• Aucun résultat trouvé

On a letter of Paul Lévy to Maurice Dumas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "On a letter of Paul Lévy to Maurice Dumas"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

On a letter of Paul L´evy to Maurice Dumas Marc BARBUT1and Laurent MAZLIAK2

As a complement to the previous documents, we publish a letter written by L´evy to a past student of his at the Ecole Polytechnique, Maurice Dumas who followed his lectures in 1919.

This letter was transmitted to us by courtesy of Denis Bayart, from theCentre de Recherches en Gestion of the Ecole Polytechnique.

Maurice Dumas (1898- 1993) was an engineer of the Navy and more precisely the chief engineer (Ing´enieur en chef de l’artillerie navale) at the time of the letter. A friend of Maurice Fr´echet, he had published in 1955 a volume of the collectionApplication of mathematical theories devoted to the question of sampling. The preface of this volume had precisely been written by Fr´echet. For details on the important rˆole played in France by Dumas to adapt modern probability theory to industrial production, one may read an interesting paper published by Denis Bayart3.

L´evy’s letter answers to a Dumas’ (lost) letter. In the latter, Dumas probably informed L´evy of a conference or of a paper he published where he apparently expressed all his admiration for L´evy’s work.

The letter appears as a good testimony of L´evy’s messy memory who did not really know what was and was not contained in his 1919 text (which he besides could not find any more ! ).

Moreover, it gives one direct expression of how he had felt that his work on probability was not considered with a sufficient esteem by the mathematicians. In fact, there is a slight exaggeration in L´evy’s way of considering Borel, Hadamard and Fr´echet on the same ground. If the first two had certainly some difficulty to classify probabilities as mathematics, it is hard to have the same discourse about Fr´echet. In the edition of L´evy’s letters to Fr´echet4, the reader may see how Fr´echet seemed to willingly expect L´evy’s comments on his works. This was not like a sign of contempt.

1CAMS-EHESS, Paris. Marc.Barbut@ehess.fr

2Laboratoire de Probabilit´es et Mod`eles al´eatoires & Institut de Math´ematiques (Histoire des Sciences Math´ematiques), Universit´e Paris VI, France. laurent.mazliak@upmc.fr

3G´erer et Comprendre, 71, 2003, 14-30. Available on-line at http://www.annales.org/gc/2003/gc71/bayart14- 30.pdf

4M.Barbut, B.Locker et L.Mazliak : Paul L´evy-Maurice Fr´echet : 50 ans de correspondance math´ematique, Hermann, 2004

1

(2)
(3)

Références

Documents relatifs

In vitro indomethacin administration up- regulates interleukin-12 production and po- larizes the immune response towards a Th1 type in susceptible BALB/c mice infected with

Physicians’ knowledge and practice towards medi- cal error reporting: a cross-sectional hospital-based study in Saudi Arabia.. CMA patient safety policy framework

The auxiliary volume contains two main tables (corrections to the first differences and tables of the functions S and T , described and reconstructed below), as well as several

Je crois qu’il vaudrait la peine de formaliser, dans le cadre d’une th´ eorie de coefficients plus ou moins arbitraires, les arguments de d´ evissage qui ont conduit, dans le cas

Rahimi Medical Biology Research Center & Department of Biochemistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran

Le taureau entravé des pattes de derrière Mithra va le porter pour son heure dernière Un corbeau dans la grotte envoyé du soleil Assiste au sacrifice lui donnant des conseils

[r]

Coupez et coller le prochain object qui devrait apparaitre dans la suite1. `