• Aucun résultat trouvé

Seed coat fragments, a major source of cotton yarn imperfections

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Seed coat fragments, a major source of cotton yarn imperfections"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

722 SEED COAT FRAGMENTS, A MAJOR SOURCE

OF COTTON YARN IMPERFECTIONS Mourad Krifa(1,2) Jean-Paul Gourlot(1) Pr. J.-Y. Drean(2) 1 CIRAD-CA / T-COT Montpellier, France 2 ENSITM/LPMT Mulhouse, France Introduction

Seed coat fragments (SCF) are “portions of a cotton seed, usually black or dark brown in color, broken from mature or immature seed, and to which fibers and linters may be or may not be attached. Seed coat fragments are distinct from other imperfections found in cotton, such us neps, motes, leaf trash and pieces of stem...” (ASTM, 1975).

SCF are caused by the breakage of the seed-coat during the ginning process (separation of cotton fibers from seed). SCF reduce the efficiency of cleaning, increase breakage during spinning (Price, 1987) and affect the fabric appearance. Our study was performed to check out the effect of SCF on cotton yarn quality using different SCF detection and counting methods.

Materials and Methods

Fifteen non-sticky cottons representative of a broad range of SCF contents were ring spun (RS) and open-end spun (OE) to 20 tex yarn. The SCF in the card web were counted by Trashcam, an image analysis method developed in CIRAD (Gourlot at al., 1995).

SCF in the yarn were counted by a capacitive-sensor evenness tester (UT3, Zellweger-Uster) based on a detailed analysis of neppiness (Frydrych, 1989). The detailed analysis allows the classification of yarn imperfections (neps : 200 % for RS, and 280 % for OE) into different types fiber neps (figure 1), SCF (figure 2) and other neps (figure 3).

Results and Discussion RS Yarn

The results of detailed analysis for RS yarn are shown on figure 4. A majority of neps examined for the cottons tested were SCF (nearly 75 %). This result would be different in case of sticky cotton (Frydrych, 1996).

OE Yarn

Figure 5 shows the results of detailed analysis of OE yarn neppiness. Nearly 59 % of total neps are SCF. The impact

of the SCF on OE yarn neppiness (at a 280% threshold), is less important than for RS yarn. This is due to SCF elimination and/or fragmentation performed by the opener during fiber individualization in OE process.

For both OE and RS yarn, we noticed a highly significant relationship (figure 6) between SCF counted on card web and an other type of yarn imperfections distinct from neps : thick places. SCF may be also a source of thick places on yarn.

Conclusion

SCF are the main source of neps for non-sticky cotton in both RS and OE spinning processes. However, the impact of this contaminant on RS yarn is more important than for OE yarn due to SCF elimination and fragmentation by the opener. SCF may also induce thick places in yarn. A study is being performed in CIRAD to identify with precision the kind of imperfections and the mechanism of structure perturbation caused by SCF in the yarn.

References

American Society for Testing Materials, 1975. Standard test method for seed-coat fragments and funiculi in cotton. D2496-75, Annual Book of ASTM standards. Frydrych R., Gutknecht J. 1989. Identification et comptage

des diverses imperfections rencontrées sur le fil de coton. Coton et Fibres Tropicales, 44 (1) : 59-65. Frydrych R., 1996. Contribution à l’étude du collage du

coton au moyen de méthodes mécaniques et thermomécaniques. Doctorat en Sciences de l’Ingénieur. Université de Haute Alsace, France., 199 p.

Gourlot J-P., Frydrych R., Hequet E., Thollard F., Constantin O., 1995. Seed-coat fragments counting and sizing in card web., Proceedings, Beltwide cotton conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2, 1245-1249. Price J.B., 1987 the suitabilty of certain american cottons for the production of fine count rotor-spun yarn. Ed: Lubbock, Tx(USA), Texas Tech University, 25p.

Reprinted from the Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference Volume 1:722-724 (1999)

(2)

723 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Cottons 0 50 100 150

200Neps per 1000 m (20 tex OE yarn)

Total neps Seed coat neps Fiber neps Other neps

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Cottons 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

1600Neps per 1000 m (20 tex RS yarn)

Total neps Seed coat neps Fiber neps Other neps

10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

Trashcam SCF count on card web 0

10 20 30 40

50 Thick places per 1000 m 20 tex yarn (RS and OE) RS yarn r = 0,88 OE yarn r = 0,76 Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5

Références

Documents relatifs

In this article, a flexible conductive strain sensor wire is developed using nylon untwisted yarn and depositing nanoscale silver metal coating on its surface for

In the real world, the practical aliasing level is different from above mentioned simulation values because the analysis filter bank (analog circuits) includes the

These show the advantages of the proposed method for the analysis of yarn deformations in woven composites due to the complete manufacturing process3. These images correspond to

Numerical Analysis of Kevlar KM2 Yarn Subjected to Transversal Impact in Short Time Period... Analyse Numérique d’un toron de Kevlar KM2 soumis à impact transverse à

The comparison between tensile tests performed on yarns from the bobbin with yarns extracted from the fabric show the importance of the weaving damage, especially for the

The impregnation level of the yarn by the cementitious matrix gives different characteristics to the composite, in particular because the repartition of the filaments

The penetration of the cementitious matrix is not homogeneous: the cross section of the impregnated yarn shows that the outer filaments are embedded in a hardened

filament independently done (heterogeneous in the structure of the yarn) and the effect of sizing material. Pull-out curve for different types of fiber. Values