjoints, Math.
Scand. 36 (1975), 317-339.9. G. M. KELLY, Basic concepts of enriched category theory, London Math. Soc., Lecture Notes 64, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.
10. M. C. PEDICCHIO, Closed structures on the category of
topological
spacesdetermined by systems of filters, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 28 (1983), 161-174.
11. H. E. PORST, Characterizations of Mac Neille
completions
andtopological
functors, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 18 (1978), 201- 210.12. M. C. VIPERA, Endo funtori
aggiunti
di Top. Quad, del gruppo di ri cercaAlg.
Geom. Topologia,
Dip. Mat. Univ.P erugia,
1980.13. O. WYLER, On the
categories
ofgeneral topology
andtopological algebra,
Arch. Math. 22 (1971), 7- 17.
14. O. WYLER,
Top-categories
andcategorical
topology, Gen.Topology Appl.
1( 1971), 17- 28
Institute of Mathematics Universita degli Studi 1-34100 TRIESTE. ITALY