• Aucun résultat trouvé

Fit to drive.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Fit to drive."

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

VOL 5: MARCH • MARS 2005d Canadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien 327

Editorials

Fit to drive

David W. Irving, MD, FRCPC, FACP, FACC

O

ne of the main problems facing the medical profession, licensing authorities, and legis- lators is how to determine medical fi tness to drive a vehicle. Driving requires many functions, including vision, mobility, refl exes, and cognition.

Most of these can be, and are, tested, and national standards have been set and are followed. For exam- ple, visual acuity, depth perception, and visual fi eld defects are regularly examined in physicians’ offi ces, and whether patients meet currently accepted stan- dards is assessed.

Of greater concern is cognition—the mental fac- ulties of perception, thought, reason, and memory.

Problems with poor or altered cognition (usually a result of aging) should be investigated in older drivers. Tests to determine cognitive function are not always standardized or reproducible. Th ey are time-consuming and, most importantly, standards for determining decrease in cognitive function have not been established and applied consistently to drivers.

Excellent articles by Dr David Hogan (page 362) and Dr Frank Molnar and colleagues (page 372) appear in this issue. They review and discuss approaches to office assessment of driving com- petence and consider practical approaches to eval- uating medical fitness to drive in older patients, especially with regard to mental ability.

Th e number of older drivers is increasing and will continue to increase, relative to younger driv- ers, in the future. Unfortunately, there will also be a progressive increase in cognitively impaired drivers. Cognitive impairment negates the posi- tive eff ects of experience and skills gained by older drivers during their lives.

Cognitive impairment can be subtle and incon- sistent in presentation, making it very diffi cult for physicians to assess in a single offi ce visit. Subtle or early aberrations are hard to spot, especially if patients are not seen regularly. Other complexities

arise, as pointed out by Dr Hogan, in association with other debilitating diseases, and with use of multiple medications—prescribed as well as over- the-counter—and possible adverse reactions and interactions that might impair cognition.

Offi ce assessment using tests such as trail-mak- ing, clock drawing, and counting backward, are use- ful in themselves, but these tests are not calibrated, and standards have yet to be established and univer- sally adopted. Th e Mini-Mental State Examination is a useful screening procedure to assess cognitive function. It is standardized, easy to use, and has been accepted as valid by many authorities, includ- ing the Canadian Council of Motor Transport Administrators, whose Medical Review Board has

set national standards for Canadian drivers.

Ultimately, actual road tests might be required for assessment. Some computer tests are available, but unfamiliarity with computers and stress or ner- vousness on the part of examinees can be problems in assessment. A road test with a qualifi ed exam- iner might be the fi nal hurdle. A test where a driver is asked to follow a set of instructions (eg, “turn left,” “change lanes,” or “pull to the curb”) might be completed accurately, because these are short- term directions. A request such as, “Take me to your doctor’s offi ce” (or barber, or bank, or grocery store), might be of more value. Th ese more compli- cated requests rely on memory and other cognitive skills. Th ose types of requests, however, add cost, requirements for personnel, and possible delays to the process of licensing drivers.

Rural seniors are at a greater disadvantage when they lose their licences than those in urban areas, as they are more likely to become isolated and lose their independence. In rural areas, however, there is usually less traffi c, less chance of physical change in familiar routes and places, and fewer signs, direc- tions, and instructions to be followed. Seniors from rural areas can sometimes benefi t from restricted

FOR PRESCRIBING INFORMATION SEE PAGE 413

(2)

328 Canadian Family Physician • Le Médecin de famille canadien dVOL 5: MARCH • MARS 2005

Editorials

licences permitting them to drive only during day- light hours, in uncongested areas, and within a defined radius of home. Similar restrictions might, on occasion, be placed on urban drivers, prohibit- ing, for example, driving during peak traffic hours or in heavy traffic areas. Seniors often impose these limitations on themselves.

Society, as well as civic and municipal jurisdic- tions, will have to come to grips with the loss of mobility and independence imposed on seniors due to restriction or loss of drivers’ licences.

Alternative transportation services, such as small buses, affordable and accessible taxis, or groups willing to drive seniors to doctors’ appointments and errands, will be needed. Such resources exist in some areas, but will need to be expanded and be universally available. More seniors might be willing to forgo drivers’ licences if convenient, available, and inexpensive alternatives are in place.

The cost of a vehicle, maintenance, and insurance can pay for a lot of taxi fares!

Education and reinforcement of driving skills are especially important for seniors, who might be experiencing slower reaction times, poorer judgment and attitudes, a lack of attentiveness, or increasing loss of cognition. Retraining courses, defensive driving classes, and retesting help to

erase or correct poor driving habits and rebuild confidence.

Physicians must be willing to take the time to assess patients and to explain their concerns about driving for the safety of all concerned.

The articles by Hogan and Molnar et al are to be commended. It is increasingly important not only to bring these problems and concerns to the forefront, but also to present solutions and to establish evidence-based tools that can be used to assess more accurately patients’ ability to drive safely.

Dr Irving is a retired internist in Edmonton, Alta. He is a senior member of the Medical Review Committee of the Alberta Department of Transportation, Driver Fitness, and Monitoring and was Chair of the committee that pre- pared the Canadian Medical Association’s Determining Medical Fitness to Drive. A Guide for Physicians.

Correspondence to: Dr David Irving, 6219 129 St, Edmonton, AB T6H 3X7; telephone (780) 434-5164; fax (780) 435-4256; e-mail dwirving@shaw.ca

The opinions expressed in editorials are those of the author and do not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

...

Références

Documents relatifs

5 Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.. 6 Department of

30 allows the more efficient extraction of intracellular or cell wall components of the microalgae (Chen et 1357.

It is also not necessary, according to this principle, that the individual have insight or acceptance about the fact that his driving poses risk of harm—an aspect of the

• This study demonstrated that the DriveABLE In-Office assessment was highly accurate in identifying drivers with suspected or confirmed cognitive impairment who would pass or

As family physicians, we have a responsibility for patient and public safety, and assessment of medical fitness to drive is an essential part of this

Other than for determining absolute disqualifying diagnoses, the current physician-based paradigm should be set aside and simulated road testing, supplemented by

4 One of the recommendations from the most recent Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia in 2006 states that “most patients

With this aim, we inspect different methods designed to enrich the perception of the robot, as well as to implement reactive robot behaviors (e.g., shared