• Aucun résultat trouvé

1S11: Calculus for students in Science

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "1S11: Calculus for students in Science"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

1S11: Calculus for students in Science

Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko

TCD

Lecture 25

(2)

Antiderivatives: reminder

It is often important for applications to solve the reverse problem: assume that we know the derivative of a function, what can we say about the original function? For example, we see the instantaneous velocity on the speedometer all the time, and want to know how far we progressed over the given period of time.

Definition. A functionF is called an antiderivativeof the given functionf if

dF(x)

dx =f(x).

Suppose that F1 andF2 are two antiderivatives of the same functionf. Then

d(F1(x)−F2(x))

dx = dF1(x) dx −

dF2(x)

dx =f(x)−f(x) = 0, which implies that F1(x)−F2(x) is a constantc. Vice versa, if F is an antiderivative of f, then G(x) =F(x) +c is also an antiderivative off.

(3)

Integral calculus: antiderivatives

There is an alternative “integral” notation for antiderivatives:

Z

f(x)dx =F(x) +C

denotes the fact that F is an antiderivative of f. The expression R

f(x)dx on the left side of that equation is called theindefinite integral.

Examples. Some examples of indefinite integrals are shown below:

derivative equivalent formula integration formula (x2) = 2x R

2x dx =x2+C (sinx) = cosx R

cosx dx = sinx+C (tanx) = cos12x

R dx

cos2x = tanx+C (lnx) = 1x R dx

x = lnx+C xn+1

n+1

=xn R

xndx = xnn+1+1 +C

(4)

Rules for antiderivatives

Theorem. Suppose that F(x) andG(x) are antiderivatives of f(x) and g(x) respectively, and thatc is a constant. Then

R cf(x)dx =cF(x) +C,

R[f(x) +g(x)]dx =F(x) +G(x) +C, R[f(x)−g(x)]dx =F(x)−G(x) +C.

Proof. Just use rules for differentiation. For example, (F(x)−G(x)) =F(x)−G(x) =f(x)−g(x).

Another way to write the same is R cf(x)dx =cR

f(x)dx, R[f(x) +g(x)]dx =R

f(x)dx+R

g(x)dx, R[f(x)−g(x)]dx =R

f(x)dx−

Rg(x)dx.

(5)

Rules for antiderivatives

These rules should be handled with care, leaving the arbitrary constant till the very end of the computation, so that we do not write anything like that

x2+C = Z

2x dx = 2 Z

x dx = 2 x2

2 +C

=x2+ 2C, concluding then thatC = 2C, soC = 0.

Of course, there is a more general rule which combines addition and multiplication by constants:

Z

[c1f1(x) +c2f2(x) +· · ·+cnfn(x)]dx =

=c1

Z

f1(x)dx +c2

Z

f2(x)dx+· · ·+cn

Z

fn(x)dx.

(6)

Rules for antiderivatives

Theorem. (u-substitution)Suppose that F(x) is an antiderivative of f(x). Then

Z

[f(g(x))g(x)]dx =F(g(x)) +C. Proof. Applying the chain rule, we obtain

(F(g(x))) =F(g(x))g(x) =f(g(x))g(x), as required.

Example. Let us evaluate the integral Z

(x2+ 1)50·2x dx.

Letg(x) =x2+ 1. Noticing that (x2+ 1) = 2x, we can write the integral as

Z

(x2+ 1)50·2x dx = Z

g(x)50g(x)dx = g(x)51

51 +C = (x2+ 1)51 51 +C.

(7)

u -substitution: more examples

Example. Let us evaluate the integral Z cosx

sin2x dx.

Denotingg(x) = sinx, we get Z cosx

sin2xdx = Z 1

g(x)2g(x)dx =− 1

g(x) +C =− 1

sinx +C. Example. Let us evaluate the integral

Z cos√ x

√x dx. Denotingg(x) =√

x, we get Z cos√x

√x dx = Z

cosg(x)·2g(x)dx = 2 sing(x) +C = 2 sin√ x+C.

(8)

Rules for antiderivatives

We already know that differentiating products is not as easy as differentiating sums. Same is true for antiderivatives.

Theorem. (Integration by parts) Suppose thatF(x) andG(x) are antiderivatives of f(x) andg(x) respectively. Then

Z

[f(x)G(x)]dx+ Z

[F(x)g(x)]dx =F(x)G(x) +C. Proof. Applying the product rule, we obtain

(F(x)G(x)) =F(x)G(x) +F(x)G(x) =f(x)G(x) +F(x)g(x), as required.

This rule is usually applied in the following way:

Z

[f(x)G(x)]dx =F(x)G(x)− Z

[F(x)g(x)]dx,

meaning that computing the antiderivative of f(x)G(x) can be reduced to computing the antiderivative of F(x)g(x), and the latter one can be substantially simpler to compute.

(9)

Integration by parts: examples

Example. Let us evaluateR

xexdx. Using integration by parts with G(x) =x,f(x) =ex (in which caseg(x) = 1, and we can take F(x) =ex), we get

Z

xexdx =xex− Z

ex·1dx =xex −ex +C.

Note that if we instead apply integration by parts withf(x) =x, G(x) =ex (so thatF(x) = x22,g(x) =ex), we get

Z

xexdx = x2 2 ex

Z x2 2 exdx,

and our computation expressed the given integral using what is a more complicated indefinite integral!

(10)

Integration by parts: examples

Example. Let us evaluateR

x2exdx. Using integration by parts with G(x) =x2,f(x) =ex (in which caseg(x) = 2x, and we can take F(x) =ex), we get

Z

x2exdx =x2ex− Z

2xexdx =x2ex −2xex+ 2ex +C, since we already know R

xexdx. Example. Let us evaluateR

lnx dx. Using integration by parts with G(x) = lnx,f(x) = 1 (in which caseg(x) = 1x, and we can take F(x) =x), we get

Z

lnx dx=xlnx− Z

x· 1

x dx =xlnx−x+C.

(11)

Integration by parts: examples

Example. Let us evaluateR

exsinx dx. Using integration by parts with G(x) = sinx,f(x) =ex (in which caseg(x) = cosx, and we can take F(x) =ex), we get

Z

exsinx dx=exsinx− Z

excosx dx.

Now we use integration by parts withG(x) = cosx,f(x) =ex (in which case g(x) =−sinx, and we can take F(x) =ex), so that we get

Z

excosx dx =excosx+ Z

exsinx dx, so thatR

exsinx dx =exsinx−excosx−

Rexsinx dx, and Z

exsinx dx = 1

2(exsinx−excosx) +C.

Références

Documents relatifs

Sketch examples of graphs for which exactly one of those situations occurs... Limits of polynomials

For a long time it was believed that a function which is continuous would only have a few corner points and points of vertical tangency, and between those points the graph will

Prove the three remaining formulas yourself; this would be an excellent way to start getting used to

However, it is true that if a differentiable function admits an inverse, that inverse is usually differentiable: geometrically, differentiability means existence of a tangent line,

Implicit differentiation refers to the situation when the dependent variable y is not given explicitly, but rather implicitly, that is a relationship between x and y is expressed by

The first derivative test is useful, but involves finding the corresponding open intervals where we can analyse the behaviour of the sign of f ′. Sometimes a simpler test is

The information we gathered about f (x) = x 2 − sin x on [0, 2π] (increasing and decreasing, local extrema, concavity up and down, inflection points) allows to plot an approximate

Using derivatives, we can make this very constructive: on the open interval (a, b), relative extremal values occur at critical points, hence an absolute extremum must occur at either