• Aucun résultat trouvé

Farming systems design: complementarities between experts' prototyping and modeling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Farming systems design: complementarities between experts' prototyping and modeling"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02740630

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02740630

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Farming systems design: complementarities between

experts’ prototyping and modeling

Vincent Couderc, Jean Marc Barbier, Roy Hammond, Laure Hossard, Florine

Mailly, Jean-Claude Mouret, Caroline Tardivo, Sylvestre Delmotte

To cite this version:

Vincent Couderc, Jean Marc Barbier, Roy Hammond, Laure Hossard, Florine Mailly, et al.. Farming

systems design: complementarities between experts’ prototyping and modeling. 13. Congress of

the European Society for Agronomy, European Society for Agronomy (ESA)., Aug 2014, Debrecen,

Hungary. 515 p. �hal-02740630�

(2)

13

th

ESA Congress

25-29 August 2014, Debrecen, Hungary

1

FARMING SYSTEMS DESIGN: COMPLEMENTARITIES

BETWEEN EXPERTS’ PROTOTYPING AND MODELING.

Couderc, V. 1 – Barbier, J-M. 1 – Hammond, R. 1 – Hossard, L. 1 – Mailly, F. 1– Mouret, J-C. 1–Tardivo, C. 1 – Delmotte, S. 1, 2

1 UMR 951 Innovation, INRA, Montpellier, France. delmotte@supagro.inra.fr

2 Farming System Ecology, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.

Introduction

Farmers are facing a great number of constraints that complicate the process of farming system (FS) adaptation (Le Gal et al., 2010). In the Camargue region, Southern France, the farmers must notably (i) adapt to the Common Agricultural Policy reform that implies the suppression of the coupled payment for rice, (ii) reduce pesticide use, (iii) and reduce greenhouse gas emissions while (iv) improving energy efficiency and (v) ensuring food provision for local and global market. To account for these multiple objectives in the design of new (FS), prototyping by experts and modeling have proved their usefulness (Sterk et al., 2007). In this paper, we present the complementary application of these two approaches to design sustainable FS in the Camargue.

Materials and Methods

Three rice farmers were interviewed to identify the objectives and constraints that guide the current state and the possible evolution of their FS. Based on these information two methods were used in parallel to design new FS. First, a panel of eight experts (mostly researchers in agronomy) designed a FS prototype for each farm, consisting in a choice of crop sequences, crop allocations and farming style (e.g. partially or totally organic). Secondly, a bioeconomic optimization model was used to identify FS that would satisfy the multiple objectives assigned to the system (see Delmotte (2011) for the details of the model). The analysis of the current situation, the experts’ prototype, and the bioeconomic simulations, were done using a database that describes the economic and environmental performances of the possible agricultural activities in Camargue.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 presents FSs designed for one farm, for which the farmer objectives were to increase the economic profitability and to maintain the labor requirements. He is constrained by its limited capacity to invest in new machineries to develop or extend the area of crops such as alfalfa, protein pea or sunflower. The experts’ prototype is based on the partial conversion of the farm toward organic crops, including rice, soybean and soft wheat (new crops) (Fig 1.B). Some lands of the farm cannot be converted to organic cropping systems due to salt pressure (from capillary rising of aboveground salty water) that requires frequent rice cultivation, what is impossible in organic farming due to weed pressure (Mailly et al., 2013). While the experts’ prototype addresses most of the farmers’ objectives and improves the socio-economic and environmental performances of the farm (Fig. 1 D.), it failed to cope with the farmer constraints as the acreages of alfalfa would require investing in new machineries. Fig. 1C shows that the system proposed by the model is close to the experts’ prototype in term of land use, but

(3)

13

th

ESA Congress

25-29 August 2014, Debrecen, Hungary

2

cope with all the objectives and constraints of the farmer. Both systems resulted in better socio-economic and environmental performances, however they reduced the global farm production in terms of energy and protein (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1. Farm land use for the current situation (A), the experts’ prototype (B) and the bioeconomic

simulation (C), compared in term of socio-economic and environmental performances.

Conclusions

Prototyping leads to propose innovative FS adapted to the farmers’ objectives and constraints but faces difficulties when the number of objectives and constraints to consider increases. On the contrary, the bio-economic optimization model allows incorporating multiple objectives and varying their levels, but has limitations for representing specific constraints of farms such as fields organization. The complementary and iterative use of these two approaches lead to design more sustainable FS that will be presented to the farmers and analyzed in terms of advantages, drawbacks, and possible pathways to be implemented.

References

Delmotte, S., 2011. Participatory assessment of scenarios: perspectives for agricultural systems in Camargue, South of France. SupAgro Montpellier, PhD thesis, 380p. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00664304

Le Gal, P.Y., Merot, A., Moulin, C.H., Navarrete, M., Wery, J., 2010. A modelling framework to support farmers in designing agricultural production systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 25, 258-268.

Mailly, F., Delmotte, S., Schaller, N., Mouret, J.C., Ridaura, S., Barbier, J.M., 2013. Un modèle de décision d'assolement en riziculture conventionnelle et biologique pour prédire les usages des sols sous différents scénarios : cas de la Camargue (Sud de la France). Cahier Agriculture 22, 424-431.

Sterk, B., van Ittersum, M.K., Leeuwis, C., Wijnands, F.G., 2007. Prototyping and farm system modelling--Partners on the road towards more sustainable farm systems? European Journal of Agronomy 26, 401-409.

Figure

Figure 1. Farm land use for the current situation (A), the experts’ prototype (B) and the bioeconomic  simulation (C), compared in term of socio-economic and environmental performances

Références

Documents relatifs

Each time the large scale computer receives an output control character from the modem it will reply with an input control character, if bit 6 is set, transmit one

Each SC/MP places its selection character in an assigned memory location (a mailbox), If the controlling SC/MP detects a selection character while polling the

Quelles que soient les dispositions tarifaires retenues, il va cependant de soi que la non- discrimination entre les fournisseurs potentiels de gaz suppose la publication de tarifs

Lilongwe, 27 March 2010 (ECA) - On the second day of their meeting, which is being held in Lilongwe, Malawi, from 25 to 29 March 2010, African experts from Ministries of

The Committee also requested the Economic Commission for Africa to work with African countries to finalize the terms of reference of the centre of excellence

Abstract. There are some situations when we need to compare work results of dierent people. For example, it may be an announced tender, a grants' distribution or a competition

Yet they differ in a number of important ways, such that Citizendium can be seen as composed of a Wikipedia core (stripped down in terms of content, templates, categories and

In order to be able to evaluate and assess whether the economic costs of reaching environmental groundwater threshold values are disproportional, an important step is to evaluate