A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION B
R. V. C HACON N. A. G HOUSSOUB
Embeddings in brownian motion
Annales de l’I. H. P., section B, tome 15, n
o3 (1979), p. 287-292
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPB_1979__15_3_287_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1979, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section B » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpb) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Embeddings in Brownian motion
R. V. CHACON (*) and N. A. GHOUSSOUB (**)
Vol. XV, n° 3, 1979, p. 287-292. Calcul des Probabilités et Statistique.
SUMMARY. - We prove the
following
Skorohod’s typeembedding
theorem. If
(Bt)
is a Brownian motion and T is anystopping time,
thenthere exists a standard
stopping
time S before T such thatBT
andBs
havethe same distribution. We also
give
anexample
of adescending
martin-gale
which does not embed in Brownian motionby
means of standardnon randomized
stopping
times.RESUME. - On montre le résultat suivant de « type Skorohod ». Si
(Bt)
est un mouvement brownien linéaire et T un temps d’arrêt
quelconque,
alors il existe un temps d’arrêt
quelconque,
alors il existe un temps d’arrêt standard S avant T tel queBT
etBs
aient la même loi. On donne aussi unexemple
demartingale
descendantequi
ne peut être réalisée par un mouve- ment brownien arrete en une suite décroissante de temps d’arrêt standardset non flous.
I. INTRODUCTION
Let {Bt;
t >0 ~
be standard Brownian motionstarting
at theorigin.
We recall that the
potential
of a measure J.1 on the Borel field of R is definedby P~(x) _ - ~ x - y ~ If T is any stopping
time we denote by PBT
(*) Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
(**) Department of Mathematics. University of British Columbia and the Ohio State
University at Columbus, Ohio. This work was partially supported by N. S. F. Grant MCS77-04909.
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B-Vol. XV, 0020-2347/1979/287/$ 4,00/
o Gauthier-Villars.
287
288 R. V. CHACON AND N. A. GHOUSSOUB
the
potential
of the distributionof BT.
Astopping
time is said to be standard(see [3 ] ) provided
there exists a sequenceTn
of boundedstopping
timessuch that lim
Tn
= T withprobability
one and limPBTn(x)
=PBT(x)
forevery x. It is
implicit
here that is finite. We recall that the Skorohodembedding
theorem as extended in[3 ]
asserts thatif
is aprobability
measure of mean zero, there exists a standard
stopping
time S such thatBs
has distribution ,u. In theorem
1,
wegive
a refinement of Skorohod’sresult,
that is
if
is the distribution of Brownian motionstopped
at T where T isany
stopping time,
then there exists a standardstopping
time S suchthat S T and
Bs
has distribution ,u.We also recall that a
stopping
time T is said to be minimal(see [5 ])
if for every
stopping
time S such that S T andBs
andBT
have the samedistribution then S = T a. e. In
[5],
Monroe uses thetheory
of barriers andfairly
difficult arguments to establish theregularity properties
ofminimal
stopping
times. Theseregularity properties
are easy to obtain for standardstopping
times(see [3 ] ).
An immediatecorollary
of theorem1,
is that the two notionsessentially coincide,
thusyielding
theproperties
of minimal
stopping
times from those of the standard ones.In Section
III,
wegiven
anexample
of adescending martingale
whichdoes not embed in standard Brownian motion
by
means of standardstopping times,
and on the otherhand,
we remark that a result of Monroe[5 ]
combined with the results of Section II
implies
theembedding
of suchmartingales by
means of standardstopping
times in a distributionalenlargement
of Brownianmotion,
a motion introduced and studied in[1 ].
Finally,
weconjecture
that theembedding
is notpossible using only
aproduct enlargement. (Every product enlargement
is a distributionalenlargement,
but the converse is nottrue.)
II. A REFINEMENT
OF SKOROHOD’S EMBEDDING THEOREM
We first recall a few facts about
potential theory
on the line and werefer for more details to
[3 ].
1)
If J.11 is a unit measure with Center of mass at xo and if is the unitmass at xo then
2)
If v, ,u, are unit measures such that ~cn -~ ,uweakly, P,,(x)
and lim
PJln(x)
exists for one x then limPJln(x)
=P,(x),
Vx.3)
If 1 and ,u2 have finite andequal potentials then J.11
= ,u2.We also recall a fact about the
balayage
ofpotentials
with respect to a finite open interval I.Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré- Section B
4)
If T is a standardstopping time,
then thestopping
time Sgiven by S(w)
=inf { t
>T(w) ; Bt
E is a standardstopping
time as well andi) PBT(x)
=PBs(x)
on F.ii) PBS(x)
is linear onI.
We shall also need the
following
dominationprinciple.
5)
Let J.11and
,u2 be finite measures on R with the same total massand having
finitepotentials.
Ifa)
>PJl2(X)
Vx e R and = on the support of 1 then b’x E R.We are now
ready
to prove thefollowing
THEOREM 1. - For any
stopping
time T such that E=
0 thereexists a standard
stopping
time S T such thatPBS
=PBT.
Proof
- Let C be the class of all standardstopping
times S less than Tsuch that
PBT.
The class is not empty sinceby (1),
zerobelongs
to C.Any
chain in C has an upper boundby (2).
Hence C is a Zorn class and itadmits a maximal element S.
Now,
we show thatPBS
=PBT.
Suppose
not. Consider the open set @_ ~ x ;
> Weclaim that
P( ~ S O. In fact, if S
let J.11 1
(resp v 1)
be the restriction of the distribution ofBs
on O(resp Oc).
Similarly,
let ~c2(resp v2)
be the restriction of the distribution ofBT
on @(resp (~‘). Clearly
and
On the other
hand, PBT
=PBS
on(~~,
thusPVl == Pv2
on U~~ which carries vl.Also,
vi 1 and v2 have the same total mass.Thus,
the dominationprinciple applies
togive
thatPVl == PV2 everywhere,
thereforePBT
=PBS everywhere
which is a contradiction.
Since (!) is an open set, there exists an open interval I ~ 0 and a constant
c > 0 such that
and
Let now
S’(w)
=inf { t
>S(w) : I}. By (4)
S’ is a standard stop-Vol. XV, n° 3-1979.
290 R. V. CHACON AND N. A. GHOUSSOUB
ping
time andPps
> c >PBT
on I. The propertyi)
translates toP( {
ST } n {
SS’ ~ )
> 0. That is S ~ S’ A T.Finally,
we get that S’ A T is a standardstopping
time greater than S and less than T such thatPBT
which contradicts themaximality
of S.We note that a similar and
simpler reasoning
as abovegives
aproof
ofthe Skorohod
embedding theorem,
that if J.1 is aprobability
measure ofmean
Zero,
there exists a standardstopping
time S such thatBs
has distri-bution ,u. For
that,
it isenought
to consider the class of standardstopping
times T such that
P~
andpick
a maximal element S. If there existsa constant c > 0 and an interval I such that
PBS
> c >P~
onI,
then thestopping
time S’ =inf { t
~S ; I}
contradicts themaximality
of S.COROLLARY - For a
stopping
timeT,
thefollowing properties
areequivalent :
.a)
T isstandard,
b)
T is a minimal andE [BT =
0.Proof 2014 &)
~a)
followsimmediately
from theorem 1 and(3).
For thereverse
implication
we notice that if T is standard and S T then for anynon-negative
Borel functionf
on R we have :where c is some constant different from zero.
Taking f
> 0 onR,
wesee that if
PBT
= then S = T a. e.III. EMBEDDING A DESCENDING MARTINGALE IN BROWNIAN MOTION
It is well known
( [3 ], [4 ], [5 ] )
that if is anascending martingale
and if
(Bt, Ft)
is standard Brownian motion with initial distributionequal
to the distribution of
Yo,
then there exists standardstopping
times(with
respect toFr)
0 = o-i 1 _ ... such that(Yn)n
and have the samejoint
distribution. We then say that(Yn)n
embeds in Brownian motionby
means of standard
stopping
times. In thefollowing,
we showthat,
unlessthe fields are
enlarged,
one cannothope
for a similar result in thecase of
descending martingales.
THEOREM II. - There exists a
descending martingale
which does not embed in standard Brownian motion(Bt, Ft) by
means of standardstopping
times with respect to
Ft.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B
Proof
- Let(Q, F, P, Bt, Ft)
be standard Brownian motionstarting
at the
origin.
Foreach n,
define thestopping
timesLet
(SZ, F, P)
and(S2, F, P)
be twocopies
of(SZ, F, P).
Denoteby
SZ thedisjoint
unionof 03A9
andQ, by
F the natural on S2 andby P the proba- bitity
measure on Fe q ual
to2( 1 P
+P . )
We now define for each n E
~l,
the random variablesby
Clearly, (Y -n)n
is adescending martingale
with respect to the 6-fieldsgenerated by {Y-m; m ~ n}.
We also note that the distri-bution J.1n of Y - n
converges when n goes toinfinity
to the distribution ofBo.
Suppose
now, there exists adecreasing
sequence of standardstopping
times
(in)
such that and have the samejoint
distributions. Thepotentials PB1:n
converges toPBo
and since thein’s
arestandard,
lemma 7.2 of[3 gives 03C4ndP = Therefore indP
converges to
zero and so the sequence decreases to zero, so
by
the zero-onelaw,
one obtains that the germ 6-field >
n)
is trivial. On the otherhand,
the (7-Held containsat
least the setsQ
and Q and thisyields
a contradiction. n
In
[1 ],
the notion of distributionalstopping
times is introduced and studied. The idea is tosufficiently enlarge
the a-fields of Brownian motionto get a richer class of
stopping
times but withoutletting
theenlargement
alter the
properties
of the process inquestion. By combining
the resultsof Section II and a theorem of Monroe
[5 ],
thefollowing
result may beproved.
THEOREM III.
- Every descending martingale
may be embedded in adistributional
enlargement
of Brownian motionby
means of standardstopping
times.One may ask if the
embedding
ispossible using only
aproduct enlarge-
ment
(and
standardstopping times,
ofcourse).
We don’t have an answer Vol. XV, n° 3-1979.292 R. V. CHACON AND N. A. GHOUSSOUB
to this
question,
butconjecture
that aproduct enlargement
is notenough
for the
embedding.
Thisquestion
isclosely
related to theproblem
ofrepresenting
adecreasing
sequence ofstopping
times in a distributionalenlargement by
adecreasing
sequence ofstopping
times in aproduct enlargement. (For
the case of anincreasing
sequence see[1 ].)
Thisquestion
is also related to the
problem
of whether randomization isenough
toassure the compactness of time
changes
in thetopology
of Baxter andChacon
[1 ].
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are indebted to Professor G. Brosamler for
helpful
discus-sions
concerning
theoremII,
and to Professor J. Walsh for useful comments.REFERENCES
[1] J. R. BAXTER and R. V. CHACON, Enlargement of 03C3-algebras and compactness of time changes, Can. J. Math., t. 29, 1977, p. 1955-1965.
[2] J. R. BAXTER and R. V. CHACON, Compactness of stopping times, Z. Wahrschein- lichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, t. 40, 1977, p. 169-181.
[3] R. V. CHACON, Potential processes, Trans. Amer. A. M. S., t. 226, 1977, p. 39-58.
[4] L. E. DUBINS, On a theorem of Shorohod, Ann. Math. Statist, t. 39, 1968, p. 2094-2097.
[5] I. MONROE, On embedding right continuous martingales in Brownian motion, Ann.
Math. Statist., t. 43, 1972, p. 1293-1311.
(Manuscrit reçu le 23 mai 1979)
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré- Section B