• Aucun résultat trouvé

Extension of the ESA CCI Total Ozone Climate Data Record with the Application of the GODFITv3 Algorithm to OMI Observations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Extension of the ESA CCI Total Ozone Climate Data Record with the Application of the GODFITv3 Algorithm to OMI Observations"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: insu-01162162

https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-01162162 Submitted on 15 Aug 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Extension of the ESA CCI Total Ozone Climate Data Record with the Application of the GODFITv3

Algorithm to OMI Observations

Christophe Lerot, Thomas Danckaert, Michel van Roozendael, Robert Spurr, Diego Loyola, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Mariliza Koukouli, Irene Zyrichidou,

Dimitris Balis, Jean-Christopher Lambert, et al.

To cite this version:

Christophe Lerot, Thomas Danckaert, Michel van Roozendael, Robert Spurr, Diego Loyola, et al.. Extension of the ESA CCI Total Ozone Climate Data Record with the Application of the GODFITv3 Algorithm to OMI Observations. ATMOS 2015. Advances in Atmospheric Science and Applications, Jun 2015, Heraklion, Greece. 41, Paper 115, 2015. �insu-01162162�

(2)

The OMI _GODFIT product: first validation results

The GODFITv3 algorithm

1

 Direct fitting of measured radiances in the Huggins bands (325-335 nm).  State vector includes a.o. total ozone, effective temperature and albedo.  O3 cross-section: Brion, Malicet, Daumont et al.2

1 Lerot et al., JGR, 2014; 2 Malicet et al, J. Atmos. Chem., 1995, 3 Mc Peters et al., JGR, 2007; 4 Ziemke et al., ACP, 2011;

The OMI _GODFIT product: inter-sensor comparison

Extension of the ESA CCI total ozone climate data record with the

application of the GODFITv3 algorithm to OMI observations

C. Lerot

(1,)

, T. Danckaert

(1)

, M. Van Roozendael

(1)

, R. Spurr

(2)

, D. Loyola

(3)

,

M. Coldewey-Egbers

(3)

, M. Koukouli

(4)

,

I. Zyrichidou

(4)

, D. Balis

(4)

, J.-C. Lambert

(1)

,

J. Granville

(1)

,

F. Goutail

(5)

, J.P. Pommereau

(5)

, and C. Zehner

(6)

(1) BIRA-IASB, (2) RT Solutions, Inc., (3) DLR-IMF, (4) AUTH, (5) LATMOS, (6) ESA/ESRIN, : christl@oma.be

Abstract

One of the great achievements of the first phase of the ESA Ozone Climate Change Initiative has been the release of new level-2 total ozone data sets from GOME, SCIAMACHY and GOME-2/Metop-A reprocessed with the latest GODFIT-3 algorithm. These data sets are characterized by unprecedented standards of consistency, stability and accuracy.

Recently, GODFIT has been adapted in order to analyze backscattered light spectra measured by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). In particular, a new look-up table version of GODFIT has been developed to process the massive OMI level-1 data set in a timely and fast manner. This approach maintains a level of accuracy similar to that of the on-line GODFIT version, in addition to providing accelerated performance by a factor of 10. This fast algorithm has been used to reprocess the entire OMI time series, thus extending the ESA CCI Climate data record for total ozone. Here, we compare the OMI GODFITv3 total ozone product to the two operational products OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS, and also to the historical multi-sensor CCI data set.

We show that an optimization of the pre-flight instrumental slit functions has been necessary in the ozone fitting window (325-335 nm) in order to completely eliminate any row dependence in the product. Such an optimization of the pre-flight slit functions has also the potential to enhance the consistency between total ozone data sets from different sensors as demonstrated here with GOME-2A and -2B.

ESA CCI total ozone data sets

Sensor Period

GOME/ERS-2 Jul 95 – Jun 11 SCIAMACHY/Envisat Aug 02 – Mar 12

GOME-2/Metop-A Jan 07 – Dec 14 GOME-2/Metop-B Jan 13 – Dec 14 OMI/AURA Oct 04 – Dec 14

Data available:

- Orbit files in NetCDF - Overpass files

- Gridded daily data

+ Level-3 merged data GTO-ECV v2*

* Coldewey-Egbers et al., AMTD, 2015

 A priori profiles: total column-classified climatology TOMSv83 combined with the

tropospheric column climatology from OMI/MLS4

 Simulated spectra are computed on-the-fly with LIDORT or extracted from pre-calculated tables. The latter option is faster by a factor of 10, while maintaining a very high level of accuracy.

 Optional Brewer-based soft-calibration of level-1 reflectances to reduce the impact of calibration limitations. This procedure is not necessary for OMI.

LUT – online difference (%)

Main features

GODFIT has the capability to optimize instrumental slit functions and to account for resolution change along the orbit. This may impact significantly the product quality.

Optimization of instrumental slit functions

Nadir-normalized ozone differences (%)

1. Row dependence of the OMI data set 2. GOME-2B/-2A consistency

Mean GOME-2B-GOME-2A differences

Conclusions

 The algorithm GODFITv3, selected to generate the total ozone ECV as part of the Ozone_CCI project, has been adapted to handle the OMI data. The full mission has been recently reprocessed using a fast look-up table version of the algorithm and is available to the public on www.esa-ozone-cci.org, along with the other CCI data sets.

 A proper characterization of the instrumental slit functions is essential to have products of good quality and may help to enhance the inter-sensor consistency. In particular, using an

optimized OMI slit function in the O3 fitting window led to a significant reduction of the row

dependence in the OMI_GODFIT product.

 In general, the three total ozone products OMI_GODFIT, OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS are very

consistent. However, larger differences appear in extreme conditions (high SZAs, extreme O3

columns, high clouds, …). Also, OMI_GODFIT agrees very well with the other CCI data sets as well as with the US golden standard long-term record SBUV v8.6.

 Validation shows that the time stability of GODFIT-OMI is excellent (<0.5%/decade) and meets the CCI user requirements. In future CCI activities, this product will be used as the long-term reference for soft-calibrating other sensors.

http://www.esa-ozone-cci.org

Comparison with OMI_TOMS and OMI_DOAS

SZA dependence O3 column dependence Cloud altitude dependence

Comparison with standard climate total O

3

records

CCI Level-2 data sets

Zonal mean differences in (60°S-60°N)

Total O3 differences wrt SBUV v8.6 (%)

More details provided in Poster #89 by M. Koukouli et al. Time dependence

Références

Documents relatifs

We present the latest validation analyses and results of the ozone profile products (from limb- and nadir-viewing instruments) developed during the second phase of

The reference experiment, referred as EXP1, rep- resents the BASCOE model with ERA-Interim thermo- dynamic forcing, on a 37 hybrid pressure level grid (a subset from the 60

The Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) has set out requirements for satellite data to meet the needs of climate science, designating key variables that are currently feasible

Furthermore, two main documents are available covering all CRDP3 products: The Product Validation and Intercomparison Report (PVIR, version 4) (Buchwitz et al., 2016),

In the frame of the ESA-funded project “GDP 5.0 - Upgrade of the GOME Data Processor for Improved Total Ozone Columns”, total ozone estimates from different

Thus, the improvement made by O 3 L2 version 5 (v5) product compared with version 4 (v4), allows IASI TCO products to be used with confidence to study the distribution and

The Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) has set out requirements for satellite data to meet the needs of climate science, designating key variables that are currently feasible

Furthermore, the comparison to in situ SM observations is utilized to: (i) evaluate the impact of the quality of the atmospheric forcing on the land DA results, (ii) assess whether