• Aucun résultat trouvé

Toponym Disambiguation in Information Retrieval

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Toponym Disambiguation in Information Retrieval"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00596880

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00596880

Submitted on 30 May 2011

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Toponym Disambiguation in Information Retrieval

Davide Buscaldi

To cite this version:

Davide Buscaldi. Toponym Disambiguation in Information Retrieval. Procesamiento del Lenguaje

Natural, Sociedad Espanola para el Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 2011, 46, pp.125-126. �hal-

00596880�

(2)

Toponym Disambiguation in Information Retrieval

Desambiguaci´ on de Top´ onimos en la Recuperaci´ on de Informaci´ on Davide Buscaldi

DSIC - Universidad Polit´ ecnica de Valencia

Laboratoire d’Informatique Fondamentale d’Orl´ eans (LIFO) Universit´ e d’Orl´ eans, Orl´ eans (France)

dbuscaldi@dsic.upv.es

Resumen: Tesis doctoral (con menci´ on de doctorado europeo) en Inform´ atica re- alizada por Davide Buscaldi y dirigida por el doctor Paolo Rosso (Univ. Polit´ ecnica de Valencia). El acto de defensa de la tesis tuvo lugar en Valencia en Octubre de 2010 ante el tribunal formado por los doctores: Paul David Clough (Univer- sity of Sheffield), Ross Purves (Universit¨ at Z¨ urich), Emilio Sanchis Arnal (Univ.

Polit´ ecnica de Valencia), Mark Sanderson (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technol- ogy), Diana Santos (Sintef-ICT, Oslo). La menci´ on europea se obtuvo a trav´ es de una estancia en el FBK-IRST (Italia) bajo la direcci´ on de Bernardo Magnini. La calificaci´ on obtenida fue de Sobresaliente Cum Laude.

Palabras clave: Recuperaci´ on de Informaci´ on Geogr´ afica, Desambiguaci´ on de Top´ onimos, Geoinform´ atica

Abstract: Ph.D. thesis (European doctorate mention) in Computer Science written by Davide Buscaldi under the supervision of Dr. Paolo Rosso (Univ. Polit´ ecnica de Valencia). The author was examined in Valencia in October 2010 by a panel composed by the following doctors: Paul David Clough (University of Sheffield), Ross Purves Universit¨ at Z¨ urich), Emilio Sanchis Arnal (Univ. Polit´ ecnica de Va- lencia), Mark Sanderson (Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology), Diana Santos (Sintef-ICT, Oslo). The European mentions was received after a 3 months stage at the FBK-IRST (Italy) under the guidance of Bernardo Magnini. The obtained grade was Cum Laude.

Keywords: Geographical Information Retrieval, Toponym Disambiguation, Geoin- formatics

1 Introduction

In this Ph.D. thesis we have investigated the effects of resolving ambiguous place names (a task commonly referred to as Toponym Dis- ambiguation (TD)) in some Information Re- trieval (IR) tasks, more specifically the Ge- ographical Information Retrieval (GIR) and Question Answering (QA) tasks.

In order to achieve this goal, we have stud- ied different toponym repositories, mostly WordNet 1 and Geonames 2 . We developed toponym disambiguation methods, applying them to the GeoCLEF 3 collection, evaluating results in IR with the queries of past Geo-

Thesis supported by a FPI Grant of the Valencian government (ref. BFPI06/97).

1

http://wordnet.princeton.edu

2

http://www.geonames.org

3

http://ir.shef.ac.uk/geoclef/

CLEF campaigns and in QA with questions from past CLEF-QA campaigns. We have studied the following problems:

1. The difference in performance of differ- ent TD methods on the same collection;

2. The difference in performance of the same TD method, using different to- ponym repositories, on the same collec- tion;

3. How these differences may affect the overall performance of the GIR and QA tasks;

4. How the overall performance in GIR and QA scales with respect to the number of errors introduced in TD;

5. How task granularity may affect the

performance in TD (disambiguation at

(3)

street level implies more difficulties that disambiguation at city level).

In order to carry out part of the work, we produced two resources that have been freely released: Geo-WordNet, a mapping of Word- Net synsets to geographical coordinates ex- tracted from Geonames; and GeoSemCor, a version of SemCor where the geographical en- tities have been automatically tagged. Part of the work resulted in the development of a prototype of a geographically-aware search engine, Geooreka 4 .

2 Thesis Overview

In this thesis, we have addressed the chal- lenges raised by the ambiguity of toponyms in Information Retrieval. The work is struc- tured as follows:

In Chapter 1, we introduce the objectives of the thesis and detail the motivations of this work and how it relates with similar works. We also explain the possible applica- tions of TD in various tasks and which prob- lems may arise from the ambiguity of place names in such applications. Chapter 2 pro- vides an overview of Information Retrieval and its evaluation.

Chapter 3 is dedicated to the most impor- tant resources used as toponym repositories:

gazetteers and geographic ontologies. More- over, the chapter provides an overview of the currently existing text corpora in which to- ponyms have been labelled with geographical coordinates: GeoSemCor, CLIR-WSD, TR- CoNLL and SpatialML.

In Chapter 4, the focus is on the ambi- guity of toponyms and the methods for its resolution; two different methods, one based on WordNet and another based on map dis- tances, were presented and compared over the GeoSemCor corpus. A case study related to the disambiguation of toponyms in an Ital- ian local news collection is also presented in this chapter.

In Chapter 5, we detail the experiments that we carried out in order to study the relation between GIR and toponym disam- biguation, especially to understand under which conditions toponym disambiguation may help, and how disambiguation errors af- fects the retrieval results.

In Chapter 6 we studied the effects of TD on Question Answering, using the

4

http://www.geooreka.eu

SemQUASAR QA engine as a base system.

In Chapter 7, we present the geographical web search engine Geooreka! and discuss the importance of the disambiguation of to- ponyms in the web. Finally, in Chapter 8 we summarise the contributions of the Ph.D.

thesis and present some ideas for further work.

3 Thesis Contributions

The main contributions of the research work carried out are: the Geo-WordNet 5 expan- sion for the WordNet ontology, especially aimed to researchers working on toponym disambiguation and in the Geographical In- formation Retrieval field; GeoSemCor, which has already been used in different works for the evaluation of various TD methods; the analysis of different resources and how they fit with the needs of researchers and develop- ers working on Toponym Disambiguation, in- cluding a case study of the application of TD to a practical problem; the design and the evaluation of two Toponym Disambiguation methods based on WordNet structure and maps, respectively; experiments to determine under which conditions TD may be used to improve the performance in GIR and QA; ex- periments to determine the relation between error levels in TD and results in GIR and QA;

implementation of a prototype search engine (Geooreka!) that exploits co-occurrences of toponyms and concepts.

The most important findings of the re- search work are the following ones: off-the- shelf gazetteers are not enough, by them- selves, to cover the needs of toponym disam- biguation above a certain detail, especially when the toponyms to be disambiguated are road names or vernacular names. The sec- ond finding is that the ambiguity level that is found in resources like WordNet does not rep- resent a problem: all referents can be used in the indexing phase to expand the index with- out affecting the overall performance. Fi- nally, that disambiguation is useful only in the case of short queries with a detailed to- ponym repository, reflecting the working con- figuration of web search engines. The prelim- inary results obtained with Geooreka! con- firms that TD is a crucial feature in geograph- ically constrained web searches.

5

Listed in the official WordNet “related projects”

page: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/related-

projects/

Références

Documents relatifs

The indexing process is performed by means of the Lucene search engine, generating two index for each text: a geo index, containing all the geographical terms included in the text

We believe that this is due to the different nature of the searches in the two exercises; more precisely, in the TREC-8 queries the geographical names usually represent

For example, there are 491 places in Finland sharing the same name ”Isosaari” (great island) that are instances of several geographical classes, such as Island, Forest,

For an example of the first situation, many URIs in the DBLP dataset are used for identifying a single author when, in fact, there are a number of people

– Each time a user creates a reference using the community-driven referencing service, the reference is automatically rated with an acceptance value of 1 in the context derived from

Evaluation To determine whether the lack of more detailed information has a negative effect on the performance of author disambiguation using these reference data, we have taken

where W semiAmbig is the number of words, for which SP new ∩ SP etalon 6= ∅, SP new is POS-tag set for current ambigious word-form, which was formed as a result of the

We describe and evaluate a semi-automatic method for mapping the large lexical network WordNet 3.0 (WN) to BFO 2.0 exploiting an existing mapping between WN and the KYOTO