A NNALI DELLA
S CUOLA N ORMALE S UPERIORE DI P ISA Classe di Scienze
E DOARDO V ESENTINI
Invariant metrics on convex cones
Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze 4
esérie, tome 3, n
o4 (1976), p. 671-696
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1976_4_3_4_671_0>
© Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, 1976, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze » (http://www.sns.it/it/edizioni/riviste/annaliscienze/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisa- tion commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.
Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
EDOARDO
VESENTINI (**)
dedicated to Jean
Leray
Let 3t be a
locally
convex real vector space and let S~ be an open convexcone in JI
containing
no non-trivial affinesubspace
of Jt.In the case in which has finite
dimension,
an affine-invariant riemannian metric has been introduced in S~by
E. B.Vinberg [16], following closely
asimilar construction
developed
earlierby
M. Koecher([11];
cf. also[14])
for the domains of
positivity.
The invariance of this metric under the action of the group of affineautomorphisms
ofSZ, coupled
with a classicallemma of van
Dantzig
and van derWaerden, implies
that actsproperly
on S~.
Furthermore,
if S~ isaffine-homogeneous,
this invariant riemannian metric on S~ isnecessarily complete [10,
p.176].
In the
general
case inwhich £
is alocally
convex real vector spacewe will define two metrics on SZ which are invariant with
respect
to thegroup
G(S2)
of all continuous affineautomorphisms
of Q. Afterconsidering
a few
examples
wecompute explicitely
one of the two metrics in the casein which S2 is the cone of
strictly positive
hermitian elements of a Banachalgebra A
endowed with alocally
continuous hermitian involution.Denoting
this metric
by
we will consider theparticular
case where A is a vonNeumann
algebra
and we willsuitably
extend to this case some of the results of Koecher andVinberg, proving
thatbo
is acomplete
metric(Theorem IV)
on S~ and that the action of is
« locally
bounded >>(Theorem V).
The main idea in the construction of the metric
bo
stems from the defi- nition of theCaratheodory
invariant metric on a domain of Cn( [1 ], [2], [3]).
A suitable class of real valued functions on the cone S~ takes the
place
ofthe bounded
holomorphic
functionsappearing
inCaratheodory’s
definition.(*) Partially supported by
the National Science Foundation(MPS
75-06992).(**) University
ofMaryland
and Scuola NormaleSuperiore,
Pisa.Pervenuto alla Redazione il 16 Marzo 1976.
The crucial role of the Schwarz-Pick lemma in
Caratheodory’s
construction isplayed
hereby
anelementary property (Lemma 1.1)
of the Haar measureof the
multiplicative
group of realpositive
numbers.Let V be the
complexification
ofJt,
and let D be the tube domain overQ: D =
{z
E flY : Im ze D}.
We will show(Theorem II) that 6.Q
is therestric-
tion to iD of theCaratheodory
metric of D.A new metric has been introduced
recently
oncomplex
manifoldsby
S.Kobayashi
and has beenextensively investigated by
him andothers
([8], [9]).
Thismetric,
besidesbeing
ofgreat
interest in thetheory
of value-distribution of
holomorphic mappings
and in otherquestions,
turns out to be useful in
simplifying
the construction ofCaratheodory’s
metric.
Adapting Kobayashi’s
ideas to the framework of convex cones and affinemappings,
we will definein §
1 the other affine-invariant metric mentioned at thebeginning.
As in the case ofcomplex manifolds,
this metric turns out to be instrumental in the construction of6D.
1. - A
Kobayashi-type
invariant metric.1. - The Haar measure of the
multiplicative
groupR*
ofpositive
realnumber is
given,
up to apositive
constantfactor, by
t-1 dt.Assuming
asa distance of any two
points
t1and t,
inR*
the measure of the interval determinedby
ti andt2:
we obtain a continuous invariant metric on the group
R + .
An affine function
f :
R - Rmapping jR~
intoJR~
isgiven by + {3,
ti
we haveequality occurring if,
andonly
= 0. This provesLEMMA 1.1.
If f
is any real-valuedaffine f unction
onR, mapping R+
into
R+,
andif t1, t2
ER+ (t1 ~ t2 ) ,
9 thenequality occurring if,
andonly if, f
is a translation in themultiplicative
groupR+.
2. - Let Jt be a real vector space and let S~ be a convex cone in
tJt,
~0~.
In thefollowing
we shall bemainly
concerned with conessatisfying
the
following
condition:i)
If x E S2 and if E is any affine line in tJt such that x e C. and that C n SZ contains ahalf-line,
then there is ahalf-line r,
c E n ,SZcontaining x
in its interior.
Condition
i)
is satisfied when everypoint x
is internal(i. e.
when S~is radial at
x ) .
Suppose that 1Jt # S,
that R isgenerated by
, and that Jt has finite dimension. Let x be abounding point
of S~(i.e.
both S~ andJtBs2
are notradial at
x)
and let P be ahyperplane
ofsupport
of S~ at x. ThenQ g P
and for any y E
QEP
the affine line{z
= x--E- ty:
t ER}
intersects ,~ on ahalf-line with
origin
x.Hence,
ifi) holds,
SZ is open in j{ for the standard vectortopology
of Jt. Since the converseobviously holds,
we have:LEMMA 2.1. The convex cone Q
satisfies
conditioni) if,
andonty if,
tor everyfinite- dimensional subspace ’G of
A such n S2 =A0,
-6 n Q isopen in
thesubspace of
’Ggenerated
nQ, for
the standard vector’G.
Throughout §
1 we shall assume that satisfies conditioni).
If x, y are twopoints
of y, either x and y are collinear with 0 or x, y and 0 determine a two dimensional spaceS(x, y).
In both cases there are twoaffine half-lines rx and rv,
starting
at x and y, such thatLet
p° =
x,pl, ... , pn = y
bepoints
inS~,
letaI, ...,
an,b 1, ... ,
bn bepoints
in
R+,
and letf 1, ... , f n
be affine functions of R into tJtmapping Rf
intoS~,
and such that
Let
where the infimum is taken over all
possible
choices of n,~1, ..., pn-1, al,
...,bl,
...,bn, f 1,
...,fn.
Clearly
yn is apseudo-metric
in Q. Thefollowing proposition
is a trivialconsequence of the definition of yn.
PROPOSITION 2.2. Let
S21
andS22
be two convex cones in two real vector spaces and acnd let F : be anaffine
map such that c92,.
If
bothS21
andQ2 satisfy
conditioni),
thenfor
all x, y EQ 1 .
In
particular, if
the convex cone S2satisfies
conditioni),
thepseudo-metric yn
is invariant under any
a f f ine automorphism of
Q.By
the definition of YD,for all a,
bE R+
and every affine mapf :
such thatf (R’)
c Q.Actually
yo is thelargest pseudo-metric
on SZsatisfying
the aboveinequality :
PROPOSITION 2.3.
If
Qsatisfies
conditioni)
andif y’ is
apseudo-metric
on S2 such that
for
everyaffine f unction f :
R - Jt such that c Q and all a, b ER+ ,
thenPROOF. With the same notations as in the definition of yo, we have
proving
our assertion.Q.E.D.
Let
S21
andQ2
be two convex cones in two real vector spacesJt,
andIf both
SZl
andS~2 satisfy
conditioni),
then the convex conesatisfies condition
i).
PROPOSITION 2.4.
I f
bothS~1
andQ2 satis f y
conditioni)
thenfor
xl , yl
E Q1’
we havePROOF. The
inequality
on theright
follows from thetriangle inequality
when we
apply Proposition
2.2 to the linear mapsand Z21-+ (y1, z2)
of
9i.1
andJt,
intojt1
X Theinequality
on the left followsdirectly
fromProposition 2.2,
when weapply
it to the canonicalprojections
(j = 1, 2).
3. - We will now construct yg in a few
examples.
Let tJt = R and S2 =
R+ .
With the same notations as in the defini-.
tion of yo, we
have, by
Lemma 1.1 andby
thetriangle inequality,
Thus
On the other
hand, choosing a = x, bl =
y,/i()
= t in the definition of we haveHence
We consider next the case where tJt = S~ = R and we prove that
Let
x =1= y.
Given any two distinctpositive
realnumbers, a and b,
there exists an affine function
f :
R - R such thatf ( a )
= x,f ( b )
= y.Being
that proves
(3. 2 ) .
We say that the cone Q is
sharp (or regular)
if it contains no affine line.If the cone SZ is not
sharp,
there is aninjective
affine mapf :
R - Jtsuch that
f (R)
c Q.Proposition
2.2 and(3.2) imply
LEMMA 3.1.
If
thepseudo-metric
yo is ametric,
then Q issharp.
We will discuss later on the converse statement.
The
following proposition
shows that both the upper and lower bounds describedby Proposition
2.4 canactually
be reached on the same cone.PROPOSITION 3.2. Let
jt=RxR,
and letQ==R+xR+.
The distancey) of
twopoints
x =(x,,, X2)
and y =(Y1’ Y2)’
x 0 y, inR+ X R*
isgiven by
or
by
according as
theaffine
line determinedby
xand y
inR X R
intersectsR+
or in asegment.
We
postpone
theproof
of thisProposition
to n. 12.2. - A
Caratheodory-type
invariant metric.4. - Let Q be a convex cone in a real vector space Jt. Let be the collection of all real valued affine functions on Jt
mapping
D intoR+.
For let
6.Q
be thenon-negative (not necessarily finite)
numberdefined
by
Clearly 6o
is apseudo-metric
on Q whenever6.Q(x, y)
oo for all x, Thefollowing
lemma is an obvious consequence of(4.1).
LEMMA 4.1.
I f
there is apseudo-metric
ð’ on S~ such thatfor
allf E
acnd all x, y ED,
then~s~
is apseudometric
onQ,
acndAccording
to thislemma, 6.Q (when
itexists)
is the smallestpseudo-metric
on Q for which every is
distance-decreasing.
Let us assume that S~ satisfies condition
i)
of n.2,
and letn, ai, (j =1, ..., n)
be as in the construction of ys~(n. 2).
For anyf
Ef o f ~
is an affine function R - Rmapping Rf
intoR’.
Thusby
Lemma 1.1By
thetriangle inequality
and therefore
Hence
6’= yg
satisfies(4.2),
and Lemma 4.1implies
LEMMA 4.2.
I f
Qsatisfies
conditioni) of
n.2,
thensa
is apseudo-metric,
and
furthermore
The
following propositions
are immediate consequences of(4.1 )
andcan be
proved imitating
similararguments
in n. 2.PROPOSITION 4.3. Let
S~1
andQ2
be convex cones in real vector spacesj{,1
and and let F:
Jt,,
- be anaffine
map such thatF(Q1)
cQ2. If
thef unetions
andde f ined by (4.1)
arepseudo-metrics,
thenfor
all x, y in Inparticular, if ~s~
is apseudo-metric
onQ,
then6D
isinvariant under any
affine automorphism of
Q.PROPOSITION 4.4.
If b..
and arepseudo-metries
onS21
andQ2’
thenthe
function de f ined by (4.1 )
on(S2,.
XQ2)
X(,521
XQ2)
is apseudo-metric
on the convex cone
Q1
XQ2
c Xj{,2.
FurthermoreX2’ Y 2 E Q 2 .
Suppose
that6D
is apseudo-metric
onS;
letr > 0,
and letbe the ball with center x and radius r for the
pseudometric bg.
Ifthen
by (1.1)
and(4.1)
for all
f Since,
for0 c t c 1, f (tyl + (1- t)y2)
=tf(yl) + (1 - t) f (y2),
then
o
i.e.
showing
thatC(x, r )
is convex.Given there is a linear form A on ~, and a real number
a> 0
such thatf (x) _ ~,(x) -~- a
for allClearly I(z) > 0
for all ifA(x)
= 0 for some x EQ, then a >
0. Let x, y E,~,
and let >f (y).
Then>
I (y), and, by (1.1),
Since the function a -
(A(.r) -f- a) j(Â(y) + a)
isdecreasing
onR+ ,
then(4.1)
is
equivalent
towhere the supremum is taken over all linear forms I on S~ such that
Â(x»
0for every x c- 92.
5. - Let ,S2 =
R’.
Since theidentity
map of R onto itselfbelongs
toby (4.1)
and(3.1)
we have0
so
that, by
Lemma4.2,
If
92 = R+ x R+,
thenby (4.4)
Interchanging x and y,
if necessary, we may Since thefunction p - (xl
cos 99--
x,sinCP)/(Y1 cos p +
Y2sing,»
is nondecreasing
forU c ~p c ~c/2,
thenby (1.1)
we haveComparing
the above formula withProposition
3.2 we see that the two metrics and are different..... s
If then
This
implies that,
if the convex cone S~ contains some of itsbounding points,
then there arepoints
such that6.Q(x, y)
= 00.Throughout
the remainder of this paper we shall consider the casewhere tJt is a real
locally
convex(Hausdorff) topological
vector space, and is an open convex cone in ~i,.For
x, y E S2, 8 (x, y)
will denote the vectorsubspace (of
dimension2)
of tJt determined
by x
and y.Then 8(x, y )
n S~ is an open conein 8(x, y).
By
a theorem of M. Krein(cf.
e.g.[12, p. 63-64]),
every linear form ony),
which ispositive
onS(x, y) n
S~ extends to apositive
linear formon S~.
By Proposition
4.3 this fact provesLEMMA 5.1.
I f
Q is an open convex cone in ac reallocally
convex vectorspace
A,
thenfor
x, y E SZCOROLLARY 5.2. be a vector
subspace of
A. Thenfor
x, yLet be the
topological
dual space of thelocally
convex spacetJt,
andlet Jt* be the set of all continuous linear forms which are
positive
on S~. For let
Then
while
Again by
Krein’s theorem every(continuous) positive
linear form onS~ r1
S(x, y)
extends to a linear formon Jt,
which ispositive
on .~ andcontinuous
[6,
Lemma7,
p.417].
Thus
so
that, by
Lemma5.1, y)
=6’0(x, y),
i.e.Suppose
now that the open convex cone S in 9i, issharp. For x,
x =1=
y )
n Q is either an open half-line or asharp
open cone in apla-
ne. In both cases
and
therefore, by
Lemma5.1, y)
> 0.Hence,
if S2 issharp, bp
is ametric,
andthus, by
Lemma4.2,
also ys~ is a metric.In view of Lemma
3.1,
we conclude withTHEOREM I. Let Q be an open convex cone in a
locally
convex(Hausdorff)
real vector space A. The cone Q is
sharp if,
andonly if,
at least oneof
the twopseudometrics
yn and6D
is a metric.If
oneof
them is ametric,
the other toois a metric.
By (5.3) 6D
is the upperenvelope
of afamily
of continuous functionson
Hence,
the relativetopology of
Q in A isliner
than thetopology defined by ~s~.
6. - Let ’U be a
locally
convex(Hausdorff )
vector space over thecomplex field,
and let jt be a realsubspace
of ’lJ such that V is thecomplexifica-
tion of Jt.
Let S~ be an open convex
sharp
cone inJt,
and let D be the tube domain in V definedby
Let ll+ be the upper
half-plane
in C:The distance between two
points
withrespect
to the Poinear6 metric in II+ isThe
Caratheodory
distance of twopoints
isgiven
by
the formulawhere the supremum is taken over all
holomorphic
mapsf :
If A is any continuous linear form on
1Jt, positive on Q,
the function is aholomorphic
map:Since,
7 fort1, ~2
ER~ ,
7then
If
D = 17+,
then([9, Proposition 2.4,
p.51])
Thus, by (~.1 ),
Similarly,
if D = Il+xII+,
then[9, example 1,
p.51]
Hence, by (5.2),
Going
back to thegeneral
case, let anddenote,
as
before, the subspace
of tJtspanned by
Y1, Y2. LetS(Y1’ Y2)C = S(Y1, y2) -~-
its
complexification. By (6.2)
and(6.3)
we haveSince
[9, Proposition 2.2,
p.50]
44 - Annati delta Scuola Norm. rSup. di Pisa
Lemma 5.1 and
(6.4) yield
and in
conclusion, by (6.1),
This proves
THEOREM II. Let %T be a
complex locally
convex(Hausdorff)
vector space, and let i, be a realsubspace of
4Y such that V is thecomplexilied of
-it.If
S2is an open, convex
sharp
cone in ~i, andif
D is the tube domain overQ,
then the metric
bo
is the restriction to iQof
theCaratheodory
metricof
D.3. - The cone of
positive
hermitian elements.7. - Let A be a
complex
Banachalgebra
with anidentity
element e.In the
following A
will be assumed to be endowed with an involution * which islocally
continuous(i.e.
continuous on every maximal commutative * sub-algebra
ofA)
and withrespect
to which A issymmetric.
The latterhypo-
thesis
implies [13,
p.233]
that the involution * ishermitian,
i.e. every her- mitian element of A has a realspectrum.
Let Jt =
RA
be the real linearsubvariety
of Aconsisting
of all the hermitian elements ofA;
is a(real)
closedsubspace
of Aif,
andonly if,
the involution is continuous. For any x E
A,
letSp x
denote thespectrum of
x in A. An element is
positive, h > 0,
ifSp h
c R+. LetS2o
be thecone in
consisting
of all thepositive
hermitian elements in A.Since A is
symmetric,
ifk ~ 0,
thenh + k ~ 0.
Thus the coneDo
is convex. Let S~ be the interior
part
ofDo
inDo
and if 0 ESp h,
for every
positive integer
v, Sinceh - ( 1 w ) e
tends to h asv
- -)-
, then On the otherhand,
ifSp h c Rf , by
the upper semi-continuity
of the mapx Sp x [13,
pp.35-36],
there is aneigh-
borhood of h in all of whose
points
have theirspectra
inR’.
Thus
Given any x E
Q,
letxl
be itspositive
square root.By
thespectral mapping
theoremSp xl
is theimage
ofSp x by
the map t ~0.
Thusxl
E Q. Letx-I = (Xl)-l.
The mapis a bounded linear
automorphism
of the Banachspace A mapping
ontoitself. If then
x-lyx-l
isinvertible;
sinceThus
Tx maps S2
onto itself.Being Tx(z)
= e, then the group actstransitively
on S. Hence the cone S is afne-homogeneous.
NOTE. We will now discuss
briefly
the case where the*-algebra A
doesnot have an
identity.
For the sake ofsimplicity
we will consideronly
thecase where A is a C*
algebra.
As it is wellknown,
the involution * extendsnaturally
to the Banachalgebra
X C obtained from Aby adjoining
the
identity e,
in such a way that~1
is a C*algebra.
For any x letSp x
be thespectrum
of(x, 0)
in3£i .
LetDo
be the convex cone inKA
con-sisting
of allpositive
hermitian elements of A. Then h EDo if,
andonly if, Sp h c
R+.However,
since 0 ESp x
for every x the interiorpart
Sz ofS2o
in
JCA
does notsatisfy (7.1).
The
following
lemma holdsLEMMA 7.1.
I f
then 0 is an isolatedpoint o f Sp h.
PROOF. The closed
subalgebra
93 of Agenerated by h
is a C*algebra
which
is *-isomorphic
and isometric to the uniformalgebra
ofall continuous
complex
valued functions onSp h vanishing
at0,
the ele-ment h
corresponding
to the restriction toSp h
of thefunction i - i
If 0 is not an isolated
point
ofSp h,
for every E > 0 there is a real- valued continuousfunction k,
onSp h, vanishing
at0,
and aneighborhood
Vof 0 in
Sp h,
such thatmax and
kE(t) 0
for any t Ec Esph
Denoting by
the samesymbol
1~~ the element of 93 whose Gelfand transform is we haveHence h is not an interior
point
of S~.Q.E.D.
According
to a theorem of Hille[7,
p.684],
0 is an isolatedpoint
ofSp h if,
andonly if,
there is asubalgebra
of A which has anidentity
and contains has an invertible element.
As a consequence of Lemma
7.1,
if A is the C*algebra
of allcompact
linear
operators
on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space, then Q =0.
8. - Let be the collection of all
positive
linearforms fl
0 on A. All elements of 0152 are continuous linear forms. Since SZ is open, every form in assumespositive
values at allpoints
of ,5~. Iff E 0152,
thenf (e)
>0,
andf
is a state of A.Let ~
be the set of all states ofA,
and letbe the set of all pure states.
For any I let
By definition,
orif,
andonly if, a ( h ) ~ 0
ora(h) > 0, respectively.
Furthermorewhere denotes the
spectral
radiusof h,
andThe first
part
of thefollowing
lemma is contained in a morecomprehensive
result of D. A. Raikov
([12,
p.307];
cf. also[13,
Theorem4.7.12,
pp.235-236,
and Theorem
4.7.21,
pp.238-239]).
LEMMA 8.1..F’or every
h G RA
PROOF. The Banach
subalgebra
93 of Agenerated by h and
e is acommutative *-subalgebra
of A.Since, by
the Zornlemma,
every com- mutative*-subalgebra
of A is contained in a maximal commutative *-Sub-algebra
ofA,
the involution is continuous on 93.Since
CBSp h
isconnected, Sp h
is also thespectrum
of h in 93. The space of maximal ideals of93,
endowed with the Gelfandtopology,
iscanonically homeomorphic
toSp h.
Thishomeomorphism
mapsX E 9R$
onto the real number
being
the Gelfand transform of h. Ifwe
identify
withSp h
via thishomeomorphism, A
becomes the restric-tion to
Sp h
of thefunction’ 1-+’ (, E C).
Thealgebra 33
of all Gelfandtransforms of the elements of $ is a
dense, conjugation-invariant, subalgebra
of the uniform
algebra C(Sp h)
of allcomplex-valued
continuous functionson
Sp h.
If g
is any state ofA,
has a continuous extension as apositive
linearform on
C(Sp h).
Hence there is a finitepositive
Borel measure mg onSp h
such that
for all x E 93. In
particular 11 m, II = g(e)
=1,
andso
that, by (8.1)
and(8.2),
The Dirac measures with mass
1,
concentrated at thepoints b(h)
anda(h),
define two states on 93 which extend to two states gl
and g2
of A[13,
p.235],
for which we have (1
Since the pure states and 0 are all the extreme
points
of the set ofpositive
linear forms on A with norm
c 1,
the Krein-Millman theoremcompletes
the
proof
of the lemma.Since for
every h
E S~By
the above lemma andby (8.2)
and(8.3),
we haveo
i.e.
This formula proves
LEMMA 8.2. The
affine-invariant pseudo-metric ~s~
is invariant under the mapof
Q ontoitself.
By (8.5),
for someh E S2, if,
andonly if,
Sinceany such h is the
exponential
of a hermitianquasi-nilpotent element,
weobtain
THEOREM III. The cone
consisting of
allstrictly positive
hermi-tian elements
o f
~ issharp it,
andonly it,
~ contains no non-trivialquasi- nil potent
hermitian element.9. - For any x E
S2,
and r >0,
letB(x, r)
be the open ball inRA
and let
Being
then forall r > 0.
Since thespectrum
of e - h is theimage
of -Sp h by
the translation definedby
thevector
1, then,
with the notations(8.1),
so
that,
for everyand therefore
Given
r > 0,
for anyR > 0
such that we have alsoexp
(-
exp r, and thereforewhere
C(e, r)
is definedby (4.3).
Since every3p-isometry Tx
definedby (6.2)
is continuous for the
norm-topology
and since thefamily
istransitive
(9.1)
showsthat-according
to what has beenproved
atthe end of n. 5-the norm
topology
in S~ is finer than thetopology
de-fined
Given
0jRl,
for any we haveexp
( - s )
exp s1 + .R,
andtherefore,
Suppose
now that A is a C*algebra
with anidentity.
Thealgebra A
con-tains no
quasi-nilpotent element :A 0,
and therefore S issharp.
Further-more, for every hermitian element
h,
we havee(h) =
so thatD(e, r )
=Thus, by (9.1)
and(9.2), the b.-
and theII ii-topology
coincide at e, and therefore-in view of the
transitivity
of the groupE
01-coincide throughout
. If x, y ES,
bothx-iyx-l
andy-ixy-i
are
hermitian,
and
(8.5)
becomesSumming
up the above conclusions we havePROPOSITION 9.1. -
If
A is a C*algebra
withidentity,
the cone Q issharp,
the metric
6.o
isdefined
on Qby formula (9.3),
and the twotopologies defined
on Q
by
the norm andby ~n
coincide.10. - In the remainder of this paper we will further
investigate
themetric
6D
in the case in which A is a von Neumannalgebra
ofoperators
ina
complex
Hilbertspace 8 (and
Q is definedby (7.1)).
We will prove first that the metric structures defined in Qby 6D
andby
the norm,although
topologically equivalent,
are indeedquite
different.Denoting by (,)
the innerproduct
in8,
the numerical radius of is relatedby
We show now
that,
with the notation(8.1),
(x~, ~ )
is a state of A forevery $
E8, ( ~, ~ ) = 1,
the left hand side of(10.2)
is less orequal
than theright
hand side.Suppose
that it isstrictly less,
and let c E R be such thatSince
by (8.1) Sp (ce
-h)
r10,
i.e. the hermitianoperator h -
ce is notposi- tive, contradicting
the factthat,
forall $
E8,
and
thereby proving (10.2).
Thus
by (8.2), (8.3)
and(8.4),
Since,
forany $
E8,
0153 ~( x~, ~ ) (0153
is a normalpositive
linear formon A,
then we have alsoIn conclusion we have
LEMMA 10.1. is a von Neumann
algebra,
the invariant metrics
isexpressed for
all x, y E Qby ((8.5), (9.3)
andby)
THEOREM IV.
I f
jt is a von Neumannalgebra,
the metvic3 p is complete
on f2.PROOF.
a)
Let be aCauchy
sequence in Q for the metric3p .
The distancesx,)l
are boundedby
a finite constant k > 0.Hence, by (8.1), (8.2), (8.3)
and(8.4),
we haveFurthermore
Denoting by A*
thepredual
ofA,
x, converges to some hermitian element for the weaktopology
definedby ~,~
on A.By
Lemma 10.1 andby (10.3),
we have x E ,S~ andx) c 1~.
We will prove that6D(x, x,)
- 0as v - oo.
By Proposition
9.1 this isequivalent
toshowing
thatIf this fact does not
hold,
there is asubsequence
of and aposi-
tive constant r > 0 such that
We may assume Since for
all YEA
then there is some
f Z E ~* ,
such thatBy considering
theorthogonal decomposition of f
z[15,
p.31]
we see that
(10.4)
must be satisfied-with r inplace
of 2r-when we sub- stituteto f at
least one of the twopositive
normal formsf/
orIi.
In otherwords,
y there is some normalstate f on A,
such thatb ) By
Lemma10.1,
for any e > 0 there exists an index vo suchthat,
whenever v,
p > vo, thenfor every
positive
normal formf
on A. Thusbeing
exp(- k)
expk,
for
all It
and for every normal statef,
we haveThus
(10.6)
contradicts the conclusion ofa )
andthereby
proves the theorem.11. - Let S2 be an open convex cone in a real Banach space jt. It is
easily
seen that S~ issharp if,
andonly if,
there is no non-trivial transla- tion of A such that theimage
of Q is a cone(with
vertex0).
Let be the real Banach
algebra consisting
of all bounded linearoperators
inSuppose
that S~ issharp
and let and be the conesin
C(Jt) consisting
of all bounded linearoperators mapping, respectively,
Sd into itself and the closure
SZ
of Q into itself. Let be the open group of all invertible elements in the Banachalgebra
and let= n
By
Banach’shomomorphism theorem,
a bounded linearoperator
in Abelongs
toif,
andonly if,
its restriction is abijective
map of S~onto S2.
0
The cone S~
being
open and convex,S2
= S2. Hence any element ofC(Jt)-l mapping D
onto.S2 belongs
toG(S2),
i.e.G(2)
=C(D)
r1 Thusclosed
subgroup of C(jt)-l (for
the normtopology).
acts
continuously
onS2,
thatis,
the natural map definedby
is continuous.THEOREM V. Let A be a von Neumann
algebra
and let Q be the openconvex cone in 9i, =
consisting of
allstrictly positive
hermitian elementsof
A. LetC(D)
c be the setof
all bounded linearoperators
onJeA;
mapping
Q intoitset f . If Yl
andY2
are any two bounded sets in Qfor
themetric
bp,
the setis bounded in norm in
PROOF. There is no restriction in
assuming Yl
andV2
to be two open ballsC( x, r )
andC(y, r )
with centers x, y E Q and radius r >0,
for themetric 3p. According
toProposition 9.1,
there is someR > 0
such thatThe norm
BlAII ]]
of any A in(11.1)
isgiven by
Denoting again by ~,~
thepredual
ofA,
Considering
theorthogonal decomposition f = f + - f -
of any normal linear formf on A,
we haveHence
where all the supremums are taken over the
family
of all normalpositive
linear forms
f
with11 t 11 1 -
By
Lemma10.1,
for all z EC(x, r),
Since A
belongs
to the set(11.1),
theny)
2r.Therefore
The theorem follows then from
(11.2).
Appendix.
12. - We prove now
Proposition
3.2.Re-arranging
theindices,
ifnecessary, y we may assume Xi yl .
a)
We consider first the case where the affine linepassing through
xand y
has a half-line in common with Since this im-plies
If 9 then x2 C y2 ,
and, by (3.1 )
andProposition 2.4,
we have
The affine function
f :
R - R X R definedby
maps
R*
into ., furthermoreProposition
2.2 and(12.1) yield
If
Y2)’ replacing
the affine functionf by
the functiong :
R - R X R
definedby
and
repeating
the aboveconsiderations,
y we obtainNote
that,
if the affine linethrough
y intersectsRI
XRI along
a half-line,
for anypoint z belonging
to thesegment [x, y],
we haveb)
Let us consider now the case where the affine linethrough
xand y
has a finite
segment
in common withR+
Since then x2 > y2 . With the same notations as in the defini- tion of
(n. 2),
we have..
For any
E > 0,
we can selectn > 2, ai, bi, p j, Ii (j = 1,..., n)
in sucha way that
By Proposition
2.2 andby (3.1 )
we have thenWe prove now that for every choice of
( j =1,
...,n )
asin n.
2,
we havec)
Ifn = 2,
thepoint pl
has coordinatesp~~.
In the first case, let u =~2)
and v =(vl, x2)
be the intersections of the lines and with thesegments [x, pl]
andrespectively.
Then u2 ~ x2 andBy
the final remark ofa)
An
entirely
similarargument,
in the second case, leads to the same conclusion.d )
Weproceed by
induction on n,assuming (12.3)
to hold forn = no ( > 2)
andproving
it forn = no + 1.
If at leastone, pi
say, of the verticesp’,
...,pn-1
has coordinates YI’ X2 orpl 1
xi yz , 7then, by
thetriangle inequality,
the left hand side of(12.3)
islarger
orequal
thanwhich, by c),
is at leastequal
toe) Suppose
now that no such vertexlike p
exists amongpl,..., pn-,.
Atleast one of the four half-lines
{(t, y2) : t ~(xl, t) :
t{(t, X2):
t >has a
non-empty
intersection with someside,
I[pi-1,p’] (1 C
of the
polygonal {[p 1, p 2], ..., [pn-2, p~-1]~. Suppose
that thishap-
pens to the half-line
{(t, Y2):
t C(An entirely
similarargument
holdsfor the other three
half-lines.)
Let w =
y2)
be one of thepoints
of intersection.By
the final remark ofa )
andby
thetriangle inequality,
Figure
1By d)
we may assume Then the affine line determinedby x
and w intersects
R+
XR+
on a finitesegment.
Since i n, thepolygonal
~[x, pl], [pl, p~], ... , [pi-1, w]~
has sides.Then, by
the inductivehypo-
thesis
so that
(12.4) yields
thereby proving (12.3).
f )
As a consequence of(12.3)
wehave, by (12.2),
for every E > 0. Hence
By (3.1)
andProposition
2.4 thisinequality implies (3.3). Q.E.D.
REFERENCES
[1]
C. CARATHEODORY,Über
das Schwarzsche Lemma beianalytischen
Funktionenvon zwei
komplexen
Veränderlichen, Math. Ann., 97 (1926), pp. 76-98; Gesam- melte Mathematische Schriften, vol. IV, pp. 132-159, C. H. BECK’SCHE Ver-lagsbuchhandlung,
München, 1956.[2]
C. CARATHEODORY,Über
einespezielle
Metrik, die in der Theorie deranalytischen
Funktionen
auftritt,
Atti della Pontificia Accademia delle Scienze Nuovi Lincei, 80(1927),
pp. 135-141; Gesammelte Mathematische Schriften, vol. IV, pp. 160-166.[3]
C. CARATHEODORY,Über
die Geometrie deranalytischen Abbildungen,
die durchanalytische
Funktionen von zwei Veränderlichen vermittelt werden, Abhandl.Math. Sem. Univ.
Hamburg,
6(1928),
pp. 97-145; Gesammelte Mathematische Schriften, vol. IV, pp. 167-227.[4]
J. DIXMIER, Les C*algèbres
et leurreprésentations,
Paris, Gauthier -Villars, 1964.[5]
J. DIXMIER, Lesalgèbres d’opérateurs
dansl’espace
Hilbertien(Algèbres
de vonNeumann),
II édition, Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.[6]
N. DUNFORD - J. T. SCHWARTZ, Linear operators, Part I, New York, Academic Press, 1958.[7] E. HILLE - R. S. PHILLIPS, Functional
analysis
andsemi-groups,
Amer. Math.Soc. Coll. Publ., 31, Providence R.I., 1974.
[8]
S. KOBAYASHI, Invariant distances oncomplex manifolds
andholomorphic mappings,
J. Math. Soc.Japan,
19 (1967), pp. 460-480.[9]
S. KOBAYASHI,Hyperbolic manifolds
andholomorphic mappings,
New York,M. Dekker, 1970.
[10] S. KOBAYASHI - K. NOMIZU, Foundations
of differential
geometry, vol. I, New York,Wiley,
1963.[11]
M. KOECHER, Positivitätsbereiche im Rn, Amer. J. Math., 79(1957),
pp. 575-596.[12]
M. A. NAIMARK, Normedrings, Groningen,
Noordhoff, 1964.[13]
C. E. RICKART, Generaltheory of
Banachalgebras,
New York, Van Nostrand,1960.
[14]
O. S. ROTHAUS, Domainsof positivity,
Abh. Math. Sem. Univ.Hamburg,
24 (1960), pp. 189-235.[15] S. SAKAI,
C*-algebras
andW*-algebras, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag,
1971.[16] E. B. VINBERG, The
theory of
convexhomogeneous
cones, Trans. Moscow Math.Soc., 12