• Aucun résultat trouvé

Peer Community In: a free process for the recommendation of preprints based on peer review

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Peer Community In: a free process for the recommendation of preprints based on peer review"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02327583

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02327583

Submitted on 5 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Peer Community In: a free process for the

recommendation of preprints based on peer review

Marjolaine Hamelin, Denis Bourguet, Benoit Facon, Thomas Guillemaud

To cite this version:

Marjolaine Hamelin, Denis Bourguet, Benoit Facon, Thomas Guillemaud. Peer Community In: a free process for the recommendation of preprints based on peer review. FORCE2019, Oct 2019, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. �hal-02327583�

(2)

Peer Community In …

A free process for the recommendation of preprints based on peer review

Who supports us so far?

We will consider preprints

recommended by a PCI

as articles published in

peer-reviewed journals

Hamelin M., Bourguet D., Facon B., Guillemaud T.

WHY?

Current publication system

• too expensive

• not transparent

Preprints

• free

• but not peer-reviewed

Communities or researchers

peer reviewing preprints

deposited in archives

publishing their

recommendation on the

PCI website

WHAT?

HOW?

For readers

Open access to the

article and the

recommendation

Transparency of the

peer-review process

PCI-friendly journals

13

scientific societies

22

institutions/universities

6

evaluation committees

17

doctoral schools

For the authors

Peer-reviewed preprint

(proof of anteriority)

Increased chances of

publication in a journal

For the recommender

and the reviewers

Citable open-access

recommendation

Valorisation of the

peer-review work

Journals in

Ecology and Evolution

23

We will consider submissions

of articles recommended

by a PCI and we may use PCI

reviews and recommendations

for our own review process

if appropriate

Références

Documents relatifs

Studying the lexical influence on words recognition, Vitevitch & Luce (1999) shown that the recognition of real words slows down as the number of phonological neighbors in

To make it more efficient, we suggest to use half-life, which is the time that the number of online tasks decrease from the value at starting point to its nth half, to indirectly

Our solution is based on PathFinder, a peer-to-peer overlay network that relies on random graphs and provides an efficient combination of long range queries and single key-value

Proceedings  editors  have  taken  all  reasonable  steps to  ensure  the  quality  of  the  materials  they  publish and  their  decision  to  accept  or  reject 

Proceedings  editors  have  taken  all  reasonable  steps to  ensure  the  quality  of  the  materials  they  publish and  their  decision  to  accept  or  reject 

This way, dissent with another user’s opinion can be expressed, and simple conversation threads about features can be established: If user A creates a feature instance of

It then focuses on trust issues within ontology based peer-to-peer networks and closes with requirements that are needed for a successful and trustful network and a possible

The majority (48%) says that they think the radio is targeted to “everyone”, followed by those who think that the radio is a medium for adults (12%) and for the elderly (8%).