• Aucun résultat trouvé

Differential patterns of functional and structural plasticity within and between inferior frontal gyri support training-induced improvements in inhibitory control proficiency

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Differential patterns of functional and structural plasticity within and between inferior frontal gyri support training-induced improvements in inhibitory control proficiency"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Supplementary Fig. 1

Figure1: Functional neuroimaging results

for the two main effects of the second

level ANOVA. A: main effect of the

stimulus type given by the Nogo > Go

contrast B: Main effect of session given by

the Pre > Post training contrast. Results

are presented on a normalized single‐

subject brain in the MNI space. Contrasts

are represented at p< 0.001 uncorrected

at voxel level and FDR corrected at the

cluster level (min cluster size = 100).

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

f. 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

Z=52

Z=37

Z=19

Z=‐11

Z=‐14

Z=49

Z=7

Z=‐2

Z=‐5

Z=‐5

Z=‐8

10

3.3

T‐Val

NoGo > Go

A Main Effect of Session

B. Main Effect of Stimulus

Pre > Post training

(2)

Anatomical region

Vx

MNI Coordinates

Z

p

Main effect Session (Pre >Post)

a.

Right inferior parietal 744 51 ‐40 52 4.79 < 0.001 Right angular gyrus 33 ‐64 46 4.65 < 0.001 Right supramarginal gyrus 51 ‐34 37 4.46 < 0.001

b. 

Left inferior parietal 337 ‐51 ‐34 37 4.69 < 0.001 Left supramarginal gyrus  * ‐42 ‐40 34 4.65 <0.001 Left inferior parietal ‐39 ‐49 52 3.54 < 0.001

c.

Right middle frontal 607 45 32 19 4.43 < 0.001 Right inferior frontal pars opercularis 51 14 37 4.23 < 0.001 Right middle frontal pars orbitalis 39 47 ‐8 4.16 < 0.001

d.

Left inferior temporal 329 ‐48 ‐61 ‐11 5.72 < 0.001 Left cerebellum * ‐33 ‐94 ‐17 4.97 <0.001 Left cerebellum * ‐42 ‐85 ‐14 4.37 <0.001

e.

Right inferior temporal 248 51 ‐49 ‐14 4.70 < 0.001

Main effect Stimulus (NoGo >Go)

a.

Right inferior parietal 1997 54 ‐40 49 Inf.  < 0.001 Right inferior parietal 54 ‐49 40 6.68 < 0.001 Right insula * 45 ‐28 ‐8 6.47 < 0.001

b. 

Right inferior frontal pars opercularis 2905 48 14 7 7.18 < 0.001 Right insula 33 20 1 6.55 < 0.001 Right middle frontal 42 26 43 5.69 < 0.001

c.

Left insula 561 ‐30 20 ‐2 5.10 < 0.001 Left inferior frontal pars opercularis ‐51 11 1 4.94 < 0.001 Left putamen ‐30 ‐1 ‐2 3.74 < 0.001

d.

Left cerebellum * 1676 ‐33 ‐94 ‐17 6.49 <0.001 Left inferior occipital ‐27 ‐97 ‐8 6.34 < 0.001 Left inferior parietal ‐57 ‐49 40 6.20 < 0.001

e.

Left inferior frontal pars orbitalis 176 ‐42 44 ‐5 4.63 < 0.001 Left inferior frontal pars triangularis ‐36 44 10 3.72 < 0.001 Left middle frontal ‐36 41 19 3.66 < 0.001

f.

Right inferior occipital 173 36 ‐94 ‐5 6.54 < 0.001

Main effect Stimulus (Go >NoGo)

Right precuneus 2688 12 ‐55 7 5.87 < 0.001 Left lingual gyrus ‐9 ‐67 1 5.55 < 0.001 Left calcarine ‐12 ‐73 19 5.44 < 0.001

Supplementary Table 1. Clusters Local Maxima for the functional MRI main effects of the Go/NoGo

Supplementary

Table

1:

Stereotaxic

brain

MNI

coordinates for peak‐voxels of

the two functional main effects

Stimulus (A) and Session (B). No

significant difference was found

for the main effect of Session

(Post>Pre).

Results

are

represented

at

p<0.001

uncorrected at voxel level and

FDR corrected at the cluster level

(min cluster size = 100). Table is

organized by activation clusters

with 3 local maxima more than

8mm apart. Vx= voxel size, Z= Z‐

value and p= p‐value of the

voxel. An asterisk (*) indicates

the nearest grey matter for

these particular peaks.

(3)

Supplementary

Fig.

2:

Functional

neuroimaging results for the main effect

of the 2‐back. The contrast results from a

one sample t‐test comparing responses

during the 2‐back of the pre‐training

session to the rest. Results are presented

on a normalized single‐subject brain in the

MNI space. Contrasts are represented at

p< 0.05 FWE corrected.

NoGo > Go

f. 

g. 

h. 

i. 

j. 

a. 

b. 

c. 

d. 

e. 

Z=‐2

Z=‐8

Z=‐11

Z=‐29

Z=1

Z=4

Z=31

Z=40

Z=49

Z=61

15

6.56

T‐Val

PRE > REST

(4)

Anatomical region

Vx

MNI Coordinates

Z

p

Main effect Session (Pre >Post)

a.

Left insula 843 ‐30 20 ‐2 6.11 < 0.05 Left precentral gyrus ‐48 14 ‐2 6.00 < 0.05 Left precentral gyrus * ‐45 ‐1 52 5.74 < 0.05

b. 

Left inferior occipital 46 ‐39 ‐64 ‐8 5.33 < 0.05

c.

Left inferior occipital 37 ‐30 ‐91 ‐11 5.35 < 0.05

d.

Right cerebellum 57 39 ‐58 ‐29 5.37 < 0.05 Right cerebellum 48 ‐58 ‐26 5.04 < 0.05

e.

Left middle temporal 26 ‐63 ‐31 1 5.09 < 0.05

f.

Right insula 83 33 23 4 5.69 < 0.05

g. 

Right inferior frontal pars opercularis 385 54 17 31 5.86 < 0.05 Right inferior frontal pars triangularis 45 20 28 5.69 < 0.05 Right middle frontal 48 41 22 5.2 < 0.05

h.

Left inferior parietal 378 ‐48 ‐37 40 6.14 < 0.05 Left superior parietal ‐27 ‐73 49 5.03 < 0.05 Left superior parietal ‐33 ‐67 49 4.97 < 0.05

i.

Right inferior parietal 294 54 ‐37 49 6.79 < 0.05 Right inferior parietal 36 ‐55 43 6.34 < 0.05 Right superior parietal 42 ‐43 55 6.20 < 0.05

j.

Left supplementary motor area 403 ‐3 2 61 6.61 < 0.05 Left supplementary motor area 0 20 49 5.69 < 0.05 Left frontal medial superior ‐6 17 40 5.53 < 0.05

Supplementary Table 2. Clusters Local Maxima for the functional MRI main effects of the 2‐back 

Supplementary

Table

2:

Stereotaxic

brain

MNI

coordinates for peak‐voxels of

the functional main effect for the

2‐back

task.

Results

are

represented

at

p<0.05

FWE

corrected. Table is organized by

activation clusters with 3 local

maxima more than 8mm apart.

Vx= voxel size, Z= Z‐value and p=

p‐value of the voxel. An asterisk

(*) indicates the nearest grey

matter

for

these

particular

peaks.

Références

Documents relatifs

Ces vallées sont closes dans leur partie inférieure p ar des gorges, des terrasses ou des éboulements, rendant les relations plus faciles avec le Haut-Valais

Toute reprise, ou performance –sanction- née in situ par l’impression, dans la foulée, de livrets du poème en état de décomposition avancé– se jouera à partir de la

• How carotenoid polarity and different supramolecular structures of casein affect protein/carotenoid interaction. Evaluation of carotenoid aggregation in hydrophilic

The results showed that the communication (interaction) among social network users is a main reason to actively use those services, loss of privacy is the

Conducted in France by Olivier Costa (Bordeaux) and in Belgium by Nathalie Brack and Jean-Benoıˆt Pilet (Brussels) during the period of 2013–2015, it developed a protocol similar to

Figure 3 presents time series of soil moisture values measured by theta probes (average of the 5 probes) and derived from SMOS observations (level2 and level3 products).. Due

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Thus the creation of a Great Albania is not explicitly called for at the present time by the majority of people, although it does remain an ideal to be attained in the future, even