Anderson localization of thermal phonons:
Anomalous heat conduction in disordered
superlattices
by
Jonathan M. Mendoza
Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering
at the
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
June 2017
@
Jonathan M. Mendoza, MMXVII. All rights reserved.
The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and
distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document
in whole or in pa
Signature redacted
A uthor...
Certified by..
Sigr
Department of Mechanical En ineering
May 5, 2017
-
.1....
Gang Chen
Carl Richard Soderberg Professor of Power Engineering
Thesis Supervisor
A ccepted by ...
Signature redacted
Rohan Ab aratne
Quentin
Berg Professor of Mechanics
Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students
The author hereby grants to MIT permission to
reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and
electronic copies of this thesis document in
whole or in part in any medium now known or
N Y
JUN 2
1
2017
LIBRARIES
ARCHIVES
Anderson localization of thermal phonons: Anomalous heat
conduction in disordered superlattices
by
Jonathan M. Mendoza
Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering on May 5, 2017, in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering
Abstract
In semiconductor devices, thermal energy is carried by phonons, the quantized exci-tation of atomic vibrations. These phonons scatter with impurities, electrons, grain boundaries, and other phonons. At a sufficiently large scale, phonon dynamics can be approximated as a Brownian random walk, leading to ordinary diffusion described
by the heat equation. However, such approximations fail at the scale of the phonon
mean free path. In this regime, a proper wave description encoding phonon scattering is required. For sufficiently short thermal systems, the thermal conductivity becomes extrinsic and exhibits linear scaling with system size. This scale is known as the ballistic transport regime. As the system size grows beyond this scale, the thermal conductivity asymptotes into the intrinsic, ordinary diffusive regime.
However, there are special circumstances where this transition does not occur. In this Thesis, we demonstrate the anomalous scaling of thermal conductivity. The source of this anomaly is the Anderson localization of thermal phonons. Anderson localization is the spatial trapping of waves due to extreme levels of elastic disorder. The hallmark of Anderson localization is an exponential decay law of conductance with increasing system size. Since thermal transport is a broadband process, this exponential suppression leads to a thermal conductivity maximum as a function of system size. Our numerical study of GaAs/AlAs superlattices with ErAs nanopar-ticles exhibits this thermal conductivity maximum, yielding quantitative agreement to experiments. We then generalize our elastic model to allow for the incorporation of finite-temperature effects. The inclusion of phonon-phonon scattering decoheres phonons, resulting in phonon delocalization. Counterintuitively, the additional inelas-tic scattering increases conductance for originally localized phonons. This localization to diffusive transition as a function of temperature is captured in our model at low temperatures (~20K).
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Gang Chen, for the opportunity, guidance,
and resources to work in a wonderful research environment. I also dedicate this thesis
to my friends and family. Their love and support has helped me through my times at MIT.
Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Diffusion . . . . 1.2 Microscopic breakdown of diffusion
1.3 Phonon transport regimes . . . . . 1.4 Phonon scattering . . . . 1.5 Coherence . . . . 1.6 Localization . . . . 1.7 Theoretical tools . . . . 1.8 Device applications . . . . 1.9 Organization of thesis . . . .
2 Theory of thermal conductivity
2.1 Phonon dynamics . . . .
2.2 Anharmonic scattering rates . . . . 2.3 Boltzmann transport equation . . . 3 Disordered coherent transport
3.1 Resistance of reflecting boundaries . . . . 3.2 Scaling theory of localization . . . .
3.3 Random matrix models . . . . 3.4 Conduction and transmission . . . .
17 . . . . 17 19 19 . . . . 21 . . . . 23 . . . . 24 . . . . 25 . . . . 27 . . . . 28 33 33 36 37 41 41 43 45 48
3.4.1 Limitations of Landauer-Buttiker formalism Nonequilibrium Green's functions . . . .
Ballistic, diffusive, and localized transport . . . . .
Thermal conductivity . . . .
4 Numerical implementation
4.1 Sparse Hamiltonian . . . .
4.1.1 Tridiagonal block form . . . . 4.2 Matrix inversion . . . .
4.3 Self-energy . . . .
5 Localization criterion
5.1 M obility edge . . . .
5.2 Classical wave localization . . . .
5.2.1 Elastic waves . . . .
5.2.2 Electromagnetic wave localization . . . 5.2.3 Localization in superlattices . . . .
5.3 Phononic superlattices . . . . 5.4 Coherent transport in a disordered medium . 5.5 Inelastic scattering . . . .
6 Anderson localization of thermal phonons in measurements
6.1 Introduction . . . .
6.2 Superlattice fabrication . . . .
6.3 Time-domain thermoreflectance . . . . 6.4 Experimental results . . . .
6.5 Preliminary numerical studies . . . .
61 . . . . 6 1 . . . . 62 . . . . 63 . . . . 66 69 . . . . 69 . . . . 70 . . . . 70 . . . . 72 . . . . 73 . . . . 74 . . . . 76 . . . . 77 thermal conductivity 79 . . . . 79 . . . . 80 . . . . 8 1 . . . . 82 . . . . 89
6.5.1 Second order interatomic force constants 89
3.5 3.6 3.7 50 51 54 56
6.5.2 Anharmonic calculation . . . . 89
6.5.3 Modeling the randomness . . . . 91
6.5.4 Transmission, localization length, and thermal conductivity . . 92
6.6 D iscussion . . . . 95
7 Detailed numerical study 97 7.1 Calculation setup . . . . 98
7.2 Dimensionless conductance and length scales . . . . 98
7.3 Thermal conductivity . . . . 101
7.4 Fluctuations of g . . . . 105
8 Disorder strength and anharmonicity 113 8.1 Disorder strength . . . . 114
8.2 Bulk GaAs with nanoparticles . . . . 115
8.3 Transmission eigenchannels . . . . 118
8.3.1 R esults . . . . 120
8.4 Inelastic Landauer-Buttiker formalism . . . . 121
8.5 Microscopic theory . . . . 125
8.6 Approximations and implementation . . . . 129
8.6.1 First-order approximation . . . .. . . . 130
8.7 Anharmonic transmission . . . . 132
8.7.1 Delocalization transition . . . . 134
9 Conclusion 141 9.1 Future work . . . . 143
List of Figures
1-1 Coarse-grained temperature profile and (zoomed) transient tempera-ture fluctuations at the nanoscale. . . . . 20
3-1 /3(g) for d = 1, 2, 3 dimensions. Taken from [1]. . . . . 46 4-1 The decomposition of the Hamiltonian, H, into intra-layer components
Hi and inter-layer components V,j . . . . 62
4-2 A system of N + 1 layers recursively constructed layer by layer. . . . 64 4-3 A decomposition of an N layer system into left and right subsystems. 65 5-1 Photon density of states. The shaded region corresponds to the
pseu-dogap of strongly localized photons (taken from [2]). . . . . 75 5-2 Propagation of waves A and B taking opposite paths through a set of
n scatterers (taken from [3]). . . . . 76 6-1 a. Depiction of the GaAs/AlAs superlattice with ErAs nanoparticles.
The GaAs and AlAs layers (half-periods) have equal thicknesses of 3
nm. The samples vary in their length and ErAs interfacial density. b.
TEM of the in-plane direction of a GaAs/AlAs superlattice without
ErAs. c. TEM of the ErAs nanoparticle (shaded-region). d.
In-plane TEM of the GaAs/AlAs superlattice with 8% ErAs interfacial
density. e. Plan-view TEM of the GaAs/AlAs superlattice with 8%
6-2 TDTR data for the 16 period superlattice with 25% ErAs nanoparticle interfacial density. Data sets a and b were taken at 40K. Data sets c
and d were taken at 296K. . . . . 83
6-3 Thermal conductivity as a function of ErAs concentration, length, and temperature. a. k(T) of the ordered superlattice. b. k(T) of the
superlattice with 8% ErAs interface concentration. c. k(T) of the
su-perlattice with 25% ErAs interface concentration. d. k(L) for the three
sets of superlattices measured at 30K and 200K. At 200K the thermal
conductivity linearly scales then asymptotes, indicating the standard
ballistic to diffusive transition. This transition is also observed for the
ordered superlattice at 30K. However, in the disordered superlattices
at 30K, the thermal conductivity reaches a maximum value at 16
pe-riods then reduces to its bulk value. e. Thermal conductivity of d
normalized by its asymptotic value at the length of 300 periods. The
normalization serves to emphasize the thermal conductivity maximum
at short length scales for the superlattices with ErAs. f. k(L) of the
superlattices with 25% ErAs concentration for various temperatures.
As the temperature is increased beyond 50K, the anomalous peak in
the thermal conductivity is lost. The measurements for temperatures
above lOOK again demonstrates the ballistic to diffusive transition. . 85
6-5 Frequency dependence of the phonon a, transmission function and b, transmittance for superlattices with only roughness and with both
roughness and ErAs nanoparticles. The transmission functions and
transmittances were averaged over the Brillouin zone. c,
Transmis-sion function as a function of superlattice length for superlattices with
perfect interfaces, interfacial roughness, and both interfacial roughness
and nanoparticles for normal incident 1.65 THz phonons. d,
Compari-son of the inelastic mean free paths of a perfect superlattice at 30K and
300K with the localization lengths of the superlattices with interfacial
roughness and nanoparticles. e, Thermal conductivity accumulation
for perfect superlattices, superlattices with interfacial roughness, and
superlattices with interfacial roughness and nanoparticles at 30K. f,
Normalized thermal conductivity as a function of superlattice length
for superlattices with and without nanoparticles at 30K. The inset
de-picts the unnormalized values of thermal conductivity . . . . . 93 7-1 Diagram of an ErAs disordered GaAs/AlAs superlattice connected to
semi-infinite GaAs leads. An infinitesimal temperature difference dT
establishes a net phonon flux across the disordered region. . . . . 99 7-2 Configuration averaged dimensionless conductance, (g), versus phonon
frequency, w, for GaAs/AlAs superlattices with 23.8% ErAs interfacial
coverage. The blue line corresponds to the dimensionless conductance
of a 560 nm ordered GaAs/AlAs superlattice. 20 configurations were
used for the averaging procedures for L > 140 nm while 40 configu-rations were used for L = 56 nm. Inset: Rescaled axes to show the
relative difference in dimensionless conductance between the ordered
7-3 The phonon mean free path (blue circles), localization length (red squares), and Thouless length (yellow crosses) versus frequency for
normal incident phonons (k1 = 0). 200 configurations were computed
to obtain the expected values (g) and (ln g) in order to fit lmfp and ,
respectively. . . . . 102
7-4 Thermal conductivity versus length of GaAs/AlAs superlattices with
2.38% and 23.8% interfacial coverage for T=1K. The linear scaling of
thermal conductivity with increasing L implies all phonon modes are
ballistic. . . . . 103
7-5 Normalized thermal conductivity versus length of GaAs/AlAs super-lattices with 2.38% and 23.8% ErAs interfacial coverage for T = 10K
and T = 100K. Each curve is normalized by its respective value at
560 nm. Anderson localization leads to the local thermal conductivity
maximum at L = 112 nm for the 23.8% interfacial disordered
configu-rations at 100K . . . . 105 7-6 Thermal conductivity versus temperature of GaAs/AlAs superlattices
with 23.8% ErAs interfacial coverage for various lengths. The crossing
of the curves of k(T) corresponds to the onset of appreciable localized
phonon transport with increasing T. . . . . 106 7-7 Histogram of the transmission eigenvalues for 345 GHz phonons at
nor-mal incidence. The dimensionless conductance g(w) 1 comes entirely
from the largest transmission eigenvalue of Tma = 1. The rest of the
transmission eigenvalues are zero. The bimodal distribution
corrobo-rates Imry and Pendry's description of open and closed transmission
7-8 Histogram (markers) and respective fits (lines) of -In g of 1.93 THz phonons with normal incidence. The mean of the log-normal
distribu-tion corresponds to (L). The histograms were generated from 3 x 104,
1.5 x 104, and 1 x 104 configurations of 50 period (blue circles), 100 period (red crosses), and 150 period (green diamonds) superlattices,
respectively. . . . . 109 7-9 Computed probability distribution of the dimensionless conductance
for three different disordered superlattices. Circle correspond to
su-perlattices with 0% ErAs, interfacial roughness, L = 935 nm, W = 1.93
THz, and N = 2.1 x 104 configurations. Crosses correspond to
super-lattices with 2.38% ErAs, interfacial roughness, L = 1120 nm, w = 1.52
THz, and N = 1.5 x 104 configurations. Diamonds correspond to
super-lattices with 4.76% ErAs, interfacial roughness, L = 577 nm, w = 1.52
THz, and N = 3.2 x 104 configurations. . . . . 110 8-1 Localization length of normal incidence phonons for various
nanopar-ticle masses me, embedded in a GaAs/AlAs superlattice. . . . . 114
8-2 Localization length of normal incidence phonons for various nanopar-ticle masses mn, embedded in bulk GaAs. . . . . 116 8-3 Localization length of normal incidence phonons for me, = 100a.m.u.
nanoparticles embedded in GaAs/AlAs (blue) and bulk GaAs (red). . 117
8-4 Localization length of normal incidence phonons for various
nanopar-ticle masses mn, embedded in bulk GaAs. . . . . 118 8-5 Resonant frequency as a function of nanoparticle mass for bulk GaAs
(blue/solid) and GaAs/AlAs superlattices (red/dashed). . . . . 119 8-6 Magnitude of jomrn) for w = 1.3 THz as a function of length along the
8-7 Logarithm of the magnitude of hra) for w = 4.5 THz as a function of length along the device region. The units of the wavefunction are
arbitrary. . . . . 122
8-8 Illustration of the inelastic scatterer (triangle) coupled to the ballis-tic wire (channels 1 and 2). The wire is connected to a reservoir at
chemical potential p via two leads (taken from [4]). . . . . 124
8-9 Dimensionless conductance of F-point phonons as a function of phonon frequency. The purely elastic model (blue) has a length-independent
conductance corresponding to ballistic transport. The perfect
super-lattices with anharmonicity at 30K exhibits power law decay. The
strength of the decay increases with increasing frequency. . . . . 133 8-10 Anharmonic mean free path as a function of temperature and phonon
frequency. . . . . 134
8-11 Elastic mean free path (blue), localization length (red), and inelastic
mean free path (yellow) of normal incident phonons at 30K. . . . . . 135 8-12 F-point conductance of a 140 nm disordered superlattice with (dashed)
and without (solid) inelastic scattering. . . . . 136 8-13 Temperature dependent conductance of F-point localized phonons in a
140 nm disordered superlattice. The calculations at OK are obtained
from the purely coherent model. . . . . 137
8-14 Accumulated thermal conductivity of a 84 nm disordered superlattice
obtained by the elastic (dashed) and inelastic (solid) models at
temper-atures up to 30K. For T < 20K, inelastic scattering increases thermal
conductivity due to the delocalization of thermal phonons. For T=30K, the diffusive transport of thermal phonons with w > 2 THz reduces the
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1
Diffusion
Thermal transport is governed by the flow of energy carriers within a medium. In any
real system, these carriers interact with other carriers and imperfections, leading to
behavior that is approximated as a memoryless random walk. For a macroscopically
large number of carriers, the time evolution of an ensemble of Brownian carriers can be
represented by the density distribution, p(x, t). In one dimension, this distribution is
governed by the probability distribution, O(A), of a particle moving from x to x + A
from time t to t + r. Since a particle has an equal chance of moving left or right
(#(A) = q(-A)), the distribution obeys the continuity equation
- DV2p=O (1.1)
at
with diffusivity
D
= A2 (A)dA (1.2)defined for sufficiently large At [5]. For a 1-d system of N particles located at the origin at t = 0, the distribution reads
N
2p(x, t) = e 4Dt (1.3)
V4irDt yielding the mean-squared displacement
(x2) = 2Dt (1.4)
The diffusivity connects the length and time scales of diffusive transport.
Since temperature is defined by the local energy near equilbibrium, which is
pro-portional to the local carrier density, the diffusion equation also describes the
macro-scopic evolution of heat via the substitution p(x, t) -* T(x, t). Similarly, the thermal
diffusivity is identified as D = k-, where k and C are the thermal conductivity and
heat capacity, respectively. At steady-state, Fourier's law
q = -kVT (1.5)
identifies the thermal conductivity as the relationship between the heat flux, q, and
the temperature gradient. Since the macroscopic thermal conductivity is an intrinsic
quantity, the flux can be computed from a 1-d temperature gradient, AT, established
over an arbitrary length scale, L. The 1-d steady state solution reads
L
T(x = 0) - T(x = L) = q- (1.6)
k
Since the temperature profile is linear, Ohm's law, R = -, can be identified through
conductivity, the thermal resistance
L
R = k A (1.7)
grows linearly with L. If k were extrinsic, (1.5) would depend greatly on the scale over which the temperature gradient is established.
1.2
Microscopic breakdown of diffusion
The definition of diffusivity relies upon the assumption that the time scale, At, is large enough that the particle motion is uncorrelated between time t and t + At. For sufficiently small At, the carrier motion is correlated on distances on the order of the carrier's mean free path. As a result, the diffusivity cannot be properly defined for carrier transport shorter than the mean free path. At this scale, scattering processes are discrete events in space and time. This discreteness manifests as fluctuations in the carrier density and, hence, temperature. At the macroscale, these temperature fluctuations are small compared to the linear temperature profile. At the nanoscale, however, the temperature fluctuations emerge as a series of discrete jumps (Figure
1-1). The discrete jumps in temperature correspond to the points in space and time
where carriers scatter. These discrete events are coarse-grained over large distances and times to provide the continuum picture of macroscale heat transport.
1.3
Phonon transport regimes
In semiconductors and insulators, the primary energy carriers are phonons, the quanta of atomic vibrations. Since phonons are the solutions to the wave equation of a crystal lattice, the diffusion of heat derives from the multiple scattering of waves. The interaction of a phonon with other phonons, electrons, and structural imperfections
Lengthi
Figure 1-1: Coarse-grained temperature profile and (zoomed) transient temperature fluctuations at the nanoscale.
contributes to scattering and dictates the length scale of the phonon mean free path.
At scales smaller than the mean free path, phonons travel unobstructed, similarly
to classical ballistic particles; consequently, this scale corresponds to the ballistic
transport regime. Ballistic waves propagate perfectly, transmitting 100 percent of
their energy. Since a ballistic phonon transmits perfectly for L < 1"mfp, the thermal
resistance, -;, is independent of L, implying k oc L!. We no longer have an intrinsic
thermal conductivity (k(L) =, k). In the ballistic regime, the thermal conductivity
depends linearly on system size.
As the transport scale exceeds the phonon mean free path, the wave inevitably
scatters, randomizing its direction (elastic or inelastic scattering) and energy (inelastic
scattering). Unlike classical Brownian particles, the random motion of waves may
interfere. Interference may extend the length over which wave transport is correlated.
When scattering is inelastic or elastically weak, the randomness of the scattering
events is a sufficient condition to ignore interference. We can therefore assume that
diffusive phonon transport can be treated analogously to Brownian motion, which is
conventionally referred to as the phonon gas model.
The thermal conductivity of the phonon gas model is characterized by a phonon's
frequency, w, group velocity, vg, and scattering rate, r. Since the scattering rate is
frequency-dependent, thermal transport at a given length scale is usually a
combi-nation of ballistic and diffusive phonons. Because of their relatively higher group
velocities and weak scattering rates, low frequency phonons tend to be ballistic.
Un-fortunately, at room temperature, low frequency phonons do not significantly
con-tribute to thermal transport, due to their low energy density. To observe the k oc L
dependence of ballistic transport, measurements must be performed at short length
and/or temperature scales. In this limit, experimentalists have since demonstrated
the breakdown of diffusive thermal transport [6-8]. The linear behavior of thermal
conductivity was first demonstrated in graphite fibers [9] then corroborated by studies
of multi-walled carbon nanotubes [10].
1.4
Phonon scattering
In order to characterize thermal transport at the nanoscale, an accurate treatment
of interface and boundary scattering is necessary. Casimir initiated the study of
phonon boundary scattering by considering a thin cylinder without intrinsic scattering
processes. The boundaries were modeled as perfect blackbodies that emit phonons at
the locally defined equilibrium distribution. The phonon mean free path was found
to be equal to the diameter of the cylinder [11]. The same geometry was then studied
more generally by Ziman using the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) [12]. Ziman
assumed diffuse boundaries, which corresponds to a phonon whose momentum, after
scattering off the boundary, is uniformly distributed and independent of the initial
yielded identical results to Casimir's model. The work was again generalized in the
BTE framework by allowing for partially specular and partially diffuse boundaries
[12].
The study of interfacial thermal resistance shares many similarities to boundary
scattering. Both theories require scattering that is partially specular and partially
diffuse. The specular model, known as the acoustic mismatch model (AMM), assumes
that reflection arises from the interfacial mismatch of the acoustic impedance, Z = pc,
where p and c are the density and speed of sound, respectively [13]. On the other
end of the spectrum, the diffuse mismatch model (DMM) assumes that a phonon
can elastically scatter into any momentum state. By allowing for the randomization
of the outgoing momentum, the DMM interfacial resistance is determined by the
density of states mismatch of the two materials [14]. Since the DMM allows for
the scattering into any channel of the same frequency, it represents the lower bound
for interfacial thermal resistance. Similarly, the constraint to purely forward and
backward scattering in the AMM constitutes an upper bound for interfacial thermal
resistance.
Unfortunately, the reality lies somewhere in between. If interfaces are perfect, the AMM would yield good agreement. If the interface has roughness whose power
spectrum is identical to white noise, the DMM is more applicable. The problem
is further compounded if the spacing between interfaces becomes on the order of
the phonon wavelength. For sufficiently specular interfaces with phonon wavelength
spacing, phonons can perfectly transmit (reflect) due to constructive (destructive)
interference. This interference effect is the thermal analogy of Bragg reflectance in
optics. In the regime where interference is important, the total interfacial resistance
is not proportional to the number of interfaces. A phonon gas model that treats each
interface to be independent of the others would overestimate the scattering rate of
phonons cause departures from the traditional treatment of phonons as point particles
[15].
1.5
Coherence
As we argued in the previous section, introducing features with sizes on the order
of the phonon wavelength can utilize the wave nature of heat. The characterization
of interference effects requires the introduction of the coherence length, the length
scale over which the phase of a wave is correlated. The coherence length needs to
be much larger than the distance required for a phonon wavepacket to interfere with
the nanostructures [16]. Since the phonon-phonon interaction is the dominant
in-elastic/dephasing mechanism, the coherence length is synonymous to the anharmonic
mean free path.
If the nanostructuring leads to a discrete translationally symmetric system, phonon
group velocities are heavily modified [17], leading to band gaps along high
symme-try directions [18]. These superperiodic systems, referred to as superlattices, have
exhibited the wave-like nature of thermal transport via thermal conductivity
mea-surements of superlattices with varying period lengths [19]. By holding the period
length constant, while varying the number of periods, the ballistic nature of phonon
transport was further corroborated in GaAs/AlAs superlattices [20].
The interference effects in phonon transport can be taken one step further by
introducing disorder to a material. In the long wavelength limit, phonon-impurity
scattering scales as w4, analogous to Rayleigh scattering of light off point-like
ob-jects [21]. As the wavelength decreases, the local structure can be probed by the
wave, leading to Mie resonance scattering for L oc A [22]. Introducing randomly
placed wavelength-sized nanostructures can dramatically reduce thermal
In a real system, a wave multiply scatters off impurities. Multiple scattering
effects are higher-order corrections to the elastic scattering rate [23]. In the dilute or
weakly disordered limit, the mutual interference of scatterers does not significantly
alter thermal conductivity predictions. For extremely large mass mismatch in the
non-dilute limit, multiple scattering must be included [24].
1.6
Localization
To see how multiple scattering can influence thermal transport, consider an extreme
example where all scatterers within a box of volume L3 are correlated by mutual interference. By increasing the size of the box to volume (L + 6L)3, the new scatterers
interfere with the original scatterers. The correlation of the new scatterers with the
original scatterers introduces a scattering rate, T(w, L), that is dependent on the size
of the box. Since k depends on the scattering rate, multiple scattering can produce a
size-dependent k(L) similarly to how ballistic thermal transport introduces k(L). The
anomalous k(L) behavior is the onset of Anderson localization, the spatial trapping
of a wave due to the presence of sufficiently strong disorder [25].
Anderson localization corresponds to an entirely new regime of transport. In this
regime, the resistance exponentially grows as
R oc eL/ (1.8)
where the localization length, , depends on the microscopic degrees of freedom, such as the disorder strength and phonon frequency. The localization length describes the
extent to which a wave is confined. At low levels of disorder, localization is weak or
nonexistent, allowing for the standard plane wave description, # oc eikx. As the level
of disorder grows, interference causes the wave to have an exponentially decaying
The observation of Anderson localization has been historically challenging. In
electronic systems, the electron-phonon interaction introduces a dephasing
mecha-nism that prevents localization. In photonic materials, an absorbing dielectric
in-troduces an additional form of exponential attenuation, which is indistinguishable
from Anderson localization in electromagnetic transmission measurements. In
ther-mal systems, heat transfer is a broadband process that depends on contributions from
ballistic, diffusive, and localized phonons. Isolating the influences of localized phonons
in thermal transport is extremely nontrivial. While low frequency acoustic phonons
have been observed to localize, their energy density is too low to contribute to thermal
transport. High frequency phonons, which generally have shorter localization lengths,
also contribute weakly to thermal transport, due to their large scattering rates. In
other words, the difference between the transport of a strongly scattering diffusive
wave and a localized wave is negligible. Intermediate frequency (~1-3 THz) thermal
phonons are thus the best candidates for observing localized phonon transport, due
to their preferable combination of sufficiently high energy density and sufficiently low
scattering rates.
1.7
Theoretical tools
The discussion, so far, has led us to a good set of qualitative heuristics for
observ-ing Anderson localization. However, in order to make predictions in real candidate
materials, we need to have a formalism and a set of computational tools that can
compute accurate phonon dispersions and scattering rates. Density functional
the-ory [26,27], an approximation of the many-body Schr6dinger equation, has provided
the most practical route for obtaining interatomic force constants that govern atomic
motion [28,29]. Perturbation theory can then be used to determine the anharmonic
mass mismatch [30] and second-order force constant mismatch [31].
Despite their accuracy, first principles methods cannot handle true disorder due
to their use of periodic boundary conditions. Effectively capturing the physics of
disordered transport remains a challenging numerical issue. Quantum mechanical
solvers are limited to domains on the order of 100 atoms, yielding - N100 possible
atomic configurations. In principle, each configuration must be calculated, weighted
by its Boltzmann factor, and averaged over. Significant approximations are necessary
to mitigate this exponential complexity. This combinatorial problem is alleviated via
mean field theories, which views disorder as a change to the average properties of a
material. The simplest of such methods takes the weighted average of the masses, mi, and force constants, 0j, of the disordered material. Given the occupation probability,
pi, of atom type i, the Virtual Crystal Approximation (VCA) [32] generates the mean
field
(M) = pimi (1.9a)
(0) = Pi (1.9b)
Elastic scattering rates are then obtained by considering the mass difference between
atom type i and the mass of the virtual crystal. This general procedure has
demon-strated great success in predicting the thermal conductivity of SiGei_2 alloys [33].
For sufficiently weak or dilute disorder, mean-field theories capture the essential
physics since multiple scattering effects are negligible. As the disorder strength grows, larger clusters of impurities must be considered for accurate evaluation of elastic
scattering rates. At the most extreme limit, where strong Anderson localization
occurs, the simulation box must be larger than the localization length. Real-space
Green's function methods [24] must be adopted to handle the spatial extent of multiple
expense of neglecting inelastic scattering. As long as the simulation box is smaller
than the anharmonic mean free path, purely elastic simulations are justified. In
this sub-micron regime, real-space methods have captured the ballistic to diffusive
transition in phonon transport [34]. The aim of this Thesis is to extend the
real-space method to larger, more disordered systems in order to quantify the effects of
phonon localization upon thermal transport.
1.8
Device applications
Semiconductor devices are exponentially decreasing in size due to the growing
preci-sion of fabrication methods. At the present time, 10 nm features can be fabricated.
This length scale is on the order of the wavelength of most thermal phonons [35].
Consequently, we are at technological tipping point where nanoscale transport
phe-nomena is leading to emerging thermal management problems and its corresponding
solutions. A description of thermal transport that supercedes ordinary diffusion is
required to engineer transistors to effectively transport heat away from the gates of
CMOS devices. Nanoscale fabrication may allow for selectively conducting regions,
potentially mitigating the hot spots that limit the capability of semiconductor devices.
While nanoscale fabrication can provide an avenue for thermally conducting
de-vices, thermal insulators can also be effectively engineered by understanding phonon
scattering and scaling phenomena. In materials that are thermally insulating and
electrically conductive, waste heat can be effectively recovered through the Seebeck
effect. More precisely, a temperature gradient within a thermoelectric material
gen-erates a proportional voltage gradient. The thermoelectric figure of merit
ZT
=
S2T
(1.10)k
Seebeck coefficient, electric conductivity, and temperature, respectively [36-39]. In the limit of ZT -+ 00, thermoelectric materials have efficiencies equivalent to the Carnot cycle. As previously mentioned, the thermal conductivity of a semiconductor is dominated by its lattice dynamics; consequently, introducing disorder that dis-rupts phonon transport may greatly reduce thermal conductivity while preserving electrical conductivity. A mature description of phonon-impurity scattering provides intuition for the optimization of thermoelectric material fabrication. Generally, the introduction of wavelength-sized impurities effectively scatters phonons. This concept was most effectively realized in disordered PbTe that incorporated dopants, nanos-tructures, and grain boundaries to suppress phonon transport over a wide range of frequencies [40].
Tailoring a material to have a specific thermal conductivity is the motivational foundation of thermal engineering. The introduction of disorder provides the choice of mass difference, nanoparticle size, and nanoparticle concentration to the engineer. In the macroscopic limit, these degrees of freedom adjust the thermal conductivity downward from its intrinsic value. If additional control is required, fabricating a device at the nanoscale introduces the k(L) dependence stemming from ballistic and localized phonon contributions. Specifying the size of the nanoscale device allows for an additional way in which to control the thermal conductivity of a desired material.
1.9
Organization of thesis
In this thesis, we investigate the impact of the Anderson localization of thermal phonons in nanoscale thermal transport. In Chapter 2, we introduce the standard formalism describing atomic motion. By including terms up to second-order, the phonon picture is exact. Perturbations due to third-order terms introduces finite-lifetimes to the phonon modes that are encoded by the relaxation time, T.
Incor-porating the phonon dynamics and relaxation times into the Boltzmann transport
equation (BTE), the thermal conductivity tensor, k,, can be computed and
com-pared to experiment.
Chapter 3 illustrates the historical paths that lead to Anderson localization. P.W.
Anderson's research concerned the study of random tight-binding models that yielded
insulating behavior for sufficiently strong disorder. Despite being first, his work
re-mained in obscurity for decades, due to its particularly rigorous mathematical
argu-ments. Landauer, on the other hand, discovered localization more intuitively
consid-ering the transport of waves subject to reflecting barriers. Landauer showed that the
resistance of this system exponentially increased with the number of reflecting
barri-ers. The theory was corrected by Anderson et. al to exhibit proper scaling laws in the
limit of low resistance (Ohm's law). P.A. Lee then unified the originally dissimilar
concepts of transmission and conductance, easing the computational study of
Ander-son localization in electronic systems. The formalism prescribed by P.A. Lee was then
generalized to allow for arbitrary boundary conditions, opening the avenue to
study-ing nanoscale phonon transport usstudy-ing Nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF) [41].
The length dependence of Anderson localized phonons is discussed, culminating in
the conclusion that a decreasing thermal conductivity with increasing length can only
be explained by localization.
Chapter 4 provides the implementation details of NEGF using force constants
obtained from density functional theory. The structure of the mixed-basis dynamical
matrix is presented to show how the sparse representation can speed up
computa-tion. The Green's function matrix elements are obtained recursively from repeated
inversions of small matrices. The full solution of the matrix elements responsible for
conductance and wavefunction computation are presented.
Chapter 5 presents the historical context for why localization should be significant
waves. This critical disorder was originally studied in electronics. S. John drew an
analogy between the electronic and phononic problem. He discovered a critical phonon
frequency, w, distinguishing high-frequency localized phonons from low-frequency
diffusive phonons. The band gap formation in superlattices is demonstrated to be
crucial to phonon localization, motivating our experimental investigation of disordered
superlattices.
Chapters 6 + 7 present the experimental and numerical study of Anderson
lo-calized thermal transport. At low temperatures and short lengths, the thermal
con-ductivity increases linearly with increasing L, signifying ballistic transport. At
in-termediate length scales, the thermal conductivity begins to decrease with increasing
L due to the exponential suppression of Anderson localized phonons. This effect
disappears at high temperatures due to the loss of coherence. NEGF simulations
cor-roborate the experimental findings and demonstrate the same thermal conductivity
maximum as a function of length. The localization length as a function of phonon
fre-quency is obtained, identifying significant localization of phonons beyond -1.5 THz.
Temperatures above -20K are required to significantly populate Anderson localized
phonons. Since conductance is configuration dependent, the probability distribution
of the conductance is computed. The form of the probability distribution
distin-guishes the ballistic, diffusive, and localized regimes. The universality of coherent
phonon transport is also observed in our numerical studies.
Chapter 8 extends the numerical investigation to different nanoparticle masses.
The localization length monotonically decreases for masses heavier than Ga. For
masses between values of Al and Ga in GaAs/AlAs superlattices, the localization
length is non-monotonic since the disorder is small for both m = mA, and m =
mGa-Using the Green's function matrix elements coupling the ends of the superlattice to
the intermediate regions, we are able to compute the wavefunction of the phonons
rapidly fluctuate with an overall power-law decay. In the localized regime, the
wave-function exponentially decays from the boundary, similarly to an evanescent wave.
Since the ballistic transport formalism is only valid when the inelastic mean free
path is larger than the system size, a method to perturbatively introduce anharmonic
scattering is implemented by attaching absorbers at every atom. By enforcing
zero-current flow into the absorbers, the conductance can be decomposed into coherent and
incoherent contributions. For sufficiently strong localization, anharmonic scattering
actually increases conductance since the phonon delocalizes via dephasing. Finally, the conclusion touches upon the future of Anderson localization thermal transport.
In low dimensional systems waves localize for any level of disorder. Consequently, the
adsorption of molecular degrees of freedom on truly 2-d materials can greatly alter
Chapter 2
Theory of thermal conductivity
A proper description of thermal transport in semiconductors requires an accurate
treatment of atomic motion. Starting from the interatomic force constants obtained
from quantum mechanical simulations, non-interacting phonon dynamics are
ob-tained. By combining the non-interacting phonon dispersion and the phonon lifetimes
stemming from interactions, the phonon contribution to thermal conductivity can be
calculated using the Boltzmann transport equation.
2.1
Phonon dynamics
The motion of atoms is governed by their interatomic potential, V. Denoting the
atomic displacement as xic = ric - ro,s, where ria and ro,ic, is ath component of the
atomic coordinate and equilibrium coordinate of atom i, respectively, the interatomic
potential can be expanded as [42],
=V 1 E 2+ 1 3V g xx8Xk-O(X4)
ia xia 2
iaoxiOa8
3! iko-y(xiaI9xjp,3XkFor a stable atomic system, the first-order term
(9V
Xia = 0 (2.2)
implies that each atom sits in an approximate quadratic potential well. For notational
brevity, we introduce the second-order term,
Oap(ij) = (2.3)
49xiaaX
j
3and third-order term,
93V
$afy(i,
j,
k) = XiXjOXk(2.4)The interatomic potential is simplified to,
V
= V + $(i, j)xiax, + aZ
,y(i, j, k)XiaXj,3Xky + O(x') (2.5)ijc43 ijkafy
The equations of motion can be obtained from Newton's first law,
F _ =9 -(z, 3 Xsp = mi ia (2.6)
Since the systems under consideration are symmetric under the transformation ri
-ri + R, where R corresponds to a lattice vector, it is convenient to replace the atomic
index i with the tuple (j, b), where
j
and b specify the position of the unit cell and basis atom, respectively. Invoking Bloch's theorem allows for the expansion of thedisplacement in Fourier coefficients,
X (i, b) 1 Z Xa(k, b)ei(k-Ri-wt) (2.7)
Is t'a k
yields the dynamical matrix,
Da3 (b,
b';
k) = 1 a,(ib, jb')eik.Ri (2.8)The equations of motion is written as the eigenvalue equation
w2
X,(k, b)
=
ED,, (b, b'; k)Xa(k, b')
(2.9)
b'I3
where w corresponds to the phonon frequency.
When the interatomic potential is limited to second-order, the dynamical matrix is Hermitian. Hermitian matrices have real eigenvalues, implying real phonon fre-quencies. Since phonon eigenfunctions have the time dependence of the form eiwt, a complex-valued eigenfrequency would correspond to a mode with a lifetime equal to the inverse of the imaginary part of the eigenvalue. The introduction of cubic force constants causes the phonon frequencies to become complex. The finite-lifetimes in-troduced by higher order terms come from the coupling between the eigenmodes of the second-order solution. The coupling of the eigenmodes is encoded in the three-body term V3, which is written in the Fourier space as
1 1
E JCG,k+k'+k"E ),(kb, k'b', k"b"/)Xc(k, b)X,3(k', b')X,(k"9, b"/)
kb,k'b ,k"b" aOy
(2.10) where
cay (kb, k'b',
k"b")
=3
'(Ob, jb',
kb")e(k'Ri+k"-Rk)(2.11)
jk
Due to the 6
G,k+k'+k" term, the three modes that are coupled obey the conservation
of crystal momentum modulo G, the reciprocal lattice vector. When G = 0, the net
momentum of the outgoing state is equivalent to the net momentum of the incoming state. This scattering process is known as normal anharmonic scattering. While these
terms do not contribute to thermal resistance, i.e. momentum relaxation, they still influence the lifetime of a phonon mode, i.e. energy relaxation. When G
$
0, theincoming and outgoing momentum are not preserved, resulting in momentum and
energy relaxation, which is conventionally known as Umklapp scattering [43].
2.2
Anharmonic scattering rates
The construction of a many-body wavefunction can be constructed from the tensor
product of single-particle states. For a bosonic system with k modes, the occupation
number basis is represented by,
|no7, nli,. . , nk) =
,O)no
D 4,1)"n 9 ... 10k)nk (2.12)where
(2.13)
10j) j := 100) (9 10 -),
The creation and annihilation operators, a and aj act on the occupation number
basis in the following manner,
aIno, nil... nj,..., n) = gnij+ 1|no, ni, ... nj
+
1, ..., nk) aj Ino, ni , ... nj,., nk) = ,~o i .y-1 .. nk)(2.14)
(2.15)
For brevity, the subscript A encodes the wavevector k and polarization v with -A
corresponding to -k. The three-body potential is now
V3 = i
3
E 6G,k~k' k"Vf(A I A',I A/')(at~ - a-,) (at, - a-,\) (a,, - a-A,,) (2.16)where
V(A, A',A") = h )2(kb, k'b', k"b") be/3b/ebl/ (2.17)
8NOwXWAW, Ombmy mbM
and eAb is the ath component of basis-atom b of eigenmode A. Using V3 as a
perturba-tion to the single-particle states obtained from the dynamical matrix, the transiperturba-tion
rate from state
Ii)
to
if)
is
27rI fV
Pi-f
=V
33(f 1i)I26(Ef - E,) (2.18)Due to the additional constraint of energy conservation imposed by Fermi's Golden Rule [44, 45], three-body terms of the forms aAa_yaa and atatalu have zero transition rate. Terms with non-zero transition rate are of the forms atat,a-Af and ataA'aA which couples the state InA, n.\, ny) to |nA + 1, n'
+
1, nAl - 1) and Inr +1, nA' - 1, nr - 1), respectively.
2.3
Boltzmann transport equation
At equilibrium, the occupation number for a phonon mode A obeys the Bose-Einstein distribution
= (e - 1 (2.19)
The ath component of heat flux carried by phonons is
J = :nAhAVA' (2.20)
where vA = is the phonon group velocity. At equilibrium, the integral of (2.20) is
zero, since the integrand is an odd function of k. More explicitly, nA and WA are even functions of k while VA is an odd function of k. Since the heat flux is related to the
temperature gradient through
=
OT
JT =(2.21)
/3'
where kafi corresponds to a component of the thermal conductivity tensor, the
sym-metry of the integrand is broken by a non-equilibrium distribution. In other words, a temperature gradient induces a nonzero value of nA
-The phonon distribution nA is governed by a conservation law that balances the
convection of the distribution with all possible phonon scattering processes,
On,\ On,\
vax - 17T- = -- (2.22)
V T at scattering
This conservation law is known as the phonon-Boltzmann transport equation (BTE).
In order to make the BTE tractable, two approximations are made. The first
approxi-mation assumes that the distribution is near equilibrium, allowing for the replacement
~, (2.23)
OT &T
The second approximation assumes that if a given nA is out of equilibrium, it is
interacting with in-equilibrium hy and hy, populations. This approximation, known
as the single-mode relaxation time approximation [12], allows for the scattering kernel
to be simplified to,
-- =
-(2.24)
at scattering TA
where
1I =
3
A,)1/\T(\ 2 [2(At,\ - f1)p)(WA + WA'- WA") + (1 + fA' + fiA")S(WA - WV- WA")]
TA A' A"
The thermal conductivity tensor can then be expressed in closed form as,
Chapter 3
Disordered coherent transport
The cornerstone of Anderson localized transport is the exponential suppression of
con-ductance with increasing system size. The exponential scaling of transport in highly
disordered systems was approached from completely different places by Anderson and
Landauer. Landauer discovered the exponential scaling by investigating the resistance
of a system of randomly distributed reflecting walls. Anderson found similar
expo-nential laws in the tight-binding Schr6dinger equation governing the time-evolution of
electrons in a lattice of quantum wells with randomly varying well depths. Landauer's
scattering picture and Anderson's matrix models were unified through Green's
func-tion studies that connected the nofunc-tion of transmission and conductance. The Green's
function formalism was then modernized, allowing for compact notation that could
be applied to general wave transport.
3.1
Resistance of reflecting boundaries
By the 1950's, the relationship between diffusive transport and the Boltzmann
trans-port equation was widely accepted. Landauer, in an attempt to self-consistently
solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for electrons in the presence of diffuse and
con-ductivity [46]. Consider a current flowing perpendicular to a set of specular reflecting
walls with a reflection coefficient, r(O), where 6 is the angle between the incident
electron direction and the direction normal to the wall. The reflection coefficient is
related to the reflection probability, R, of a single interface as
Irn
2= R. For a given
density of walls per unit length, R, Landauer finds the conductivity
e2
k
2 1 - r(9)- = F
dQ
cos(0) (3.1)87r3Rh I
r(9)
demonstrating resistivity proportional to R. The assumption that resistance linearly
scales with the number of scattering elements naively assumes that the resistance of
each individual scatterer is additive. This ultimately relies on interference between
subsequent scatterers to be negligible,
R Ir
+
r212 = ri l2 + 1r212 + rir* i12 + 1r2 2 (3.2)In the presence of interference, the relationship between the reflection coefficient of
two individual obstacles with reflection coefficients r, and r2 obeys
1 1 + rir2 + 2(rir2)1/2 cos() (3.3)
1- r (1 - r1)(1 - r2)
r r1 + r2+ 2(rir2)1/2cos(O) (3.4)
1-r (1-r 1 )(1 - r2)
where 0 is the phase accumulated by the wave between the first and second obstacle
[47].
The argument generalizes by evaluating the total reflection coefficient of a random
obstacle placed after n - 1 obstacles all with identical reflection coefficients r. At each
step, the phase associated with the obstacle placement is averaged, corresponding to
relation 1 1 +rrn_ 1 + (3.5) 1 -pr, (1 -r)(1 - r 1)(35 r. r + rn-1 (3.6) 1 - -n (1 - r')(1 - (3.6)
yielding the averaged resistance
P-(R )dsre 1+rn (3.7
p 1 - R 2 1 - r 2 3.
Landauer has ultimately demonstrated that the resistance exponentially grows with
the number of obstacles! In the limit of r << 1, the series expansion
I (I+r)" 1 1 + r2.. 1 1 .. 1)
S - r -
((I1+
r)(1 + r + r22 -(1+ 2r + . ."- nr(3.8)
recovers classical Ohm's law.
3.2
Scaling theory of localization
A decade later, Anderson, Thouless, Abrahams, and Fisher found subtle
inconsisten-cies in Landauer's argument [48]. Consider the averaged conductance, (g), obtained
from combining two average resistances, (p1) and (P2). If one defines the total aver-aged resistance, (p), from the averaver-aged conductance as
1
(p) = = (PI) - (P2)1 (3.9)
the scaling law (additivity) for resistance cannot be recovered. This inconsistency
stems from the consequence of disorder averaging. If a given disordered system
distribution, then the corresponding support of the probability distribution for the
resistance spans orders of magnitudes. The expected value of the resistance is
dom-inated by the configurations with the shortest localization lengths. Oppositely, the
expected value of the conductance is dominated by the systems with the largest
lo-calization lengths; consequently, the mean resistance and mean conductance are no
longer inversely related. The four authors corrected the theory, yielding the additive
law
(ln(1 + p)) = (ln(1 + pi)) + (ln(1 + P2)) (3.10)
which reduces to Ohm's law for small dimensionless resistance. By identifying the
inverse localization length as the statistically definable object, the typical resistance
is inversely related to the typical conductance through
S(p)typ e " -'- ) = e
+ ) (3.11)
(g) typ
The additive properties of cxL implies the resistance scaling law
p aeL" - 1 (3.12)
and conductance scaling law
g g e (3.13)
where ga is the conductance at some arbitrary scale.
Equations (3.13) and (3.14) are prototypical examples of single parameter scaling
[1]. Single parameter scaling attempts to describe how conductance scales with system
size. Given a system of size L, increasing the size by 6L should obey the single
parameter scaling law
or its differential form a In g(L) = IL
(g(L))
(3.15)Solving for the beta-function of (3.16) for (3.14),
0 In
g (L)
= ln(-) = O(g(L)) (3.16)alnL
gaSince g < ga, the negative sign of the beta function corresponds to a system that
becomes more insulating as it grows in size. Conversely, a beta function with a positive
sign corresponds to a system that becomes more conducting as it scales to larger size.
Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello, and Ramakrishnan used the asymptotic insulating
and conducting regimes of systems in d = 1, 2, 3 dimensions to qualitatively sketch
the beta-function. In the conducting limit, the conductance scales as
G(L) = uLd-2 (3.17)
yielding the beta-function
lim /3d(g) = d - 2 (3.18)
g-+oo
In d = 1, 2 dimensions, the beta-function is always negative; consequently,
Ander-son localization is present for any amount of disorder. In d = 3 dimensions, the
beta-function must change sign, implying a critical disorder separating the Anderson
localized phase from the metallic regime. The beta function for d = 1, 2, 3 and critical
conductance g, is visualized in Figure 3-1
3.3
Random matrix models
Until this point, the study of Anderson localization has been discussed abstractly in
P(g)
s In (g/g C)
d 3
9 d = 2 g
d = 1
Figure 3-1: 3(g) for d = 1, 2,3 dimensions. Taken from [1].
of randomly placed obstacles. P.W. Anderson, however, discovered localization in a
far less intuitive manner by studying the Schrddinger equation subject to a random
potential [25]. By expanding the wavefunction in terms of local orbitals 0" centered
at positions Ri
(r) = c() 0 (r - R,) (3.19)
n2 Z
the tight binding Hamiltonian takes the form
H
= n n)j
(+V'#
n$)(
I+
h.c.
(3.20)
x n nm 1
Anderson originally considered a n = 1 orbital problem with constant nearest
neigh-bor coupling V on a cubic lattice. The disorder is encoded by a uniform distribution
on energy levels Ec between -W/2 and W/2. The solution of the Anderson model
Hamiltonian,