• Aucun résultat trouvé

Determiner la Valeur de la Position, et la Valeur du Chiffre de Millionièmes a Centaines De Milliers (Format Européen) (A)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Determiner la Valeur de la Position, et la Valeur du Chiffre de Millionièmes a Centaines De Milliers (Format Européen) (A)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Position et Valeur du Chiffre (Format Euro) (A)

Nom:

Date:

Determinez la valeur de la position, et la valeur de chaque chiffre souligné.

1.

592.790,876692

2.

639.367,863657

3.

859.554,742568

4.

430.966,523929

5.

246.167,412162

6.

446.003,542822

7.

622.104,475247

8.

766.728,388813

9.

151.958,073436

10.

987.295,102161

11.

304.941,919924

12.

989.710,121606

13.

271.271,606404

14.

997.103,904509

15.

317.740,854874

16.

257.127,447064

17.

891.351,659883

18.

129.041,356937

19.

792.481,368662

20.

131.313,713695

MathsLibres.com

(2)

Position et Valeur du Chiffre (Format Euro) (A) Réponses

Nom:

Date:

Determinez la valeur de la position, et la valeur de chaque chiffre souligné.

1.

592.790,876692

Position: 100.000; Valeur: 500.000 Position: 0,001; Valeur: 0,006 2.

639.367,863657

Position: 1; Valeur: 7 Position: 0,1; Valeur: 0,8 3.

859.554,742568

Position: 1000; Valeur: 9000 Position: 0,001; Valeur: 0,002 4.

430.966,523929

Position: 100.000; Valeur: 400.000 Position: 0,000001; Valeur: 0,000009 5.

246.167,412162

Position: 10; Valeur: 60 Position: 0,001; Valeur: 0,002 6.

446.003,542822

Position: 1; Valeur: 3 Position: 0,00001; Valeur: 0,00002 7.

622.104,475247

Position: 100.000; Valeur: 600.000 Position: 0,00001; Valeur: 0,00004 8.

766.728,388813

Position: 1; Valeur: 8 Position: 0,01; Valeur: 0,08 9.

151.958,073436

Position: 10.000; Valeur: 50.000 Position: 0,0001; Valeur: 0,0004 10.

987.295,102161

Position: 10; Valeur: 90 Position: 0,1; Valeur: 0,1 11.

304.941,919924

Position: 10.000; Valeur: 0 Position: 0,000001; Valeur: 0,000004 12.

989.710,121606

Position: 10; Valeur: 10 Position: 0,000001; Valeur: 0,000006 13.

271.271,606404

Position: 100; Valeur: 200 Position: 0,0001; Valeur: 0,0004 14.

997.103,904509

Position: 1000; Valeur: 7000 Position: 0,01; Valeur: 0 15.

317.740,854874

Position: 100; Valeur: 700 Position: 0,00001; Valeur: 0,00007 16.

257.127,447064

Position: 1000; Valeur: 7000 Position: 0,000001; Valeur: 0,000004 17.

891.351,659883

Position: 10.000; Valeur: 90.000 Position: 0,01; Valeur: 0,05 18.

129.041,356937

Position: 10.000; Valeur: 20.000 Position: 0,00001; Valeur: 0,00003 19.

792.481,368662

Position: 100.000; Valeur: 700.000 Position: 0,0001; Valeur: 0,0006 20.

131.313,713695

Position: 100; Valeur: 300 Position: 0,1; Valeur: 0,7 MathsLibres.com

Références

Documents relatifs

The Enthalpy change is equivalent to the heat exchange through the ground surface during each season, thus enabling to describe the interaction ground-atmosphere and pro-

The humidity profiles derived using the radiosonde measured temperature match fairly well with the humidity as measured by the radiosonde, and the discrep- ancies (if any) in

using both methods with such a relatively large maximum allowed shift (17 grid points) yields to an unphysical comparison between forecast an observed fields.. A larger do- main over

Dst and Dst*, characteristic of the equatorial magnetic ®eld, responded to the 1314 (‹5) UT southward turning prior to the ®rst observed substorm expansion phase onset, suggesting

[“The nor- mal, thickness, and speed of the dusk magnetopause current layer from Cluster Electric Field and Wave experiment mea- surements of spacecraft potential”,

A short-period normal mode wave with the period 11.6 hours would modulate the tide with a period of 14 days and the zonal wave number of the modulation would be 2 (east-.. Merzlyakov

Although verification of rainfall using contiguous rain area analysis is an effective approach to verify systematic errors in quantitative precipitation forecasts (McBride and

Neither the combined solar and auroral evidence for an individual intense (recurrent) geomagnetic storm during De- cember in AD 1128 (Sects. 2 and 3), nor the associated au-