• Aucun résultat trouvé

Dendritic cells mature to resist lamin degradation and herpes virus release

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Dendritic cells mature to resist lamin degradation and herpes virus release"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02408259

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02408259

Submitted on 16 Dec 2019

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike| 4.0

International License

Dendritic cells mature to resist lamin degradation and

herpes virus release

Florence Niedergang

To cite this version:

Florence Niedergang. Dendritic cells mature to resist lamin degradation and herpes virus release.

Jour-nal of Cell Biology, Rockefeller University Press, 2019, 218 (2), pp.387-388. �10.1083/jcb.201812051�.

�hal-02408259�

(2)

SPOTLIGHT

SPOTLIGHT

Rockefeller University Press https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201812051 387

J. Cell Biol. 2019 Vol. 218 No. 2 387–388

Herpes simplex viruses bud into the nuclear membrane of infected cells. Turan et al. (2019. J. Cell Biol. https:// doi .org/ 10 .1083/ jcb .201801151) demonstrate that mature dendritic cells control the peripheral location of lysosomes, reducing autophagic degradation of lamins and inhibiting viral release.

Dendritic cells mature to resist lamin degradation and herpes

virus release

Florence Niedergang

Viruses have unexpected ways to divert cellular machineries. Herpes simplex virus type 1, or human herpesvirus 1 (HSV-1), represents common and contagious viruses that cause sores around the mouth. Around two-thirds of the global population is in-fected. The virus persists in neuronal cells, where it remains hidden from the immune system. It has been reported to have a rapid lytic cycle. As for other Alphaherpesvirinae, an important step in viral production is the budding of the viral capsid in the inner nu-clear membrane, before the crossing of the outer nuclear membrane and the release in the cytosol. It was determined that the nu-clear lamina plays a crucial role in prevent-ing viral egress (1), and its reorganization appears to be a conserved mechanism, trig-gered by herpesviruses to promote nuclear egress. In this issue, Turan et al. show that this reorganization is differentially regu-lated in immature and mature dendritic cells, potentially explaining the disparity in their permissiveness for infection (2).

Dendritic cells are sentinel cells, con-stantly sampling their environment for antigens and solutes (3). They link innate and adaptive immune responses by captur-ing, processcaptur-ing, and presenting antigens to lymphocytes. They come in two flavors, immature and mature dendritic cells. Im-mature dendritic cells have a wide range of innate receptors enabling the recognition of pathogens and a high internalization capac-ity. Dendritic cells undergo a differentiation program, or maturation, while migrating from the periphery to the draining lym-phoid organs or tissues where they present antigens. Mature dendritic cells express

molecules that expose antigens to, interact with, and stimulate lymphocytes. Drastic reorganization of intracellular structures and surface extensions accompany this dif-ferentiation program.

While the replication of HSV-1 has previ-ously been considered inefficient in mature dendritic cells, in this issue, Turan et al. (2) have demonstrated that the virus is pro-duced intracellularly, without release from mature dendritic cells. The authors com-pared monocyte-derived immature and ma-ture dendritic cells and provide microscopic evidence that the nuclear capsid egress is blocked in mature dendritic cells. Strikingly, the level of lamin A/C proteins was reduced only in immature dendritic cells upon viral infection, not in mature dendritic cells. This decrease was further shown to occur at the protein level by an autophagy-related pro-cess. Thus, HSV utilizes autophagy to facil-itate the nuclear egress of progeny capsids and, therefore, viral release and spread.

Autophagy is a cellular degradation pathway to digest and recycle intracellular proteins and organelles via the lysosomal pathway (4). In Turan et al., the authors fur-ther show that lysosomal positioning by two kinesin family members, KIF1B and KIF2A, and an ARF-like GTPase 8 A/B, contribute to inefficient autophagy in mature dendritic cells. This contrasts with immature den-dritic cells, where lower expression of these kinesins results in perinuclear position of lysosomes and more efficient autophagic degradation of lamins (Fig. 1). The authors provide compelling evidence for the roles of these kinesins in controlling autophagy and, thus, viral egress. Lysosomal positioning

was described previously to play a crucial role in the autophagic pathway in relation to the activation of mTORC1 signaling and in response to a variety of stressors (5).

More than 60 years after Christian de Duve described and named them, lysosomes remain fascinating organelles. Lysosomal biogenesis and positioning is tightly regu-lated in cells. Advanced imaging techniques now allow for high temporal and spatial analysis of organelle dynamics. Lysosomes were recently revealed to form clusters that are positioned within cells via interactions with the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton and with other organelles such as the ER (6). The position of lysosomes is essential for efficient fusion of lysosomes with various endosomes, including phagosomes, both in normal and pathological conditions. Besides their role in genetic lysosomal storage dis-eases, lysosomes have to be considered as central players in many infectious or meta-bolic disorders (7, 8).

The study by Turan et al. raises questions on how nuclear lamins are degraded by an autophagic pathway: Where and how are the lamins recognized by the macroautophagic machinery and how is the phagophore formed? What is the source of membrane used for that? What is the time and space regulation between the autophagic degrada-tion of lamins and the nuclear envelope-de-pendent autophagy induced in some cell types (9)?

How lysosomal positioning affects the fate of the virus in subsequent steps of the viral cycle in dendritic cells is also of inter-est, in particular, for the subsequent step generating the secondary envelope that

© 2019 Niedergang This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http:// www .rupress .org/ terms/ ). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https:// creativecommons .org/ licenses/ by -nc -sa/ 4 .0/ ).

Correspondence to Florence Niedergang: Florence.niedergang@ inserm .fr. 

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U1016, Institut Cochin, Paris, France.

(3)

Niedergang

Autophagy degrades lamin for herpesvirus egress

Journal of Cell Biology https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201812051

388 occurs in the cytoplasm. Despite the fact

that autophagy induction occurs both in immature and mature dendritic cells, the elevated KIF1B and KIF2A levels are key de-terminants for the inhibition of autophago-some–lysosome fusion and the impairment of viral capsids nuclear egress. It is worth noting, however, that the level of expression of KIF1B and KIF2A in dendritic cells might affect not only the location of lysosomes, but of other organelles as well. How more global differences in the intracellular trafficking in immature versus mature dendritic cells af-fect viral production is yet another question. Finally, many questions remain concern-ing the role of dendritic cells as antigen- presenting cells that are central to the orchestration of immune responses. What is the fate of immature dendritic cells once they internalize the virus? Among the range of innate receptors enabling the recognition of pathogens, many activate dendritic cells through signaling pathways that elicit their maturation. Mature cells were prepared with a specific cocktail of cytokines by the

authors in their study. Would it change the results if the maturation protocol was dif-ferent? The authors infect immature and mature dendritic cells as two distinct cell types generated in vitro, but the immature dendritic cells are very plastic and often evolve quickly into mature cells. What are the functional consequences of the infection of immature and mature dendritic cells with HSV-1, in particular for antigen presenta-tion and immune escape mechanisms? How is the antigen presentation machinery of dendritic cells affected by viral production? How many of the subversions of dendritic cell functions that have already been re-ported (10) can be related to the kinesin-de-pendent pathways described in this paper? Although many of these questions remain to be answered, the study by Turan et al. represents an important step forward in the effort to better understand how viruses interact with important immune cells that are meant to drive their elimination, but are also prominent targets for hijacking by the viruses.

Acknowledgments

I thank Drs. Anna Mularski and Fatah Ouaaz for critical reading of the manuscript.

F. Niedergang is funded by Centre Na-tional de la Recherche Scientifique, Insti-tut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, and Université Paris Descartes, and grants from Agence Nationale de Re-cherches sur le Sida et les Hépatites (ANRS AO2012-2) and Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM DEQ20130326518).

The author declares no competing finan-cial interests.

1. Mou, F., et al. 2008. J. Virol. 82:8094–8104.

2. Turan, A., et al. 2019. J. Cell Biol. https:// doi .org/ 10 .1083/ jcb .201801151

3. Merad, M., et al. 2013. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 31:563–604. 4. Zhao, Y.G., and H. Zhang. 2019. J. Cell Biol. https:// doi .org/

10 .1083/ jcb .201810099

5. Korolchuk, V.I., et al. 2011. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:453–460. 6. Ba, Q., et al. 2018. Cell Reports. 23:3591–3606. 7. Lim, C.Y., and R. Zoncu. 2016. J. Cell Biol. 214:653–664. 8. Lawrence, R.E., and R. Zoncu. 2019. Nat. Cell Biol.

https:// doi .org/ 10 .1038/ s41556 -018 -0244 -7

9. Radtke, K., et al. 2013. J. Virol. 87:3990–3997. 10. Grosche, L., et al. 2017. Front. Microbiol. 8:2149.

Figure 1. Lysosome positioning regulates

her-pesvirus egress from the nucleus and viral re-lease in dendritic cells. Immature dendritic cells

(left) have low levels of expression of the KIF1B and KIF2A kinesins. Lysosomes accumulate in the center of the cell. Autophagy induction following herpesvirus infection leads to efficient degrada-tion of the nuclear intermediate filaments lamins and efficient viral egress. In mature dendritic cells (right), the high kinesins activity maintains a pe-ripheral location of the lysosomes, which prevents efficient degradation of lamins and therefore limits viral egress.

Figure

Figure 1. Lysosome positioning regulates her- her-pesvirus egress from the nucleus and viral  re-lease in dendritic cells

Références

Documents relatifs

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Study 1 Different isolates of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 (PRRSV1) produce different patterns of infection in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells

The initial report demonstrated the importance of autophagy in antigen donor cells for the MHC class I cross-presentation of antigens by DCs both in vitro and in..

Specifically, CNA.42+ cells were counted inside lymph node follicular germinal cen- tres (Figure  2 ); MHC-II+ (Figure  4 ), CD83+ (Figure  5 ) and S100+ cells were counted in

factors secreted by MoDC, PBMC were in- cubated in the presence of cell-free culture supernatants collected 3–24 h after stimu- lation of the DC, and cell proliferation was measured

To investigate the role of PRR signaling in the protective effects of probiotic, Lr32-pulsed BMDCs derived from MyD88, TLR2 and NOD2 deficient mice were transferred to TNBS-

Con- cerning SR-A1 and CD36, there is a clear dissociation between the TLR-dependent modulation of mRNA (increased) and protein (decreased) expression suggesting DEP

(C–C4) An early antral follicle from an adult ovary showing a GV oocyte with a pair of GFP CETN2 foci (C2: green, long arrows) within γ-tubulin (C3: red, arrowheads) at the