HAL Id: jpa-00246808
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246808
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Phason excitations in the SDW state of (TMTSF)2PF6
S. Donovan, Y. Kim, L. Degiorgi, G. Grüner
To cite this version:
S. Donovan, Y. Kim, L. Degiorgi, G. Grüner. Phason excitations in the SDW state of (TMTSF)2PF6.
Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (6), pp.1493-1498. �10.1051/jp1:1993193�. �jpa-00246808�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts72.15N 75.30F
Phason excitations in the SDW state of (TMTSF)~PF~
S. Donovan, Y.
Kim,
L.Degiorgi
and G. GrUnerDepartment
ofPhysics
and Solid State Science Center,University
of Califomia at LosAngeles,
Los
Angeles,
CA 90024.1547, U.S.A.(Received 30 December 1992,
accepted
5February
1993)Abstract. We have measured the
frequency dependent conductivity
at various temperatures below the SDW transition in (TMTSF )~PF~. We find two distinct resonances which we ascribe tointemal deformations and
pinned
mode oscillations of the SDW condensate. Furthermore, the spectralweight
of thepinned
mode resonance is found to benearly
temperatureindependent
below the SDW transition. Ourfindings
are contrasted with various models andsuggestions
on theelectrodynamics
of the SDW ground state.Considerable progress has been made
recently
inexploring
the collective modedynamics
of the brokensymmetry
state called thespin density
wave(SDW) [Il.
Theelectrodynamical
response & of the
ground
state is determinedby
both the collective mode&s~w
andsingle particle
&~~ excitations. As for asuperconductor, single particle
excitations areexpected
forphoton energies
hw > 2 A where 2 A is the SDW gap. The collective mode response arises at zerofrequency
for asuperconductor,
while for a SDWimpurities
shift the mode to a finitefrequency
wo, the so-calledpinning frequency.
In either case, in the clean limit(fir
'< A,
where r~ ' is the
scattering rate)
at T=
OK all the
spectral weight,
defined asj~
Re&(w
dw =~
(I)
o
8
=
~~~~~
~~
~~~~
~'~~' ~ ~~'~ ~Urnber
density
of eie~t~~~ ~~~~'llb
the bandmass, ;s e~ ~~~~to be associated with the collective mode. This is in contrast to that found for
charge density
wave
(CDW)
systems where, due to thelarge
effective mass m * of the condensate, thespectral weight
of the collective mode resonance is small[2].
We have
recently
observed[3]
a lowlying
resonance atfrequencies
well below theexpected single particle
gap ~ ~ m 30 cm~ '(as
determined from the temperaturedependence
of the dch
conductivity
«= «~ exp
(-
~ in the modelcompound (TMTSF~PF~
below the SDWkT transition
(Ts~w
= I1.5
K).
Weargued
that this resonance is due to theoscillatory
response of1494 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N° 6
the SDW condensate, the q
=
0
phason
excitation and, in clear contrast with thatexpected
fromequation (I),
astrongly
reducedspectral weight
has been found.Several models have been
proposed
to account for ourexperimental findings.
Oneexplanation,
that the effective mass islarge
due tocoupling
tophonons,
can be ruled out as nolattice distortion has been found in the SDW state
[4].
It has also beensuggested [5] that,
as forsuperconductors, long
range Coulomb forces shift thespectral weight
away from thepinning frequency
w~ up to theplasma frequency w~.
Thismodel,
based on the so-called Anderson-Higgs
mechanism[6],
shouldapply
in atranslationally
invariant systemonly
to thelongitudinal
mode(q
iiE while
leaving
the transverse mode(q
I E),
assampled
withoptical
measurements, unaffected. However, the transverse and
longitudinal
modes may be mixed due toanisotropy
effects and therandomly
situatedimpurities [7].
It has also beensuggested [8]
that the mode observed may well be due to internal deformations
[7]
and not to theoscillatory
response of the SDW. If this is the case, the
pinned
mode resonance which should be atfrequencies
well above thespectral
range where the modes due to intemal deformations occur would mostlikely
be above the gap, I.e.hw~
> 2 A.Recently,
it has beensuggested
thatcommensurability
effects mayplay
animportant
role and that these effects lead to bound stateresonances below the gap
[9].
These bound state resonances may have alarge spectral weight
and thus
(because
of the conservation of totalspectral weight)
may lead to the reduction of theintensity
of thepinned
mode resonance.Impurities
can also lead to bound stateslo,
II],
and in ananalogous
way also lead to a reduction of the collective modespectral weight. Finally,
itwas also
proposed [12]
thatimpurities
may lead to amixing
of the q = 0 magnon andphason modes,
and that the lowlying
resonance observed is a magnon excitation at theantiferromagne-
tic resonance
frequency.
In order to address these
questions
we have conductedexperiments
at varioustemperatures
over an extensive
spectral
range which spans the audio to infraredfrequencies.
Standardradiofrequency (rf~ techniques
were utilized up to IGHz,
and the components of theoptical conductivity
d= « j + I «~ were evaluated from the time
dependence
of thedischarge
current[13].
In the micro- and millimeter wavespectral
range resonant cavitiesoperating
at3, 7, 9,
12,
35,60,
loo and 150GHz wereemployed,
and the surfaceimpedance 2~
=
R~+
iX~
was measured. Our measurementtechniques
andanalysis
are described elsewhere[14].
Fora
good
metal R~ isproportional
to theabsorptivity A(w
=
I
R(w ),
whereR(w
is thereflectivity,
and thus can be combined withoptical experiments,
conducted between 15 and10~
cm~',
to construct A(w
over a broadspectral
range. Theoptical
measurements describedhere were made on mosaics and the
procedure
has been described in more detail in reference[15].
AKramers-Kronig (KK) analysis
was used to evaluate«j(w
at varioustemperatures.
In
figure
I we show theabsorptivity
at two temperatures, one above and one well belowTsow.
Theabsorptivity
values measured with differenttechniques
are showntogether
with aDrude and Lorentz oscillator fit. At
high frequencies
~°>100cm~')
atemperature
2 gr
independent
feature is found which is discussed in detail elsewhere[15].
AboveTs~w,
at 20K,
thefrequency dependent conductivity
can be well described with asimple
Drudeexpression.
The Drude fit
gives
a relaxation time=
3 cm~
', placing
it well into the clean limit. This2 gr r
leads,
with «~~(20 K)
= 3 x10~
fl~ ' cm~ ' and a carrier concentration n= 1.4 x
10~'
cm~ ~ toa bandmass of m~=
20m~,
inqualitative
agreement with the bandmass obtained frommagnetic
measurements[16].
BelowTs~w
the measuredabsorptivity
can be wellreproduced using
a Drude oscillator to model the uncondensed electrons and anunderdamped
Lorentzoscillator for the microwave resonance. An
extrapolation
between the measuredpoints
is madeby joining
the different sets of datatogether using
the oscillator fit as aguide.
At eachtemperature
A(w
is transformedthrough
a KKanalysis
togive
« j(w ),
as shown infigure
2.TMTSF),PF,
m
~ /
~
~
~ /
~
$
~
~ ~/~ ~ ~
~
°
~ ~
' ~~~~~~~~
)16,°°'' : ll~l
sI do<o"
~~~~
~'~'~~~lo" lo"' lo° lo' lo' lo' lo'
frequency (cm"')
Fig.
I. Thefrequency dependence
of theabsorptivity
both above (T=
20 K) and below (T = 2 K Tsow in
(TMTSF)~PF6. Optical
measurements (solid line) are shown together with both surfaceimpedance
(SI) measurements (circles and boxes) and asimple
harmonic oscillator (h.o.) fit (dashed and dotted line).~~~~~'Z~~6
ZOK . tm4
a ,0K 6 . Ploo÷iWW
~~
~
,,
'~#'~lii~i
_
+ f °,,
-, #
. ,
, Jf - fi. -+
~
' +] ",
~
'£ ",,'
u I .
~' I
~ ,
- , ~'~
a I
]-
,..~ i
. . ,
. ,
i
'lf'
lo"'io° lo' lo'
lo' idftequmcy (cm-')
Fig.
2.- Thefrequency dependent conductivity
both above and below Tsow for(TMTSF)2PF6
determined from a Kramers
Kronig analysis
offigure
I. Thesingle particle
gap, determined from dcconductivity
measurements, is indicated in thefigure
with an arrow. Thepluses
(+) are the values of« as determined
directly
from a measurement of both R~ and X~ in the microwaveregion.
In the inset, the temperaturedependence
of the normalizedspectral weight
of the various contributions to «sow (w below Tsow aredisplayed,
where each has been normalized by thespectral weight
of the Drude response at20 K.
1496 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N° 6A resonance at temperatures below
Ts~w
isclearly
evident near 0. I cm~ ' This resonancewas
previously
associated[3]
with thepinned
mode resonance. Thesingle particle
gap, asestablished from the temperature
dependence
of the dcconductivity,
is indicatedby
the arrow infigure
2. Earlier[3]
we have associated the increase of «,(w )
around thisfrequency
with thegap in the SDW state, however, the fact that this structure is also observed well above
Tsow [15]
suggests that it has a differentorigin
and is mostprobably
due to an interband transition. The reason for the absence of the gap structure in theoptical conductivity
is thesame as that in a
superconductor
in the clean limit «j
(w )
is small in thespectral
range around 2 A, andconsequently
the effect of the removal of thisspectral weight
leads toonly
minorchanges
in thereflectivity.
The detailed form of the low
lying
resonance wasexplored by combining
theoptical
datawith
experiments
in the rfspectral
range. BelowTsow,
theconductivity d(w)
has contributions from both thethermally
excited electronsd~~(w )
and the condensed electrons&sow(w )(&(w )
=
&~~(w
+ds~w(w )). ds~w
for(TMTSF)~PF~, together
with the conduc-tivity
observed[17]
in the materialKo_~MOO~
in the CDW state aredisplayed
infigure
3. Inboth cases we find a broad structure at low
frequencies together
with a well defined resonancein the
high frequency
end of thespectrum.
In the CDW system the lowfrequency
behavior has beenanalyzed
in detail and is now well understood[7]
to be due to the intemal deformations of the collective mode.Furthermore,
the resonance which appears at loo GHz forKo_~MOO~
is due to the oscillations of the entire collective mode. This resonance isusually
referred to as thepinned
mode resonance at thepinning frequency
wo. Extensiveexperiments [2, 18]
on several materials with a CDWground
stateclearly
establish that wo is indeed determinedby pinning
to theimpurities,
and that itrepresents
the oscillations of the entire collective modesubject
to anaverage
restoring
force whosespring
constant isgiven by
k=
m*
w(.
Much less is known104
/j
io3
)
jj
102~~~~~~~~~~~
S~ ~~
E T=2K
~~~ /.
i
~j
loo§~
( K0.3MO°3
" °
T=40K
io-2
/
o-3
ioi io2 io3 io4 ios io6 io7 io8 io9 trio ion
Frequency(Hz)
Fig.
3. -Thefrequency
dependence of the real part of the SDW conductivitydsow(w)
for (TMTSF )~PF6 and&~ow(w
) for the CDW compound KO~MOO~. The measuredconductivity
is shown (boxes and circles)together
with the output of the KKanalysis
(solid and broken lines). Themeasurements shown were made at different temperatures, but in each case the measurement was made
well below the transition temperature.
about the
electrodynamical
response of the SDW materials.Experiments
on SDWsamples
with
varying impurity
concentrations arecurrently underway
in order to determine thedependence
of«j(w)
onimpurity
concentration.However,
thestriking similarity
of thefrequency dependent
response of these two systems seen infigure
3strongly
suggests that the lowfrequency
mode in(TMTSF )~PF~
is due to internal oscillations of the SDW and the modearound o-I
cm~'
is the response of thepinned
SDW.Therefore,
we conclude that forKO~MOO~
and(TMTSF)~PF~
both the intemal mode deformations and thepinned
moderesonance appear well within the
single particle
gap,hwo
< 2 A, in contrast to thesuggestion
of reference
[7].
The temperature
dependence
of thespectral weight
of thepinned
SDW mode was evaluatedby fitting
the observedconductivity
with a function of the form&
~
~ ~ ~
n(T)
e~ r Iill
w
~~ ~~~
mb(
' IW T)
47r
1(w I
w 2) 1w r
j
~~~where the first term
d~~
is the Drude response of thethermally
excitedelectrons,
taken from thetemperature dependent
dcconductivity
«~~=
~~~ ~
below the
transition,
and the second m~Lorentzian term
&s~w
describes thepinned
mode resonance, withD~
the SDWplasma frequency
and r the SDWdamping.
A temperatureindependent
r has been used forT<Ts~w.
Thespectral weight
associated with the two contributions inequation (2)
isdisplayed
in the inset offigure
2 as a function of temperature. It is clear from thefigure
that incontrast to the temperature
dependent
Drudecontribution,
thespectral weight
of thepinned
mode resonance is
only weakly
temperaturedependent
and issignificantly
reduced from thespectral weight
associated with the Drudeconductivity
above the SDW transition. Our observations therefore rule out theAnderson-Higgs
mechanism[5]
as it would lead to anexponential
freeze out of thespectral weight
of thepinned
mode resonance withdecreasing
temperature. The strong reduction in the
spectral weight
of thepinned
mode has beenindependently
confirmed with the measured lowfrequency
dielectric constant e[13].
Just belowTsow,
e is dominatedby
lowfrequency excitations,
but at T= 2 K these low
frequency
modes freeze out and
e is determined
by
thepinned
mode resonance. Thespectral weight
obtained
by
this method is alsodisplayed
in the inset offigure
2 and it is more than two orders ofmagnitude
below thespectral weight
associated with the Drude response at 20 K.Presently
we canonly speculate
on theorigin
of themissing spectral weight
in the SDWstate. As the total
spectral weight
must be the same both below and above the transitionlgrne~
CC(~,
T»
Tsow
~'°"
~
~~~°'
~~~~~~(w
dw=
~
~~ "°~~~~
there must be excitations associated with the SDW response in addition to those found in the microwave
region
and below. Onelikely explanation
is that themissing spectral weight
is associated with bound statesaccompanying
the SDW condensate. In contrast toCDW'S,
it isexpected
that bound states due toimpurities
canreadily
occur, and thereasoning
is as follows[10].
In a CDW theperiodically
modulatedcharge density
canadjust
to the electrostaticimpurity potentials by adjusting
its localphase
to minimize the total energy(electrostatic
+elastic) gain.
On the other hand, the SDWground
state can be viewed as twoCDW'S,
one for eachspin direction,
with a CDW modulation on the sublattices which differsby
gr. As thepinning
in an SDW is also due to electrostatic forceslo, 19],
a fulladjustment
of thephase
cannot occur
simultaneously
for bothspin sublattices, leaving
a net energygain
which is muchlarger
than for a CDW.However,
the electrostatic energy can be loweredby removing
1498, JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N° 6electrons from the condensate to form a bound state about the
impurity.
Inaddition,
thespectral weight
of these bound states isexpected
to besignificantly larger
than in CDW systems. Thespatial
extension of a bound state isgiven by
the coherencelength
hv~
f = ,
-, and with a Fermi
velocity
v~ m locm/s,
andsingle particle
gap A/hm 15 cm~
WA ,
f m
10~ h,
which issignificantly larger
than the coherencelength
fortypical
CDW systems.As the matrix element for
optical
transitions of the bound state isproportional
to itsdipole
moment and hence f, a
large
coherencelength
leads to alarge optical spectral weight
associated with that transition.
Several
microscopic
models also suggest a broad spectrum ofimpurity
induced bound stateslo,
II]
below thesingle particle
gap. An altemative model[9]
suggests that as these materialsare near to
commensurability,
soliton excitations could occur below the gap. These excitationshv~
would also have a
spatial
extension off
=
and therefore would have a
large spectral
WA
weight.
At present we do not have clearspectroscopic
evidence for states below thesingle particle
gap. Furthermore, since themissing spectral weight
is much smaller(m
5 fb than that associated with the temperatureindependent
feature above the gap, we cannotexperimentally
determine whether the
missing weight
is above or below the continuum ofsingle particle
excitations.
Acknowledgments.
This research was
supported by
the National Science Foundation grant DMR 89-13236. Usefuldiscussions with
H.Fukayama, K.Maki,
G.Mihdly,
and A.Zawadowski aregratefully
acknowledged.
References
Ill GRUNER G. and MAKI K., comments condensed Matter Phys. IS (1991) 145.
[2] GRUNER G., Rev. Mod. Phys. 60 (1988) l129.
[3] QUINLIVAN D., KIM Y., HOLCzER K., GRUNER G. and WUDL F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1816.
[4] POUGET J. P.
(private
communication).[5] MAKI K. and GRONER G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 782.
[6] ANDERSON P. W., Basic Notions of Condensed Matter
Physics (Benjamin/Cummings,
CA, 1984).[7] LITTLEWOOD P.,
Phys.
Rev. B 36 (1987) 3108 ; WONNEBERGER W.,Synthetic
Metals 43 (1991) 3793.[8] LITTLEWOOD P.
(private
communication).[9] WONNEBERGER W., Solid State commun. 80 (1991) 953.
[lO] T0TTo1. and ZAwAoowsKi A.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1442.[I Ii ZAwADowsKi A. and T0TTo 1.,
Synthetic
Metals 29 (1989) F 469.[12] FUKAYAMA H.
(private
communication).[13] MIHALY G., KIM Y. and GRUNER G., Phys. Rev. Len. 66 (1991) 2806.
[14] DONOVAN S., KLEIN O., HOLCzER K. and GRUNER G., to be
published.
[15] DONOVAN S., DEGIORGI L., KIM Y. and GRUNER G., submitted to Europhys. Lett. 19 (1992) 433.
[16] MORTENSEN K., TomKiEwicz Y. and BECHGAARDK.,
Phys.
Rev. B 25 (1982) 3319.Using
the measured value of X for a one dimensional free electron gasgives
mjm~ = 3.[17] MIHALY G., KIM T. W. and GRIjNER G.,
Phys.
Rev. B 39 (1989) 13009.[18] KIM T. W., DONOVAN S., GRONER G. and PHILIPP A.,
Phys.
Rev. B 43 (1991) 6315.j19] TVA P. F. and RuvALos J.,