Landscape genetics and gene flow in the banana
pathogenic fungus
Mycosphaerella fijiensis
Fabien Halkett, Adrien Rieux, Sonia Cogneau-Perineau, Luc de Lapeyre de Bellaire, Virginie Ravigné, Marie-Françoise
Zapater, Luc Pignolet and Jean Carlier
CIRAD, Montpellier CARBAP, Cameroon
Mutation
Recombinaison
Genetic drift Gene flow
Selection Reproductive strategy
Dispersal processes Population size Demographic fluctuations Plant resistances Fungicides Adaptation of pathogen populations
Efficient and durable strategies of disease management should be define in time and space taking into account epidemiology
and evolutionary potential of pathogens
Objective: To infer gene flow and dispersal processes in M. fijiensis
Mycosphaerella fijiensis
• panmictic populations
• Relative demographic stability
Recent epidemic 3 dispersal modes:
- Infected plant material - Ascospores (sexual cycle) - Conidia (asexual cycle)
Population structure at different geographic scales ofMycosphaerella fijiensis
plant/plantation locality country continent Globe
Fst= 0.28 -0.52 Fst= 0.19 Fst= 0.30 Fst= 0.11 Fst= 0.13 Fst= 0.0 COSTA RICA CAMEROON
High level of genetic diversity Panmixia
Founder effects
Populations structure and dispersal modes of
Mycosphaerella fijiensis
Population
analysis in
M. fijiensis
within a production
area (few 100 km long)
Cameroon Transect of 270 km 10 sites (26.8 km) 287 isolats / 15 microsatellites markers Costa Rica Transect of 297 km 15 sites (26.4 km) 347 isolats / 7 PCR-RFLP and 9 microsatellites markers
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
within a
production area (few 100 km long)
0.012 to 0.17 0.014 to 0.26 Differentiation between populations, Fst < 0.04 NS < 0.02, NS linkage disequilibrium, rD ~ 1.00 ~ 1.00 Genotypic diverstiy, DG 0.41 to 0.59 0.31 to 0.46 Gene diversity, HE Costa Rica Cameroon
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
within a
production area (few 100 km long)
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
1-Lim 2-Agr 3-Yo 4-BaK 5-Fo 6-KoB 7-Man 8-Ey 9-AMb 10-AMa
Differentiation between populations:
Costa Rica: Fst = 0.012 to 0.17 (Costa Rica) Cameroon: Fst = 0.014 to 0.26 (Cameroon) Clustering analysis
Costa Rica: no structure detected Cameroon: number of cluster K = 3
Transect of 270 km
Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
within a
production area (few 100 km long)
1
4 π D σ ²
b ≈
dm = mean dispersal distance of ascospores dm << 300 km 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 FST/(1 - FST) Log distance (km) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 FST/(1 - FST) Log distance (km)
Cameroon Costa Rica
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
within a
production area (few 100 km long)
• IBD Analysis on a distance too long in regard
with dispersal capacity of the pathogen
• No realistic genetic model
- Effects of barriers10 Km
• 105 sites – 6 isolats / sites (bananas)
• Assignation Bayesian method
GENELAND (Guillot et al., 2005): spatial method
Population analysis at a local scale ( few 10 km long)
1- Landscape genetics analysis
-To deliminate pathogen populations -To detect barriers to gene flow
10 Km
Population analysis at a local scale ( few 10 km long)
Transect of 33km
2- Isolation by distance analysis -To assess dispersal pattern within continuous population
• 90 sites separated by 1Km, 250 m or 50 m • 2 to 6 isolat / sites
Isolation by distance analysis in continuous population (Rousset, 2000)
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
at a local scale
( few 10 km long)
10 km ● Number of population K=2 ● FST = 0,111 between Populations 1 and 2 ● Discontinuity observed in 2001 FST = 0,14 between samples 5-Fo and 6-KoB fromprevious analysis
1 2
5-Fo 6- KoB
Population analysis in
M. fijiensis
at a local scale
( few 10 km long)
●No physical barrier between pop 1 and 2
●Effects of potential physical barriers not detected
10 Km
Carte des probabilités d’appartenance à la population n° 1
L A T I T U D E LONGITUDE F O R E T M O N T A G N E 1 2 Lanscape genetic analysis
Population analysis at a local scale ( few 10 km long)
-0.5 -0.3 -0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Ln(d) en degrés F /( 1 -F )Isolation by distance analysis
- On the transect of 33km: No significant isolation by distance - On the whole sample:
No significant isolation by distance in Pop 1 Significant isolation by distance in Pop 1 + 2
10 km
1 2
Hypothetical population structure in
M. fijiensis
No IBD on short transects IBD on Long transects 2D sampling in CameroonConclusions
• IBD model might be not adapted to described dispersal processes and gene flow in M. fijiensis
• Local population structure of M. fijiensis might be a mosaic of distinct patches initiated from single long-distance dispersal evens
Simulation-based approach to test effects on IBD of high densities and demographic scenarios
Landscape genetic study on larger geographical scale Development of new inference models
Description of dispersal processes:
- Stochastic versus gradual dispersal in space - Man mediated versus natural dispersal