• Aucun résultat trouvé

Field microstructure and temporal and spatial instability of photonic Bloch waves in nonlinear periodic media

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Field microstructure and temporal and spatial instability of photonic Bloch waves in nonlinear periodic media"

Copied!
23
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00249278

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00249278

Submitted on 1 Jan 1994

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Field microstructure and temporal and spatial instability of photonic Bloch waves in nonlinear periodic media

Prue Russell, J.-L. Archambaul

To cite this version:

Prue Russell, J.-L. Archambaul. Field microstructure and temporal and spatial instability of photonic Bloch waves in nonlinear periodic media. Journal de Physique III, EDP Sciences, 1994, 4 (12), pp.2471-2491. �10.1051/jp3:1994292�. �jpa-00249278�

(2)

J. Phys. iii Franc-e 4 (1994) 2471-2491 DECEMBER 1994, PAGE 2471

Classification Phy.tic.I Absn.act.I

42.658

Field microstructure and temporal and spatial instability of

photonic Bloch waves in nonlinear periodic media

P. St. J. Russell and J.-L. Archambault

Optoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 IBJ, United

Kingdom

(Received J4 March J994, accepted Jo May J994)

Abstract. The nonlinear dispersion relation of monochromatic optical Bloch modes in a periodic

half-space is derived for both normal and oblique incidence. It i~ shown that strong nonlinear beam

~teering can occur in the vicinity of the Bragg condition. By studying the field microstructure, and

making use of diagrams of wavevector iwi,iui frequency, a fresh perspective i~ gained on the

phy~ical mechanism~ that govern the behaviour of light in nonlinear periodic media. A lineari;ed analysis i~ uwd to identify parameter ranges of temporal and spatial instability, and to quantify the

gain oi the awociated modulational instability.

1. Introduction.

For some years there has been considerable interest in the behaviour of light in nonlinear

periodic structures. Winful Ii in an early paper pointed out that bistability, self-pulsing and chaos could occur in distributed feedback (DFB) geometries. The later realization that strong group velocity dispersion appears close to a Bragg condition (positive on the red-shifted, negative on the blue-shifted side) suggested that gratings could be used for pulse compres-

sion [2, 3] and for soliton formation in spectral regions (for optical fibres, in the visible) where the material dispersion is positive. This has led to a series of theoretical studies, driven by the

prospect of solitons at any wavelength in any nonlinear medium whose refractive index can be

periodically patterned [4-9]. ln most of these contributions, a coupled wave formalism is used, leading to nonlinear differential equations describing the behaviour of the so-called gap- .iolitoii.I that can form in the vicinity of the linear stop-band. Our pre-occupation in this paper is the alternative Bloch wave (BW) approach, including two-dimensional spatial effects (I.e., Bragg angles less than 90°). The BW approach has been used for over a decade to explain wave

propagation in periodic structure~ such as corrugated planar waveguides [10-15]. It has, however, only recently been introduced to ~tudy noiilineai propagation in periodic structu-

res [16-19]. In the temporal domain, nonlinear Bloch pulses can represented by a centre-band

single-frequency BW which i~ modulated by a slowly-varying envelope function [16, 17].

What advantage is there in choosing a BW (and not a coupled-wave) approach to

propagation in periodic ~tructures The coupled-wave approach sketches a physical picture of

@Les Editions de Physique 1994

(3)

power being continuously exchanged among a group of plane waves by multiple reflections at the grating planes. The BW approach, on the other hand, provides a complementary picture

based on the actual eigenmodes of the periodic structure, which consist of superpositions of

constant amplitude plane waves that propagate as independent (and in the linear case, always

stable) groups through the grating (see Fig. I). These BW'S play the same role in uniform

periodic media as infinite plane waves do in isotropic media [?0(. In linear periodic media, this provides a useful alternative viewpoint from which to interpret, and make use of, the many

curious aspects of propagation in periodic media (e.g., BW interference [12], focusing

elements based on group velocity dispersion [I I] and BW superlattice modulators [211). One further advantage of the BW approach is that it enables, and indeed encourages, one to think in

terms of field microstructure, which leads to a range of useful explanations for the behaviour of

light in linear gratings [lsl.

high index planes

~~°~~ "~~" ~~~h~~l

grating

boundary y=0

§ ~i ~

~$~~ally

/ ~

intensity

Fig. I. Boundary condition at periodic half-space. The fringes are ~hown. They are identical in~ide and out,ide the periodic region ; however the partial waves are « pinned together » inside the periodic region. sharing a common group velocity.

A criticism sometimes levelled at the use of Bloch waves (and eigen-modes in general) to

treat nonlinear propagation is that they are not a reliable concept under these circum~tances ;

this view is, however, inconsistent given that plane waves (the normal modes of linear

isotropic medial and their rays are commonly used to treat a wide range of nonlinear phenomena. Our specific aim in this paper is to treat the excitation of nonlinear photonic B loch

waves in semi-infinite periodic structures. By restricting the discussion to a periodic half-space

(I.e., not the more usual parallel-sided slab), the quantizing and cross-phase effects of multiple

Bloch wave reflections [13] are avoided, permitting the discussion to concentrate on the BW'S themselves. The approach is thus reminiscent of work on reflection at a nonlinear dielectric interface [22]. The Bloch waves are used as the starting point of a stability analysis if they are stable, it is clear that they are a useful simple solution to the half-space problem if not, their

degree of instability can be assessed. The intention is not to present a global analysis of the behaviour of short pulses in nonlinear periodic media. Instead, we aim to provide a physical picture (and an analytical formulation) that may be useful in interpreting the complex results of

full-blown numerical simulations.

(4)

12 OPTICAL BLOCH MODES IN NON-LINEAR PERIODIC MEDIA 2473

OUTLINE OF PAPER. The paper is organized as follows: the dispersion relation of

monochromatic nonlinear BW'S is derived in section 2. The nonlinear dispersion diagram is plotted and its behaviour related to the field microstructure (and associated effective grating strength) in ~ection 3, where reflectivity iwisu.~ nonlinearity is also explored. Group velocity

and nonlinear beam-~teering are discussed in section 4. and the stability of the BW'S is then asses;ed (Sect. 5) by introducing additional weak Bloch wave side-bands, linearising the

resulting equations and obtaining a modulational instability (Ml) matrix equation describing

the behaviour of the MI modes. This enables the MI gain spectrum of the side-bands to be

plotted (Sect. 6), and hence the stability of the pump wave to be assessed. Various

experimental situations in which these instabilities might be observed are explored in

section 7, and conclusions are presented in section 8. The validity of the two-wave

approximation is briefly touched on in an appendix.

2. General nonlinear dispersion relation.

Under circumstances when the Bragg angle is large and the grating strength small it is valid (see appendix) to adopt the two-wave approximation, I.e., to model the Bloch waves by a pair

of superimposed plane paitia/ waves

E(=, t = En[l'i exp (- jki r + 1,'~ exp(- jk~ r )] exp (/wt ) + c-c- (1)

where E~, is the electric field amplitude, w = 2 arc./A is the optical frequency in radians per second, I and A the optical velocity and wavelength in i>aiuo, Vi and V~ are the (constant) complex partial wave amplitudes, f'and h are forward and backward labels and r ant t are the

position vector and time coordinates respectively. The wavevectors in (lj are related by Floquet's theorem

ki = k~ + K (2)

where ~i

=

2 ml )K) is the grating period and K the grating vector. This pair of waves propagates through the grating at a fixed group velocity or decay rate. Its direction of power flow is determined by the relative strengths of each wave. We define the dominaiit wavevector as the one whose associated partial wave amplitude is strongest. For BW'S with positive group

velocities, the dominant wavevector is the forward one. The wavevectors k~ and ki are written

as follows 'j

k~=k~+K=ijj+Pi,

~3) ki = (k~+K)

where p is the wavevector component along the boundary, parallel to the grating planes (see Fig. 2). For purely distributed feed-back (DFB) structures, p

=

0 and k~ and k~ are anti- parallel. Putting ( into Maxwell's equations, assuming a grating with first order susceptibility

~l'l~~j"+~[~'COS(K_V), x)/~~° ~~~

(') [ and th are the wavevector component, normal to the boundary, I-e-, [kj[ ~kj and

[k~[ ~ t~ (except at normal incidence when p

= 0j.

(5)

k~

fi

Fig. 2. -Wavevectors and geometry u;ed to de~cribe an arbitrary Bloch wave.

a third order susceptibility x '~', and making standard approximations, it is straightforward to

show that the field amplitudes obey

I- y + A(jvij~ + jv~j~) K + AVf Vi vi~ o~ ~~~

K+AV~V~* y+2d+A(jvij~+jv~j~) ~ ~b °

where the coupling constant

~

x("ko j j

~ ~~~

~ 2 ~

~ ~N ~' ~0 ~ ~ ~(i ~~)

,fi ~

no is the average index and K~ the coupling constant at normal incidence (P

=

0). The mean wavevector kjj is given by

ko = 2 arnu/A = wno/c. (7)

and the nonlinear dephasing parameter A is given by

~

')~~ ~

~~~ ~

(8)

3 x w psii 3 x Ej ko

~~

4 n( 8 11(

where A~ is its value at normal incidence and So is the incident Poynting vector. The parameter y is the perturbation to kjjj (the wavevector component normal to the boundary in the absence of

a grating, I.e., based on the average index) that appears in the vicinity of a Bragg condition, I-e-,

ii = , pi + y iju + y. (9)

The parameter d, which signifies dephasing from the Bragg condition, is given by (2)

0

= kjo K/2 = ko sin K/2

> (0 0~)[Lo~ cos H~] + (w w~)[(no/c) sin H~] (10)

> (p p~) cos 0~ + (w w~)[(nn/c sin H~)]

(2) This definition of o differs by a factor of two from the one used in previou~ publications [15], and results in simpler algebra.

(6)

12 OPTICAL BLOCH MODES IN NON-LJNEAR PERIODIC MEDIA 2475

where the subscript B indicates a Bragg condition, which occurs when the angle of incidence 0

(see Fig. 2) and the wavevector ko are related by sin 0

=

K/2 ko.

Analytical solutions of (5) are easily found for a given boundary condition, yielding up to three different sets of values (y, V~, V~), each describing a different nonlinear Bloch wave.

Expressed in their most symmetrical form, the solutions are as follows

2 V) f

=

d + A(V) V)) (I I)

V) + V)

and

~)~ ~(

=

(12) Vb + Vf d + [3 1(V) + V))/2]

where only trai>elling Bloch waves are considered (for which V~ and V~ are real-valued). This restriction is needed to avoid evanescent waves, whose field amplitudes suffer exponential growth or decay, altering the level of nonlinearity and preventing the formation of nonlinear

eigenmodes. In (I I) and (12) the normalized parameters (with hats) are defined as follows :

d

= d/K

,

I

= A/K

,

f = y/K (13)

Equation (12) represents the visibility of the fringes in the periodic field microstructure of the

Bloch wave in both linear and nonlinear gratings, this is 100 % at the stop-band edges

(I

= ± in the linear case). In the presence of nonlinearity, however, the stop-band edges shift away from these points to the positions :

d

=

31(V) + Vj)/2 ±1 (14)

notice that the stop-band width is always equal to 2 in normalized units (2 K in wavevector units), regardless of the level of nonlinearity. The expression for f in (I I contains a linear and

a nonlinear term. At the stop-band edges, Vi

= ± V~ and the nonlinear second term is zero at these points f is given by d

at any level of nonlinearity. In the linear case, and (12) can be solved to yield to well known solution :

f = I

± (15)

as recorded for example in reference [15]. A number of different ways of expressing the

solutions of (I I) and (12) exist. For the purposes of this paper, we select two examples V) + V)

=

I, and Vj

=

1.

2. SOLUTIONS FOR Vi + Vi

=

I. In this case (see (I I and (12)), the effects of nonlinearity

are controlled by I and the difference term V) V). The resulting solutions constitute a

general purpose description of isolated nonlinear Bloch waves, inside an extended periodic

medium far from any boundary. The dispersion relation takes the form

f+d

(I+d)~/I -(d+31/2)~~ (16)

at a reflectivity q

=

V)(0 w q w I given by :

q = [I ± ~/I (I

+ 3 )/2)~~j/2. (17)

(7)

These expressions are real-valued outside the range

-31/2-1~ d~-3]/2+1 (18)

which defines the stop-band. The expression in (16) is zero, I.e. k~

=

K/?, at three points : the

stop-band edges (the two limits in (18)), and d

=

I. If the third point occurs outside the

stop-band, then a loop appears in the wavevector diagram. The onset of this loop occurs when the upper stop-band edge (the right-hand limit in (18)) coincides with the third condition, I.e.,

when 1= 2. Some examples of the resulting stop-band shapes are given in figure 3.

2.2 SOLUTIONS FOR V)

=

I. When a particular boundary condition is to be treated, however, these general-purpose solutions are not appropriate. As an example we now analyze

8

',

~ A/K"0 "'

4 ",

"

Z '

0 .$.

-Z

-4

-6 -8 8

~

~

"', ~~

~

~

' ~ ~

_ ~ '~

CQ ~",

~ ~

,

~c~ -Z

-4

~h

4d -6

-8

8

~

4 .,

, .

.

z .

. .,

o ,

,

-z

; ,

-4

' -6

-8

-lZ 1~/K

Fig. 3. - top-band for ca,e hen I/)

portion,

(8)

12 OPTICAL BLOCH MODES IN NON-LINEAR PERIODIC MEDIA 2477

the case of a semi~infinite periodic space with a boundary at the plane j~

= 0, excited by an

infinite plane wave from the isotropic side y

~ 0. Under these circumstances, at least for linear

structures [15], a single Bloch wave is excited in the periodic half-space. It is logical, given the

way the equations are cast, to set V~(j, = 0)

= 1, I-e-, to normalize the field amplitudes to that of the incident wave ; changes in the incident power level are then handled by the parameter

]. Under these conditions (5) yields

:

f+d

=

d+V~+j(1+2V))=-d- (I/V~)-1(2+V)) (19)

where, since VI

= I, I/) is equivalent to the reflectivity q from the grating. It is useful to define

a parameter s to repre~ent the sign of the backward partial wave amplitude, I-e-, V~ = ~i,/ q ; this parameter determines the phase of the interference fringes relative to the

grating (see Sect. 3 for a discussionj. From (12), .I is given by :

ii

= sign (.~)

= sign (- I 3 ](1 +

q )/2 ], (20)

and (191 can be further ,implified to f+I

=

I+s, q +](1+2q)=- b- (s/,/q)-](2+n). (21)

The nonlinear dispersion diagrams in section 3 are plots of the wavevector (ki- K/?)/K

(= I + ii against frequency deviation d. They

are obtained by taking a range of values of Rand solving (21) straightforwardly for f and I. As in the previous

case (Sect. 2. ), there are three possible points where ki = K/2(f + d

=

0 the first two are at the stop-band edges d

=

3 ] ±1 (22)

where V~

= ± I, and the third occurs at

d

=

] ~, (23)

A

when it turns out that l'~

=

Il. The right-hand stop-band edge coincides with this last point

at J at ~

~ l, three di~tinct points exist where f + d

=

0.

If instead the reflectivity for given values of I and ] is sought~ it

may be shown to be given by solutions of the cubic

(9]~) n~+ (6](2 d +3j)-1) q~+ ((2i+3j)~-2) q -1=0. (24)

Finally, the level of nonlinearity j turns out to be related to

q and d by the simple expression 3

= l~ ~ + ) (25)

3 1+q

,,~

3. Field microstructure and dispersion diagrams.

The behaviour of the eigenvalues of matrix equation (5) is best understood by reference to the field microstructure of the Bloch waves. The discussion in this section is restricted to the ca~e

when VI (the solution of Sect. 2.2).

(9)

In the absence of a grating, the solution is the straight « light» line (kj -K/2)/K

=

d + ) expected of a monochromatic plane wave travelling into an isotropic nonlinear half- space. It is the sloping (-. ) line on three left-hand diagrams in figure 4, and shifts to the left

as the level of nonlinearity increases.

In the absence of any nonlinearity (1

=

0) but in the presence of a linear grating, the usual

stop-band opens up at the Bragg condition (Fig. 4, top left). The branches with negative group

velocities (dk~/dd ~ 0) are plotted with thinner dashed lines the assumption of no sources at

infinity means that they play no role in the grating half-space. As explained previously [15],

the main consequence of Floquet's theorem is that the field microstructure (created by

interference of backward and forward partial waves) mimics the grating structure. Fast and

3

Z m 0---

~,

'

~ if

o

,

~l '., i~(

-2 ].,

~ '~._

-4

~

$~ -8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1o 1 2 3 ~ 2 9

, ~~j )~)~

~/ lC "1 ~

~ l Cl .S .L

~,

~_, ,$~ '~ 3 ',_ 8

~~h -~ 'i ~ $ '~ ~.

J~ g~ ', .,

~' ~

°

-4 ~~q _' '

-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1o I Z 3 '

3 .~ 7

2 lA/K

" 2-.5

5 3'' '1~ 5 5

o 4 4 ~'

, ,,

_~ ," ~'~ 5 ' 6

,' .< ~

-3 .. I

-4 o ' o

-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 o 2 3 -1o I Z 3 4 5 6 -1o 1 2 3 4 5 6

~/K indeX profiles

Fig. 4. Stop-bands and refractive index profiles for case when V)

=

and V)

= ~ for three levels of

nonlinearity. The slanting (dash-dot-dot) lines on the stop-band diagrams are the solutions for a plane in

an isotropic nonlinear medium. Except in the linear cam, only the loci of forward travelling Bloch waves

are included (the backward travelling waves do not appear in a half~space). The refractive index profiles

show the original grating (dash-dot), the nonlinear index change (dash-dot-dot) and the net index profile (full line). Note that cancellation of the linear grating occurs at points and 3. All the nonlinear

distortions in the stop-band shape can be understood from these index modulation patterns. Although the branches (terminating at 4 and 5, and I and 21 may be extended above the horizontal axis (dashed lines), the solutions fail to conserve power (~y ~ l), see text for discussion.

Références

Documents relatifs

We point out that the instability predictions based on the KP-I equation for the regime of strong surface tension have been confirmed for the full water-wave problem for both

More recently, Oh–Zumbrun and Johnson–Zumbrun [OZ2, JZ2] in 2010 and 2011 using rather different tools coming from viscous shock theory have resolved the corresponding problem in

Standing waves are observed for the symmetric forcing term (a), periodic traveling waves for the asymmetric forcing terms (b,c).. these waves «may contribute to both normal

In section 4, the stripped flux lattice is considered in general and the fully general problem is worked out in section 5.. Some applications of our results are given

2 , the unit cells of the periodic structure can therefore be delimited owing to two virtual layers of helices, each layer having their own helix parameters (in particular, the

It is seen from figures 1 and 2 that the variation of the HZ gives rise to the substantial changes of the wall excitation spectrum: the first peak disap- pears when HZ 2

We see that the growth of amplitude modulation causes de- creasing of instability increment to the value which makes possible the existence of wave chains observed in /I/..

The matching the product wave frequency had to be beam density depended on the beam current and voltage identified and in a separate experiment under the same and could be