R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
M ARIO M IRANDA
S TEPHEN R OBERTS
Lagrange multipliers and geometric measure theory
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 74 (1985), p. 219-224
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1985__74__219_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1985, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Lagrange Multipliers Theory.
MARIO MIRANDA - STEPHEN
ROBERTS (*)
What we want to
present
here are some theoretical and numerical remarks about solutions to variationalproblems
with a volume con-straint. The first author is
responsible
for the theoreticalwork,
the second for the
computations.
We shall first recall some
general
facts aboutintegrable
functionsminimizing
anelliptic integrand,
then we will pass to the considera- tion of measurable setsminimizing
anintegrand depending essentially
on the sets’ boundaries.
Finally,
we will consider the case where the sets are restricted to assume a fixed measure. For this case wepresent
some recent results of other
authors,
which can be seen as an extension of the classicalLagrange Multiplier
Rule. The numericalexperiments
are related to this new
Lagrange Multiplier
Rule.It is a
pleasure
for us to thank Paul Concus for a number ofhelpful
comments.
1. In the late
fifties,
E. DeGiorgi
and J.Nash, independently,
yproved
the H61dercontinuity
of weak solution u to theequation
(*)
Indirizzodegli
AA.: M. MIRANDA :Dipartimento
di Matematica, Uni- versithdegli
Studi di Trento, 38050 Povo(Trento), Italy;
S. ROBERTS: De- partment of Mathematics and LawrenceBerkeley Laboratory, University
ofCalifornia, Berkeley,
California 94720.This work was done
during
a visit of the first author to the LawrenceBerkeley Laboratory.
This work wassupported
inpart by
theApplied
Ma-thematical Sciences
subprogram
of the Office ofEnergy
Research, U.S. De- partment ofEnergy
under contract DE-AC03-76SF00098.220
n
where the
quadratic
is bounded from above andi.j=1
below,
withrespect to A, independently
of x. The solution is assumed to have first derivatives in and the coefficients aresimply Lebesgue-measurable.
This result
implied
the H61dercontinuity
of first derivatives of solu- tions to Hilbert-Haarproblems,
hence theiranalyticity
in case ofanalytic
data(cfr.
Hilbert’s 19thproblem
and A. Haar’s paper in Mathe- matische Annalen of1927).
The
problems
ofregularity
of solutions with unboundedgradients
and solutions to
systems
ofelliptic equations
weresuccessively
consi-dered and solved with similar methods as De
Giorgi-Nash’s.
Someremarkable
contemporary
successes were obtained in thestudy
ofregularity
of solutions toparametric problems,
say those variationalproblems dealing
with morecomplicated objects
thanintegrable
functions. We must
quote
the results of DeGiorgi
and E. R. Reifen-berg
for thehigher
dimensional Plateauproblem, together
with theirextensions to more
general problems by
F. J.Almgren.
The result of De
Giorgi,
limited to codimension one manifolds but much easier to bepresented,
is thefollowing:
« If the n-dimensionalmeasure of the
boundary
of a set is minimal in the open set S~ c then aXt1 Q
is ananalytic
n-dimensional manifoldexcept
for a closed set whose n-measure vanishes ».Later on H. Federer
proved
that the codimension of thesingular
set is not less than 8.
It must be said that the results for
elliptic systems,
which we indi-cated
above,
were madepossible by
thetechniques
introduced for theparametric problems.
2. In the
early
seventies U. Massari extended DeGiorgi-Federer’s
result to sets x
minimizing.
for a bounded
A.(x).
What comes out from Massari’s paper is that DeGiorgi technique
works for sets Xsatisfying
thefollowing inequality
for all sets Y
equal
to X outside a ball of radius e. The constant c must bepositive.
The boundaries of such sets X have C2E-continuoustangent plane except
for a set of n-measure zero.3. The result of Massari was
successfully applied by
M. Emmerand I. Tamanini to the
study
of theequilibrium
surfaces incapillary problems.
But most of theinteresting capillary problems,
as theones considered
by
E.Gonzalez, by Gonzalez-Massari-Tamanini,
andby
S.Albano-Gonzalez,
areproblems
where the sets are restrictedto
having
aprescribed
measure. To these sets neither DeGiorgi’s
nor Massari’s
techniques apply directly.
A rule likeLagrange
multi-plier
wouldput
the solutions of variationalproblems
with a volumeconstraint into the range of Massari’s method. The
validity
of a ruleof this
type
was shownby
G.Congedo-Gonzalez,
whoproved
that thevolume constraint can be
forgotten
if one adds to the functional aterm like
Vol,
where X is a constantsufficiently large
and
TTo
is therequired
volume.4. Numerical
experiments
were made for the one-dimensionalproblem
in the class of
non-negative
real functions defined on the interval[0, 1].
Theoretical considerations show that for
large
values of g andYo
thegraph
of the solution of Problem(**)
is an arc ofcircle, symmetric
withrespect
to the linex = 2 passing through
thepoints (0, 0), (1, 0)
andsurrounding together
with the x-axis an areaequal
to
Yo . By
the samearguments
one could show that forVo
>~c/8
the
graph
of the solution is the half circle of radius2,
centered at27 0)
and translatedupwards Yo - a/8.
Our numerical method consisted of
approximating
the functionas a
piecewise
linearspline,
with 21 nodes in the interval[0,1].
We then minimized the f unctional
(**)
over all suchsplines, using
the routine E04JAF from the Numerical
Algorithm Group (NAG)
subroutine
library.
The toleranceparameter
for the routine abovewas chosen so that our results were accurate to within 10-3. We
222
restricted our runs to three
specific
values ofYo, namely ~/8
and For each of these volumes we let the value of .g range from 1.6 to 2.6
(in
increments of0.05).
Below are shown the volume of the resultant
minimizing spline
solution vs. the value of l~. As can be seen from the
results,
for eachvolume
Vo,
there exists a criticalvalue
such that for .g >.Ko,
the volume V of the
minimizing spline
satisfies the volume constant V =Yo.
1
Table 1.
Computed
valueof f f (x)
dx.o
5. The second
problem
we considered was thefollowing:
where E is a two dimensional
set,
with area.H’2(E)
and arclength
This
problem
was intended toapproximate
arotating
waterdrop.
By considering
Problem(**)
in terms ofpolar coordinates,
wewere able to
approximate
theboundary
of E as aperiodic piecewise
linear
spline, using
50 nodes. Onceagain
we used the NAG minimiza-tion routine to
produce
ourminimizing spline
solution.Our numerical runs consisted of
letting
a = 1 andhaving fl
takethe values
0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0,
and4.0, corresponding
toincreasing
theangular velocity
of the « waterdrop ». Again
we found critical values.K~ (depending
onfl).
For runs with .KK#
weconsistently
obtainedthe zero function as our
minimizing spline
solution. On the otherhand,
for runs with .K >K#
wealways
obtained aspline
solutionwhich satisfied the volume
constraint, .H2(.E)
= i.o.Below are tabulated our
computed
results for the K’s close toKp (one slightly smaller,
the otherslightly larger
thantogether
with
.H’2(E),
and theangular
ofthe
resulting spline minimizing
solution. BTable 2
In
conclusion,
thesecomputations
seem to confirm that the addi- tion of the termI
solves theproblem
oftransforming
aconditioned variational
problem
into a free one. For more discussionof the numerical
aspects
of this method the reader is referred to the book PracticalOptimization by Gill, Murray,
andWright.
REFERENCES
E. DE GIORGI, Sulla
differenziabilità
e l’analiticità delle estremalidegli integrali
multipli regolari,
Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino, Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat.,3,
(1957),
pp. 25-43.224
J. NASH,
Continuity of
the solutionsof parabolic
andelliptic equations,
Amer.J. Math., 80 (1958), pp. 931-954.
F. BROWDER, Mathematical
developments arising from
Hilbertproblems,
Proc.Symp.
Pure Math., 28(1976),
A.M.S.A. HAAR,
Über
das Plateausche Problem, Math. Ann., 97(1927),
pp. 127-158.E. DE GIORGI, Frontiere orientate di misura minima, Sem. Scuola Normale
Superiore,
Pisa, 1960.E. R. REIFENBERG, Solution
of
the Plateauproblem for
r-dimensionalsurfaces of varying topological
type, Acta Math., 104(1960),
pp. 1-92.F. J. ALMGREN Jr., Existence and
regularity
almosteverywhere of
solutions toelliptic
variationalproblems
amongsurfaces of varying topological type
andsingularity
structure, Ann. of Math., 87 (1968), pp. 321-391.H. FEDERER, The
singular
setsof
areaminimizing
etc., Bull. A.M.S. (1970),pp. 767-771.
U. MASSARI, Esistenza e
regolarità
delleipersuperficie
di curvatura media asse-gnata in
Rn, Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal., 55 (1974), pp. 357-382.M. EMMER, Esistenza unicità e
regolarità
dellesuperficie
diequilibrio
neicapil-
lari, Ann. Univ. Ferrara Sez. VII, 18 (1973), pp. 79-94.I. TAMANINI, Il
problema
dellacapillarità su
domini nonregolari,
Rend. Sem.Univ. Padova, 56 (1977), pp. 169-191.
E. GONZALEZ, Sul
problema
dellagoccia appoggiata,
Rend. Sem. Mat. Padcva, 55 (1976), pp. 289-302.E. GONZALEZ - U. MASSARI - I. TAMANINI, Existence and
regularity for
theproblem of a pendant liquid drop,
Pacific J. of Math., 88(1980),
pp. 399-420.S. ALBANO - E. GONZALEZ,
Rotating drops,
Indiana Univ. Math. J., 32(1983),
pp. 687-702.
G. CONGEDO - E. GONZALEZ, Sul
problema
di Plateau con volumefissato,
Quad.Univ. Lecce, 15 (1981).
P. E. GILL - W. MURRAY - M. H. WRIGHT, Practical
Optimization,
Academic Press, 1981.Manoscritto pervenuto in redazione il 12 ottobre 1984.