Electrochemical affinity sensors for biomedical, food and environmental applications
Texte intégral
(2) N° d’ordre: 126-2015. Année 2015. THESE DE L’UNIVERSITE DE LYON Délivrée par L’UNIVERSITE CLAUDE BERNARD LYON 1 ECOLE DOCTORALE: Chimie Spécialité: Chimie DIPLOME DE DOCTORANT (Arrêté du 7 août 2006) Soutenue publiquement le 14 Septembre 2015 Par Mlle FLOREA Anca Stefana TITRE:. Electrochemical affinity sensors for biomedical, food and environmental applications JURY: Rapporteurs: Prof. Dr. Camelia Bala Dr. Serge Cosnier Examinateurs: Dr. Cecilia Cristea Dr. Joelle Saulnier Directeurs de these: Dr. Nicole Jaffrezic-Renault Prof. Dr. Robert Săndulescu.
(3) . . ʹ. AncaftefanaFlorea. . . .
(4) . ǡ . . ͵ . Dr. Christopher A. Mills Directeurs de these: Prof. Abdelhamid Errachid-El-Salhi Dr. Nadia Zine “Iamnotyoungenoughtoknoweverything” OscarWilde . Dedicatedtomyfamily . .
(5) Ͷ . AncaftefanaFlorea. Acknowledgements There are more people that I can countwhohelped making this work possible. I oweahugedebtofgratitudetomysupervisors,mycoworkers,myfamilyandmyfriends. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisors Prof. Dr. Robert SãndulescuandDr.NicoleJaffrezicǦRenaultfortheopportunitytoworkintheirexcellent researchgroups.Theirconstantsupport,valuabletime,constructiveadvicesandpositive attitude and confidence towards me have been wholehearted and made me believe in myselfasaresearcher. I owe a big debt of gratitude to Dr. Cecilia Cristea forher friendship, continuous support,confidenceinmeandpreciousadvicesinbothmyworkandlife. I am greatly appreciative to prof. Dr. Giovanna Marrazza from Univeristy of Florenceforherguidanceandsupportandtodr.AndreaRavalliforhisvaluableadvices andhelp. Ialsothankthecomiteefortheadvicesandhelpinimprovingmythesis. I owe special thanks to all my collegues and friends from the Department of Analytical Chemistry Cluj, from ISA Lyon and “Ugo Shiff” Department Florence, who contributednotonlytoworkbutalsotomakingitfun.Therearecountlesspeoplethat have been helpful throughout time and with whom I shared great experiences, so I apologize in advance for forgetting naming some of them. Thanks to Bogdan, Andreea, Mihaela, Lumi, Bibi, Oana, whose advices, friendship and support was essential to my progress.IthankCoco,RebeccaandDiegofortheirfriendshipandcheerfulnessandfor makingFlorencehomeforme.IamgreatlythankfultoMamisforthesupport,friendship and good spirit all along the way. I am grateful to fam. Lacroix for their hospitality during my staying in Lyon. I would like to thank to all doctorants in ISA Lyon, Elena, Sylvia,Nedjla,Mohamed,Vika,Katyaetc,forthememorableexperiencesinandoutside workinLyon.ToZhenZhong,HuyandMadihafortheircollaborationandhelpregarding MIPsensors.SpecialthankstoAlvaroforhisfriendshipandencouragement.Ialsothank Eliforherfriendship,cheerfulnessandinspiration. Iwouldliketothankallmyfriendsfortheirsupportandunderstanding. Finnaly,Iamdeeplythankfultomyparents,mybrother,mysisterǦinǦlawandto mywholefamilyfortheirendlesslove,encouragementandsupport.Wordstrulycannot expresshowluckyIfeeltohavehadthemeverystepalongtheway. .
(6) . ǡ . ͷ .
(7) ǣ Capteurs électrochimiques d’affinité applique dans l’analysebiomédicale,sécuritéalimentaireetenvironnementale ǣ ± ± ǡ ðǡ ±± ±ǡ± ± ǡ̵ ̵Ǥ °ǡ
(8) ǡ° ± ±Ǥ2 ±ǡ ǡ ± °± ǡ ± Ǥ ° ǯ ± ± ǣ ± ° ǡ ± ± ǡ ± ²±Ǥ ̵ ±± ± ± ° ± ± ± Ǥ ° ̵ǡ± ±± Ǥ° ° ± ̵± Ǥ ǡ ±± ± ° ±± ǡ ± ± ± Ǥ ̵± ± ± ±±Ǥ ǡ ° ± Ǥ ± ǣ ± ± ± ± ͳǤ ±± ±ǡ ° ° ̵ ± ° ± ǡ ±± ± ± ̵ǡ ± ǡ Ǥ MotsǦclésǣ ± ǡ ǡ°ǡ° ± ǡ ǡ ± ± ǡ Ø ̵ǡ± Ǥ .
(9) . AncaftefanaFlorea.
(10) ǣ Electrochemical affinity sensors for biomedical, food andenvironmentalapplications ǣ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(11) ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ͳ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡ Ǧ ǡǡ Ǥ Keywordsǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǡ ǡ Ǥ . . . .
(12) . ǡ . . Résumésubstantiel ± ð ± ± ± ± ± ±Ǥ ± ² ± ± ǡ ± ǡ ± ± ± ̵ Ǥ ±± ± ± ± ± Ǥͳ ±± ± ° °±±± ±± Ǥ ± ±± ±± ± Ǧ̵Ǥ ± ± ± ±±± ̵ ǯ°ǡ Ǥ ̵±±±̵°± ±± ͳǤ ° ± ± °± ǡ ± ̵ °Ǥ ±± ± ± ± ± ± ǡ ̵ Ǥ ± ± ±± ² ± ± ǡ ± ± ǡ ± Ȁ Ǥ±±±±±± ± ± ± pǦ± ± ± °Ǥ̵ ± ° ± ± ǡ Ǥ ± ̵ ± ̵ ̵ǡ ǯ ̵°ǡǡ±± Ǥ ± Ǧ ±± ͳ± ±Ǥ.
(13) ͺ . AncaftefanaFlorea. ͳ ± ± ± ±±ǡ± ±Ǥ ±ǡ ͳ ² ± ± Ǥ ± ± ± ± ͳ ± ° ± Ǥ ° ± ±± ± ±̵°̵°ǡ ǡ ± Á±ͳǤ ± ± ̵ ̵° ± ± ° Ǥ ± ̵± ± ± ̵Ǥ Ǧ ±± ±Ǥ ± ± ±± ± ±ȋȌǡ ±±ǡ̵ ȋͳǦ Ȍ ± ͳǦ ǡ ± ± Ǥ ̵ǡ ± °± ǦǤǡ ± ±±±± ±±± ± ±± ± Ǥ ̵°±±±± ± ± ͳ̵ Ǥ ±ǡ ̵± ± ͳ±±ͲͳͲȀ ± ȋα͵ȀȌͳǡͶȀȋ ǯͲͲǡʹͺ ǡ ͲǡͲ͵ Ȍǡ ± ± ̵ ± ±Ǥ ̵± ǯ ± ǯ±±̵±̵ ̵ ǡ± ± ± ± ± ͳ ±± ±Ǥ ± ͵ǡͲ Ȁ ȋαͳͲȀȌͳͲǡͲȀ±±Ǥǡ ±± ± Ǧ ͳ±± ± ± ǡ± ± Ǥ.
(14) . ǡ . ͻ . ° ± ± ǯ± ± ̵ ± ± ± ± ͳǤ ° ±ǡ ± ±± ± ̵Ǥ ǡ ° ± ̵° ͳ ±± Ǧ± ̵Ǥ̵ ̵°±ͳ ±± ±± ± ̵± ± Ǥ± ±± ± ° ̵ ° ± Ǥ ± ± ± ± ̵° ǡ ± ± ͳ Ǥ ̵± ±±ͳ±± ±Ǥ ± ± ± ͳ ±± ͵ǡ Ȁ ǯ ±ʹǤͷǦͳͷȀǤ ǡ ± ±
(15) Ǧ ± ± ± ± Ǥ ±± ±±ǯ °± Ȁ²± ± ± ± Ǥǡ ǡ ± ǡ ̵ ±± ±± ± °Ǥ ̵ǡ ̵Ǧ± ̵± ǯǦǤǡ
(16) ±±±±̵± ± ± ± ± ǯ Ǥ ̵ ±ǡ ̵± ±±±±±± ± °ǡ̵± ± ° ± ± Ǥ ̵ ± ǯ± ± ±±ǡ ±±± ± ± ±Ǥ ° ±±±±± ±± ± °̵± ±Ǥ. .
(17) ͳͲ . AncaftefanaFlorea. LISTOFPUBLICATIONS ͳǤ A. Floreaǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǧǡ Ǥ £ ǡ ͳ ǡ ǡ ͵͵ ȋʹͲͳ͵Ȍ ͳʹǦͳ͵ͲǡISIImpactFactor4.287 ʹǤ A.Florea,ǤǡǤ ǡͳ Ǥ ǡ
(18)
(19) ǡ ͳ ȋʹͲͳͶȌ ͳǦͳ͵ǡ ISI Impact Factor0.971 ͵Ǥ ǤǤ ǡA.FloreaǡǤǡ Ǥǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤǤ ǡǤ£ ǡ ǤǡǤ Ǧǡͳǡ͵ǡͷǦ ǦǦ ǡ ʹͲȋʹͲͳͷȌͻͲǦͻǡISIImpactFactor3.840 ͶǤ A. Floreaǡ ǤǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ £ ǡ Ǥ Ǧǡ ǡ Ǥ ͳ͵ͺȋʹͲͳͷȌͳǦǤISIImpactFactor3.511 ͷǤ A. Floreaǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ £ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ͳ ǡ ǤʹȋʹͲͳͷȌ ͳͷͻͶǦͳͲͳ.ISIImpactFactor2.502 Ǥ Ǥ ǡ A. Floreaǡ Ǥ £ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ
(20)
(21) ǡ
(22) ǤǤ
(23) ȋʹͲͳͷȌinpress Ǥ A. Floreaǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ £ ǡ Ǥ ǦǤ Ǥ Ǥ ͷͻ ȋʹͲͳͷȌ ͵Ǧ͵ͻǤISIImpactFactor4.287 ͺǤ Ǥǡ A.FloreaǡǤǡǤ ǡ Ǥ ǡǤ ǡǤ ǡǤǡǤ ǦǤ Ǥ ǤͷͻȋʹͲͳȌͶʹͶǦͶʹͻǤISI ImpactFactor2.819.
(24) . ǡ . ͳͳ .
(25) ͳʹ . AncaftefanaFlorea. . TableofContents . . INTRODUCTION. 18. STATEOFTHEART. 20. 1.. 21 22 23 24 25 26. Generalaspectsofaffinitysensors 1.2.Generalclassification 1.3.Voltamperometricsensors 1.4.Impedimetricsensors 1.5. Singleusesensors 1.6.Immobilizationofthebioelements. 2.. Immunosensorsandaptasensors 2.1.Definitions 2.2.Generalclassification 2.3.Typesofformat 2.3.1.Competitiveimmunosensors 2.3.2.NonͲcompetitiveimmunosensors 2.4.Typesofbiorecognitionelement 2.4.1.Antibodies 2.4.2.Aptamers 2.5.Immobilizationofantibodies/aptamers 2.5.1.Physicaladsorption 2.5.2.Entrapment 2.5.3.CovalentBinding 2.5.4.OrientedBinding 2.6.Applicationsofelectrochemicalimmunosensorsforcancerbiomarkers detection 3.. 4.. Nanomaterialsforthedesignofamperometricsensors 3.1.Magneticbeads 3.2.Goldnanoparticles Molecularlyimprintedpolymers. 28 28 29 30 30 30 32 32 34 35 35 35 36 36 38 42 43 44 45.
(26) . ǡ . 4.1.Definitionandgeneralprinciple 4.2.Classification ͶǤ͵ǤPreparationofmolecularlyimprintedpolymer ͶǤͶǤMolecularlyimprintedpolymersinsensors PERSONALCONTRIBUTIONS. ͳ͵ . 45 46 47 48 53. 1.OptimizedbioassaysforMucin1detectioninserumsamples 55 1.1.Introduction 55 1.2.MaterialsandMethods 57 1.2.1.Chemicalsandinstrumentation 57 1.2.2.ProtocolofantibodyͲbasedbioassay 58 1.2.3.ProtocolofaptamerͲbasedbioassay 60 1.2.3.1.Immobilizationoftheprimaryaptamer 61 1.2.3.2.BlockingoffreebindingͲsites 61 1.2.3.3.CapturingtheMUC1protein 61 1.2.3.4.BindingofsecondaryaptamerandlabellingwithstreptavidinͲ alkalinephosphatase 61 1.2.4.Analysisofhumanserumsamplesbytheaptamerbasedbioassay 62 1.3.Resultsanddiscussion 62 1.3.1.OptimizationofexperimentalparametersofaptamerͲbasedbioassay 62 1.3.2.OptimizationofexperimentalparametersforantibodyͲbasedbioassay 64 1.3.3.DetectionofMUC1inbufferedsolutions 66 1.3.4.Selectivitystudiesofthebioassay 67 1.3.5.Serumsamplesanalysis 68 1.4.Conclusions 72 2.LabelfreeMUC1aptasensorbasedonelectrodepositionofgold nanoparticlesonscreenprintedelectrodes 2.1.Introduction 2.2.Experimental 2.2.1.Chemicalsandinstrumentation 2.2.2.PreparationofAuNPsmodifiedSPE 2.2.3.Immobilizationoftheaptamerandinteractionwiththeprotein 2.3.Resultsanddiscussion 2.3.1.PrincipleofelectrochemicalaptamerͲbasedbiosensor 2.3.2.Optimizationofexperimentalparameters. 74 74 75 75 76 76 77 77 77.
(27) ͳͶ . AncaftefanaFlorea. 2.3.3.CharacterizationofAuNPsͲgraphiteSPEͲbasedaptasensorbyEIS 2.3.4.QuantitativedetectionofMUC1protein 2.4.Conclusion. 79 81 82. 3.MIPǦbasedsensorsforthedetectionofvariousanalytesof environmental,biomedicalandfoodsafetyinterest 85 3.1.Introduction 85 3.2.Materialsandmethods 90 3.2.1.Chemicalsandinstrumentation 90 3.2.2.Experimentaltechniquesusedforfabricationandcharacterizationof themolecularlyimprintedsensors 91 3.2.2.1.StepsintheconstructionoftheMIPsensors 91 3.2.2.2.PreparationofthefunctionalizedAuNPs 92 3.2.2.3.Electrodepositionofmolecularlyimprintingfilmsontothegold electrodes 93 3.2.2.4.ElectrochemicalmeasurementsonMIPandNIPͲmodified electrodes 94 3.2.2.5.Surfacecharacterizationbyatomicforcemicroscopy(AFM) 94 3.2.2.6.Analysisofrealsamples 95 3.3.Resultsanddiscussion 95 3.3.1.ElectrochemicalpreparationofMIPandNIPbasedsensors 95 3.3.2.ElectrochemicalandmorphologicalcharacterizationofMIPandNIP films 99 3.3.3.ElectrochemicalbehaviourandrecognitionabilityofMIPfilmstowards thetargetanalytes 101 3.3.4.Optimizationofexperimentalconditions 105 3.3.4.1.OptimizationofexperimentalparametersforGMTimprinted sensor 105 3.3.4.2.OptimizationofexperimentalparametersforTCimprintedsensor 108 3.3.4.3.OptimizationofexperimentalparametersforGlyimprintedfilms 109 3.3.5.AnalyticalperformanceoftheimprintedandnonͲimprintedpolymer 111 3.3.6.Analysesofrealsamples 117 3.3.7.Reproducibilityandreusabilityoftheimprintedsensor 119 3.3.8.Stabilitystudies 120 3.4.Conclusions 120.
(28) . ǡ . ͳͷ . 4.Generalconclusions. 122. 5.Originalityofthethesis. 124. REFERENCES. 125. . .
(29) ͳ . AncaftefanaFlorea. ABBREVIATIONS Ab Ag Apt AP A(n) BSA CE cDNA CDR CNT CV DEA DNA DNT DPV DPSV dT E2 EDTA EIS ELISA GC GC/MS GCE Gly GMT HPLC Ig LBL LOD LOQ LSV. Ǧ. . . . .
(30) .
(31) . ǡ . LR mAb MUC1 MUC4 MUC16 MIP MMOF mRNA MW NIP ODN pAb PATP PCR rAb RE RNA SAMs SCE SEM SPE SPCs SPR SWV TC TNT TRIS WE WHO QD QCM. ͳ Ͷ ͳ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ ParaǦ Ǧ Ǧ Ǧ TrisȋȌ . . . ͳ .
(32) ͳͺ . AncaftefanaFlorea. INTRODUCTION ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(33) ǡ Ǥ ȋǡ Ȍ ǡ ǡ Ǥ Ǥͳ Ǥ .
(34) . ǡ . ͳͻ . Ǥ Ǧ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ͳ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ȁ Ǥ
(35) via pǦ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ . . .
(36) ʹͲ . AncaftefanaFlorea. STATEOFTHEART . .
(37) . ǡ . ʹͳ . 1. Generalaspectsofaffinitysensors ǡ Ǥ ǡ ʹͲǤ ǡ ͳǤ Ǥ ʹǦͶǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ȁǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǤͳǤ Ǧ Ǧ ͵Ǥ ȋǡ ǡ Ȍ ǡ ͷǤ ǡ Ǥ . Fig.1. .
(38) ʹʹ . AncaftefanaFlorea. 1.2.Generalclassification ǣ x. ǣ o. Opticalǣ ȋ ǡǡ ȌǢ ǡ Ǣ. o. Thermalǣ ǣ ǡ Ǣ. o. Mass (piezoelectric)ǣ ǡ Ǥ. o. Electrochemicalǣ ǣ . PotentiometricȂ Ǧ ȋǤ ǡ ȌǢ ǡ ǡ Ǣ. . Conductimetric Ǧ Ǣ Ǣ. . Amperometric Ȃ Ǥ. x. ȋ Ȍʹ. x. ǣ o. Biocatalytic sensorsǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ. o. Affinitysensorsǣ ǡ ǡ ͷǡǤ.
(39) . ǡ . ʹ͵ . x ǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ʹǤ. 1.3.Voltamperometricsensors ǡ ǡ Ǥ ͳͻʹǤ ǣ ǡ Ǥ ǯ Ǥ
(40) Ǥ
(41) ǡ Ǥ ͷǤ ǡ ǣ x. Analysis by preǦconcentrationǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ. x. Direct electrocatalytic detectionǡ ȋ Ȍǡ Ǥ. x. Indirect amperometric detectionǡ ǡ ʹǤ. ǡ ǡ ǡ ʹǤ ǡ ȋ ͳȌǡ ǡǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ .
(42) ʹͶ . AncaftefanaFlorea. Ǥ Ǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ʹǡ͵ǡͷǤ ǡ ǡ Ǥ. 1.4.Impedimetricsensors ȋ
(43) Ȍ Ǧ ͺǤ
(44) ͻ Ȁ ͳͲǤ
(45) Ǥ Ǥ ǣ ͷǤ ǯ ǡ ǡǡ ǡ
(46) Ǣ ǣ ܼൌ. Ͳܧሺ߱ݐሻ ሺ߱ݐሻ ܧ௧ ൌ ൌ ܼͲ ܫ௧ Ͳܫሺ߱ ݐ ߔሻ ሺ߱ ݐ ߔሻ. ǡǡ
(47) ǡͲ
(48) Ͳ ǡ ɘ ߔ
(49) ͷǤ
(50) ͲߔǤ
(51) ǣ x. faradaic impedance Ȃ ǡ Ǣ ǡ Ǥ. x. nonǦfaradaicimpedanceȂ ǡ ͺǤ.
(52) ǡǦǡǡǡǤ.
(53) . ǡ . ʹͷ . ȋ Ȍǡ ȋȌǡ ȋȌǡ ǡ ȋȌ ȋȌǤ ǡ ȋȌǡ ȋȌ ȋȌͺǤ
(54) Ǧ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ͷǡͺǤ ǡ Ǧ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ͷǤ. 1.5.. Singleusesensors. ȋȌ ǡ ȋ Ǥ ʹȌ ͳͳǤ ǦǦǡ Ǥ Ǣ Ǥ ʹǤ ǣ ǡ Ǣ Ǣ insituǢ ͳʹǤ Ǥ.
Documents relatifs
Figure IV-55 : Evolution du (a) volume d’usure mécanique V mec et (b) chimique V chem en fonction de l’énergie dissipée cumulée à potentiel libre pour n = 2,9
Enfin, si vous pensez avoir repéré une erreur d’énoncé, signalez-le sur la copie et poursuivez votre composition en expliquant les raisons des initiatives que vous avez été
Enfin, si vous pensez avoir repéré une erreur d’énoncé, signalez-le sur la copie et poursuivez votre composition en expliquant les raisons des initiatives que vous avez été
La personne recrutée s’intégrera dans l’équipe pédagogique responsable des enseignements du département GEII (Génie Electrique et Informatique Industrielle) de l’IUT Lyon 1..
La protéine intégrase étant nécessaire pour d’autres processus du cycle viral, tels que la réverse transcription et/ou l’assemblage des virions, les mutants du core de la
Proposer des valeurs pour Vhmin la tension minimale associee a un niveau haut I Vbmax la tension maximale associee a un niveau bas.. Etablir la table de verite
Au fil de notre réflexion clinique, nous avons établi qu’habiter un logement nécessitait certains prérequis, comme pouvoir habiter son corps, sa subjectivité, son
Car même si certains auteurs parlent de surévaluation des troubles psychopathologiques, que ce soit une surévaluation dans leur définition (certains troubles régressent