Original article
Cold room thermoregulation, store consumption,
and survival of Africanized and European honey bees (Apis mellifera L)
JD Villa TE Rinderer
USDA,
ARSHoney-Bee Breeding,
Genetics andPhysiology Research,
1157 Ben HurRd,
BatonRouge,
LA70820-5502,
USA(Received
14September 1992; accepted
6April 1993)
Summary —
Thepotential
of Africanizedhoney
bees to survive winters was evaluatedby
compa-ring
them in groups(40
g, 1.0kg,
1.5kg
or wholecolonies)
toEuropean
bees in cold rooms. Africa- nized workerscaged
in40-g
groups at 15°Caggregated
in differentpositions
and intighter
confor-mations,
removedsignificantly
lower amounts of sucrose syrup fromfeeders,
and hadhigher
mortalities than
European
workers. Africanized bees in1.0-kg
groups also had lower rates of syrup removal but were similar toEuropean
groups inaggregation
and coretemperatures. Groups
of 1.5kg
showed similartemperature profiles
inside the hives. Whole colonies of bothtypes exposed
totemperatures
≈ 0°C died before 10 wk, and did not differsignificantly
in amounts of recovered dead workers, or inweight
loss. These resultssuggest
that some of theimportant
behavioralcomponents
ofoverwintering
arepresent
in Africanizedhoney
bees.Africanized
honey
bee / cold tolerance / survival /thermoregulation
INTRODUCTION
Africanized and European honey
beeshave been
categorized respectively
as’tropically
andtemperately adapted’
organ- isms basedupon
their nativeranges
andlife history characteristics (Winston
etal, 1984;
Danka etal, 1987).
Differences in theranges
of these 2bee types
asferal populations after
theirhuman-assisted
in-troduction
tothe
Americashave
also beenexplained
as aconsequence
of these con-trasting evolutionary strategies (Taylor,
1977, 1985; Taylor and Spivak, 1984;
Winston
et al, 1984). European
bees havebeen
present
intemperate
areas afNorth
America for several centuries
(Kritsky, 1991). Tropical
areas ofSouth America did
notappear
tohave sizable European-
derived feral populations, but since
1956 these areas have beenrapidly occupied by
African-derivedhoney
bees(Taylor, 1977).
Theadaptation paradigm has
beenfurther substantiated by the
much slower movement of African-derivedhoney
beesinto
subtropical
areas ofBrazil and Argen-
tina
andby the
presenceof largely Euro-
pean bees in temperate Argentina (Kerr
etal, 1982; Sheppard et al, 1991).
Given this
cleardifference
indensity
and
distribution it is
notsurprising
that sev-eral hypotheses
have beenpresented
toexplain possible differential survival under cold
orwinter
conditions:1) Africanized bees may
be lessprecise
atmaintaining
thermal homeostasis
through imperfect
heat
generation
andaggregation (Nuñez, 1979); 2)
smaller worker size and lesspre- cise aggregation might produce higher
mass
specific
metabolic rates at cold tem-peratures
and lead to theearly depletion
of
already
small winter stores(Taylor, 1977; Southwick
etal, 1990);
or3) ’tropi-
cal’
lifehistory traits such
as shorterwork-
er
lifespan
and continued broodproduction during
wintermonths might
lead tocolony winter mortality (Taylor and Spivak, 1984).
We conducted 4
experiments
with groups of different sizes toquantify
thesepossible
differences in
thermoregulation,
aggrega-tion,
storeconsumption and
workerand colony longevity.
MATERIALS
ANDMETHODS
Experiments
were conducted in a cold room inAcarigua,
Venezueladuring
1986 and 1987.Bees of 3 different stock
types
were used: Euro- pean bees from mated queensimported
fromthe US
(E),
Africanized bees from local queens with a feralorigin (A),
orEuropean daughter
queens that had mated with feral drones and therefore
produced largely F 1 hybrid
workers(E
x
A).
Four differentexperiments
weredesigned
to compare behavioral and
physiological
com-ponents
ofoverwintering
among thetypes.
Experiment 1: forty g
of workersin hoarding cages
Brood from 64 colonies
(33 E,
31A)
was al-lowed to emerge in incubators at 35°C. A total
of 75 E and 77 A
hoarding
cages(Kulin&jadnr;evi&jadnr;
and
Rothenbuher, 1973)
were filled with 40 g of adult workers fromsingle
colonies(mean
num- ber of workers ± SE: E = 371 ± 3.2, A = 429 ±3.9). Caged
workers(without queens)
were pro- vided with sugar syrup andwater,
and were maintained at ambienttemperature (22-30°C)
for up to 3 d until all cages had been filled.
Cop- per-constantan thermocouples
wereplaced
be-tween the food vials in 55 of the cages.
At the
beginning
of theexperiment
all cageswere
given
2 vials with 50% sucrose and thecold room
temperature
was decreased to 15°C(±2.5°C).
Thecooling
unit inside the room was controlledby
a thermostat set at 15°Cproducing
an intermittent air current that reached all the cages. This caused a
cooling potential beyond
that of still air at that
temperature.
For the first 11d,
dead bees at the bottom of each cagewere counted and removed. Also the
positions
of the clustered bees in each cage were record- ed. An observer
(blind
to theidentity
ofcages)
classified them into 1 of 3
position categories: 1)
’non-viable’ when
separated
from foodvials; 2)
roof when
symmetrically hanging
from the’roof’;
or
3)
’side’ when on the roof and side wall but still in contact with feeders.Additionally,
clustertightness
was scored in 1 of 6 clustertightness categories ranging
from nogrouping
andhighly
mobile bees
(0),
to verytightly packed
and im-mobile bees
(5). Syrup
vials wereweighed
andreplaced according
to need on d2,
4, 6, 8 and 10.Preliminary
trials had indicated atendency
for Africanized workers to cluster away from feeders and die if contact with feeders was not re-established.
Therefore,
the cold room wasopened
for 2 h afterdaily
observations so that thechange
to ambienttemperatures (> 25°C)
would allow workers to move, feed and relocate if necessary. Then the room was cooled
again
to 15°C
(± 2.5°C)
for the next 22 h. Since many Africanized groups clustered inpositions
away from thethermocouples,
thethermocouples
inthe first 55 cages were moved to cages with clusters near the feeder on d 7, and
only
tem-peratures
obtained from within the cluster wereused to compare differences among
types.
Daily frequencies
of clusterpositions
for eachtype
wereanalyzed by
G-tests(Sokal
andRohlf, 1981).
Clustertightness rankings
were reducedto 3 classes
(0,1, 2, 3,
and4,5)
to have suffi- cient numbers in each cell foranalysis by type
andday
with G-tests.Temperatures
inside theclusters on d 7 were
compared by
ANOVA. Therate of sugar syrup
consumption
per g of live bees for each 2-dperiod
was calculated and the values werecompared by repeated
measuresANOVA
(Steel
andTorrie, 1980;
SAS Institute1990).
Experiment 2:
onekg
of workersin screen
cages
Workers
(1.0 kg)
were taken from each of 5A, 5E and 5E x A colonies andput
into wooden cages with screened sides(15
x 25 x 35cm).
Cages
weregiven
aweighed
feeder can with50% sucrose solution over a screened hole
(di-
ameter 10
cm)
at thetop
of the cage. The cageswere then maintained in the cold for 24-h inter- vals
sequentially
at 20,10, 5,
and 0°C(± 2.5°C).
At each
temperature setting,
the cross-sectional dimensions of thehanging
cluster(maximun length
andheight
as observed from the screenedside)
were measured at 20:00 h and at 8:00 h thefollowing day. Also,
cluster coretemperatures
were recorded with copper- constantanthermocouples
connected to a tele-thermometer.
The
rapid changes
intemperatures
in this first test causedleakage
of syrup so that foodconsumption
rates could not be estimated. Con-sequently,
a second set of 10 A and 10 E 1.0kg
screened groups were maintained at between 10 and 15°C for a
period
of 5 d and syrup com-sumption
was measured in these groups.Maximum cross-sectional areas, ratios of
length
toheight,
and coretemperatures
of the clusters in the first test werecompared by
re-peated
measure ANOVA. Totalconsumption
ofsucrose syrup
by
the twotypes
in the second test wascompared by
ANOVA.Experiment
3:colonies without brood
Tenhoney
combs wereplaced
into each of 4empty
screened hives.Copper
constantan ther-mocouples
were distributed in 7-cmgrids
ar-ranged
inside each of the colonies as follows: 3rows and 6 columns in the space between combs 5 and 6
(center);
2 rows and 4 columns in the spaces between combs 2 and 3(left),
andbetween combs 8 and 9
(right) (see figure
2 forthe exact
positions
ofthermocouples).
Workers(1.5 kg)
with a queen were added to each of the hives(2 A,
2E). Temperatures
at the thermo-couple
locations were recorded at 7:00 and19:00 h over a 3-d
period
while ambienttemper-
ature oscillated between 10 and
15°C;
ambienttemperatures
weregradually
decreased for 5 d untilthey
oscillated between -2 and +2°C;
a se- ries of measurements were then made at thesame times for 3 d at these new
temperatures.
Isotherms for 15,
20,
25, and 30°C were drawn for each of the sections between combs(center,
left andright) by interpolating
the location of thesetemperatures
betweenadjacent
thermo-couples.
Experiment
4:colonies
withbrood
Five A and five E colonies were selected as
matched
pairs
from researchapiaries.
Combweight
and brood area were measured in the field. Colonies were thenscreened, transported, reweighed,
andplaced
in a cold room at 15°C.Adult worker biomass was estimated as the dif- ference between total
colony weight
and theweight
of combsplus
hive.Temperatures
weredecreased over a
period
of 10 d to0°C, except
for aperiod
of 5 d wherethey
rose to ambientdue to failure of the
cooling
unit’s compressor.Colonies remained in this cold room for 73 d.
At the end of the
experiment,
combs anddead adults were
weighed,
and brood areaswere remeasured. Total adult
mortality,
finalbrood area, and rate of
weight
loss(kg weight loss/kg adults)
werecompared by
ANOVA.RESULTS
Experiment
1There was a distinct difference between the
types
in thedistribution
ofcluster position and
clustertightness of the 40-g
groups
exposed
tocooling by air
currentsat
15°C (tables I, II). These differences
were
fairly consistent through days
asindicated
by significant G-values
for mostdays.
When coretemperatures
weremeasured in groups that maintained contact with
feeders,
no differences werefound
between
Agroups (mean
=21.55, SE
=6.08,
n =20)
andE groups (mean
=22.96, SE
=5.38,
n= 35) (F = 0.03,
df =1, 53;
P =0.8685).
Africanized groupsremoved
lesssugar
syrup per 2-dperiod during this experiment (table III). When the
amount of
syrup consumed
wasrated
tothe
weight
of live bees ineach cage,
Africanized workers removedless syrup per weight
of beesduring
the first 3measurement
periods (table III);
in thefourth
2-dperiod,
whengroups
were thesmallest due
tomortality,
theAfricanized workers had
ahigher ratio of syrup
removal.There
was asteeper mortality
curve(fig 1)
for A
workers
eventhough the
bees wereallowed
to recoverdaily by opening
thecold
room to ambient
temperatures.
Experiment 2
Cluster
measurementsdid
not differ asmuch
among
beetypes
inlarger 1.0-kg
groups in screened cages
(table IV).
In thiscase, the mean
cross-sectional
areaand
ra-tio of
length
toheight
did not differsignifi- cantly.
These 2 attributes ofclustering
werestrongly influenced by decreasing tempera-
ture in both
types. However,
asignificant
in-teraction between area and ambient tem-
perature
was causedby
agreater change
incluster
dimensions
atthe highest and low-
est ambient
temperature
inthe
Egroups.
Despite
these differences inclustering,
coretemperatures
weresimilar
ateach
of theambient temperatures and times of day (ta-
ble V).
Eventhough aggregation and
tem-peratures
were similar in these1.0-kg
groups, dramatically
lower amountsof syr-
up
were removedby A
bees maintained be- tween 10 and15°C (table IIIc).
Experiment
3Although only
2 colonies of eachtype
were
used
to measuretemperatures
inbroodless hives with comb, the
samebio-
mass
of
Aand
Eworkers produced
similartemperature cross-sectional profiles
ateach
temperature (12,5
and-2,5°C). Also,
the areas
occupied by
bees(as indicated by temperatures)
were muchsmaller
forboth
type of colonies
atthe
lowertempera-
ture
(fig 2).
Measurements withineach
col-ony at each
temperature
were very consis-tent,
and are thereforeonly presented
once in
figure
2.Experiment
4All 5 E and 5 A colonies
had died after
10 wk in thecold
room. Total Africanized workermortality
was not differentfrom
thatin
European colonies (table VI). Also,
dif-ferences between the
types
in totalweight
loss or rate of
weight loss (rated
to bio-mass)
were notclearly
detectable in thesecolonies (table VI). Since only the final
amount
of
deadworkers
wasmeasured,
there could have been differences in themortality
curves ofworkers,
andalso differ-
ences in the time of death of colonies that
were not detectable with our observations.
DISCUSSION
This series of experiments indicate that
some of the
earlier hypotheses of potential
winter
mortality
ofAfricanized colonies
pre- sented toexplain
theirecological distribu-
tions
were not correct.There
are nomarked
differences inaggregation and temperature regulation
under cold conditions betweenEuropean and Africanized groups
of natu-rally encountered sizes. Also, instead of the hypothesized higher
rates of sucrose storeutilization in Africanized
groups,
undersome
conditions groups of Africanized bees
actually
consume less stores. Thepossible
causes
of overwintering mortality
inAfrican- ized
bees areprobably
morecomplex
andinvolve interactions of
lifehistory traits such
as
honey collection,
workerlongevity
andbrood production.
Aggregation
andclustering
A
fairly widespread
notionportrays
African-ized
colonies
ashaving impaired thermo- regulatory capacities. Recent studies (Villa et al, 1987; Dietz et al, 1988)
haveshown that Africanized and European
colonies athigh
and lowambient temperatures have
similar
hive temperatures
andthat African-
ized workers
aggregate
at lowtempera-
tures. In
this study, small groups of
Afri-canized workers actually clustered
moretightly than European workers and main-
tained similar coretemperatures.
Inlarger 1.0-kg groups
differences inclustering
were not as
clear, although European bees
had
greater
reduction in volume in re-sponse to
decreasing temperatures. The
fact that the
shapes
oftemperature
iso-lines appeared
tobe
similar in the1.5-kg
groups
with comb suggests that major dif-
ferences in
aggregation
may not occur inlarger groups.
It is
unclear whether observations of
un-naturally small groups
haveany implica-
tions for the
long-term
survivalof African-
ized colonies. It could be that imperfect be-
havioral interactions among
workers suchas cluster
separation from honey
storesand decreased food exchange
inlarger
colonies could
compound overwintering problems.
Food consumption
The smaller worker
sizeof Africanized
workers has led to thehypothesis
that col-onies
might
have increased metabolic ratesleading
toearlier
winterdepletion
ofstores. This
hypothesis
was substantiatedby
the differentslopes
in theVO 2
line forthe 2
types
of bees obtainedby Southwick
et al
(1990).
Incontrast,
ourstudy
showsthat combless
groupsof Africanized
work- ers, whether small orlarge,
consumedsig- nificantly
less sucrose syrup thanEurop-
ean bees. Even
though
direct measure-ments of oxygen
consumption
can bemore
precise
indetecting
a short-termmetabolic
rate,
measurements of storeconsumption
canprovide
a much more re-alistic assessment of the
energetic
costsof
thermoregulation
overlonger periods
oftime. Our
measurementsof
sucrose re-moval fall within the broad ranges
reported
in the
literature
under similar situations(Free
andSpencer-Booth, 1958; Heinrich, 1981). The
absence ofclearly higher
foodconsumption by Africanized bees
wasalso found in measurements of store con-
sumption
in colonies in this and other ex-periments. Experiments
onweight
loss ofcolonies
at lowtemperatures
inArgentina (Krell et al, 1985; Dietz et al, 1986, 1988, 1989), and
inColombia
andVenezuela (Villa et al, 1987, 1993), have
notindicated significant differences
fromEuropean
bees. Different
rankings
in the rate of storeconsumption
inAfricanized, hybrid and
Eu-ropean
bees (Villa et al, 1991, 1993)
underdifferent experimental
conditions indicatethat differences among European and
Afri-canized bees in
this character
willbe de- termined by
local environmental conditions eachwinter,
and will notnecessarily
be asignificant factor determining higher
over-wintering mortality
of Africanized colonies.Life
history traits
Other factors
in which Africanized and Eu- ropean bees differedsignificantly
in thesetests will
likely
be moreimportant
in deter-mining overwintering mortality.
If thepoten- tially tighter clustering
of Africanized work-ers is
compounded by
shorterlifespans of
workers
which
occursduring active months (Winston
andKatz, 1981), and
underperi-
ods of cold confinement
(40-g
groups inthis study; Woyke, 1973; Villa et al, 1991, 1993)
asignificant proportion of highly
Afri-can colonies could
die
in areashaving longer
winters. The increasedmortality
ofhighly
Africancolony during
winter will like-ly
exertselective
pressures toproduce
ahybrid population.
Theimproved
overwin-tering capabilities
ofthis hybrid population
as well as other more
’temperate’
life hist- ory characteristics willlikely produce
abroad
hybrid
zone in theUnited States,
similar to one found in
Argentina (Shep- pard et al, 1991).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank L
Beaman,
RColmenares,
A Escalona and T Stelzer for assistance inpreparing
the ex-periments
and in data collection. G DeGrandi-Hoffman,
JGrace,
SJohnson,
JHarbo,
D Pash-ley,
JWoodring
and 3 anonymous reviewers pro- vided useful comments on themanuscript.
Facili-ties were
provided by
MielPrimavera,
Venezuela.This
study
was carried out incooperation
with theLouisiana
Agricultural Experiment
Station.Résumé — Thermorégulation,
consom-mation des provisions
etsurvie
desabeilles
européennes
et africanisées(Apis
melliferaL)
en chambrefroide. La possibilité
pourles abeilles africanisées (A)
de survivre dans des conditions hiver-nales
oude froid
aété évaluée
dans unechambre froide
encomparant l’aggréga- tion,
latempérature
à l’intérieur desgrap-
pes, la consommation desaccharose
oude miel et la survie des ouvrières avec les
mêmes
donnéespour
les abeilles euro-péennes (E). Quatre types d’expériences
ont été faites en chambre froide à Acari-
gua, Venezuela,
en 1986 et 1987 :1)
40 g d’abeilles ouvrières dans descagettes
maintenues à
15°C pendant
10j; 2) 1,0 kg
d’ouvrières
dans des cagesgrillagées
maintenues durant 24 h à
20, 10,
5 et0°C;
3) des colonies de 1,5 kg d’ouvrières, dé- pourvues de couvain
et maintenues pen- dant3 j
auxtempératures
ambiantes de12,5
et-2,5°C; 4)
des colonies avec du couvain maintenues à0°C
durant 10 se-maines.
Les
petits
groupes de 40 gd’abeilles
A ontplus
souvent formé une grappe àl’écart des nourrisseurs
et en structureplus
serrée
que lesouvrières
E(Tableaux
I etII);
elles ont moins consommé desirop
desaccharose
(tableau III)
et la mortalité des ouvrières aété plus
forte(fig 1). En
revan-che,
les groupes d’abeilles deplus
de 1kg
maintenues dans des cages
grillagées (ta-
bleaux IV et
V),
et lescolonies
sans cou-vain
à12,5
et-2,5°C (fig 2)
n’ontpas pré-
senté de
différences.
Lesessaims
d’abeilles A de 1kg
sans rayons ont moinsprévelé
desirop
dans les nourrisseurs queles ouvrières
E(tableau III). Les
5colonies E
et les 5colonies
Aétaient
toutes mortesau bout
de
10semaines
à10°C. Dans
cesconditions,
on n’a pas observé de différen-ces
dans la mortalité totale des ouvrières,
ni dans la
perte
depoids (évaluée d’après la biomasse),
nidans
lasurface de
cou-vain en
fin d’expérience (tableau VI).
Ces expériences
montrent que certai-nes
interprétations
antérieures concernantla mortalité hivernale des colonies africani-
sées n’étaient pas correctes(formation de
la
grappe
etcapacité thermorégulatrices
fortement
diminuées,
tauxmétaboliques accrus)
et que certains mécanismes com-portementaux
associés à la survie auxbasses
températures
sontprésents chez
les abeilles africanisées et
pourraient
êtreaméliorés par hybridation
avecdes
abeilles
européennes
oupar sélection
na- turelle.Abeille africanisée / tolérance au froid /
survie
/thermorégulation
Zusammenfassung — Thermoregula-
tion in einem kalten Raum,
Futterver-brauch
und Überleben
vonafrikanisier-
ten undeuropäischen Honigbienen.
DieMöglichkeit
afrikanisierterBienen (A),
unter
kalten oder winterlichen Bedingun-
gen zu
überleben,
wurde durch den Ver-gleich
vonTraubenbildung, Temperatur
in-nerhalb der
Traube,
Zucker- undHonig-
verbrauch und
Überlebensrate
derArbeits-
bienen inkalten Räumen
mitBienen
euro-päischen Ursprungs (E) verglichen.
Ineinem Kühlraum in
Acarigua, Venezuela,
wurden 1986 und 1987 vier
Versuche
durchgeführt: 1)
40 g Arbeiterinnen in Ver-suchskäfigen
bei15°C
für 10Tage; 2)
1.0kg Bienen
inGitterkäfigen
bei20, 10, 5,
und0°C
für 24h; 3) brutlose Völker
mit 1.5kg Bienen
beieiner Umgebungstemperatur
von 12.5° und -2.5°C für drei
Tage; 4) Völker
mitBrut
bei0°C
für 10 Wochen.Kleine Gruppen
von40 g A-Bienen bilde-
ten
häufiger Trauben
abseits vomFutter
und in engerem
Zusammenschluß als E-
Arbeiterinnen (Tabelle
I undII), zeigten
einen
geringeren Verbrauch
anZuckersi-
rup
(Tabelle III)
und eine höhereArbeiter- innen-Mortalität (Abb 1). Unterschiede
inder
Traubenbildung
und derTemperatur
waren
jedoch
beigrößeren Schwärmen
von 1.0
kg
inGitterkäfigen (Tabelle
IV undV) oder
inbrutlosen
Völkernauf Waben bei 12.5°C
und-2.5°C
nichtfestzustellen
(Abb 2). Schwärme
von 1.0kg ohne
Waben mit Sirup-Futter-gefäßen nahmen weniger Sirup ab
alsE-Arbeiterinnen
(Tabelle III). Alle
5E- und alle
5A-Völker
waren
nach
10Wochen bei 0°C
tot.Unter diesen Bedingungen
warkein Unterschied
in derGesamtmortalität
derArbeiterinnen,
im
Gewichtsverlust (berechnet nach
derBiomasse)
oder derBrutmenge
amEnde
festzustellen
(Tabelle VI).
Diese Versuche weisen daraufhin, daß einige
frühere Er-klärungen
zurWintermortalität afrikanisier-
ter Völker nicht korrekt sind(stark
verrin-gerte Fähigkeit
zurTraubenbildung
undTemperaturregulierung,
erhöhte Stoff-wechselwerte)
unddaß einige
derVerhal- tensmerkmale, die für das Überleben
imkalten
Klimanötig sind,
auch bei afrikani-sierten Bienen vorhanden sind und sowohl durch Hybridisierung mit europäischen
Bienen
wie durchnatürliche Selektion
ver-bessert werden
könnten.
Afrikanisierte Bienen
/ Kältetoleranz /Überleben
/Thermoregulation
REFERENCES
Danka
RG,
HellmichRL,
RindererTE,
Collins AM(1987)
Diet selectionecology
oftropical- ly
andtemperately adapted honey
bees.Anim Behav
35,
1858-1863Dietz
A,
KrellR, Pettis,
J(1986)
Thepotential
limit of survival for Africanized bees in the United States. In: Proc Africanized
Honey
Bee
Symp.
Am Farm Bureau ResFound,
ParkRidge,
ILDietz
A,
KrellR,
Pettis J(1988)
Survival of Afri- canized andEuropean honey-bee
coloniesconfined in a
refrigeration
chamber. In: Afri- canized Bees and Bee Mites(Needham
GRet al, eds)
JohnWiley, NY,
237-242Dietz
A,
LeitnerJF, Vergara C, Mejia
M(1989)
Effect of
prolonged
confinement in arefriger-
ation chamber on the survival of Africanized
and
European honey
bee colonies. In: Proc 4th Am Bee Res Conf. Am Bee J129, 815
5 FreeJB, Spencer-Booth
Y(1958)
Observationson the
temperature regulation
and food con-sumption
ofhoneybees (Apis mellifera).
J Exp Biol 35,
930-937Heinrich B
(1981)
The mechanisms and ener-getics
ofhoneybee
swarmtemperature
regu- lation. JExp Biol 91,
25-55Kerr
WE,
del RioSL,
Barrionuevo MD(1982)
Distribucao da abelha africanizada em seus limites ao sul. Cienc Cult
34,
1493-1442 KrellR, Dietz,
Eischen FA(1985)
Apreliminary
study
on winter survival of Africanized andEuropean honey
bees inCordoba, Argentina.
Apidologie 16, 109-118
Kristsky
G(1991)
Lessons fromhistory,
thespread
of thehoney
bee in North America.Am Bee
J,
367-370Kulin&jadnr;evi&jadnr;
JM,
Rothenbuhler WC(1973)
Labora-tory
and field measurements ofhoarding
be-havior in the
honeybee. J Apic
Res 12, 179- 182Nuñez JA
(1979) Comparative study
of thermo-regulation
betweenEuropean
and African- izedApis
mellifera in Brazil. JApic
Res18,
116-121
SAS Institute
(1990)
SAS/STAT User’s Guide.SAS Institute,
Cary,
NCSheppard WS,
RindererTE,
MazzoliJA,
StelzerFA,
Shimanuki H(1991)
Gene flow between African- andEuropean-derived honey
beepopulations
inArgentina.
Nature349,
782-784 SokalRR,
Rohlf FJ(1981) Biometry.
WH Free-man, San
Francisco,
CASouthwick
EE,
RoubikDW,
Williams JM(1990) Comparative
energy balance in groups of Afri- canized andEuropean honey
bees:ecological implications. Comp
BiochemPhysiol 97A,
1-7 SteelRGD,
Torrie JH(1980) Principles
and Pro-cedures of Statistics.
McGraw-Hill,
NYTaylor
OR(1977)
Thepast
andpossible
futurespread
of Africanizedhoneybees
in the Americas. BeeWorld 58, 19-30
Taylor
OR(1985)
African bees:potential impact
in the United States. Bull Entomol Soc Am
31, 14-24
Taylor OR, Spivak
M(1984)
Climatic limits oftropical
Africanhoneybees
in the Americas.Bee
World 65,
38-47Villa
JD, Gentry C, Taylor
OR(1987) Preliminary
observations on
thermoregulation, clustering,
and energy utilization in African and
European honey
bees. J Kansas Entomol Soc60, 4-14
VillaJD, Koeniger N,
Rinderer TE(1991)
Over-wintering
ofAfricanized, European,
andhy-
brid
honey
bees inGermany.
Environ Ento-mol 20,
39-43Villa
JD,
RindererTE,
Collins AM(1993)
’Over-wintering’
ofAfricanized, European,
andhy-
brid
honey
bees in the Andes of Venezuela.Environ
Entomol 22,
183-189Winston
ML,
Katz SJ(1981) Longevity
of cross-fostered
honey
bee workers(Apis mellifera)
of
European
and Africanized races. Can JZool 59, 1571-1575
Winston
ML, Taylor OR,
Otis GR(1984)
Somedifferences between
temperate European
and
tropical
African and South American hon-eybees.
BeeWorld 64,
12-21Woyke
J(1973) Experiences
withApis
melliferaadansonii in Brazil and Poland.