• Aucun résultat trouvé

ensemble inversion of time-dependent core flow models

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "ensemble inversion of time-dependent core flow models"

Copied!
31
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00377131

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00377131

Submitted on 6 May 2009

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

ensemble inversion of time-dependent core flow models

Nicolas Gillet, Alexandra Pais, Dominique Jault

To cite this version:

Nicolas Gillet, Alexandra Pais, Dominique Jault. ensemble inversion of time-dependent core

flow models. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, AGU and the Geochemical Society, 2009,

pp.2008GC002290. �10.1029/2008GC002290�. �hal-00377131�

(2)

Niolas Gillet

†∗

, MariaAlexandra Pais

& Dominique Jault

AeptedforpubliationatGeohem., Geophy s., Geosyst., April2009

LGIT,UniversityJosephFourier,CNRS, BP53,38041GrenobleCedex9,FRANCE.

CFC,DepartmentofPhysis,UniversityofCoimbra,3004-516Coimbra,PORTUGAL.

orrespondingauthor: Niolas.Gilletobs.ujf-grenoble.fr

Résumé

Quasi-geostrophi oreowmodelsarebuilt fromtwoseularvariationmodelsspanning

the periods 19602002 and 19972008. We relyon anensemblemethodto aount for the

ontributionsoftheunresolvedsmall-salemagnetield interatingwithore surfaeows

to the observed magneti eld hanges. The dierent ore ow members of the ensemble

solution agree up tospherial harmoni degree ℓ≃10,and this resolvedomponent varies onlyweaklywithregularization.Takingintoaount theniteorrelationtimeofthesmall-

saleonealedmagnetield,wendthatthetimevariationsofthemagnetieldourring

overshorttime-sales,suhasthegeomagnetijerks,anbeaountedforbytheresolved

largesalepartoftheowtoalargeextent.Residualsfromourowmodelsare30%smaller

for reentepohs,after 1995. Thisresult isattributedto animprovement inthe quality of

geomagneti data.The magnetield models showlittle frozen-uxviolation for the most

reent epohs,withinourestimateoftheapparentmagnetiuxhangesattheore-mantle

boundaryarisingfromspatialresolutionerrors.Weassoiatethemoreimportantuxhanges

deteted atearlier epohswith unertaintiesinthe eld modelsat large harmonidegrees.

Ouroreowmodelsshow,atallepohs,aneentriandplanetarysaleanti-ylonigyre

irlingaroundtheylindrialsurfaetangenttotheinnerore,atapproximately30

and60

latitudeundertheIndianandPaioeans,respetively.Theyaountwellforthehanges

inore angularmomentumforthemostreentepohs.

1 Introdution

Largeandmediumsalesoforesurfaeowshavebeenapturedastheresultoftheontinuous

observation of the large-sale (harmoni degree ℓ ≤ 13) Earth's magneti eld from low Earth

orbiting satellites sine 1999 [ Holme and Olsen, 2006℄. Unfortunately, from the Earth surfae

upwards,thesmall-salemagnetield(ℓ >13)originatingfromtheoreisdiulttoisolate: itsintensityathigherdegreesbeomesweakerthanthatofthelithospherield. Thesmall-sale

oreeld is muh strongerat theore surfae,where it interats signiantly with themedium

salesoftheowandontributestothelarge-saleseularvariation(SV)[ Hulotetal.,1992℄.This

SV signalorresponds to spatial resolution errors,sometimes alled errors of representativeness

in thedata assimilationommunity [ Kalnay, 2003℄.Both Eymin and Hulot [2005℄and Pais and

Jault [2008℄reliedonastohasti approahto quantify itatdisretetimes.Theyfoundthat the

spatialresolutionerrorsdominatetheerrorbudgetforthelargelengthsaleseularvariation.

Ensemble methodsareroutinelyusedinatmospheriforeastingtoprodueestimatesforthe

omplete probability density of the state variable [ Wunsh, 2000℄. Ensemble foreasting helps

improve the foreastby ensemble averaging, and provides an indiationof thereliability of the

foreast[ Kalnay, 2003, p. 236℄.Weremark that ensemble methods are suitableto quantify the

ontributionoftheonealedinteratingwiththesurfaeoreowto theobservedlarge-sale

SV.UsinganensemblemethodmakesitstraightforwardtoaountforthetimevariabilityofB(t)˜ .

Weantiipatethatimprovingourknowledgeofthetimepropertiesoftheseularvariationsignal

thatresultsfrom theadvetionofmayhelpalleviateitsimpatonthealulationofthelarge-

saleoresurfaeow.Typialtimesalesforthemagnetieldstrutureshavebeenderivedfrom

theratiooftheSVandmain eldspetra[ Hulotand Mouël,1994℄.Extrapolatingthosespetra,

(3)

as obtainedfrom time-dependent eld models, one nds thattypially has orrelation times

oftheorder of20yrsand belowforharmonidegreesabove13.It isthusreasonabletosuppose

that its advetion entailsspatial resolution errors that are orrelated in time. We test this idea

andgenerateanensembleoforeowsolutionsfromanensembleofsmall-salemagnetields

orrelatedintime.

All disussions on ore dynamis relying on observations of magneti eld time hanges are

potentiallyaeted bythespatial resolutionerrorsthat weseekto quantify.As anexample,the

observedtemporalvariationsof theunsigned magnetiux areoften interpretedas evidene for

magnetidiusion[ GubbinsandBloxham,1985℄.Itisnoteasy,however,todisentangletherespe-

tiveontributionsofmagneti diusion,andthat ofindution involvingtheunresolvedmagneti

eld,tothehangesinmagnetiuxattheoresurfae.Anotherexampleisthesuggestion[ Blox-

hametal.,2002℄thatgeomagnetijerksmayresultfromtheinterationbetweentorsionalAlfvén

wavesandtheradialmagnetield at theoremantleboundary(CMB).Aordingto Bloxham

et al.[2002℄,dierenesin thegeometry oftheradialmagneti eldfrom one plae totheother

explaintheobservationthatgeomagnetijerksareseeninsomeomponentsatsomeobservatories

butnotdetetedinothers.Weshallinvestigaterstwhihomponentofthelargesaleoreow

aountsfor the rapid hanges of themagneti eld, one time orrelation of spatial resolution

errorsistakenintoaount,andseondly whetherspatial resolutionerrorshavemoreimpaton

magnetiseriesinsomeobservatoriesthanin others.

The set-upof ourore ow inverse problem isdetailed in Ÿ2.Wealulate quasi-geostrophi

time-dependentoreowsfromtwoSV modelsoveringannualtodeadaltimesales:theom-

prehensive model CM4 [ Sabaka et al., 2004℄, whih overs 19602002, and the model xCHAOS

[ Olsen and Mandea, 2008℄, derived from satellitedata and annual dierenesof monthly means

overthe period 19972008. Theamplitudeofthe spatialresolution errors,theirtime orrelation

and SV preditionsfrom ourdierent owmodelsat loationof magneti observatoriesaredis-

ussedin Ÿ3. Estimates ofthehangesin themagneti ux throughthemain reverseux path

(beneath SouthAtlanti) assoiatedwith thespatialresolutionerrorsarethen arriedoutinŸ4.

Theomputedoreowsaredesribedin Ÿ5,whereaomparisonwithindependentlengthofday

dataisalsoarriedout.Finally,inŸ6wedisusstheperspetivesfortheoreowinverseproblem.

2 Methodology

2.1 Formalism and notations

Vetorsm,yandxstorethespherialharmonioeientsforthemainmagnetield,seular

variation, poloidal and toroidal salarsofthe oresurfaeowmodelrespetively. The`data' y

(andtheirassoiatederrorse)arelinkedtotheoreowmodelx,ateveryepoht,viatheforward

problem

y(t) =A[m(t)]x(t) +e, (1)

orrespondingtothefrozenux radialindution equationattheCMB[e.g.Holme,2007℄

∂Br

∂t =−∇h·(uBr). (2)

We hooseto trunate the seular variationdata set at harmoni degreey = 13. Themain

eld m= [m,m]˜ isomposed ofalargesalepartmobtainedfrom publishedgeomagnetield

models(up todegreem= 13),andasmall-salepart(degreesm< ℓ≤ℓm)estimatedwitha

stohastiapproah(Ÿ2.3).Wetrunatetheoreowmodelatx= 26 [ Pais andJault, 2008℄,a

degreehighenoughtoinludeinterationsbetweenmandxpossiblygeneratingseularvariation

at ℓ ≤ ℓy. The trunation level foris hosen asm = 40, a degree high enough to inlude

interationsbetweenandxpossiblygeneratingseularvariationatℓ≤ℓy.Thevetorssizesof

m, y andx at asingleepohare thenNm =ℓm(ℓm+ 2),Ny =ℓy(ℓy+ 2)and Nx = 2ℓx(ℓx+ 2),

respetively.

(4)

[ Bakus, 1968℄. For short timesale dynamis, the ratio between Lorentz and Coriolis fores is

alsotheratiobetweenthefrequeniesof Alfvénand inertialwaves,and an beestimated bythe

Lehnert [1954℄numberλ=B/Ωc√ρµ0 [ Jault,2008℄,where cis theouteroreradius,ρtheore

density,µ0thepermeabilityoffreespae,therotationrate,andBisanestimateofthemagneti

eldstrength. B istypiallyofafewmTinside theore,basedonalongtimesalefore balane

[ Starhenko and Jones, 2002℄, whih givesλ ∼ 104 ≪ 1. This motivates the use of the quasi-

geostrophi (QG) hypothesis, a onstraintwhih allowsa ow invariantparallel to therotation

axis zto be desribed everywhere in theouter ore. It implies the tangentialgeostrophy(TG)

onstrainth·(ucosθ) = 0 at theCMB [ Hills, 1979, Le Mouël, 1984℄, plusnon-penetrationat the tangent ylinder(the ylindertangent to theinner ore and alignedwith therotationaxis)

andequatorialsymmetryoutsidethetangentylinder[ Pais andJault,2008℄.Wedeomposethe

oreowas u=ue+uzˆz. Thez-invariantequatorialomponentue of theow an bedened

withastream funtionψ(s, φ, t)as

ue(s, φ, t) =∇ ×(zψ). (3)

Thedesriptionoftheowisompletedbytheexpressionofitsaxialomponent

uz(s, φ, z, t) = −sz

H(s)2us(s, φ, t), (4)

whihensuresthenon-penetrationonditionattheCMB,with(s, φ, z)theylindrialoordinates

andH(s) =√

c2−s2 thehalf-heightofauidolumn.

There exists a basis of ow vetors that automatially satisfy the TG onstraint [ Le Mouël

etal., 1985,Bakusand Le Mouël,1986℄.Theowoeientsw in thatbasisarerelatedto the

oeientsxinthetoroidal/poloidalexpansionthroughtheorthogonalmatrixG:

x(t) =Gw(t). (5)

Thenumberofunknownsfor asingleepohis thenreduedto Nw=ℓ2x the sizeof thevetorw

[ Jakson, 1997℄.We denote H(t) = A(t)G the matrixrelating the ow oeientsw to the SV

oeientsy.

We follow Jakson [1997℄ for the implementation of the time-dependent problem (see also

Bloxham andJakson [1992℄).Theoreowoeientsareexpandedintermsofabasisofubi

B-splines funtions Fp(t) [ Lanaster and Salkauskas, 1986℄uniformly spanning the timeinterval

[ts, te] withknot-spaing∆t:

w(t) =

P

X

p=1

Fp(t)wp. (6)

Wedenote Wthevetor

w1. . .wP

andX thevetor

x1. . .xP

,with xp=Gwp.Wesample

the time-span [ts, te] with steps δt. At every epoh tj we estimate the main eld oeients

m(tj) = m(tj) + ˜m(tj)needed to build the interation matries A(tj) (see Ÿ2.3),and thedata

oeients y(tj) = ∂m

∂t (tj). From the latter we generate a data vetor Y = [y(ts). . .y(te)],

a ombined set of SV Gauss oeients alulated at eah time-step, assoiated with the error

vetorE = [e(ts). . .e(te)]. The forwardproblem is now written Y =HW+E, where H is a

bandedmatrixwithbandwidth4Nw,alulatedfromtheinterationmatriesH(tj) =A(tj)Gand

thevalueFp(tj)takenbyeahB-splineFp atepoh tj.

Thesolutionofourproblemisfoundbyminimizingtheobjetivefuntion

J(W) =kY− HWk2Cy+ξkWk2Qw +µkWk2Pw, (7)

with thegeneri notation kVk2M =VTM1V. The rstterm is χ2 = kY− HWk2Cy, ameasure

ofthe misttotheSV data, withthedata ovarianematrixCy as detailed in Ÿ2.2.Theseond

termisaspatialregularizationoftheowmodel,withξadampingparametertunedtoadjustthe

(5)

orrespondstotheequatorialsymmetryandnon-penetrationonstraintsatthetangentylinder,

imposedusingaweakformwithµaparameterbigenoughsothattheseonstraintsarepratially

satised.ThedampingmatrixQw,together withtheonstraintmatries Pw,aredened in Ÿ2.2.

Minimizing the ostfuntion J, as dened in equation (7), isalinear optimizationproblem. Its solutionis

W=

HTC−1y H+ξQ−1w +µP−1w −1

HTC−1y Y. (8)

Inpratie,δt= 1yrandP= 24,whihorrespondstoaknotspaing∆t= 2years,areusedto

invertthe CM4SV oeientsspanning [ts, te] = [1960,2002]. Convergeneof thesolutionwith δthasbeenhekedfor. Similarly,δt= 0.5 yearandP = 25 areused toinvertthexCHAOSSV

oeientsoverthetime-span [ts, te] = [1997,2008] (i.e.aknotspaing ∆t= 0.5 year). Finally,

wederivex(t)fromWusingEquations(5)and(6).

2.2 Regularization, onstraints and error model

Thenormusedthroughoutourstudytoregularizetheproblemis

Q3(u)2= Z

CMB D2+V2 ds

= (te−ts)−1kWk2Qw = (te−ts)−1kXk2Qx, (9)

with the horizontal divergene D= ∇h·uand the radialvortiity V = ˆr· ∇ ×u. Theangular

braketsdenotethetime-averagingoperator:

h. . .i= 1 te−ts

Z te

ts

. . . dt . (10)

ThematrixQ−1x isblo-diagonal,withelementsvaryingwithharmonidegreeas[ℓ(ℓ+ 1)]2/(2ℓ+

1)∝ℓ3,andQ−1w =GTQ−1x G.Theextralinearonstraintsin(7),namelytheequatorialsymmetry

andnon-penetrationatthetangentylinder,arealulatedasinPais andJault [2008℄.Theyan

bewrittenintheformLx=L Gw= 0,whihyieldsPw1=GTLTLG.Inpratietheparameterµ

islargeenoughsothat inreasingitdoesnotaetthesolution.

Otherquadratinormsouldhavebeenused,suhastheminimumenergynorm[ Madden and

LeMouël,1982,Pais etal.,2004℄

Q1(u)2= Z

CMB

kuk2ds

∝ ℓ(ℓ+ 1)

2ℓ+ 1 ∼ℓ1, (11)

whih gives the r.m.s. veloity Q1 and orresponds to a relativelyweaker damping of the high

harmoni degrees, or the more severe and widely used `strong norm' [ Bloxham, 1988, Jakson

etal.,1993,Jakson,1997℄

Q5(u)2= Z

CMB k∇hDk2+k∇hVk2 ds

∝[ℓ(ℓ+ 1)]3

2ℓ+ 1 ∼ℓ5. (12)

Our norm Q3(u)2 sales as3, as does the strongest omponent of the norm used in Pais and

Jault [2008℄(symmetripartoftheReynoldstensor).

Weassumethattheerrorsarestationaryandthatthedataovarianematrixisdiagonal.We

denoteσd2(ℓ) =Eh edℓm2i

thedata ovarianes,whihareindependentofthespherialharmoni

orderm(isotropierrors).Supposingthat theenergyofthedataerrorspreadsuniformlyoverall

harmonidegree (i.e.atLowesspetrum),one obtainsa blo-diagonalovarianematrixCy of

whihelementsarethevarianesσd2(ℓ) =η/(ℓ+1)(2ℓ+1).Theapriorinoiselevelissetatη= 0.4

(nT/yr)

2

forboththeCM4andxCHAOSmodels.Thishoieissomewhatarbitrary,andabetter

desriptionofboththespatialandtemporalstatistialbehaviourofdataerrorsouldbeusefulin

futurework.First,therearesomehintsthattheoeientsofthedataovarianematrixshould

(6)

dependonℓ−mto aountforapoorknowledgeof themagnetieldin auroralregions[ Olsen

and Mandea, 2007℄. Seondly the use of a temporal regularization to generate time-dependent

eld models redues the time variability of the SV oeients at high degrees, penalizing the

instantaneousseularaeleration

2Br

∂t2 at small sales.There isindeed atrade-o betweenthe

spatialomplexityandthetemporalvariabilityofamagnetieldmodel.OlsenandMandea[2008℄

gavepreedenetotheformer overthelatter,as notedbyLesur et al.[2008℄whoalsoremarked

thattheseularaelerationpreditedbyxCHAOSisfullyontrolledbytheregularizationproess

abovedegree11.Introduingtimeorrelationinthedataerrors(nondiagonalovarianematrix,

i.e. E

edℓm(t)edℓm(t±τ)

6

= 0) or a time-orrelated noise at small sales (e.g. with an ensemble approahforthedataerrors)mightbeawaytoaddressthisissue.

2.3 Small-sale magneti eld with zero mean and Gaussian time or-

relation funtion

An ensemble of K matries Ak is alulated from an ensemble of K small-sale magneti

eldsk. We onsider the small-sale eld as a random noise with a Gaussian entered time

orrelation. A set of K random small sale main eld modelsk(t) is generated, satisfying :

∀k∈[1, K],∀ℓ∈ ℓm, ℓm

,∀m≤ℓ,∀(t, t)∈[ts, te]2, E

˜

mkℓm(t),m˜kℓm(t)

m2(ℓ)exp

"

−1 2

t−t τm(ℓ)

2#

, (13)

wherekℓm(t)denotesaoeientofdegreeandordermofthespherialharmoniexpansionof

themagnetieldatepoht.E[. . .]representsthemathematialexpetation,τm(ℓ)isthetypial

orrelationtimeforthemaineld oeientsofdegreeand σm2(ℓ)theirvariane.Thehoieof

astationary Gaussian orrelated stohasti proess is justied by thework of Hulot and Mouël

[1994℄.Itreetsthestatistialbehaviourofboththeobservedhistorialandarheomagnetields

[ Hongreetal.,1998℄.

In order to estimate the varianesσm2(ℓ) =E

˜ mℓm(t)2

, we t an exponentialurveto the

Lowesspetrumofthemain eldmodelGRIMM[ Lesuretal.,2008℄fordegreesℓ∈[2,13],epoh

2003.5,and extrapolateitfordegreesℓ >13.It givesσm2(ℓ) = 1.09×109e−1.26ℓ/(ℓ+ 1)(2ℓ+ 1).

For eah degree, typial orrelationtimes τm(ℓ) for themain eld are estimated from SV and

maineld spetra[ HulotandMouël,1994℄,

R(ℓ) =τm(ℓ)−2=

 X

m≤ℓ

gℓm2 +h2ℓm

−1

X

m≤ℓ

2ℓm+ ˙h2ℓm

, (14)

wheretheupper`dot'denotesthetimederivative.Apowerlawtforharmonidegreesℓ≤11of

GRIMMat2003.5givesR(ℓ)≃1.47×1062.75yrs2.Itsextrapolationgivesestimatesfrom22to 5yearsforharmonidegrees14to40of.AsmentionedinŸ2.2,theSVoeientsarelikelytobe

toomuhorrelatedathighdegrees,duetotemporalregularizationoftime-dependenteldmodels.

ThusthehoieofapowerlawttoR(ℓ)isquestionable[seee.g.HolmeandOlsen,2006℄,andwe alsotriedtheaseofanexponentialttoR(ℓ)forℓ∈[2,11].WeobtainR(ℓ)≃1.1×105e0.44ℓ,

that isτm from 14to 0.05yearsforharmonidegrees14to40of.Inthis latterasethesmall

salesaremuh lessorrelatedin time,asillustratedin Figure1.Thisgurealsoshowsthat our

synthetioeienttime series,omputed bylow-passlteringarandomnoise,haveorrelation

timesverylosetowhatisrequested.Thesetimeseriesarenormalizedinordertohavetherequired

varianeσm2(ℓ),andsampledeveryδttoproduetheoeientsℓm(tj).

Weonatenatethelarge-salemaineldoeientswiththesmall-salerandomonesintoan

ensembleofKmodelsmk(t) =

m(t),m˜k(t)

. Fromthese,wegenerateK matries

Ak(t) =A[mk(t)] =A(t) + ˜Ak(t), (15)

(7)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 10

−1

10

0

10

1

10

2

10

3

harm. degree τ

m

(yrs)

Fig.1Themaineldorrelationtimeτmasafuntionofharmonidegree,estimatedfromthe

ratioR(ℓ)fortheGRIMMmodelatepoh2003.5(greentriangles),itsexponentialandpowerlaw ts(dotted blak),and alulatedfromthesyntheti timeseries (redirles :powerlawt; red

rosses: exponential t).Only harmonidegreesaboveℓ = 13(to the rightof the vertialline)

areusedintheensembleinversion.

Références

Documents relatifs