• Aucun résultat trouvé

Book review: Using a book-club approach to support early researchers building their research program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Book review: Using a book-club approach to support early researchers building their research program"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

109

Canadian OnCOlOgy nursing JOurnal • VOlume 31, issue 1, Winter 2021 reVue Canadienne de sOins infirmiers en OnCOlOgie

FEA TURES /Ch R o niq UES

BOOK reVieW

Using a book-club approach to support early researchers building their research program

by Anne Christin Rahn and Dawn Stacey

ABstrAct

We used the book entitled, Developing a Program of Research, by Nancy Edwards and Susan Roelofs to support early researchers in building their research pro- gram at the University of Ottawa. Given the challenges of finding time to focus on our research program, we set up a series of four sessions every two weeks that required participants to read two chapters from this book in preparation for group discus- sions while concurrently building their own research programs.

iNtrOductiON

Developing a Program of Research edited by Nancy Edwards and Susan Roelofs (2018) can be considered an essential read for anyone starting a research career and who is open to guid- ance from very experienced and sea- soned researchers on how they built and nurtured their programs of research.

We organized a book club in the School of Nursing at the University of Ottawa aiming to read and discuss selected chapters, exchange ideas, and to develop or change our respec- tive programs of research. We orga- nized a 60-minute book club every two weeks for two months for early career researchers. We wrote this short com- munication to share our experience, because we thought others would ben- efit from knowing about our approach and could possibly use it in their setting.

Our eXPerieNce

Researchers were instructed to download (free of charge) or purchase a copy of the book. A full professor led

the group with seven participants who were postdoctoral researchers, PhD stu- dents within their last year, and early career assistant professors. For each ses- sion, a different additional senior pro- fessor joined our group. We started with reading and deliberating on the first two chapters and agreed on the next chap- ters to read at the end of the meetings.

For the first two book club sessions, we focused on reading the four chap- ters in the “critical considerations for developing a research program” sec- tion. All four chapters helped establish a common understanding of the rele- vant aspects to reflect on when devel- oping a research program. For the third session, we selected two chapters

AutHOr NOtes

Anne Christin Rahn, RN, PhD, Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis (INIMS), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Dawn Stacey, RN, PhD, CON(C), FAAN, FCAHS, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON

(2)

110 Volume 31, Issue 1, WInter 2021 • CanadIan onCology nursIng Journal reVue CanadIenne de soIns InfIrmIers en onCologIe

FEA TURES /Ch R o niq UES

from the section on examples of indi- viduals’ “research programs.” At the last extended session, we read chap- ters from the sections on “research programs to research centres” and

“funders’ perspectives.”

At the beginning of the meetings, we discussed the prepared chapters and content we found to be of special relevance. The discussions were fur- ther stimulated by the experiences of the senior professors. The early career researchers, building their research programs, discussed how the content applied to their individual challenges or situations and concurrently drafted their programs of research. In the sec- ond session, we discussed the titles and briefly shared the vision of our research programs. The fourth session was two hours to allow adequate time to discuss the readings and for each early researcher to present their drafted research programs, as well as obtain feedback from the group.

WHAt We leArNed

During the course of our sessions, it was possible for the assistant professor

and postdoctoral fellows to draft their program of research. Although it was too early for the PhD students to draft their research program, they found the readings and discussions very helpful.

All participants felt more inspired by taking part in the book club.

For future book clubs, we would make no changes to the concept, but recognize that the book club might be most supportive for early career researchers after completing their PhD or when writing funding awards for postdoctoral fellowships. We think, a small group of 7 to 10 is fitting for this book club approach to building a research program, because it gave all researchers the opportunity to partic- ipate in the disccusions. For PhD stu- dents or other early career researchers, a

“methods club” relating to the methods applied in the PhD or postdoctoral proj- ect might be another relevant topic for a longer-running book club.

In summary, the book is well writ- ten and provides the basis for a solid understanding of the issues related to developing one’s research program. The professors facilitating the sessions and

the content in the chapters provided practical advice on how to navigate the early years of one’s research career. By the end of the four sessions, most early career researchers had a draft of their research program that was broader than the series of studies they were consider- ing as they began this book club.

AcKNOWledGeMeNts

We would like to thank all participants of the book club for the advice and the fruitful discussions. Anne Rahn received a travel grant from the German Research Foundation to support the initiation of an international collaboration.

declArAtiONs

Competing interests: DS and AR have no conflict of interests to declare.

Ethics approval and consent to participate:

Not applicable.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Funding: There was no funding provided.

Authors’ contributions: AR wrote the first draft, which was commented and edited by DS.

reFereNce

Edwards, N, & Roelofs, S, Eds. (2018).

Developing a program of research: An essential process for a successful research career. CHNET Press.

Références

Documents relatifs

The final chapter in this section, “Unpacking Cultural Differences in Emotion Regulation: The Role of Flexibility” by Elisabeth Arons from the University of Heidelberg, offers a

Testing of ‘Faraj’ on-station and on-farm revealed a clear yield advantage under dry conditions (Fig 2).. Origin of 125 durum wheat varieties released from ICARDA’s

( 78 Se IV , 82 Se VI , 15 N and 13 C) to study uptake, assimilation and speciation of selenite and selenate species in this plant and 2) in examining during 10 months

Also, a term is added to the cost function, that expresses the di fference between the prices computed by the model though equations (2.7) and (2.8), and the values of the

In Europe, it is reinforced by the creation of the European Higher Education Area and the Bologna Process ( www.ehea.info ), and the focus of this study, the University of

 Columbia  University

–  research discussions –  paper presentations –  practice talks. – 

Class  by  David  Jensen  at  University  of  Massachusetts,  Amherst    .!. DOING RESEARCH