Original article
Time of drone flight of Apis laboriosa
Smith in Nepal
BA Underwood
Cornell University,
Department
ofEntomology,
Ithaca, NY 14853, USA (Received 21 March 1990; accepted 10 July 1990)Summary — Drones of
Apis
laboriosa were found to fly in the early afternoon between 12.20 h and 14.20 h in Nepal. These flights were not associated with either cleansing flights or orientationflights.
Weather conditions
during
the observation period did notpermit flight
in the late afternoon or eve-ning.
It issuggested
that the time of droneflight
may serve as anisolating
mechanism between the closely related A laboriosa and A dorsata; however, additional data arerequired.
Apis
laboriose /Apis
dorsata / droneflight
/Nepal
INTRODUCTION
The taxonomic status of
Apis
laboriosaSmith 1871 has been the
subject
of somediscussion in recent years. After exami-
ning
workers of A dorsata and Alaboriosa, Sakagami
et al(1980)
concluded on thebasis of
morphological
characters thatthey
should be considered asseparate species.
Ruttner(1988)
has stated that the differences notedby Sakagami
etal,
areof a
quantitative
rather thanqualitative
na-ture and do not in themselves
justify
assi-gning
aspecific
status to A laboriosa. All thecommonly recognized species
ofApis (cerana, dorsata, florea, mellifera,
and therecently
"rediscovered"koschevnikovi)
ex-hibit
striking
differences in dronegenitalia.
Although
no such differences have been noted in thegenitalia
of males of A laboriosa and Adorsata, McEvoy
and Un-derwood
(1988) argued
forrecognition
ofA laboriosa and
suggested
that apossible isolating
mechanism(given
theapparent
sympatric
distribution of the 2 inAssam)
could be the time of drone
flight.
A recentstudy
of A laboriosa inNepal provided
anopportunity
for somepreliminary
observa-tions to be made of the
flight activity
ofApis
laboriosa drones.MATERIALS AND METHODS
Studies were carried out at a cliff site at an alti- tude of 2 680 m in the valley of the Modi Khola river in Kaski District, West-Central Nepal. A
viewing platform suspended
from bolts an-chored to the cliff face made it
possible
to ob-serve an A laboriosa colony at a distance of less than 1 m. The entire surface of the colony
was visible and drones were easily
distinguisha-
ble from workers.
Flight
activity of the colonywas monitored from 09.30 to 18.30 h on
4 days during
theperiod
2-10September
1988. Droneflight was assessed by counting the number of drones arriving on the surface of the colony dur- ing 10-min intervals. These counts were begun
within about 1 min after the first drone was seen
leaving the colony and ended after drone
flight
was
suspended
(ie, no exits or arrivals for a full10-min period). On the 14th
September,
the col-ony comb was cut and the bees were killed and counted to determine the number of workers and drones in the colony.
RESULTS
At most
times, only
worker bees could beseen on the surface of the
protective
cur-tain of the A laboriosa
colony.
On all 4 ob-servation
days,
dronesbegan
to appearon the surface of the curtain between 12.15 and 13.00 h.
Flight activity
was seenon
only
2days;
inclement weather cur-tailed drone
flight
at about 13.30 h on 1day
andentirely prevented
it on the other2
days.
Inaddition,
and alsoapparently
because of the weather
conditions,
noworker
flight
was observed later than 15.30 h.Flight by
drones was not associatedwith either
cleansing flights (no
suchflights
tookplace
within the observationperiod)
or orientation
flights (Lindauer, 1956).
Alto-gether,
357 arrivals of drones were ob-served,
all between 12.20 and 14.20 h. Of 287 arrivals observed on the 10thSeptem- ber,
theonly day
when fullflight occurred,
211
(74%)
tookplace
between 13.20 and14.20 h
(fig
1; forconvenience,
observa-tion
periods
have been combined into 20- min intervals.An orientation
flight
was observed at10.30 h on the 10th
September,
but nodrones were seen
taking part
in it. From 12.00 to 12.10 h on thatday,
609 workerswere observed
returning
to the nest. Work-er
flight activity
continued unabated at thetime the first drone was seen
departing
at12.27 h. The
activity
level was sohigh
thatit
proved impossible
to monitor both worker and droneflight simultaneously. Thus,
atthe time of initiation of drone
flight,
therewas no diminution in
foraging activity,
suchas
might
occurprior
to an orientationflight (Lindauer, 1956);
theflights
observed wereprobably mating flights.
Inspection
of thecolony
on the 14thSeptember
revealed thatalthough
therewere several thousand cells of
capped
worker
brood,
there were no eggs or drone brood andonly
2 unsealed larvae. Of a to- talcolony population
of 21 312only
230 in-sects were drones.
DISCUSSION
The absence of eggs and unsealed brood is
probably
an indication that thecolony
was
making preparations
for amigratory
move, normal behavior for A laboriosa col- onies at this altitude in
September (Under- wood, 1990).
While themigratory
status ofa
colony
may influence thetiming
of orien-tation
flights (Lindauer, 1956),
there are no data tosuggest
thatimpending migration
would affect the time of
day
at which drones takemating flights.
Preferably,
acomparison
of the time of droneflight
of A laboriosa and A dorsata should be madeusing
data from the 2 spe- cies wherethey
occursympatrically,
or atleast in
relatively
closeproximity.
Unfortu-nately,
data for the time of A dorsata droneflight
inNepal
are unavailable(have
in factnot been
collected).
It has beenreported
that
Apis
dorsata drones takemating
flights
between 18.15 h and 19.00 h in Sa- bah on the island of Borneo(Koeniger
etal, 1988),
between 18.00 and 18.45 h in Sri Lanka(Koeniger
andWijayagunaseke-
ra,
1976),
and in a 15-20-minperiod just
before dark in
Mysore State,
India(FC Dyer, personal communication).
Indirect evidence that A dorsata drones in
Nepal
may follow thispattern
offlying
atdusk was
suggested by
observations of workerflight
inRampur,
Chitwan District.In March 1984, a time when drones were
known to be
present (from samples
of thepopulations
of the colonies under observa-tion),
2 A dorsata colonies were observed at close range(<
2m)
on successivedays
between 08.30 and 16.30 h.
Although
workers were
foraging actively,
no droneflights occurred; indeed,
no drones ap-peared
on the curtain surfaces of these colonies(personal observations).
If drones of A dorsata colonies
nesting
in the
Himalayan
foothills alsofly
atdusk,
the data for A laboriosasuggest
that the time of droneflight
may serve as a repro- ductiveisolating
mechanism between the twospecies.
Evidencepresented
heremust be
regarded
aspreliminary, however;
there is an evident need for additional data. In
particular,
it must be established that A laboriosa drones do notfly
atdusk,
even under favorable weather conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks His
Majesty’s
Government forpermission to travel and conduct research in Ne-
pal.
Financial support wasprovided by
a grant(No
3682-87) from the NationalGeographic
So-ciety.
Discussions with FC Dyer, RA Morse, and
TD Seeley assisted the author in improving upon the
original
manuscript.Résumé — Période de vol des mâles
d’Apis
laboriosa Smith auNépal.
Unecolonie
d’Apis
laboriosaqui
nichait dansune falaise à 2 680 m d’altitude dans le Centre-Ouest du
Népal
a été observée àune distance < 1 m. L’activité de vol de la colonie a été suivie
pendant 4 j
en sep- tembre 1988. Les couches externes du ri- deauprotecteur
de la colonie étaient habi- tuellementuniquement
constituées d’ouvrièresmais,
lors de chacun desjours d’observation,
les mâles ont commencé à faire leurapparition
à la surface entre 12 h 15 et 13 h 00. Le vol desmâles,
observésur
2 j seulement,
se limitait à lapériode
12 h 20-14 h 20. Les conditions météoro-
logiques
n’ont paspermis
le vol des mâlesen fin
d’après-midi
ni dans la soirée. Les vols des mâles n’étaient associés ni à des vols depropreté,
ni à des vols d’orienta- tion. Sur les 287 arrivées observées le 10septembre,
seuljour
où les vols se sontpleinement déroulés,
211(74%)
ont eu lieuentre 13 h 20 et 14 h 20
(fig 1).
Les mâlesd’Apis
dorsata volent le soir(juste
avant lecoucher du
soleil)
à Bornéo(Koeniger
etal, 1988),
au Sri Lanka(Koeniger
et Wi-jayagunasekera, 1976)
et dans l’Etat deMysore
en Inde(FC Dyer,
communicationpersonnelle).
Si c’est aussi le cas pour leNépal,
les observationsprésentées
ici sug-gèrent
que lapériode
de vol des mâlespeut
servir de mécanisme d’isolement entre lesespèces A
dorsata et A laboriosa étroitementapparentées.
Mais il est néces-saire de rassembler des données
complé-
mentaires.
Apis
cerana /Apis
laboriosa / vol des mâles /Nepal
Zusammenfassung — Drohnenflug-
zeiten von
Apis
laboriosa Smith inNepal.
Ein Volk vonApis laboriosa,
das an einer Felswand im westlichen Zentral-Nepal
in einer Seehöhe von 2680 m nis- tete, wurde aus einerEntfernung
von weni-ger als 1 m beobachtet. Die
Flugtätigkeit
des Volkes wurde vier
Tagelang
imSep-
tember 1988 beobachtet. Die äußere Schichte des
Schutzvorhanges
des Volkesbestand
gewöhnlich
ausArbeitsbienen,
aber an
jedem
der vierTage begannen
zwischen 12.15 und 13.00 Drohnen zuerscheinen.
Drohnenflug
wurde nur zweiTagelang beobachtet;
er war auf die Zeit- spanne zwischen 12.20 und 14.20 be- schränkt. DieWetterbedingungen
erlaub-ten keinen
Drohnenflug
amspäten
Nach-mittag
oder Abend. DieDrohnenflüge
hat-ten nichts mit
Orientierungs-
oderReinigungsflügen
zu tun. Von 287 beo-bachteten Ankünften am 10.
September,
dem
einzigen Tag
mit vollemFlug, erfolg-
ten 211
(74%)
zwischen 13.20 und 14.20(Abb 1). Die
Drohnen vonApis
dorsatafliegen
amAbend,
unmittelbar vor derDunkelheit;
dies wurde sowohl in Borneo beobachtet(Koeniger
etal, 1988),
alsauch in Sri Lanka
(Koeniger
undWijayagu- nasekera, 1976)
und im StaatMysore,
In-dien
(FC Dyer, persönliche Mitteilung).
Wenn diese
Flugzeiten
auch fürNepal
zu-treffen,
solegen
dieBeobachtungen
dergegenwärtigen Untersuchung nahe,
dieDrohnenflugzeiten
als einenIsolierungs-
mechanismus zwischen den nahe ver-
wandten Arten A dorsata und A laboriosa
zu betrachten. Es müssen aber noch wei- tere Daten
gesammelt
werden.Apis
cerana/ Apis
laboriosa / Drohnen-flug
/Nepal
REFERENCES
Koeniger N,
Koeniger
G,Tingek
S, Mardan M,Rinderer TE (1988)
Reproductive
isolation bydifferent time of drone flight between Apis ce-
rana (Fabricius, 1793) and Apis vechti (Maa, 1953).
Apidologie
19, 103-106Koeniger
N,Wijayagunasekera
HNP (1976)Time of drone flight in the three Asiatic hon-
eybee species (Apis cerana, Apis florea,
Apis dorsata).
J Apic Res 15, 67-71Lindauer M (1956) Ueber die Verständigung bei
indischen Bienen. Z Vergl Physiol 38, 521- 557
McEvoy
MV, Underwood BA (1988) The droneand
species
status of the Himalayan honey bee,Apis
laboriosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J Kans Entomol Soc 61, 246-249
Ruttner F (1988)
Biogeography
and Taxonomy of Honeybees.Springer
Verlag, Berlin Sakagami SF, Matsumura T, Ito K (1980) Apislaboriosa in Himalaya, the little known world’s
largest
honey
bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae).Insecta Matsumurana 19, 47-77
Underwood BA (1990) Seasonal nesting cycle
and migration patterns of the Himalayan honey bee, Apis laboriosa. Natl
Geogr
Res 6,276-290