• Aucun résultat trouvé

Metagenomic analysis of the pig gut microbiota and association with Salmonella status

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Metagenomic analysis of the pig gut microbiota and association with Salmonella status"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-03186798

https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03186798

Submitted on 31 Mar 2021

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Metagenomic analysis of the pig gut microbiota and association with Salmonella status

Guido Cordoni, Daniel Horton, Helen Brown, Barbara Chirullo, Paolo Pasquali, Annaëlle Kerouanton, Martine Denis, Loris Alborali, Matteo Tonni,

Philippe Velge, et al.

To cite this version:

Guido Cordoni, Daniel Horton, Helen Brown, Barbara Chirullo, Paolo Pasquali, et al.. Metagenomic analysis of the pig gut microbiota and association with Salmonella status. OneHealth EJP Annual Scientific meeting 2020 - virtual, May 2020, virtual, France. �hal-03186798�

(2)

Background

Intestinal microbiota species richness and relative abundance can be linked with the health state of the animals.

Recent studies have uncovered the importance of host heterogeneity in infection with zoonotic pathogens, and it has been shown that a minority of the infected individuals are responsible for the majority of the infections (known as ’super-shedders’). A better understanding of the composition of the microbiota of super-shedders may facilitate targeted interventions with, for example, pre and pro-biotics, to reduce colonisation and shedding.

Aim of study: to investigate whether there was any association between Salmonella shedding status and microbiota heterogeneity.

Study 1:Assess the microbiome composition in experimental infected piglets (ISS/IZSLER)

• Three groups: 30 piglets in total. Two separate Groups (A and B) were challenged with S. Typhimurium (10 piglets each group), and 10 piglets used as a control group.

• Faecal samples were taken at T0 to T3. Post-mortem samples were also taken from ileum, caecum and colon.

• Temperature, serological data, MRSV (+-) and CFU data were collected at T0 to T3.

• Samples taken from faeces (different dates), ileum caecum and colon (post- mortem).

Usable Metadata: Challenged pigs, type of sample. Temperature, serological data, MRSV (+-) and CFU data were collected from T0 to T3.

Study 2: Explore the microbiota composition in different shedding classes (Low, Intermediate, High) (ANSES)

• 45 piglets challenged by a monophasic variant of S. Typhimurium.

• Samples taken from faeces (different dates before and after inoculation, during a 3- week follow-up.), ileum caecum and colon (post-mortem).

• Temperature, serological data and CFU data were collected for the 45 piglets before and after inoculation during the 3 weeks.

Usable Metadata: Type of sample, location of pigs during the experiment, sex, CFU, class (LS,IS,HS), place of birth. Temperature, serological data, CFU (currently under analysis).

Methods: 16s metagenomic analysis was conducted on samples (faeces and GI contents collected post- mortem) from two different studies (666 samples in total). Microbiota species richness and relative abundance were compared with clinical and husbandry data using software for metagenomic and statistical analysis (Qiime2 and Orange3).

Results: The study detected small, but statistically significant differences between sample types, and between the different groups of pigs with regard to the bacterial species richness with implications for our understanding and potential mitigation of foodborne zoonoses.

Bioinformatic analysis workflow

Illumina short reads

Qiime2 on High Performance Computer

Data Pre-process

Demultiplex (separate multiplexed sequences) Trimming (cut illumina primers)

Quality check (discard low quality sequences) Mafft tree generation

upload

Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) Metadata validation (Conversion in a Qiim2

standard format)

Greengene db

Alpha rarefaction Alpha distribution Beta distribution Boxplot

PCoA (Jaccard or Unifrac based) Qiime2 pipeline output

Orange3 statistical software

Kmeans Data import MDS

Statistical analysis

Qualitative/quantitative evaluation of the results

Salmonella challenged pigs VS control group - Left image - the α – rarefaction curve, right image - the β-distribution of the microbiota from challenged pigs (Orange=

control; light blue= group A; dark blue= group B.

• Both analyses show a small, but statistically significant difference between control and challenged group (A->B= H 1.98, p 0.007; A->C= H 4.47, p 0.001; B->C= H 4.84, p 0.001 in β-distribution (Permanova pseudo-F values). In conclusion both A and B differs from the control group C, and the difference between A and B, however statistically significant, is minimal.

Study 1 (ISS/IZSLER) and Study 2 (ANSES) comparable metadata: Sample Type.

Unweighted Unifrac PCoA: Comparison between sample type and shedding classes Comparison of two PCoA considering sample type (left) and shedding class (right).

• It is possible to see a clear grouping of the samples isolated from ileum (orange) respect to the ones isolated from caecum (red) or faeces (blue) (left image).

• On the right image, (shedding class) it is not possible to see any clear pattern even if the β-distribution suggested small, but significant differences between control group and shedding classes.

• It was not possible to find differences in OTUs composition between the proposed High, Low, and Intermediate shedding classes.

Discussion and future plans

α – rarefaction curves for sample type showed that it is possible to notice a difference in the OTUs number in ileum environment which is much less than what found in caecum and faeces. All the other analysis conducted (β- distribution, Unifrac PCoA, Kmean and MDS) confirmed this

distribution.

• Statistically significant variations were detected in the relative abundance of bacteria in different intestinal locations (ileum, caecum and faeces), between the control and challenged groups.

.

• This study concurs with previous studies demonstrating the composition of microbiota varies in different parts of the intestinal tract.

• The biological importance of these small variations requires further investigation.

• To date, for all the other metadata it was not possible to find statistically significance in the OTUs composition/abundance.

• Shotgun metagenomic data may provide more detailed information on species level differences.

• A combined gene-targeted bacterial and virologic metagenomic analysis could shed a light on the interactions (synergic or divergent).

IS S

ANSES

This poster is part of the European Joint Programme One Health EJP. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 773830.

Metagenomic Analysis of The Pig Gut Microbiota and association with Salmonella status

Guido Cordoni1, Daniel Horton1, Helen Brown1,6, Barbara Chirullo2, Paolo Pasquali2, Annaëlle Kerouanton3, Martine Denis3, Loris Alborali4, Matteo Tonni4, Philippe Velge5 Roberto La Ragione1

1 UoS - Vet School Main Building (VSM), Daphne Jackson Road, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7AL. 2 Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Unit of Emerging Zoonoses, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Rome, Italy. 3 Anses – Laboratoire de Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort- Unité HQPAP- BP 53 – 22440 Ploufragan. 4 Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Lombardy and Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy. 5 INRA Val de Loire, UMR ISP – 311, 37380 – Nouzilly, France. 6 School of Dentistry, Dental Drive, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF14 4XY (H.B. current affiliation)

Références

Documents relatifs

observed by class 1 only; class 2 observes no signal. But because class 2 does not observe s,,. it produces some quantity between y^ and z„.

نازيلغ ةنابز دمحأ يعماجلا زكرملا رييستلاو ةيداصتاقلا مولعلا مساق ةياتلواقملا لوح ينطولا ىقتلملا : يموي 26/27/28 ليرفأ 2017 ةلخادملا ناونع ةعانصلا لاجم

The impact of exposure to fumonisins was evaluated based on pig growth performance, health status and Sa/So ratio , immune response, bacteriological status, including the dynamics

Notamment, dans certaines conditions que nous évoquerons dans un chapitre sur la lumière, un atome peut absorber de l'énergie lumineuse ce qui cause le passage d'un

Two different approaches were performed for mRNA quantification: (i) to establish the changes in gene expression that occur in an intestinal section during the experimental

To overcome the intrinsic limitations of classical Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) involving univariate tests between statistically dependent markers, we have proposed in

Metagenomic analysis of microbiome provides insights of interactions and contributes to understand how the bacterial species can be related to CRC development, as it has been

But the activation of an efferent vagal pathway, involving a-adrenergic receptors, stim- ulates transpyloric flow as a primary consequence of reduced pyloric