Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building
Research), 1965-01-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=e996a71a-6612-48ab-ab67-e847b3f09aae https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=e996a71a-6612-48ab-ab67-e847b3f09aae
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/20337984
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Green Creek landslide
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
esawaa
DIVISION
OF
BUILDING RESEARCHTHE GREEN CREEK LANDSLIDE
Internal Report 246s. 309 sf %he
Division of Building
R e
searchOTTAWA January 1 9 4 5
P R E F A C E
F o r a number sf y e a r s , the Soil Mechanics Section of the
Division of Building Research
has
been engaged in the study of theg e o t e e h i c a l properties of L e d a clay. These atudie s have included $ha documentation sf c a s e records sf Handslidee.
One of the landslides that has been investigated is
the
"Green Creek" landslide, located on t h e eastern outskirts of the
G i t y sf Ottawaa. ATthough the landslide scar is relatively old, It has many of the characteristics sf the eart'lab%sw-type 05 1mdsli.de
that occurs frequently in Leda clay.
This
report s u m m a r i z e s the results sf several years sf work, It was prepared by D r . E .L.
Matyas of Carleton University whilehe
was engaged as a s u m m e r professor by the Bivfsisn.Ottawa
January 1965
Robert
F,
LeggetTHE
GREEN CREEK LANDSLDEThis
report d e s e r i b e e the r e s u l t s s f a study of the G r e e n Greek landslide n e a r Ottawa. Laboratory and field data have been included far completeness but have not been discussed in detail. Emphasis has bean placed on a stability analysis of the landslide site; in p a r t i c u l a r , a slopeIseated west of the landslide crater. The apparent factor of safety of this slspe is in the order of 2 . 5 , E the actual factor s f safety is close
t o unity (the original slope in the slide area would have had this value) it
will
be n e c e s s a r y to r e v i s e the normal interpretation of parameters for s h e a r strength and pore pressure f o r the soil at this s i t e ,An investigation of the Green Creek landslide has been carried out intermittently since 1958 by the Soil Mechanics Section of the Division of Building Research, National Research C ~ u n c i l , in order ( 1 ) to study the general properties sf Eeda clay, ( 2 ) to document the earth flow as a cPassical example of this type of failure, (38 to a s s e s s the theoretical
approach for predicting the stability of slopes, and (4) $0 determine the nature 0% the ground water movements in the a r e a . T h e Hmvestigatisn
included field tests and laboratory tests on soil
within
and outside the slide area and a stability analysis *airas m a d e for a selected slope lneated west of the 'landslide c r a t e r .HISTORY
OF
THE L A N B S L D E AND TQPOGRAPMC FEATURESThe G r e e n Creek landslide is located approximately one mile e a s t 0% the mtawa city limits and about 508ft north ~f Montreal Road
(Highway 17) as shorn i n F i g u r e l o The slide w a s noted initially in 8a.1458
on contous m a p s which had been prepared f r s m aerial photographs taken in November 1957. Figure 2 , a contour map of t h e slide area, shows that the earth flowed in a northerly direction affecting an area approximately
1700 ft wide by 2800 f t Iongo that is, about bOO acres; the crater itself covers about 35 acrea.
3g Suaxnnaeac- P r s f e a s o r , Soil Mechanics Section, Division
QP
Building R e s e a r c h , National Research @rsumciP, Qttawa.No r e c o r d of the earth fl.sw i s h o r n to exist and it is t h e r e f o r e almost c e r t a i n that the slide s c c u r r e d before the land was settled about
1840. Judging f r o m the appearance of the slide it i s probable that it o c c u r r e d the l a s t 206, o r 308 years.
VANE TESTS
In
the fall of 1 9 5 8 , a number of vane boring8 w e r e m a d e a% the leeations s h o r n im F i g u r e 2 - B ~ r i n g s ~ designated VS-H t o V S - 5 Hnc%usive, w e r e made on the slope located about 600ft west of the c r a t e r . Theboring% w e r e extended t o depths s f about 47 t o 7 3 f t where refusal w a s m e t . The r e s u l t s , given in F i g u r e 3, show that the undisturbed shear s t r e n g t h generally d e c r e a s e d t o a depth s f about % s f $ and then i n c r e a s e d , indicating a drying crust above this level. Somewhat lower s t r e n g t h s w e r e obtained in bssimga
VS-1
andVS-2.
Following the initial t e s t , the vane w a s rotated rapidly through 25 revslutions and the shear s t r e n g t h of the rern~uldled s o i l was obtained. Sensitivity, defined a s the (undisturbed s h e a r strength)/ (remoulded s h e a r strength) i s plotted against depth in F i g u r e 4. %"&Hues range from a minimurn sf about9
t o a maximum of s e v e r a l h m d r e d . In t h e s e t e s t s , a. 4-blade vane measuring 43 by 8 6 mm a s d e s c r i b e d by Andresen and B j e r r u m (1956) wae used.Three vane borings, V G - l to V @ - 3 inclusive, w e r e a l s o m a d e in 1958 at the l i p of the slide in o r d e r t o d e t e r m i n e the nature and
c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s or" the m a t e r i a l involved in the slide and also to detesemline, if possible, the depth t o the original ground s u r f a c e . The t e s t r e s u l t s , plotted in F i g u r e 5, d o mot show any marked discontinuity at depth and t h e r e f o r e cannot be used to locate with certainty the position a% the original ground surface. A. slight disesntinuity is apparent for borings
VG
-1 and VC-2 a t a depth sf 25ft which corresponds to an elevation s f about 190ft.Vane hole V X - I was made i;z undisturbed ssPP a f e w hundred f e e t south of the c r a t e r (Figuse 2 ) . The r e s u l t s f r o m t h i s "enale, plotted in
F i g u r e
6 ,
a r e reasonably consistent but somewhat lower than the strengthts obtained in boringaVS-l
and VS-2. T e s t s w e r e also conducted s n remoulded soil and t h e s e indicated very Isw s t r e n g t h s with many readings of z e r owhich would sargga st sensitivity value s of infinity,
h
1960,
two additional holes, $PA-4 and VA-5 w e r e located on the apron of the slide at the locations s h a m in F i g u r e 2 , Again, theseholes w e r e made to investigate the p r o p e r t i e s of t h e disturbed s a i l and t o locate the original ground s u r f a c e .
h
both holes, o b s t r u c t i s n s w e r e encountered at depths of aboutI 4 A
and some sand and w o o d adhered t othe vane casing when it was removed, T h i s suggested that the original ground level w a s probably at this depth. Vane t e s t s w e r e taken between
P O
t o6
ft and t h e s e a r e plotted in Figure. 5. These show r e s u l t s s i m i l a r t o those f s m d in borings V C - 1 , V C - 2 and VC-3.The final vane b s r i s g , designated VX-2, w a s put down in the barnyard of SorPey" f a r m t o d e t e r m i n e whether water seeping through
manure piles and into the subsoil had any effect OR the shear strength.
The
r e s u l t s s f the t e s t s a r e plotted ic F i g u r e6
and it can be seen that the r e s u l t s compare closely with those in baring V X - % which was locatedsome 600 8% f r o m the b a r n y a r d .
'The vane bsrinags a r e summarized in Table
I.
WATER TABLE AND P I E Z B m T R I C LEVELS
1x1 o r d e r t o c a r r y out a stability a n a l y s i s En terms of effective s t r e s s e s it i s n e c e s s a r y t o determine the p i e z o m e t r i c l e v e l s in the sub- s o i l . Since the stability analysis was m a d e f o r the elape west 0% the
c r a t e r , the determination of the water bevel and the pie s o m e t r i c level w a s concentrated in this area. The w a t e r l e v e l s noted in vane borings
VS-B
t s VS-5 a r e given in Table 11, These show that the water table atthe top of the slope was about 5;ft below the s u r f a c e
a d
n e a r the toe of the slope the water table was close to the s u r f a c e .In
1961, three p i e z o m e t e s s , designated a s Nos. 17,18, and 19, wese installed at depths of 20,40, and 6 6 f t respectively at the locationshorn in Figare 2. In plan, the pieaometere w e r e 4 f t apart. Readings have been taken periodically since the installation and the r e s u l t s are plotted in F i g u r e 7. T h e s e indicate peak pieeometric l e v e l s in May of each y e a r and minimum bevels in August o r September. The level f o r piezometer No. 17 fluctuates considerably, since it i s closest t o the $roar;nd s u r f a c e and is m o r e subject to seasonal variations.
SAPPAPLIB?@ AND TEST RESULTS
In November P 958, a boring designated SX
-
1 , was made at the s a m e Iocatiori as vane boring VX-l. and undisturbed s a m p l e s were obtained$9 depths s f about 23 ft. In October 1960, bsringa S X - 1 A w a s made c l o s e
t o boring
SX-1
and s a m p l e s w7ere taken from depths s f about 24 t o $Oft.The
r e s u l t s of ~Hasaification tests, w a t e r cantent and density determinations, me% cansolidation tests are given in F i g u r e 8; boringsSX-
1 and S X - I A have been inclrzded in the profiles. The t e s t s indieate that the clay h a s weathered t o a depth of about 2 8 to 25f-t.Cansolidated undrained triaxialb t e s t s w e r e carried out on samples taken from boring S X - 1 A . The grouping s f t e s t results f r o m an a r b i t r a r y number sf sampling tubes l e a d s t o a csnsiderable variation in the effective s h e a r s t r e n g t h p a r a m e t e r s c 0 (cohesion) and eq@ &angle s f i n t e r n a l f r i c t i o n ) as shown in. F i g u r e
9.
T o obtain an over -all average which would simplify the stability a n a l y s i s , all the r e s u l t s wese included on one plot (Figasre 10).1
In
this plot, values of-$
( 0-
0 ) are plotted against 2(01
+
0' ) T h i smethod avoids the
plotting
sfnumerous
~ W s h r c i r c l e swhich tend to
obscure
the
r e s u l t s . Inaddition,
amethod
s fleast
squarescan
beused to obtain an average failure envelope
throughthe points.
T h i splot does not
give c%nd ~9directly
butthese
values canbe sbtained
readily
bythe simple expressions given in Figure
10 [Bishop et al,1960).
Usingthis
method, the shear strength param-eters
interms
of
effective stresses
werefound to
be c" 6608 psfand
q Q
= 1 9 . 2degrees.
M a x i m u m deviator stress w a s cansidered
asthe failure criterion.
Two
borings designated
asSA-4
andSA-5
were m a d e
adjacentto
borings V A - 4and
VA-5
respectively
inSeptember
1960. Sometests
were
carried om%
and these
a r e plotted inFigure
HI. In
both boringe,
organic matter
wasnoted at a depth of about 15 to
17ft
which indicated
the original ground surface,
This is a l s oconfirmed
by the discontinuity
in the water content
profiles.STABILHTY ANALYSES
Since the original profile
sf
the slope affected by the landslide
was
not known, the slope
located about 6 0 0 f twest sf the crater w a s
selacted for
analysis;
the location
isshown
inFigure
2and the profile in
Figure 42. This location
w a schosen because:
( 9 %the gradient
isrelatively steep
andconstant
andtherefore
itcan
beassumed that
it maybe the most critical
slopein
theimmediate area;
6 2 ) itmight
be assumedthat
t h egradient
ofthe
elope inthe slide area
wassimilar
$0the slope
baing considered; and ( 3 )if
theslope
is atPimiti~g
equilibrium,
a
etability analysis should give
afactor
ofsafety
sf
unityprovided
thecsrrect shear strength
andpore pressure parameters
havebeen used.
T o
carry
aut astability analysis
inte1~1-n~
ofeffective stresees
it is
necessary
to knowthe
groundwater flow pattern.
O n the basis sflimited information an approximate flow
netw a s sketched (Figure
h 2). Thisiazdicqted that the
flow isnearly vertical,
%hatis, th-ae
underlying
till
orbedrock provides free
drainagewith respect
$0the overlying clay,
The stability analysis becomes m u c h
easierif an average
porepressure
ratio, rcan
beused:
C$
r = -
u
Y
I-3whqre
pis
the:pore pressure expressed in beet
ofhead,
Y
is
theunit density
ofthe
soil,H is
the height sf overburden in feet.
A n average
a° valuew a s obtained by drawing
afew
trialslip
u
w e r e then averaged arithmetica%%y to give a value sf about 0 . 2 0 which
wae used in the analysis.
O w the basis of reswlte obtained from t e ~ t s on 8ampEes frorn boriags SX-h and 5%-PA the following values w e r e a%sa used in the analysis.
y - 1 O O . O pcf; e b = 608 psf; r g 8 = 1 9 , 2 0 ,
Using
these values, a number sf t r i a l s l i p circlee were d r a w n and analysed. It w a s a s s u m e d that the failure was deep-seated, that is, the failure a r c s were tangent t s the underlying hard stratum. A fewshallow c i r c l e s were also analyaed and these gave higher f a c t o r s of
safety. O n this basis sufficient c i r c l e s were analysed ts locate the c i r c l e having a minimum factor of safety. This circle is shown in Figure 13; i t had a factor of safety of 2 . 4 % .
The calculations were made with the use sf the Nationah R e s e a r c h GornnciI8s IBM 1 6 2 0 , M a r k I1 computer. The program for the computer w a s prepared in F O R T U N
I.I
and reported separately by Irwin (1964).Briefly, each circle required a separate data card which included:
%
-
the x cs-ordinate of the centre of the c i r c l e ,8
Y
-
the y co-ordinate ~f the centre s fthe
c i r c l e ,0
W
-
the radius of the c i r c l e ,$b9
-
the n u m b e r of the c i r c l e ,S
-
the
number of d i c e s ,XS
-
the x co-ordinate s f the c i r c l e a t its interseetihsn withthe top of the shape,
XF
-
the x cs-ordinate of the c i r c l e a t i t s intersection with the bottom s f the slope,TOT
-
an estimated f a c t o r of safety.Each slope was csnverted to a number of straight-line segments, The number of s l i c e s was a r b i t r a r i l y calculated by dividing the c i r c l e into slices about
PO
ft vride. Fsr a typical c i r c l e this resulted in about 25 slices.Initially, an estimated factor of safety of unity w a s used; a s the
actual factor sf safety was over two, the e~mputakiomr time par c i r c l e was ae much as 10 minutes.
The
p r o g r a m was later streamlined and a m a r etime per circle to l e e s than a minute in m o s t c a s e s
The method of analysis was by a method of e12ces p r o p ~ s e d
by
Bishop(1955).
It w a s obvious that the value
sf
2.4'7 for the factor of safety w a s eoneidarabPy higher than one might expect for a elope located so close %a an area that bas actually bailed. This discrepancy can be attributed toseveral factor a:
(a) The initial slope of the clipped area is not known and it % e
possiblle that it was steeper tkqn
the
adjacent slopes,($1
T h e value used far the pore pressure ratior
was too Sow, u( c ) The shear strength parameters as interpretaa were t o o high.
Of
these possibilities, there is ns way to check (a) but bath(b)
and (c) m a y be changed. There does not appear to be any $nstifica%ion
for changing [$) owing to the measured pore pres<suree. Nevertk%ehessg
other values
of
r ,
w e r e introduced intothe
analysis. This only required recalculation for the critical circle since a change in r, only d o e s not affect the position sf the critical c i r c l e ,As
seen in Figure 184 a m a x i m u m psseibke value Ear r, of about 0.6
only reduced the f a c t o r of safety toabout 1 . 7.
Figure 9 indicated a large variation in the shear s t r e n g t h parameters
when an arbitrary grouping sf the test results w a s considered. Crawford
(1961)
has also shorn that different va%uessf e g
andas
can be obtained fromone s e t of test reau%ts depevlding on the method of testing and interpretation,
On the basis of these arguments there is some &stification for changing the shear strength parameters
.
Hence, additional analy a e a were m a d e to determine the effect a% variatisn in cohesion and friction snthe
f a c t o r of safety. A change in either et or q%ehangea the position of the critical circle.The results are plotted in Figure % 5 and these indicate that when c B is extrapolated to zero
the
apparent factor of safety still exceeds unity.The possibility that c E decreases with gasPogica1 time Baas been recognized
for s o m e t i m e and this has been confirmed recently by Skempton (1964) who
has reported a number of case histories.
H e
suggested that m o s t soils have both a peak and a residual ekear stkength andthe
residual strength m a y be considerably less than the peak strength. This woa;ld not appear to beapplicable to Leda cEax however, since it does not norm all.)^ exhibit a decrease in strength once the maxhmuzm eksmpreesive strength has been reached. There m a y be an analogous situation f o r L e d a clay in which the strength d e c r e a s e s withetime but this has not been formalatedo It may also be argued that the triaxiak t e s t does not simulate field conditions and the observed behaviour i s misleading.
It i s also seen in Figure 1% that the friction angle, rpB, must d e c r e a s e to a l m s s t zero bedore a factor s f safety of unity is approached;
such a d e c r e a s e , hawever, coeeld only be r e a l i s t i c if it can be s h a m that
the soil i s purely cohesive.
On the assumption. that s B can approach z e r o and ep8 remains constant at 19.2", Figure
I 6
illustrates the effect s f r,, on the factor ofsafety, that i s , a value s f c" 0 and r, = 0. 3 3 will give a factor of safety of unity. This particular analysis was based on an equivalent straight- line approximation for the slope a s shown in Figure 1 6 ,
A s an alternative, the soil profile considered in the analysis
could be divided into four a r b i t r a r y l a y e r s and represented by the different shear strength p a r a m e t e r s given in F i g u r e 9 znd re-an-aalyeed, This
procedure, howe~rer, might also be questioned because the samples f o r shear testing w e r e taken from one boring located s e v e r a l h u ~ ~ d r e d feet from the ana1yae.d section and the assumptian of uniform soil prspertges throughout is %as% strictly justified. This argument may a l s o be extended
to include the effects of the different s t r e s s history imposed on the soil at the top and the toe s f the slope
.
Referring to the crftieaP circle s h e w in Figure 1 3 , it i s seen that a considerable portion of the circle passes through the upper desiccated
Z
5 to 20 ft s f the s t r a t u m , In addition, computations willshow that the effective normal s t r e s s along a t r i a l slip surface is ueual&ly Low and in this case does not exceed abeut 2 kgdcmZ. 2.n consalidated undrained t e s t s the normal practice i s ts t e s t samples a t high confining p r e s s u r e s in o r d e r t o obtain a straight-line failure envelope which can be extrapolated into the low effective stress range. With overconsokidated soils, tests made ia the how effective s t r e s s range, howeverl Cia not
appear t o give r e s u l t s that coincide with the extrapolated failure envelope. This has been recognized for some time and recently Crawford ( 1 9 6 3 ) and Crawford and Eden (1964) have reported some experimental evidence of this f a r Leda clay. This type of r e s e a r c h couHg9 be expanded to include t e s t s on samples taken f r o m the desiccated c r u s t .
A s mentioned previously, z %Bow net had been prepared from readings taken from t h r e e pieze~meters installed at one locatian. This necessitated the extrapolation of these observations to cover the fall
length of the s l i p c i r c l e . Additional pis eometera instalked a% s t r a t e g i c points f u r t h e r d o w n the slope would both simplify the csnstruction of the flow net
and
increase i t s reliability.Tension c r a c k s had not been cansidered in the a n a l y s i s since it was thought that these would have a m i n o r effect a s the factor of safety. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The
planning s f this investigation, as well as the s u m m a r i z a t i s n of observations and t e s t r e s u l t s , i s credited mainly t o M e s s r s . C . B. Crawford andW.
9, Eden. Field and laboratory t e a t s involved, periodically, m o s t of the personnel in the DBR Soil Mechanics Section. The a ~ t h s r has collected m o s t of the observations and t e s t results in %&is r e p o r t and with the aid of M r . W , Irwin ( s u m m e r student) has used t h e m t o c a r r y out the stability analysis. The aid s f per sonsel in the $%RCes Computation C e n t r ef s a l s o achowBadged.
REFERENCES
Andresen, A. and E. Bjerrktm, (1956).Vane testing in Narway, Symposium on Vane Shear Testing of
S o i l s ,
A.S.
T.
M. S T P No. 1 9 3 , A m . Sac. Testing Mats.,
p. 54- 60.Bishop, A,W. (185508. The u s e s f the s l i p c i r c l e in the stability a n a l y s i s sf slopes. G 6 o t e c h i q u e , %Pol, 5, No. 1, p . 7 .
Bishop, A. W . , I. Alpan, G . E . Blight, and H.B. Donald,
fE960).
Factor e coratroPBing the s t r e n g t h of p a r t l y s a t u r a t e d eohe slve s o i l s . P r o c . A m . Sot. Civ. E n g r s . , R e s e a r c h Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Sails, Boulder, C s l s r a d s , 1960, p I 583-532.
Bishop, A. SF%, and N. M s r g e a ~ s t e r n , { 1 9 6 0 ) . Stability coeffieien-ts f d r e a r t h s % o p s . G & s t e c h i q u e , Vs%. 10, No.
4,
p, 1 2 9 .Crawford, C . B. (1
961
1.
The Inf%uemce of s t r a i n on shearing ~ e s i s t a n c e of sensitive clay. Proe. Soc. Testing M a t s .,
VoE,
61, p. 1250-1276.Crawford, C , B. $ 1 9 6 3 ) . Cohesion in a n undisturbed sensitive clay. GCoteehique, Vo1. 13, No. 2 , p. 6 3 2 .
C r a , w f ~ r d ,
C.
B. grid W. J . Eden (1964). A comparison of la5orator-q~ r e s u l t s with in situ properties s f Eeda clay. Paper submitted t e the Sixthht.
Con%. sn Soil Mechs. 2nd Fsundn. Engineering, t o be held in Montreal, Canada, September 1965.Irwin,
W.
(%964), The use ofa
digitall computer $072 ~a1ving slopestability problems. National
Re
seazch C smciP, Division sf Building Researc&Gomputa% ProgramL9,
Skemptcm, A , W.
(B
$64). Long -term stability of clay slopes. G & s t e c h i q u e , V a l . 14, No, 2 , g. 77.WATER TABLE
IN VANE
BOMNGSS W E A R S T R E N G T H , K I P S I S Q . FT.
F I G U R E 3
F I E L D V A N E T E S T S , P R O F 1 bE W E S T 6F C R A T E R M52#Y-3
S E N S B T O M I T Y D E Y E R M l N E D B Y R E M O U L D E D F I E L D V A N E T E S T S . W E S T OF C R A T E R
F I G U R E 5
F I E L D V A N E P E S T S A T L I P A N D A P R O N O F 5 % 1 9 % @@ saw- 4-
S T R E S S , K B P S F S Q
FP
0 1 2 3 45
Q
F I G U R E 6 F I E L D V A N E T E S T S S O U T HOF
C R A T E R 6?@3X87-6F I G L I R E 7
T E S T R E S U L T S OF U N D I S T U R B E D S 0 F L IN B E L W f [ O M T O D E P T H
Green C r e e k L a n d s l i d e
F I G U R E 8 8
cA
(PI zi 0 0' PBI & Pad a. a k4 (PI m W az r- tA u >-
i-- %a W t& bL WF I G U R E 10
A V E R A G E D C O N S O L ! D A T E D - U N D R A I N E D T R 1 A X I A h T E S T R E S U L T S
W a t e r Content - % D e s c r i p t i o n 0 6 % &I84
0
.----
.-=_
Weathered Red Ckay wits Siit PocketsBet
.__ -- --
Gry Clqwltk Red Patches
_ _ _ -
- - -
-
- - -
~4
Grey Clay with Silt PatchesJ - - - .
---
---
- - - -
I-'
Greenish Grey to Brown Clay
with Organic Matter Kirvigs) Ground Surface
W a t e r C o n t e n t - 9b
..zP
Q
20 4(9 60 80 1 , 1s.c.l B e s c r i p t i a n Weathered Brown Clayh . 4
1 1
.
...+
R E L A T I O M S H I P B E T W E E R FW@%OW OF S A F E T Y A N D P O R E P R E S S U R E
W A B $ O
Bc'
-
600,8 ' -
1 9 . 41103
m
m
m
5m 680C Q H E S l ON, c ' ,
L B P E R
S Q Fbc' = 600 I& per sq fb
ANGLE OF I N T E R N A L F R B C T i Q N ,
PI',
D E G R E E SProfife Used for - hL P O R E P R E S S U R E R A T I O . r, R E L W T l O N S H B P B E T W E E N F A C T O R OF S A F E T Y A N D P O R E PWE$SUWE R A T I O ( c ' = O F B i = 19. 2'1