• Aucun résultat trouvé

Summations over generalized ribbon Feynman diagrams and all genus Gromov-Witten invariants

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Summations over generalized ribbon Feynman diagrams and all genus Gromov-Witten invariants"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01915676

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01915676

Preprint submitted on 7 Nov 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Summations over generalized ribbon Feynman diagrams

and all genus Gromov-Witten invariants

S. Barannikov

To cite this version:

S. Barannikov. Summations over generalized ribbon Feynman diagrams and all genus Gromov-Witten invariants. 2018. �hal-01915676�

(2)

Summations over generalized ribbon Feynman

diagrams and all genus Gromov-Witten

invariants.

Skoltech

Serguei Barannikov (Paris VII, NRU HSE)

(3)

yi =c1(Tp⇤i), yi 2H

2(M¯

g ,n). Consider H⇤(M¯ g ,n) valued

generating function for products of yi

I Theorem (S.B.[2009])

Â

 di=d yd1 1 . . . yndn n

i=1 (2di 1)!! l2di+1 i = = 2 4

Â

[G]2Gdec,odd g ,n (G , or(G)) 2 c(G) |Aut(G)|e2Edge

(G) 1 li(e)+lj(e) 3 5 (1)

I the sum on the right is over stable ribbon graphs of genus g with n numbered punctures, with 2d+n edges, and such that the vertices of the graph have cyclically ordered subsets of arbitrary odd cardinality

I In the simplest case, corresponding to the top degree, the cohomology H6g 6+2n(M¯ g ,n)is 1-dimensional, the

summation is over 3-valent usual ribbon graphs and this formula then reproduces the main identity from Kontsevich proof of Witten conjecture.

(4)

This formula is a byproduct of the construction of cohomology classes from [2006b, 2009]

I I - an odd derivation acting on cyclic associative /A•

algebra A, with odd scalar product, in general I2 6=0 (!)

I Theorem (S.B.[2006b, 2009]) This data !Cohomology classes in H⇤(Mg ,n)

I Theorem (S.B.[2018]) This construction defines Cohomological Field Theory.

I Theorem (S.B.[2006b, 2009]) This construction applied to “odd matrix algebra” A=q(N),

q(N) ={[X , p] =0|X 2gl(N|N)} , where p odd

involution, I = [X,·], X- odd element !the formula (1) for all products of yi

I This formula was the first nontrivial computation of categorical all genus Gromov-Witten invariants.

(5)

Counterexample to a Theorem of Kontsevich

Another byproduct is a counterexample to the Theorem 1.3 from Kontsevich “Feynman diagrams in low-dimansional

topology”(1993)

It turns out this sum ÂGZ(G)G is NOT

(6)

Counterexample A

=

h

1, x

i

/x

2

=

1

I A=h1, xi/x2 =1, ¯x =1, b(1, x) =1, d(x) =1, d2=0,

w =xx.

I For this data this sum ÂGZ(G)G is nonzero on the boundary

of the following ribbon graph =a generator of the dual complex:

(7)

Cellular decomposition of ¯

M

g ,n

R

n

A stable ribbon graph is a connected graph G (recall: a graph G is a triple (Flag(G), l, s), where Flag(G)is a finite set, whose elements are called flags, l is a partition of Flag(G)$vertices , s is an involution acting on Flag(G)$ edges/legs ) together with:

I partitions of the set of flags adjacent to every vertex into i(v)

nonempty subsets

Leg(v) =Leg(v)(1)t. . .tLeg(v)(i(v)), v 2Vert(G)

I fixed cyclic order on every subset Leg(v)(k) , I a number g(v)2Z 0 such

that|Leg(v)| >2(2 i(v) 2g(v)).

I Define an orientation

or(G)2Det(v2Vert(G)(kFlag(v) kCycle(v))

I {G}k(G , or(G)) has natural “generalized contraction of

(8)

Cellular decomposition of ¯

M

g ,n

R

n

A metric on the stable ribbon graph is a function

l : Edge(G)!R>0 . Given a stable ribbon graph G w/out legs

and a metric on G one can construct by standard procedure a punctured Riemann surfaceS(G), which have double points in general.

I replace every edge by a pair of oriented strips [0, l]⇥ [0+i•[

one for each flag and glue them side 0⇥ [0+i•[to l⇥ [0+i•[ according to the cyclic order of the cyclically ordered subsets at each vertex. Then glue the two strips for each edge [0, l]$ [l, 0]

I identify points corresponding to 2 subsets at vertices with g(v) =0, i(v) =2 , (double points); for points with 2g(v) +i(v) >2 remplace the vertex by some Riemann surface of genus g(v), which does not contain any marked point, connected to the rest via i(v)double points.

I This gives an isomorphism of complexes

(9)

Example of the formula for products of y

i

Example: The class of y1 in H2(M¯ g ,n)is represented as linear

combination of stable (G , or(G))with|Edge(G)| =2+n. It is the coefficient in front of l13

1’

n

(10)

Compactifications and y

i

classes

I The compactification ¯Mg ,n is a quotent of Deligne-Mumford

compactification ¯MDM

g ,n: the natural map ¯MDM !M¯ is the

contraction which forgets complex structure on every component of singular Riemann surface which does not contain marked points.

I One can consider ribbon graph decomposition of such components. This way we get some intermediate

compactification ¯MDM !M¯ 0 !M¯ . On the boundary of

new stratas again some components must be contracted and so on.

I The line bundles Tpion ¯MDMg ,n are pullbacks of the line

bundles Tpion ¯Mg ,n

I hence the yi classes on ¯MDMg ,n are pullbacks of the

(11)

The Quantum Master Equation on Cyclic Cochains

I The stable ribbon graph complex is intimately related with the Quantum Master Equation on Cyclic Cochains (QMCC).

I Let V =V0 V1 be Z/2Z -graded vector space,

dimkV <• , scalar product b : V⌦2 !k[p]

I Cl = (

j=1Hom((PV⌦j), k)Z/jZ) ,

S 2Sym(Cl[1 p])[[¯h]] (symmetric products for odd b , antisymmetric for even b )

I The Quantum Master Equation on Cyclic Cochains / The noncommutative Batalin-Vilkovisky equation (S.B.[2006a])

¯hDNCS+1

2{S, S} =0 QMCC S =Âg 0,i>0¯h2g 1+iSg ,i, Sg ,i 2Symi(Cl[1 p]) .

I

{S0,1, S0,1} =0,

S0,1 - A• algebra with (even/odd) scalar product, so S

(12)

The noncommutative BV di↵erential

I (QMCC) ()DNC(exp¯h1S) =0

I The noncommutative BV di↵erential on F =Sym(Cl[1 p])

DNC(ar1. . . arr) l(at 1. . . att) l = =

Â

p,q ( 1)#b_rptq(ar1. . . arp 1atq+1. . . atq 1arp+1. . . arr) l+

Â

p±16=q ( 1)˜#b_rprq(. . . arp 1arq+1. . . arr) l(a rp+1. . . arq 1) l(a t1. . . att) l

Â

p±16=q ( 1)˜˜#b_tptq(. . . arr) l(at 1. . . atp 1atq+1. . . att) l(at p+1. . . atq 1) l

I signs are the standard Koszul signs taking into account that ¯

(ar1. . . arr)l =1 p+Â ¯ari , ai 2Hom(PV) . I Theorem (S.B.[2006a]) D2

(13)

(A, m)is a d-Z/2Z graded associative algebra with odd scalar

product b, dimkA<• .

H is an odd selfadjoint operator H: A!PA, H_ =H , such that Id [d, H] =P, dP =0 , P2=P. B - the image of P.

LetG be a 3-valent ribbon graph with legs, then put:

I on every vertex v !the 3-tensors of the cyclic product on A mv 2 ((PA)⌦3)_

I on every interieur edge e = (↵0)! the two tensor

b_(H_uf, vf0), b_H,e 2 (PA)⌦2,

I on every leg l 2Leg(G)!element al 2 PB

I make the contraction WG( O l2Leg(G) al) =h O v2Vert(G) mv, 0 @ O e2Edge(G) b_H,e 1 A O l2Leg(G) ali

(14)

The summation over 3-valent ribbon graphs with legs

(cont’d).

I WG( O l2Leg(G) al) =h O v2Vert(G) mv, 0 @ O e2Edge(G) b_H,e 1 A O l2Leg(G) ali S =

Â

{G} ¯h1 c(G)WG I S 2Sym( •j=1Hom((PB⌦j), k)Z/jZ)[[¯h]]

I Theorem (S.B.[2010]) The sum

over ribbon graphs S satisfy the QMCC/noncommutative Batalin-Vilkovisky equation:

¯hDNCS+

1

(15)

Let S2Sym(Cl[1 p])[[¯h]] be a solution to the QMCC, with S0,1,2=0 ( dV =0 ), let G be a stable ribbon graph, then put:

I on every vertex v !the multi-cyclic tensors Sg ,iv 2

i

Sym( •j=1Hom((PV⌦j), k)Z/jZ[1 p])

I on every edge e = (↵0)! the two tensor

b_(uf, vf0), b_,e 2 (PV)⌦2,

I take the contraction WG =h N v2Vert(G) Sv g ,i, N e2Edge(G) b_,e ! i

I Theorem (S.B.[2006a]) For any S- a solution to the QMCC equation the following chain is a cycle in the stable ribbon graph complex W(S) =

Â

{G}2SRG ¯h1 c(SG)WG[G] dgraphW(S) =0, therefore [W(S)]2H M⇤,⇤

(16)

More constructions of solutions to the QMCC equation

I Conjecture (S.B.[2006a]) Counting of holomorphic curves

(S, ∂S, pi)! (M, ‰ Li, H⇤(LiTLj)), with Z/2Z -graded

local systems, gives solution to the QMCC equation.

I Theorem (S.B. 2013) If A is an A• infinity algebra with the

degeneration of the Hodge to de Rham spectral sequence, then the solution to the QMCC is constructed step by step starting from {S0,1, S0,1} =0

(17)

Homotopy theory of the QMCC equation

I Theorem (S.B.[2006a]) Solutions to the QMCC are in one-to-one correspondence with the structure of algebra over the Feynman transform of k[[Sn]

I Theorem (S.B.[2006a])(The Feynman transform of

[

(18)

Associative algebra plus odd derivation I

2

6=

0.

I A- associative algebra , with odd scalar product

I Assume: I - an odd derivation acting on A, preserving the scalar product: ,for example I = [L,·], L2Aodd, in general I2 6=0 (!), 9eI, [I ,eI] =1, str([a,·]) =0 for any a2A.

I Theorem(S.B.[2006b, 2009]) This data !Cohomology classes in H⇤(Mg ,n)

(19)

“Odd matrix algebra” Q

(

N

)

I Example q(N), q(N) ={[X , p] =0|X 2gl(N|N)}, where

p odd involution, q(N)has odd trace otr , I = [X,·], X-odd element X= 0 |diag(l1,. . . , ln) , ( I2 6=0 (!))

I Theorem (S.B.[2006b, 2009]) This gives the generating function for products of tautological classes yi =c1(Tp⇤i).

(20)

I Conjecture (S.B.[2009]) This construction, applied to A• algebra A=End(C), where C is a generating object of

Db(Coh(Y)), Y is the mirror dual Calabi-Yau manifold to X

!...

(21)

Evidences for the conjecture

I In the case of X =pt the construction reproduces the all-genus Gromov-Witten descendent potential of the point.

I For projective Calabi-Yau manifolds the summation over g =0 generalized ribbon graphs reproduces the summation over trees giving Frobenius manifold of the •2 VHS defined by the HC . It coincides with the g =0 Gromov-Witten of the mirror dual for hypersurfaces.

I The construction defines a Cohomological Field Theory (S.B.[2018]).

(22)

[2006a] S.Barannikov Modular operads and Batalin-Vilkovisky geometry. IMRN, Vol. 2007, article ID rnm075. Preprint Max Planck Institute for Mathematics 2006-48

[2006b] S.Barannikov Noncommutative Batalin-Vilkovisky geometry and matrix integrals. ¡¡Comptes rendus Mathematique¿¿ of the French Academy of Sciences,

arXiv:0912.5484; Preprint NI06043 Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences (09/2006), hal-00102085 (09/2006) [2009] S.Barannikov Supersymmetry and cohomology of graph

complexes. Lett Math.Phys. doi:10.1007/s11005-018-1123-7 hal-00429963 (2009)

[2010] S.Barannikov Solving the noncommutative

Batalin-Vilkovisky equation. Letters in Math. Phys., 2013, Vol 103, 6, pp 605-628 arXiv:1004.2253 (2010)

[2018] S.Barannikov Feynman transform and cohomological field theories. hal-01804639 (2018)

Références

Documents relatifs

The genus 0 open orbifold Gromov-Witten invariants which are relevant to the SYZ mirror construction are computed in Section 6 via an open/closed equality and an equivariant

Lagrangian Floer theory, open Gromov-Witten invariants, semi-Fano, toric surface, Landau-Ginzburg model, superpotential, quantum cohomology, Jacobian

As an application, we show that certain open Gromov–Witten invariants for toric Calabi–Yau threefolds can be computed via local mirror symmetry.. First, we recall the

In ILl, LeBrun studied these equations and generalized the (four dimensional) Miyaoka-Yau inequality to Einstein manifolds with non- vanishing Seiberg Witten invariants. In

(ii) Since the genus g Gopakumar-Vafa invariants can be (very rough- ly) thought of as the “virtual number of genus g Jacobians” con- tained in the moduli space S(X, β ), any

This extension is used to show that these cones are the correct genus-one analogues of the vector bundles relating genus- zero Gromov-Witten invariants of a complete intersection

COMPUTING GROMOV-WITTEN INVARIANTS In this section we will try to apply the main theorem recursively to reconstruct the invariants of an s-codimensional subvariety X of a variety Z..

Dans le cas d’une varit symplectique presque complexe mu- nie d’une involution antisymplectique et antiholomorphe, nous utilisons les rsultats de Taubes pour dmontrer d’une part que