• Aucun résultat trouvé

South Africa’s “Right Track” Land Reform? RECAP’s efforts to resuscitate land reform projects in distress

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "South Africa’s “Right Track” Land Reform? RECAP’s efforts to resuscitate land reform projects in distress"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

South Africa’s “Right Track” Land Reform?

RECAP’s efforts to resuscitate land reform

projects in distress

Ward Anseeuw

UP / CIRAD

52nd AEASA conference

« 20 years on since Democracy – Quo vadis? » 28/9 – 1/10/2014

(2)

RECAP

1) Recapitalisation 5 phases/years

100% funding for infrastructure and operational costs to 20% funding for development needs.

2) Development

Human and physical * Mentorship

Training, marketing, finance, networking and other farm related skills Mentors appointed / Costs covered by enterprise once generating profit (12 months/production cycle)

* Strategic Partnerships

SP – companies/individuals investing in the land reform project Risk sharing / Profit-sharing arrangement

SP = contract farming, co-management and share equity schemes (2010, planned 1807 farms, 640 implemented, 264 SP, 117 mentorship, 38 SP and 50 mentors)

(3)

RECAP assessment

Province RADP farms per province Number of projects selected

initially

Number of projects visited

Gauteng 51 10 10 Eastern Cape 71 9 9 Limpopo 72 13 13 Free State 70 25 22 KwaZulu-Natal 118 23 24 North West 79 20 20 Total 461 100 98 Realised in 2013

(4)

Promoting a commercial farm model

Eastern Cape

Free State Gauteng KZN Limpopo North West Total

Average 1742,3 901,8 200,4 394,2 249,2 823,9 672,2 Max 12215,0 2310,0 623,0 2296,0 937,0 3900,0 12215,0 Min 24,0 19,0 2,7 40,0 5,1 12,4 2,7 St deviation 4247,7 621,0 230,7 514,4 303,0 1107,4 1390,8

RECAP - focus on viable economic entities

- activities mainly oriented for market production

Average size: 672 ha

Beneficiaries: 670 (-7 per project)

42% are time and 58% are part-time; with 71% of the projects having at least one full-time beneficiary.

(5)

Increased production and

socio-economic impacts

• Many of the beneficiaries on their way to becoming commercial farmers – 50% • Operations on-going on 69 of the 98 projects

• 29 out of the 98 projects (29.6%) still have a turnover of zero • Turnover, on average, R1.45 million

Eastern

Cape Free State Gauteng KZN Limpopo

North-West Total Average total 531 1 192 188 1 380 2 409 2 221 1 446 Average producing farmers 796 2 184 268 1 840 3 915 2 468 2 054 Standard deviation 1 189 3 639 310 1 619 8 363 6 732 4 653 Minimum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maximum 3 615 17 100 918 5 180 30 240 28 788 30 240 Sum 4 778 26 213 1 881 33 113 31 324 44 436 141 745

(6)

Increased production and

socio-economic impacts

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

At acquisition Before RECAP After RECAP At present

Livetsock

(7)

Increased production and

socio-economic impacts

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000

At acquisition Before RECAP After RECAP At present

Livetsock

Area under crop production

Accumulation

Stagnation

(8)

Increased production and

socio-economic impacts

Eastern Cape Free State Gauten g KZN Limpop o North-West Total Since RECAP, has market access been

easier?

% of respondents 42,86 42,86 0,00 70,83 58,33 15,38 46,91 Since RECAP, did your economic

situation change?

% of respondents 85,71 52,38 66,67 81,82 75,00 76,92 71,79 Since RECAP, did your social status

change?

% of respondents 85,71 55,00 66,67 77,27 66,67 76,92 70,13 Number since the implementation of

RECAP, has your diet change?

% of respondents 85,71 42,86 66,67 47,83 72,73 76,92 58,97

(9)

Questionable empowerment

Eastern

Cape Free State Gauteng KZN Limpopo

North-West Total Funding 100 0 100 80 100 - 76,00 Providing technical expertise 100 30,77 100 42 50 75 66,24 Farm management 100 50 100 75 50 50 70,83 Provide output markets 100 66,67 100 75 100 - 88,33 Providing input markets - 0 100 88 - - 62,50 Empowerment 0 16,67 - 57 - 28,57 25,59 Overall satisfaction 80,00 27,35 100,00 69,00 75,00 51,19 67,15

(10)

A model that lacks broader development

and employment implications

N full-time employment N part-time employment N total Average full-time employment per project Average part-time employment per project Average total employment per project Before RADP 565 454 1019 5,77 4,63 10,40 After RADP 676 883 1559 6,90 9,01 15,91 Difference N 111 429 540 +1,13 +4,38 +4,51 Difference % +19,65 +94,49 +52,99 +19,58 +94,60 +52,98

• Employment creation - positive but low • 540 jobs created through RECAP • 111 full-time and 429 part-time

• Not – or little - created jobs or leveraged development dynamics in the beneficiary communities.

(11)

The huge cost of the RECAP model

Eastern Cape

Free

State Gauteng KZN Limpopo

North-West Total Average per receiving project

in Province R2 133 333 R7 338 182 R3 750 000 R2 037 471 R1 976 143 R3 025 000 R3 556 563 Max R3 200 000 R33 200 000 R10 000 000 R7 500 000 R3 600 000 R7 500 000 R33 200 000 Sum/Total R6 400 000 R80 720 000 R15 000 000 R30 562 059 R13 833 000 R24 200 000 R170 715 059

Table: Funds received in the framework of RADP per province

(12)

Concluding

• Significant progress

• Certain type of agricultural development, i.e.

large-scale commercial faming, based on

significant capitalisation, which is often externally

led - sometimes by corporate structures

• Because of the transfer of decision making power,

the little spin-off developments, the few

beneficiaries reached and the low labour

creation, it is also clear that RECAP broader

results remain very limited.

Références

Documents relatifs

Keeping this in mind, this paper plans to research the legality of local government’s reform and innovation during land requisition and demolishing by tracing investigation

It was partly as a result of the above that the Recapitalisation and Development Programme (RADP) was introduced in 2010, promoting recapitalisation of land reform farms and

Accordingly, within this framework, provision for state intervention was made in the Constitution and was embodied in a government land reform programme: land restitution,

This deliberately historicised approach, which recognises the constitutive role of norms in the formation of institutions and institutional practice, will lead in the third and

The previous chapter concluded that the main controversies around CLaRA at the national level included several issues, two of which are of particular interest in

Three main programmes, recognised by the Constitution, form the core of South Africa’s land reform programme: land restitution, land tenure reform and land

During Vietnam’s transition from a socialist to a market economy, household’s property rights over agricultural land were considerably strengthened through a land certification

modity produced by a given technique generates a rent depending on the technical coefficients, the market prices, the distribution variables and the cost of