• Aucun résultat trouvé

Interest of Genotyping-by-Sequencing technologies as an alternative to low density SNP chips for genomic selection in layer chicken

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Interest of Genotyping-by-Sequencing technologies as an alternative to low density SNP chips for genomic selection in layer chicken"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02460147

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02460147

Submitted on 2 Jun 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Interest of Genotyping-by-Sequencing technologies as an alternative to low density SNP chips for genomic

selection in layer chicken

Florian Herry, Frédéric Herault, David Picard Druet, Philippe Bardou, Camille Eché, Amandine Varenne, Thierry Burlot, Pascale Le Roy, Sophie

Allais

To cite this version:

Florian Herry, Frédéric Herault, David Picard Druet, Philippe Bardou, Camille Eché, et al.. Interest of Genotyping-by-Sequencing technologies as an alternative to low density SNP chips for genomic selection in layer chicken. XIth European symposium on poultry genetics (ESPG), Oct 2019, Prague, Czech Republic. Guarant International spol. s r.o., 2019, Proceedings of the XIth European sympo- sium on Poultry Genetics. �hal-02460147�

(2)

23–25 OCTOBER 2019 PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC PROCEEDINGS OF THE

XITH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON POULTRY GENETICS 74

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

Estimation of additive and dominant variance of egg quality traits in pure-line layers

David Picard Druet1, Llibertat Tusell2, Frédéric Hérault1, Florian Herry1,3, Sophie Allais1, Amandine Varenne³, Thierry Burlot3 &

Pascale Le Roy1

1PEGASE, INRA, AGROCAMPUS OUEST, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France; 2GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, 24 chemin de Borde- Rouge – Auzeville Tolosane, 31326 Castanet Tolosan, France; 3NOVOGEN, 5 rue des Compagnons, Secteur du Vau Ballier, 22960 Plédran, France

Corresponding author: david.picard-druet@inra.fr

Improved performances are partly due to heterosis effects. One of the basis of heterosis is dominance, which cannot be inherited.

However, it can be exploited to boost the total genetic merit of the animals. This has a special interest in avian selection schemes where commercial animals are crossbred. In this study, we have estimated additive and dominance genetic variances for several egg quality traits in pure-line layers.

Around 10,500 egg quality performances were used, collected from 1,148 female Rhode Island layers, phenotyped at 70 weeks old and genotyped using a 600K high density SNP chip. Five egg quality traits were analysed: egg weight (EW), egg shell color (ESC), egg shell strength (ESS), albumen height (AH) and egg shell shape (ESShape). Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated via EM-REML with univariate models. That included an inbreeding coefficient and an additive and a dominance random effect. Dominance variance explained a small fraction of the phenotypic variance (between 2 to 4 % across all traits).

However, it represented a relevant fraction of the total genetic variance for some of the traits (16%, 10%, 35%, 2.4% and 15% of the total genetic variance for EW, ESC, ESS, AH, ESShape, respectively).

Further research will estimate additive and dominance genetic correlations between the traits to maximize the total genetic gain of these traits simultaneously. In addition, a genomic BLUP with dominance effects is envisaged for the joint analyses of purebred and crossbred performances, to evaluate the potential to generate superior crossbred performances.

Keywords: genomic selection, dominance genetic variance, pure-line layers, egg quality

Interest of Genotyping-by-Sequencing technologies as an alterna- tive to low density SNP chips for genomic selection in layer chick- en

Florian Herry1,2, Frédéric Hérault2, David Picard-Druet2, Philippe Bardou3, Camille Eché4, Amandine Varenne1, Thierry Burlot1, Pascale Le Roy2 and Sophie Allais2

1NOVOGEN, Plédran, France; 2PEGASE, INRA, Agrocampus Ouest, Saint-Gilles, France; 3SIGENAE, GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRA, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France; 4GeT-PlaGe, INRA, Castanet Tolosan, France

Corresponding author: florian.herry@inra.fr

To reduce the cost of genomic selection, low density SNP chip can be used in combination with imputation for genotyping the selection candidates instead of using high density (HD) SNP chip. Concurrently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques has been increasingly used in livestock species but remain expensive to be routinely used in selection. An alternative and cost- efficient solution is the Genotyping by Genome Reducing and Sequencing (GGRS) techniques to sequence only a fraction of the genome by using restriction enzymes. This approach was simulated from sequences of 1027 individuals in a pure layer line, using four enzymes (EcoRI, TaqI, AvaII and PstI). Imputation accuracy on HD genotypes was assessed as the mean correlation between true and imputed genotypes. Egg weight, egg shell color, egg shell strength and albumen height were evaluated with single-step GBLUP methodology. The impact of imputation errors on the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) was also investigated.

AvaII or PstI led to the detection of more than 10K SNPs in common with the HD SNP chip resulting in imputation accuracy higher than 0.97. The impact of imputation errors on the ranking of the selection candidates was reduced with Spearman correlation (between GEBV calculated on true and imputed genotypes) higher than 0.97 for AvaII and PstI. Finally, the GGRS approach can be an interesting alternative to low density SNP chip for genomic selection. However, with real data, heterogeneity between individuals with missing data has to be taken into account.

Keywords: Genomic selection, Low density panel, Imputation accuracy, Genomic evaluation accuracy, Genotyping-by- Sequencing

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 7 Response to selection with GBS data in the expanding prediction set based on accuracies of genomic predictions when training on SNP array data with 1000 individuals

Using haplotype blocks (haploblocks) based on LD, from a high- density (HD) marker data in the Nordic Holstein popu- lation, reliability of genomic prediction for economically

Figure 3 Increase in genetic gain achieved when using genomic selection (IBD-GS) relative to classical pedigree-based selection (PED) for a binary trait with an underlying

tween breeds; and (iii) perform an Analysis of MOlecular VAriance (AMOVA, [25]) at different hierarchical levels to test the differentiation between breeds and between groups of

Here, we present the LD decay curves for SNPs on bo- vine autosomes and the X chromosome for three genetic groups of cattle breeds: Bos taurus (taurine), Bos indicus (indicine) and

In the top two panels, the genotypes were perturbed (x-axis) using the estimated error rate, and in the bottom two panels, the genotypes were perturbed (x-axis) using the assumed

Extending the reference set by adding a large number of cows with genotypes and phenotypes increases the reli- ability of breeding values of young selection candidates and

The impact of genomic evaluation using imputed genotypes was evaluated as the correlation between GEBVs estimated with imputed genotypes and the ones estimated with