.- THE EFFECT OF SOIL RICROORGANISMS ON PLANT- PRODUCTIVITY

.- THE EFFECT OF SOIL RICROORGANISMS _ON PLANT- PRODUCTIVITY

^I

J ( .

Y.R. Domergues, H.D. Diem and F. Crmry*

ABSTRACT

I:oilmicroorganismsaffect p l a n t p r o d u c t i v i t y favourably o r unfavourably e i t h e r i n d i r e c t l y , by a c t i n g upon s o i l p h y s i c a l o r chemical p r o p e r t i e s , o r d i r e c t l y by i n t e r a c t i o n w i t h p l a n t r o o t s . B e n e f i c i a l o r d e t r i m e n t a l e f f e c t s on s o i l p r o p e r t i e s concern s t r u c t u r e s , c o a t i n g of p a r t i c l e s with w a t e r - r e p e l l e n t compounds, redox p o t e n t i a l , s o i l n i t r o g e n s t a t u s ( e . g . g a i n s by N2

-

f i x a t i o n and l o s s e s through d e n i t r i f i c a t i o n ) , a v a i l a b i l i t y o f n u t r i e n t s ( e s p e c i a l l y N and P ) and accumulation o r e l i m i n a t i o n of phyiotoxic inorganic and o r g a n i c compounds.

a f f e c t p l a n t growth by improving or reducing n u t r i e n t o r wzter uptake (some a r e well-known, e . g . ecto- o r endo-mycorrhizae; o t h e r s a r e not even

c h a r a c t e r i z e d , such as microorganisms iwlucing p r o t e o i d r o o c s ) . a l s o produce growth-regulating substances o r p r o t e c t t h e @ a n t a g a i n s t c e r t a i n 7athogens.

highly d e s i r a b l e , b u t it i s d i f f i c u l t t o accomplish. Some m c c e s s has a l r e a e y been zchieved with d i r e c t i n o c u l a t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y i n t h e c a s e of N2

-

f i x e r s a d mycorrhizae.

methods invol-:ing c l a s s i c a l means, s t e r i l i z a t i o n o r t h e q F i i c a t i o n of s p e c i f i c ccnp’inds, Ls p o s s i b l e provided some r e q u i r e m e n u e r e f u l f i l l e d . A l t e r i n g t h e s o i l m i c r o f l o r a by a c t i n g through t h e p l a n t 1s another promising p o s s i b i l i t y .

r e f e r e n c e t o :heir importance and occurrence i n t r o p i c a l soils.

. . pihny agronomists today would readily ayree that soil micro-

S o i l microorganisms d i r e c t l y

They may Manipulation o f t h e s o i l m i c r o f l o r a a-wears t o be

I n d i r e c t c o n t r o l of s o i l m i c r o f l o r a by

The processes a r e d i s c u s s e d with s;r?cial

organisms affect plant productivity, zspecially in the tropics.

ü \

’ Yet this idea took a long time to penetrate, except in the case of Rhizobium, because microbiologists-were mainly concerned with the yhysiology of microorganisms that had been isolated and skudied in %est-tubes or Petri dishes and were therefore out Òf their natural environment.

the study of the very complex soil-plant-microorganism systems is mich more difficult that the study of pure culture.

Another reason is that i

In this paper, we shall consider some of the mechanisms by which soil microorganisms favorably or unfavorably affect’

*Microbiologists, QRST@4/CNRS, Dakur and CNRA/ISRA,

9 f &Eva 8980

tiambey, Senegal

1 ,

1 - ^{E o}

sa ^To am MQ

GQQ~QFFBG~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n G o

1

'.I 206

plant growth by altering the soil physical or chemical pro- pFrties, or by directly acting upon the plant itself. Since other contributors have covered the interactions between plants and mycorrhizae, or N 2

-

fixing microorganisms, (Kenya, 1979;

Redhead, 1979) we shall only briefly mention the role of those microorganisms, focusing our attention upon other groups whose influence is still not always recognized. Two preliminary remarks relate to the unique conditioqs that prevail in the tropics.

First, when soil water content is not limiting tropical tempe- ratures are generally high enough to allow much more vigorous microbial activity than in temperate areas. Second, since the organic materials thar originate from the plant debris are only to a slight extent stored as humic compounds and are readil) decomposed, most microbial life.is located on or around the root system of the plants (rhizosphere).

INFLUENCE O F M I C R O O R G A N I S M S ON SOIL P R O P E R T I E S

EFFECTS ON SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

The role of microorganisms in the genesis and maintenance of soil structure has recently been reviewed (Hepper, 1975). Our aim here is to emphasize thc inportance of this process in the rhizosphere. It has been demonstrated that there are more water- stable aggregates in the rhizosphere than in the non-rhizosphere soil (Harris e t aZ.,1964). Since the number of polysaccharide- producing microorganisms is characteristically higher in the rhizosphere, it can be assumed that soil stabilization around the root can, at least to some extent, be due to 'the rhizosphere microflora. In tropical soils, where most of the microbial population is Concentrated in the root zone, it would be worth- while to elucidate ehe relative importance of the root itself and that of associated microorganisms in soil structure stabilization. Such investigations should not be restricted to free-living microorganisms, (such as A s o t o j a c t e r spp., B e i j e r i n e k i a i n d i c a or L i p o m g e e s s t a r k e y i , which are well-

own p o l y s a c c h a r i d e p r o d u c e r s ) , b u t s h o u l d be e x t e n d e d to c o r r h i z a e which w e r e r e p o r t e d t o be i n v o l v e d i n sand a g g r e - a t i o n and' dune s t a b i l i z â t i o n i n c o l d e r c l i m a t e s (Koske e t aZ., 9 7 5 ) . I n c o n t r a s t t o t h i s b e n e f i c i a l a c t i v i t y , microorqanisms c a n be harmful i n two ways: by decomposing t h e a g g r e g a t i n g compounds o r i g i n a t i n g from p l a n t s o r microorganisms; and by c o a t i n g ' s o i l p a r t i c l e s w i t h w a t e r - r e p e l l e n t f i l m s (Bond, 1 9 6 4 ; Bond and H a r r i s , 1 9 6 4 ) . By a l t e r i n g t h e advancing ' c o n t a c t a n g l e of w a t e r w i t h the p a r t i c l e s such f i l m s d i s t u r b t h e i n f i l t r a t i o n of. w a t e r i n t o t h e s o i l , i n d u c i n g a p a t c h y d i s t r i b u t i o n o f p l a n t s and a marked l o s s of p r o d u c t i v i t y . Water r e p e l l e n c y , which was mostl? a t t i b u t e d t o basidiomycete hyphae, i s t h o u g h t by G r i f f i n

(1969) t o be of p o t e n t i a l l y wide i m p o r t a n c e , e s p e c i a l l y i n s e m i - a r i d c o n d i t i o n s .

Microorganisms may a l s o a l t e r t h e s o i l redox p o t e n t i a l . Thus the growth of a e r o b i c microorganisms, most of which grow a t t h e expense o f decaying p l a n t d e b r i s , may l e a d t o a r e d u c t i o n i n t h e p l a n t . A l t e r n a t i v e l y , p h o t o s y n t h e t i c a l g a e can produce oxygen and r a i s e 'che redox p o t e n t i a l , t h u s a c t i n g d i r e c t l y o r i n d i r e c t l y upon t i e p l a n t .

NITROGEN G A I N S AND LOSSES THROUGH BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES

The p r o c e s s of s y m b i o t i c N 2 f i x a t i o n h a s a l r e a d y been reviewee (Keya, 1 9 7 9 1 , b u t mention s h o u l d be made of t h e e f f e c t of

l i m i t i n g f a c t o r s , an a s p e c t o f t e n o v e r l o o k e d . B e s i d e s t h e p o s s i b l e inadequacy of n a t i v e N 2 - f i x i n g m i c r o p o p u l a t i o n s and t h e a t t a c k s of pathogens, e s p e c i a l l y nematodes (Germani, 1 9 7 9 ) , f o u r major f a c t o r s can l i m i t s y m b i o t i c N 2 f i x a t i o n i n t h e t r o p i c s : m o i s t u r e stress ( e s p e c i a l l y i n s e m i - a r i d c o n d i t i o n s ) , s o i l a c i d i t y and a s s o c i a t e d t o x i c i t y , m i n e r a l d e f i c i e n c i e s and, i n some s i t u a t i o n s , a n e x c e s s of combined n i t r o g e n i n t h e s o i l (Table 1 ) . As long a s one l i m i t i n g f a c t o r i s o p e r a t i n g N2 f i x a t i o n i s low o r n i l and t h e i n p u t of n i t r o g e n t o t h e ecosystem n e g l i g i b l e o r n o n - e x i s t e n t . Two examples w i l l i l l u s t r a t e t h e unfavourable e f f e c t of l i m i t i n g f a c t o r s . These examples a r e r e l a t e d t o p e a n u t and r e s u l t from f i e l d e x p e r i m e n t s

208

+Table 1. Methods to control the effects of environmental factors limiting symbiotic N2 f i x a t i o n

Limiting factors 1.

2.

3 .

4 .

5.

Moisture stress

Soil acidity and toxicity

Mineral deficiencies,

especially phosphorus deficiency

Soil inorganic nitrogen

Pathogens

Methods of control

-

Irrigation

-

Search for drought- resisting cv. of legumes and drought-resisting E% izo bi wn

infection

-

Stimulating VA mycorrhizal

-

^Lizing

-

Addition of organic matter

-

Addition of phosphorus

-

Stimulating VA mycorrhizal infection

-

Split application of nitroger

-

Slow-release nitrogen

-

^{C a e} of compatible

-

Sesrch for legumes with fertilizers

fertilizers fertilizers

a lower capacity for nitrate assimilation

-

Chemical, biological or

-

Crop rotations integrated control

Senegal during the last 3 years. The first is illustrated by Fig. 1, which shows that in the arid conditions prevailing

in Central Senegal, N2 fixation (measured by the acetylene assay) is closely related to soil water content. The second example concerns the limiting effect of inorganic nitrogen.

Using'the A value method, (Ganry, 19761, found that by increasing the rate of application of nitrogen fertilizer from 15 to 60 kg per ha, N2 fixation by peanut decreased from 52 to 25 kg per ha. In spite of those limitations, some N2

-

fixing systems can remain active. For example, Casuarina e q u i - s e t i f o Z . i a , a non-leguminous nodule-bearing tree, largely used for reforesting sandy soils on the coast of West Africa, was reported to fix as much as 60 kg N2ha-1 year-1 on the Cap- Vert peninsula (Dommergues, 1963).

Microorganisms can bring about losses through nitrification and denitrification. The activity of nitrifying bacteria varies considerably according to the soil characteristics and to the nature of the vegetation. These bacteria are typically neu- trophilic but nitrification is not necessarJly restricted to neutral soils, but to the neutral micro-habitats. Since such habitats may occur ( e . g . in the vicinity of organic debris) in soils whose overall pH is acid, nitrification can be very active in such soils. Thus acid tropical soils grown with banana, maize, or rain-fed rice exhibit a high nitrifying activity

when ammonium fertilizer is applied. (Dommergues e t aZ., 1978:

Chabalier, 1978). In forest soils, nitrification may be hindered by antibacterial substances released by the litter: when the forest is cleared, a flush of nitrification usually occurs

(Dommergues, 1954). There is increasing agreement that nitri- fication is a detrimental process since it ip respon'sible for two types of nitrogen loss: through leaching, since nitrate is of an anionic nature, and through denitrification (Focht and Verstraete, 1977).

are seldom lcwer than 20-30 per cent of the nitrogen applied as fertilizer. The increased cost and shortage of fertilizer nitrogen, especially in the tropics, must prompt soil micro- biologists to gather more information on factors that could

Such losses are highly variable, but they

100

90

- ₅

₈₀

a

!c

m C

- -

⁷⁰

I

*

o

^{N 60}

u) m

-

O 50

E E .-

:

⁴⁰

v

a

30 K Q

20

10.

O

n

I

I

-

¹⁰

- 9

- 8

- 7

h

-I

-

- 6 O Cn

z

- 5

!5 ù

I I I

20 4 0 60 80 100

DAYS AFTER SOWING

Fig. 1: Variations of acetylene reducing a e t i v l t y ASA pez plant) of field-grown peanut and of s o l water cszcent throughout the peanut growth cycle as observed in 197: a t the Bambey Experimental Station, Central Senegal (Durezï, 1978)

211

I '

it nitrification in soils, since this process is presumably the fie'ld o f methodology (especially direct detection of cteria in the soil by the fluorescent-antibody techniques) omise to be most helpful (Schmidt, 19781.

easily controlled than denitrification. Recent advances

I

AVAILABILITY OF NUTRIENTS

In tropical soils ammonification is usually very active, so that the potential for the release of ammonium from soil organic nitrogen is high. Unfortunately, the organic nitrogen inputs (through N2 fixation, root and litter deposition) into the spi1 are often limited, so that ammonium release is not high enough to meet the plant's requirements. It is not

clear whether nitrate, which is the end product of nitrification, is more available to plants than the ammonium ion..

Microorganisms, especially those thriving in the rhizosphere, are often thought to be able to increase the phosphate avai-

' lable to plants by dissolving water-insoluble mineral phospha- te, or by mineralizing phosphate from soil organic matter. As far as mycorrhizae are concerned, their role as solubilizing agents has not yet been demonstrated. Other soil micro- organisms'might be involved. I n v i t r o experiments- have clearly shown that many common microorganisms, including Pseudomonas, Achromoba-zer, P Z a v o b a c t e r i u m , S t r e p t o m y c e s , and especially A s p e r g i i l k s and A r t h r o b a c t e r can solubilize soil phosphorus (Hayman, 1975; Barber, 1978)'. However some authors argue that the increased uptake of phosphate may not only result from an increase in the availability of phosphate, but could also be explained by the effect on plant growth of stimulating substances synthesized by the micro-organisms. With regard to organic phosphate, it is readily mineralized by

plant phosphates of the root surface. The soil microflora do

P

not seem to increase this process significantly.

Miçrob{ally-inducsd changes of available trace elements have recently been discussed; (Bawber, 1978).

.4 of microorganisms, as well as plants, synthesize some hydrooxamic Since a variety acids known to be powerful chelating agents, it is not surprising that so51 microorganisms play a prominent role in the iron

metabolism of plants (Waid, 1975). A classical example of the decreased availability of trace elements is that of manganese.

Manganese deficiency of oats was shown to occur when the activity of manganese-oxidizing microorganisìzs was too high. Soil

fumigation reduced the population of these microorganisms and eliminated the manganese deficiency symptoms (Timonin, 1946).

S O I L TOXICITY

Phytotoxic compounds that may accumulate in the soils are of microbial or plant origin. A classical example of phytotoxi- city induced by microorganisms is that of hydrogen sulphide produced by sulphate-reducing bacteria. The growth and activity of these bacteria is triggered in the rhizosphere when the following environmental conditions exist concurrently: active root exudation, soil sulphate contenz of the rhizospheric soil above a minimum threshold, and stricz anaerobiosis. Accumulation of hydrogen sulphide can be high enough to lead to the death of plants (Dommergues e t aZ., 1976; Jacc and Roger 1978). Manganese toxicity which occurs in acid soils t h a t are relatively rich in manganese may be reinforced by rhizosphere microorganisms capable of reducing manganic sourceç. Partial sterilization of such soils may prevent toxicity (Barber, 1978).

Phytotoxic compounds of plant or:gin are responsible €or diminishing plant growth when thev a r e not decomposed. Many examples of such toxic effects have Seen described bv Rice

(1974)

.

Recently, investigations carried out at the Agronomic Research Center of Bambey in Central Senegal showed that sorghum rbots contained phytotoxic compounds vhich, in some circumstances, could significantly reduce the yield of subsequent crops, especiñily sorghum. When sorghum is grown once in a two-course rotation

(peanut-sorghum) instead of once in a four-course rotation (green manure-peanut-sorghum-peanut) yields are severely depressed.

213

ffect (known as “soil sickness“) is induced e accumulation in the soil of a phytotoxic compound after irst crop.

itory to sorghum, remains in the soil as long as environmental The phytotoxic compound, which is specifically rtions prevent its biodegradation by soil microorganisms.

Since such unfavorable conditions may prevail in sandy soils f o r seven to eight months, the phytotoxic compounds are still present when sorghum is re-sown too soon after its last cropping.

It should be pointed out that while “soil sickness” does occur in sandy soils containing kaolinite-type clays and showing a poor microbial activity, no symptoms are noted in Vertisols, which contain montmorillonite-type clays and where microorganisms are significantly more active. In Vertisols, the sorghum

microflora comprising strains that can actively decompose the phytotoxic compound (Domergues, 1978b).

Another example of phytotoxicity of importance in forestsy is related to the failurs of G r e v i Z Z e a r o b u s t a regeneration in Australia. Seedlings of this species were reported to be killed by some water-transferable factor associated with the roots of parent trees. The resjlting regulation of population in G .

r o t u s t a is thought to explain the maintenance of floristic diversity in complex tropical rain forests (Webb e t O Z . , 1967) ^.)

I

c

^-

^DIRECT EFFECTS ON THE PLANT

As the root grows through soil, it encounters diverse com- ponents of the soil microflora and it is directly affected by the activity of soil microorganisms. Rhizoplane and rhizosphere populations affect the host plant in many ways, but there is‘now increasing evidence that the most important effects of microorga- nisms on plant growth ccncern the modification of plant nutrition and water uptake, the production of growth-regulating substances and the protection of roots against pathogens.

!4ClDIFICATION OF PLANT NDTRITION AND WATER UPTAKE BY MYCORRHIZAE The best example of the role of microorganisms as regulating agents of plant nutrition is illustrated by mycorrhizal asso-

ciations., The plan main response to mycorrhizal infection is an increased uptake nutr2ent$, especially phosphorus, Mineral nutrition of plants as stimulated by ectomycorrhizae has been, well treated by Bowen (1973) and the effects of vesicular-

-

arbuscular mycorrhizae (VAM) have been reviewed by Tinker (1975) Redh.ead (1979) and others.

. . 7

Many theories have already been proposed to explain the increased uptake of phosphorus by ectomycorrhizal roots (Bowen, 1973). Some of them could apply to VX4 since Gerdemann (1968) considers that the function of VAM may also be very similar to that of the ectomycorrhizae.

It includes the formation of more efficient nutrient-absorbing structures than non-mycorrhizal'roots, The extensive strands of extramatrical hyphae in VAM may also explore a much greater volume

of s o i l than non-infected roots, as do hyphae of ectomycorrhizal

fungi. The possibility of a longer active absorbing life for mycorrhizal as compared with non-mycorrhizal roots, a s stated by

.

Bowen and Theodorou (Bowen, 1973) for ectotrophic mycorrhizae,

-

should also apply to VAM (Gerdemann, 1968), although actual evidence is still lacking. Another interesting facet of the biology of mycorrhizae is related to the behaviour of infected roots under low water regimes in the soil. Tropical soils are quite different from one another in water content because there is a wide range of soil textures and climates in the tropics.

In sandy soils, especially in semi-arid regions, plants are often subjected to a relatively long period of water stress. A most interesting question is whether soil water supplies could be improved by mycorrhizae.

by mycorrhizae has hardly been studied but some investigations have indicated a greater drought resistance in a number of mycorrhizal seedlings (Bowen, 1973).

The physiology of water absorption

In 1971, Safir et aZ. indicated that 'WU4 could probably decrease the resistance to water transport in soybean. But later (Safir e t a Z . , 1972) they concluded thatbincreased plant growth in water-stressed conditions was due to the improvement of phosphorus nutrition. Recently, however, Menge et aZ. (1978) have reported that mycorrhizal infection enabled avocado plants to resist transplant shock, suggesting that mycorrhizae could

rove water uptake by the*hostTplant. ^I Drought resistance soil by extensive hyphal growth, but also to large

ferences between infected and non-infected roots in their corrh.iza1 plants may be related to the greatex exploitation

biology. As stated Gy Cromer (in Bowen, 1973), mycorrhizal oots of Pinus r a d i a t a seemed to renew growth more quickly han non-infected roots when they are subjected to severe water stress.

ships between soil-water regime and mycorrhizal infection is Another interesting hypothesis on the relation- iven by Sieverding (in Moawad, 1978) who found that the amount f water used to produce lg of dry matter was much lower in mycor,rhizal than in non-mycorrhizal plants growing in dry

soil fertilized with Ca5 (PO4) 30H (Table 2)

.

According to Moawad, Sieverding's findings may simply be due to the better utilization of water by plants growing in phosphorus-deficient soils. If we wish to explain the greater drought resistance of plants, the theory of water consumption economy as stated above seems to be more plausible and more attractive than the -principle of increased uptake or transport of water in plants

(Safir e t a l . , 1971).

MYCORRHIZAE UNDER TROPICAL CONDITIONS

r The impact of mycorrhizal symbiosis in the growth of tropical plants has been recently discussed by Bogen (1978) and Black (1978). Black noticed that the number of tropical plants associated with ectomycorrhizae appears to be very limited as compared to the wide range of ectomycorrhizal plants in the temperate region. The only crop recordedwith ecto- mycorrhizae is P i n u s (Redhead, 1978). Inventories and other information concerning ectomycorrhizal forest trees are given in Alwis and Abeynayake (1978).

As for endomycorrhizae, although same families such as C a s u a r i n a c e a e , C h e n o p o d i a c e a e , U r t i c a c e a e are devoid of VAM

(Khan, 1974), most tropical plant species of economic

importance are infected: cocoa, tobacco, cotton, corn, sweet potato, peanut, sugar cane, sorghum, rubber, tea, citrus and many species of timber trees (Redhead, 1971). Spores of VAM

levels of soil water content (80 and 20% available water) and with two forms of p (after PlOawad, 1978).

Ca ( I I 2 P O 4 ) 2 H 2 0 Ca5 (Po41 3 OH Plant

BPUCiÇ?l?

My cor r hi z al.

t rc a t m e n t 8 0 % 20% 80% 2 0 %

- -

NM 1208 1207 2860 4112

M 1237 1177 1574 1436

E . odo79atum

NM 1073 1.005 2563 3397

'7'. P > ' , , * 1 c 1

M 923 1 0 6 0 118 O 1424

NM: Not inoculated with VA mycorrhiza

'

\ 217

widely distributed in Niger from the moiPt low- d forest to the regions (Redhead, 77). ?few oliv i

e significance of mycorrhizal symbiosis in the cultivation olives in Pakistan has been discussed by Khan and Saif (1973).

In different soils olc..the arid and semi-arid regions, it is robable that mycorrhizal associations play an important part n the growth and drought-resistance of a number of plants ecause of their ability to regulate uptake of nutrients and oil water. Unfortunately, little is known about the' mycorrhizal of mycorrhizal effects in these regions of the world would be of great practical interest, particularly in the case of

afforestation with plant species that usually are transplanted.

In our laboratory, observations of the roots of Azadirachta indica, a tree whose growth is wide-spread in dry sandy soils in Senegal, indicate that most roots, if not all, are infected with V A M

(Fig. 2 ) . It is significant to note that Azadirachta indica is able to grow vigorously in non-fertilized soils and in arid conditions.

EFFECT OF VAM INFECTION ON LEGUME-RHIZOBIUM SYMBIOSIS

-

According to a number of papers VAM also occur in many tropical legumes of ecanomic importance e.g. peanuts, cow-pea, MacroptiZium atropurpurzum, StyZasanthes spp. (Possingham et al., 1971;. Sanni, 1976: Graw and Rehm, 1977). As legumes.

have been shown to require high levels of phosphate for nodulation, it is likely that mycorrhizal infection may affect the

s (Crush, 1974: Islam et aZ.,1976; Mosse e t al., 1976;

and Daft, 1977). Recently, in an excellent essay on the f mycorrhizae in legume nutrition on marginal soils, Mosse

pply of rock phosphate stimulated growth and nodulation of ny legumes. Although the principal cause of this is undoubtly

Fig. 2: A z a d i r a c h t a i n d i c a roots infected with VA mycorrhizae

INDUCED PROTEOID ROOTS ^,

stimulates the phosphorus-nutrition of host plants. Despite

absorb soil phosphate has been attributed to-the formation of clusters of rootletk in localized parts of the lupin root system. These clusters of rootlets resemble the den clusters known as proteoid roots which have been described in the family of Proteaceae by Purnell (in Trinick, 1977). Other proteoid roots have also been recorded by Lamont on V i m i n a r i a

' j z i n c e a and by Malajczuk on Kennedia (Trinick, 1977). It has now been shown that proteoid roots play an important role in thephosphorusnutrition of plants due to their increased absorbing ability as compared with normal roots (Jeffrey, 1967;

-

Malajczuk and Bowen, 1974).

Aicording to published literature, very few plant species

* form 'proteoid roots. In Senegal, one of the authors (H.G.D.) observed that rootlet clusters similar to proteoid roots can be found in Casuarina eqki3ezifoZia usually growing in sandy and deficient soils. In the cluster, lateral rootlets are so numerous that they resemble fingers (Fig. 3 ) . Proteoid

roots could therefore provide C. equisetifoZia with an alternative

, system- to mycorrhizae for increasinq P uptake from deficient ns are now in progress in our laboratory to cts of these root formations on the physiology lthough the mechanisms o f the initiation re not clear, some tion experiments oid roots may be in

e root surface (MaLajczuk

;il

I

1

220

r

i

Fig. 3 : C l u s t e r of rootlets ( p r o t e o i d r o o t s ! of C a s x i 1

* o r f a growing i n a sandy soll ( S e n e g a l )

. As m i c r o b i a l d a c t i v i t y are m n s e i n t h e

r o o t .growth: f o r example r o o t s of tomato, s u b t e r r a n e a n c l o v e r

o v i s a and McDouqall, 1 9 6 7 ) . However, p a r t i c u l a r a t t e n t i o n has een p a i d t o t h e b e n e f i c i a l e f f e c t e x e r t e d by r h i z o s p h e r e i n - a b i t a n t s . T y p i c a l r h i z o s p h e r e b a c t e r i a such as A r t h r o b a e t e r , s e u d o p o n a s and Azrobacterium w e r e found l o n g ago t o be a b l e t o roduce s u b s t a n c e s promoting p l a n t growth ( K r a s i l n i k o v , 1 9 5 8 ) .

Ectomycorrhizal f u n g i a l s o p r o v i d e t h e h o s t p l a n t w i t h phytohormones and g r o w t h - r e g u l a t i n g B v i t a m i n s ( S l a n k i s , 1 9 7 3 ) . D e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n a b o u t t h e d i r e c t e f f e c t s of b a c t e r i a on r o o t

rowth t h r o u g h the p r o d u c t i o n of p l a n t g r o w t h - r e g u l a t i n g f a c t o r s an be found i n many reviews ( X r a s i l n i k o v , 1958; K a t n e l s o n , 1965;

~ Brown, 1 9 7 5 ) . The i n f l u e n c e of e c t o n y c o r r h i z a l hormones on t h e development of r o o t s of t h e h o s t p l a n t has a l s o been amply

demonstrated i n S l a n k i s , ( l 9 7 3 ) . However, i n s t a n c e s of i n c r e a s e d . p l a n t growth r e s u l t i n g from i n t e r a c t i o n s between s o i l micro- organisms and p l a n t s show t h a t when p l a n t s a r e a r t i f i c i a l l y i n o c u l a t e d w i t h a p a r t i c u l a r microorganism known f o r a d e t e r m i n e d b i o l o a i c a l a c t i v i t y ( e . g . N 2 f i x a t i o n ; phosphorus s o l u b i l i z a t i o n ) , s t i k i l l a t i o n of p l a n t growth o f t e n was p u t a t i v e l y a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e e f f e c t of t h i s s p e c i f i c a c t i v i t y , a l t h o u g h i t may s i m p l y be due t o t h e p r o d u c t i o n of phytohormones by t h e same microorganism.

Three examples found i n d i f f e r e n t f i e l d s r e i n f o r c e t h i s p o i n t of view: (1) T h i r t y y e a r s ago, G e r r e t s e n (1948) t h o u g h t t h a t t h e i n c r e a s e d growth of p l a n t s i n s t e r i l i z e d sand c o n t a i n i n g i n s o l u b l e

. ,.

, .

7 y i e l d s have o f t e n been r e c o r d e d after i n o c u l

s m a l l m o u n t s of h i g h l y ^~ a c t i v e growth-promoti

A z o s p i m ' Z l u m b r a s i Z i e n s e , a f

a l s o induce i n c r e a s e d p l a n t g Table 3 s h w s t h a t growth of t h e a e r i a l p a r t s of rice were i v e l y s t i m u l a t e d by i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h a n o n - N ~ - f i x i n g bacteri th A . b r a s f l i e n s e , and that

r o o t growth was even more ac t i m u l & e d . Moreover, s i n c e i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h ~ z ~ s p i r i ZZum g e n e r a l l y does n o t s i g n i f i c a n t l y improve Na f i x a t i o n , Gaskins and Hube11 (1978) and Tien e t a l .

( 1 9 7 9 ) s u g g e s t e d t h a t the e f f e c t of A z o s p i r i Z t u m i n o c u l a t i o n on p l a n t growth c o u l d be due t o g r m t h - s t i m u l a t i n g s u b s t a n c e s produced by t h i s b a c t e r i u m , a s i n t h e case of A z o t o b a c t e r . ( 3 ) I n some experiments of b i o l o g i c a l c o n t r o l , r o o t disease of wheat

a s s o c i a t e d w i t h R h i z o c t o n i a s o l u n i was reduced and g r a i n y i e l d i n c r e a s e d by seed i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h b a c t e r i a and a c t i n o m y c e t e s . Merriman e t al.. ( 1 9 7 4 ) s u g g e s t e d t h a t t h e y i e l d i n c r e a s e s are p r i m a r i l y due t o p l a r t g r o w t h - s t i m u l a t i n g f a c t o r s r a t h e r th? t o t h e b i o l o g i c a l c o n t r o l of r o o t d i s e a s e .

, the b a c t e r i a (Brown, 1 9 7 5 ) . SimLlarly, i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h

v i n g NZ-fixing b a c t e r i u m , can

IMPROVEMENT O F PLANT RESISTANCE TO I N F E C T I O N

Discussion w i l l be r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e c o n t r o l of pathogens through t h e improvement of p l a n t r e s i s t a n c e by s y m b i o t i c micro- organisms o r microorganisms more o r less l o o s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e r o o t s l which i s only one a s p e c t of t h e v a s t problem

of b i o l o g i c a l c o n t r o l .

i n t h e type of c o n t r o l s t u d i e d h e r e .

Two t y p e s of mcchaqisms may be i n v o l v e d

I n h i s review, Marx (1975) i n d i c a t e d t h a t if p i n e r o o t s w e r e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h L a u c o p a x i 1 Z m c e r e a l i s var. p i c e i n a t o f c r m ectomycorrhizae, t h e y became r e s i s t a n t to i n f e c t i o n s caused by such p a t h o g e n i c f u n g i a s P h y t o p k t h o r a cinnamomi. Many

mchanisms could be i n v o l v e d t o e x p l a i n t h e p r o t e c t i v e r o l e o f e c t o m y c o r r h i z a l p i n e r o o t s . Apart from the e x p l a n a t i o n t h a t a n t i b i o t i c p r o d u c t i o n i n h i b i t s f u n g a l pathog-rns (Marx, 1975)

,

t h e f u n g a l mantle of ectomycorrhizae a l s o c r e a t e s e f f e c t i v e

7 ' 224

m c h a n i c a l b a r r i e r s a g a i n g t p e n e t r a t i o n by P. c<nnamomi. There w a s f u r t h e r e v i d e n c e t h a t f u n g a l m a n t l e s formed b y n o n - a n t i b i o t i c - p r o d u c i n g e c t o m y c o r r h i z a l f u n g i a l s o p r o t e c t e d r o o t s f r a

p a t h o g e n i c r o o t i n f e c t i o n s .

mycorrhizae may p r o v i d e p l a n t p r o t e c t i o n (Milhelm, 1973)

-

^{I n}

t h i s c a s e , t h e r e i s n o p h y s i c a l b a r r i e r , b u t e a r l y t e r r i t o r i a l o c c u p a t i o n of Living r o o t t i s s u e s by t h e endophyte may promote b i o l o g i c a l c o n t r o l .

I t i s a l s o s u g g e s t e d t h a t e n d o p h y t i c

I n t h e p r e s e n c e o f s a p r o p h y t i c m i c r o f l o r a many p l a n t s produce a m u l t i t u d e of compounds, e s p e c i a l l y the s o - c a l l e d p h y t o a l e x i n s , which can p l a y a r o l e i n r o o t disease r e s i s t a n c e . Most have been i d e n t i f i e d i n a e r i a l p l a n t p a r t s , b u t it i s

l i k e l y t h a t t h e same compounds can also be f o m d in t h e r o o t system (Paxton, 1 9 7 5 ) . F o r i n s t a n c e , p i s a t i n , the well-known p h y t o a l e x i n of t h e p e a p l a n t , o c c u r s i n t h e r o o t s as w e l l a s i n most o t h e r p a r t s of t h e p l a n t and h a s a wide spectrum of a n t i b i o t i c a c t i v i t y .

a l e x i n s i n r e s p o n s e t o P h y t o p h t h o r a f r a g a r i a e i n f e c t i o n s ( M u s s e l l and S t a p l e s , 1 9 7 1 ) .

S t r a w b e r r y r o o t s a l s o produce phyto-

MANIPULATING THE S O I L MICROFLORA

S i n c e t h e major p a r t o f t h e s o i l p o p u l a t i a i i n t r o p i c a l c o n d i t i o n s i s made up o f t h e r h i z o s p h e r e m i c r o f l o r a , and s i n c e t h e r h i z o s p h e r e m i c r o f l o r a must, be viewed as a component of t h e whole s o i l - p l a n t - a t m o s p h e r e system [ D m e r g u e s , 1978a)

,

t h e soil m i c r o f l o r a c o u l d p r e d i c t a b l y b e manipulated,' n o t o n l y d i r e c t l y by a c t i n g upon t h e microorganisms, b u t a l s o i n d i r e c t l y by a c t i n g upon t h e s o i l and t h e p l a n t . D i r e c t m a n i p u l a t i o n of t h e s o i l m i c r o f l o r a can be achieved by inocu-

l a t i o n p r a c t i c e s

,

s t e r i l i z a t i o n and t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of s p e c i f i c i n h i b i t o r s o r s p e c i f i c substrates. I n d i r e c t manipu- l a t i o n of t h e s o i l - p l a n t - a t m o s p h e r e s y s t e m can be achieved by c l a s s i c a l or n o n - c o n v e n t i o n a l s o i l management p r a c t i c e s ,

o r by a c t i n g upon t h e p l a n t component i t s e l f .

, . In spite of the fact that root colonization by non-path icroorganisms is still poorly unaerstood

,

soil microbiologis d agronomists have been trying for many years to alter the

osphere microflora by introducing selected microbial strains, er by coating seeds with an inoculum, or by placing the inoculum into the soil close to the seed or the seedling.

The value of legume inoculation is well recognized, provided

I

l that the strain used is highly effective and efficient in its symbiosis with the selected legume cultivar, that it is a good colonizer of the roots and is able to compete with any ,iative root microorqanism, and that the proper environmental prerequisites are fulfilled. However, legume inoculation by classical methods is not always fully satisfactory.

The value of ectomycorrhizal inoculation is also generally acknowledged as long as the proper environmental conditions are met (e.g. Hacskaylo, 1 9 7 2 ; fiarx and Krupa, 1 9 7 8 ) . Inoculation by endomycorrhizae is currer.cly at the experimental stage excepr.

in special situations. Preliminary reports suggest that larger responses are more likely in Lropical regions than in temperate

-

regions, because of higher temperatures and the naturally low- phosphcrrus level of soils (Iiayman, 1 9 7 8 ) .

-

Recent experiments carried out in the northern coastal area of Senegal have shown that inoculating .'asuar-ina s ; v i s e r l ' ? Z i ,

with crüshed nodules improved that plant's growth markedly (Dubrekrl and Andeque, personal communication). Further investigation OT.

the endophyte of i7u T Y . . ~ ~ : is needed in order to improve the currenr method of inoculation, which is obviously hazardous s x z s crushed nodules used as inoculum may carry pathogens.

Although techniques noculation with typically symbioz;z microorganisms (e.g. R h i c c - 1 are already Ln use in the field, or could be used in the near future (e.g. endomycorrhizaef,

-

techniques of inoculation with loosely symbiotic or non-symbiotic microorganisms (e.g. rhizosphere N 2 fixers oz phosphate-solubi- lizing bacteria) cannot yet be safely recommended.

I ' ,'

-..

The first attempts at using Npfixing rhizosphere bacteria to inoculate grasses or cereals were made

(Rubenchick, 1963). Since tha't' date many

performed, at first with A z o t o b a c b e r or B e i j e r i n c k i a ahd later with AzospiriZZum (e.g. Smith e t al., 1976: Dobereiner, 1977).

Yield increases have sometimes been reported but up to now results have generally been inconsistent.

c

Fïeld experiments with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (especially BaciZZus m e g a t h e r i u m ) have not shown any consistent effect on plant yield. According to Barber (19?8),

*

this lack of response is not really surprising for two reasons.

since a considerable proportion o f soil phosphorus is present in organic compounds and up to 90%' of the rhizosphere microflora axe capable of producing phosphatases, the introduction of other

organisms, which would have to compete for available carbon sources, is unlikely to cause any increase in the supply of phosphate to plants. secondly, the inoculum used, BaciZZus m e g a t h e r i u m v a r phosphaticum is a spore-forming bacterium and such organisms grow far less readily in the rhizosphere than do other types of bacteria".

Firstly,

When stimulation of plant growth consecutive to inoculation by N 2 fixers or phosphate-solubilizing bacteria has been observed, it could not be explained by N 2 fixation, nor by an increase of phosphate solubilization.

has resulted, at least in part, from the effecc of growth sub- stances produced by the microorganisms added w i t h inoculum, as already mentioned above. In spite of some recent improvements in the preparation of the inoculum itself (Doumel'gues e t al., 1979) or in the introduction of mixed cultures (Domergues e t a Z . , 1978), there would seem to be no easy solution to the difficulties that arise when attempting to inoculate non-sterile soils.

The stimulation of plant growth probably

Soil sickness can result from the presence of plant residues in the soil, especially root litter contáining phytotoxic sub- stances.

actively decompose the root litter appears to be a promising approach to curing these soils. Thus inoculating a Eerrallitic sandy soil that contained phytotoxic root debris with E n t e r o b a c t e r

Inoculating such soils with microorganisms that

I

227

aeae restored soil fertility (l'able 4 ) . Phytotoxic sub- nces, pxe-existing in plant residues or formed during decom- position, can possess a broad spectrum of effects that are

jurious to the roots and stems of plants (Toussoun &-ad Patrick, 6 3 ) .

il inoculation with proper microbial strains.

Such a deleterious effect could probably be seduced by

SOIL STERILIZATION AND APPLICATTON OF SPECIFIC COMPOUXDS In sterilization by heating, irradiation and drying is sed in certain circumstances, sterilization is often achieved y fumigation with such chemicals as chloroform, carbon-sulfide methylbromide or chloro-picrin. Such treatments often improve plant growth even in the absence of pathogens (Wilhelm, 1966;

Rovira, 1976). This beneficial effect can be attribured to different causes: chemical modifications, especially increase of NH4 zontent, flush of organic matter decQmposition, including

d microorganisms (Anderson and Domsch, 1978), elimination of nitrifying bacteria, which are particularly vulnerablt to fumi- gation (Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976), and re-colonizeiron of soil by rion-pathogenic microorganisms, especially pseudomcnads, which are thought to stimulate plant growth (Ridge, 1976).

Soil sterilization prior to inoculation wich rr.y-orrhizae

u appears to be most helptul in special sltuations ( L a i i b and Richards, 1978). Among these are fumigated nursery s o l l s where severe stunting of citrus was reported: inoculation with vesicular-arbuscular-mycorrhizae appeared to be the kest method to overcome this stunting (Lamb and Richards, 1978; TFmmer and Leyden, 1978; Hayman, 1978).

Among the different specific inhibitors that have been studied [e.g. Anderson and Domsch, 1975), nitrification inhibitors have received much attention because of their possible use in the field.

Besides the agronomic practices mentioned above, inhibitors such as 2-chloro-6- (trichloromethy1)-pyridine have been successfully used to inhibit nitrification, thus increasing the efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers by reducing de-nitrification ana leaching

f the nitrate ion. Unfortunately, especially in tropical conditions, he inhibitor is readily decomposed by the soil microflora so

NO inoculatirn W i t h inoculatia (ccntrol)

B o t s

65 60

3.9 2.7

48.7 14.7

8.2 1.3

.

stitutes have been proposed, such as neem cake (made of the eds of A z a d i r a c h t a i n d i c a ) , but this material is not as effective

2-chloro-6 (trichloromethy1)-pyridine (Prasad and de Datta, The stimulation of a given component of the microflora can e achieved by adding a specific substrate to the soil. A lassical example is that of the selective multiplication of

decomposing microflora (Alexander, 1961).

Another example is that of the solubilization of rock- phosphate by T h i o b a c i Z Z i . These chemoautotrophic bacteria are introduced into the soil together with sulphur which is oxidized to sulphuric acid, thus dissolving the phosphate (Swaby, 1975).

FERTILIZATION AND SOIL MANAGEMENT

. .

Inoculation even with specific microorganisms, especially

n R h i z o b i u m , is unsuccessful when one of the limiting environmental factors listed in Table 1 is still operating. Therefore, improve- ment of environmental conditions is a pre-requisite that can be achieved by different soil management practices, such as irrigation, liming, application of organic amendments or slow-release

fertilizers. The beneficial effect of liming is illustrated by Table 5 (Expt. 1) which reports on a study of soybean nodulation in a ferrallitic acid soil from Casamance, Senegal. The increased nodulation was attributed to the elimination of Mn and Al toxicity of liming. Table 5 (Expt. 2), shows that the application of

organic matter even at low rates (400 kg of peat per ha) favourably affected the growth and nodulation of soybean. This last result confirms those obtained by Dart e t a l . , 1973 with V i g n a mungo and V . r a d i a t a . Neither species grew well in a nitrogen-free sand-

rit mixture.

rowth and nodulation.

t 45OoC for 4 h to remove soil organic matter, plant growth was But adding 10% of Kettering loam by volume improved

When added loam had been previously ignited

E q t . 1

C a l t r o l 4.0 a ¹⁴ a 4 2 a 3.38 a

co3

(2500 kg per ha) 7.0 b 39 b U 2 b 3178 a

E x p t . 2

4.0 a 28 a 44 a ^' 2.16 a C c n t r o l

Fe a t

(400 kg p r ha) 4.0 a 41 b 88 b 3.03 b

Qle p l a n t per pot cmtaining 5 kg of s o i l fran Sefa &sear& Statim, Senegal. A l 1 plants we= i n o c u l a t e d w i t h 1 ml of a 3-day old culture of f i i z o b i m . j a p " m m asp (10 bacteria per ml)

.

Observatims were made wfen plants VÆE 6 weeks old.

colunns not hrming the smre letter are statistically difkrent a

I n e¿& experirrent, n u n h r s in

(P = .05).

and the plants eventually died.

A combination of liming, ploughing and the application of farm-yard manure was reportea significantly to increase peanut yields in Cent91 Senegal, probably through increasing N2 fixation

(Wey and Obaton, 1978).

Since N2 fixation is not always active enough to meet the To gume's requirements, it is necessary to use nitrogen fertilizers.

t it is known that such applications inhibit N2 fixation.

prevent this inhibition in legumes, Hardy e t al. (1973) suggested the use of other form of nitrogen fertilizers that do not inhibit N2 fixation, while providing the plants with the complementary nitrogen required for their growth. Such new forms of chemical fertilizers, which they designated as compatible fertilizers, could also be recommended for use. The possibility, though promising, has not yet been seriously explored.

Nitrification can be controlled by such classical methods as split application of ammonium fertilizers, localization in mud balls (International Rice Research Institute, 1978), or banding, which inhibits nitrification due to the effect of the high

-

_' concentration of fertilizer on nitrifying bacteria (Wetselaar e t a l . , 1972; Myers, 1978). The use of slow-release fertilizers is

+ also recommended to avoid the harmful effects of nitrification (Fochts and Verstraete

,

¹⁹⁷⁷⁾

.

MANIPULATION OF THE PLANT COMPONENT OF THE SOIL-PLANT-MICRO- ORGANISMS SYSTEM

Introducing a specific crop in the rotation system has been used successfully as a basis for the biological control of some pests. Thus in Florida, soils infested by nematodes pathogenic to tomato, are cured by growing a grass, D i g i t a r i a decumbens, after the tomato crop (Salette, personal communication).

Crop rotation is often the best method of controlling soil-

borne phytopathogenic fungi in cereals (see Baker and Cook, 1974).

he possibility of increasing populations of microorganisms eneficial to plants through proper crop rotation was suggested y Krasilnikov (19.58) but the method has not yet been exploited.

w i l l p r o b a b l y be d i f f i c u l t t o i n i t i a t e and develop b e c a u s e of t h e l a r g e v a r i a b i l i t y o f climate and s o i l c o n d i t i o n s .

G e n e t i c v a r i a b i l i t y i n p l a n t s responding t o lhhizobhium i n f e c t i o n i s w e l l known. T h i s v a r i a b i l i t y could b e u s e d as a b a s i s f o r t h e b r e e d i n g programmes of legumes. The f u t u r e of t h i s approach w a s envisi0ne.d a s f o l l o w s by Hol1 and La Rue ( 1 9 7 4 ) .

" P l a n t genes c o n t r o l l i n g f i x a t i o n do o c c u r , and e x p e r i e n c e shows t h a t w e can o b t a i n i n f o r m a t i v e and u s e f u l v a r i a n t s . There i s no obvious, r e a s o n why s y m b i o t i c f i x a t i o n cannot be i n c r e a s e d by g e n e t i c means. W e can e n v i s a g e c u l t i v a r s which n o d u l a t e e a r l y i n h a r s h s o i l c o n d i t i o n s , f i x d i n i t r o g e n , even i n the p r e s e n c e of h i g h s o i l n i t r a t e levels, and c o n t i n u e f i e n g t h r o u g h o u t t h e i r l i f e . I t a p p e a r s t h a t f i x a t i o n may be l i m i t e d by t h e s u p p l y of p h o t o s y n t h a t e t o t h e r o o t s . I n c r e a s e d f i x a t i o n may t h e n r e q u i r e g r e a t e r p h o t o s y n t h e s i s , d e c r e a s e d p h o t o r e s p i r a t i o n

,

d e l a y e d l o d g i n g , o r less pod-nodule competition f o r c a r b o n " .

Two examples may s e r v e a s an i l l u s t r a t i o n f o r such a promising approach, which h a s n o t y e t been s e r i o u s l y e x p l o i t e d . The f i r s t concerns t h e n o d u l a t i o n of p e a n u t . Comparing t h e t i m e c o u r s e of n o d u l e d r y w e i g h t of three peanut c u l t i v a r s grown i n 1977 a t t h e same t i m e i n i d e n t i c a l c o n d i t i o n s (Dior s o i l , C e n t r a l S e n e g a l )

,

Germani ( 1 9 7 9 ) found t h a t t h e maxiinum nodule w e i g h t of two of them was much h i g h e r th^ t h a t of t h e t h i r d ( F i g . 4 ) . However, such r e s u l t s s h o u l d be i n t e r p r e t e d w i t h c a u t i o n s i n c e d i f f e r e n c e s i n n o d u l e w e i g h t a r e also observed from one y e a r t o a n o t h e r . Thus t h e m a x i m u m nodule weight of cv. 55-437, which was o n l y 70 mg i n 1977, c o u l d reach 100 mg i n t h e same s o i l d u r i n g more humid y e a r s (1973 and 1975) and even more t h a n 2 0 0 mg d u r i n g an even more humid y e a r ( 1 9 7 4 ) (Wey and Obaton, 1 9 7 8 ) .

The o t h e r example i s r e l a t e d t o soybeaq. I n West A f r i c a n s o i l s , c e r t a i n soybean c u l t i v a r s , such as Malayan, are r e a d i l y n o d u l a t e d by n a t i v e BaR2izobium of the cow-pea group, whereas other c u l t i v a r s , such as B o s s i e r , a h i g h y i e l a i n g cv. from t h e USA, r e q u i r e i n o c u l a t i o n w i t h t h e s p e c i f i c lhR2izobium japonieum ' % t r a i n s . S e l e c t i o n of h i g h - y i e l d i n g soybean t h a t c o u l d n o d u l a t e w i t h n a t i v e %izobitri.: of the cow-pea group would

. .

n

F i

&

I ^{3 0 0}

5

-

^{2 0 0}

a

c3 z

c

I c3 3 w w

I

100

F i g . 4 .

O 20 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 1 2 0

AGE ^OF

^THE

PLANT

(DAYS)

T i m e c o u r s e of n o d u l e d r y w e i g h t of p e a n u t e x p r e s s e d a s mg p e r p l a n t . A : c v . 2 8 - 2 0 6 and GH 1 1 9 - 2 0 ;

B : c v . 5 5 - 4 3 7 . A l l d a t a a r e mean v a l u e s f o r c o l l e c t i o n s i n 1 9 7 7 a t P a t a r , C e n t r a l S e n e g a l ( G e r m a n i , 1 9 7 9 )

-

CONCLUS IONS

This paper has summarized the numerous ways in which soil microorganisms can affect the fertility of soil and it has noted, with examples, how in some cases they can be manipulated in order

to benefit the growth of plants. Up to now practically all work done has been with agricultural, horticultural or forestry land- use systems. There is clearly a very urgent need now to relate specific areas of soil microbiological research to agroforestry systems in which woody and herbaceous plants will be grown either mixed together or in some sequential manner.

The many possible ways in which the activities of soil micro- organisms in the soil-plant association of one of these groups of plants can affect the other is an almost untouched field of research. In particular, the effects on microorganisms of soil management, innoculation and nitrogen fixation and transformation, and the consequent influence on soil fertility in agroforestry systems might be given early attention.

D I

^SCUSSI O N

Keya: Nitrification inhibitors are produced in the r m t s of many grasses.

The neem (Azadirachta i n d i c a ) plant also produces such an inhibitor, which might have some prospects in agroforestq.

Scinchez: In North Queensland, Australia, they have observed a competitive relationship between EucaZ@us and grass pastilre for li, but not in legume pasture.

Pereira: The reason for all crops doing poorly after sorghum in dry conditions is that the stubble continues to utilize water from the 2-m deep subsoil for many weeks.

bmergues: A reduction in soil water content may also reduce the micro- biological activity responsible for decomposing phytotoxic compounds added by sorghum roots.

Ahn: Some grasses are known to inhibit nitrification in West African savanna soils.

the first season followed by grain crops.

Thus, yams (Dioscorea spp.) which demand less U, are grown in

235

es:

e r a l i z e d and it i s o n l y p r o g r e s s i v e l y decomposecl.

p r e s i d u e s a r e e a s i l y mineralized.

Pwbably N immobilized ir! t h e grass r o o t system i s n o t I n c o n t r

Does t h e phytotoxic e f f e c t of sorghum on a succeeding c r o p apply t o a succeeding crop of sorghum a l s o ?

rgues: Y e s . However, t h e phytotoxic e f f e c t i s o n l y on s o i l s w i t h low biological a c t i v i t y and w a t e r reserve.

Zsen: Does g r a s s exude n i t r i f i c a t i o n i n h i b i t o r s , t h e r e b y reducing growth of Eucalyptus?

ergU0s: Y e s . But t h e r e i s no published r e f e r e n c e f o r t h e i n h i b i t i o n of Eußalyptus growth.

t: C i t r u s and peach produce t o x i c m a t e r i a l s i n t h e i r r o o t s which i n h i b i t the development of new trees.

i n h i b i t o r s t h a t p r e v e n t germination u n t i l t h e s e water-soluble i n h i b i t o r s sre leached away o r changed chemically.

Some seeds of d e s e r t annuals have growth

LITERATURE CITED

xander, M. 1961. Introduction E o Soiz ~ C P o b i o z o g y . J h Wiley, New Y o r k . i s , D.P. de and Abeynayake, K . 1978. A survey of mycorrhiza i n some fores:

trees of S r i Lanka.

&eorrhiza Bseareh. Kumasi, September 1978, IFS, Stockholm. pp. 135- 155.

3 1 : Proe. I*.;snrationaZ Workshop on TropicaZ

derson, J.P.E. and Domsch, K.H. 1978. A p h y s i o l o g i c a l method f o r the

q u a n t i t a t i v e masuremznt of microbial biomass i n s o i l s . SoiZ BioZ. Bio&-., 10: 215-221.

a k e r , K.F. and Cook, R . J . 1974. i?tc.:3jicaZ eontroz o f p l a n t pathoge?ls.

W.H. Freeman and Compagny, San Francisco.

a r b e r , D.A. 1978. N u t r i e n t uptake. I n : Y.R. Domergues and S.V. Krupa (E&.!:

Interactions between n m - p a t h e m - i e s o i 2 microorganisms ïmd pZants

.

Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 131-162.

l a c k , R. 1978. The role of mycorrhizal symbiosis i n t h e n u t r i t i o n of t r o p i d p l a n t s . I n : Proc. I r t e m a t i m c z l Xorkshop on Tropical @jcorrhiza ResearG.

Kumasi, September 1978, IFS. Stookinolm. pp. 73-86.

a d , R.D. 1964. The i n f l u e n c e of &&e m i c r o f l o r a cm the p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of s o i l s . I I . F i e l d s t u d i e s cn water r e p e l l e n t s a n d s . Austr. J . S o i l

R e s . , 2 : 123-131.

a d , R.D. a n d H a r r i s , J . R . 1964. %e i n f l u e n c e of the m i c r o f l o r a on the p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of soi'ls. I. The occurrence and s i g n i f i c a n c e of micrchial f i l a m n t s and slimes izs o i l s . Austr. J. S d Z Res., 2: 111-

. I

122.

'

%,

, Bowen, G.D. 1973. Mineral n u t r i t i c m of Ectomycorrhizae. I n : G.C. Marks and

I T.T. Kozlawski (E&.): ,Eeton;yccmhizcie. Academic P r e s s , New Y o r k and

_. London. pp. 151-197.