• Aucun résultat trouvé

Particle Size: A sediment tracing challenge or opportunity?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Particle Size: A sediment tracing challenge or opportunity?"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: cea-02666844

https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-02666844

Submitted on 31 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Particle Size: A sediment tracing challenge or

opportunity?

J. Laceby, Olivier Evrard

To cite this version:

J. Laceby, Olivier Evrard. Particle Size: A sediment tracing challenge or opportunity?. EGU General

Assembly 2016, Apr 2016, Vienne, Austria. pp.EGU2016-7871. �cea-02666844�

(2)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 18, EGU2016-7871, 2016 EGU General Assembly 2016

© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Particle Size: A sediment tracing challenge or opportunity?

J. Patrick Laceby and Olivier Evrard

CNRS, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France ([email protected])

Tracing sediment back to their sources with biogeochemical fingerprints involves multiple assumptions. One of the most fundamental assumptions is the conservative behavior of tracer properties during sediment generation, transportation, and deposition processes. Essentially, the biogeochemical fingerprints used to trace sediment must remain constant, or conservative, during these erosion processes, or they must vary in a predictable way. At the core of this assumption of conservative behavior are potential particle size impacts. Owing to the significance of particle size for sediment tracing research, we believe it is important to present an overview of past and present techniques used to address particle size, along with possibilities for future research. The two primary approaches utilized to address particle size impacts are fractionation (e.g., <10µm and <63µm fractions) and corrections (e.g. specific surface area), with both approaches often used simultaneously. The effectiveness of fractionation and cor-rections to address particle size has received increasing attention, testing fundamental assumptions central to the applicability of sediment tracing and fingerprinting. Alternative approaches to addressing particle size have also been presented. For example, researchers applying the tributary tracing approach or sampling sediment generated directly on hillslopes may potentially address particle size impacts in their sampling design. Although these ap-proaches have been presented in the literature, their effectiveness has yet to be determined. For the future, we boldly suggest that there are likely situations where particle size may be potentially used as a fingerprint in and of itself. Indeed, potential particle size impacts are directly related to the biogeochemical fingerprints used to trace sediments and we believe that there is a fantastic opportunity to obtain further sediment source information through comprehensively investigating and unravelling inherent particle size complexities.

Références

Documents relatifs

Using her mind power to zoom in, Maria saw that the object was actually a tennis shoe, and a little more zooming revealed that the shoe was well worn and the laces were tucked under

Nor is the idea that one may accept a theory as empirically adequate rather than as true a counter-example, since such acceptance combines belief in the truth of the

In ‘To Believe is to Believe True’, true to his word, Howard Sankey (this issue) argues that to believe is to believe true.. Sankey clarifies at the outset of his essay: “To believe

It also seemed relevant to examine the value attributed to this belief in itself, therefore we asked: is having to work with a colleague who believes (vs. who does not believe) in

This case involves a number of return-related problems that can be found elsewhere and put in a comparative perspective; it might also shed some light on the specific

Countries program and Research4Life. • Elsevier will continue to experiment with education program and build more Online Courses by Elsevier employees. • Challenge for a presenter:

Means and standard desviations of enzymatic coagulation parameters, rennet clotting time (RCT), rennet curd firming (RCF), gel firmness at 30, 60 and 80 minutes (F30, 60, 80),

In terms of an optimal summary length for the different devices, our experimental results suggest it is best to show the same level of summary on all de- vices, and that our