• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

M ETA -L EARNING AND A LGORITHM

S ELECTION W ORKSHOP AT ECAI 2014

MetaSel 2014

August 19, 2014 Prague, Czech Republic

Edited by

Joaquin Vanschoren, Pavel Brazdil, Carlos Soares and Lars Kotthoff

(2)

Preface

Algorithm Selection and configuration are increasingly relevant today. Researchers and practitioners from all branches of science and technology face a large choice of parameterized machine learning algorithms, with little guidance as to which techniques to use. Moreover, data mining challenges frequently remind us that algorithm selection and configuration are crucial in order to achieve the best performance, and drive industrial applications.

Meta-learning leverages knowledge of past algorithm applications to select the best techniques for future applications, and offers effective techniques that are superior to humans both in terms of the end result and especially in the time required to achieve it. In this workshop we will discuss different ways of exploiting meta-learning techniques to identify the potentially best algorithm(s) for a new task, based on meta-level information and prior experiments. We also discuss the prerequisites for effective meta-learning systems such as recent infrastructure such as OpenML.org.

Many problems of today require that solutions be elaborated in the form of complex systems or work- flows which include many different processes or operations. Constructing such complex systems or work- flows requires extensive expertise, and could be greatly facilitated by leveraging planning, meta-learning and intelligent system design. This task is inherently interdisciplinary, as it builds on expertise in various areas of AI.

This ECAI-2014 workshop will provide a platform for researchers and research students interested to exchange their knowledge about:

– Problems and solutions of algorithm selection and algorithm configuration – How to use software and platforms to select algorithms in practice

– How to provide advice to end users about which algorithms to select in diverse domains, including optimization, SAT etc. and incorporate this knowledge in new platforms.

These proceedings include 14 contributions discussing the nature of algorithm selection which arises in many diverse domains, such as machine learning, data mining, optimization and satisfiability solving, among many others. We thank everybody for their sincere interest and their contributions, our programme committee for reviewing all submissions, and especially our invited speakers:

– Lars Kotthoff: Towards an Algorithm Selection Standard: Data Format and Tools.

– Frank Hutter: Bayesian Optimization for More Automatic Machine Learning.

We hope you will find it an interesting and inspiring workshop, leading to great new collaborations.

Eindhoven, July 2014

Joaquin Vanschoren Pavel Brazdil Carlos Soares Lars Kotthoff

(3)

Main areas covered by the workshop

Of particular interest are methods and proposals that address the following issues:

– Algorithm Selection and Configuration – Planning to learn and construct workflows – Applications of workflow planning

– Meta-learning and exploitation of meta-knowledge – Exploitation of ontologies of tasks and methods – Exploitation of benchmarks and experimentation – Representation of learning goals and states in learning – Control and coordination of learning processes – Meta-reasoning

– Experimentation and evaluation of learning processes – Layered learning

– Multi-task and transfer learning – Learning to learn

– Intelligent design – Performance modeling – Process mining

Program Committee

– Pavel Brazdil, LIAAD-INESC Porto L.A. / FEP, University of Porto, Portugal – Andr´e C. P. Carvalho, USP, Brasil

– Claudia Diamantini, Universit ˘A Politecnica delle Marche, Italy – Johannes Fuernkranz, TU Darmstadt, Germany

– Christophe Giraud-Carrier, Brigham Young Univ., USA – Krzysztof Grabczewski, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland – Melanie Hilario, Switzerland

– Frank Hutter, University of Freiburg, Germany – Christopher Jefferson, University of St Andrews, UK – Alexandros Kalousis, U Geneva, Switzerland – J¨org-Uwe Kietz, U.Zurich, Switzerland – Lars Kotthoff, University College Cork, Ireland – Yuri Malitsky, University College Cork, Ireland – Bernhard Pfahringer, U Waikato, New Zealand – Vid Podpecan, Jozef Stefan Institute, Slovenia

– Ricardo Prudˆencio, Univ. Federal de Pernambuco Recife (PE), Brasil – Carlos Soares, FEP, University of Porto, Portugal

– Guido Tack, Monash University, Australia

– Joaquin Vanschoren, Eindhoven University of Technology – Ricardo Vilalta, University of Houston, USA

– Filip Zelezn´y, CVUT, Prague, R.Checa

Références

Documents relatifs

The project MESoR, co-funded by the European Commission, reduces the associated uncertainty by setting up standard benchmarking rules and measures for comparing the data bases,

Fondation Maison des sciences de l’homme - 190 avenue de France - 75013 Paris - France http://www.msh-paris.fr - FMSH-WP-2012-11.. Working

-- Exploitation of ontologies of tasks and methods -- Representation of learning goals and states in learning -- Control and coordination of learning processes -- Experimentation

ISO 13606 and openEHR follow this architecture in which archetypes, according to Kalra and Archana (2008), are considered the minimal information unit that clinical information

In this paper, we have demonstrated how modern multimedia processing systems have evolved to be able to extract useful semantics from their input data, be it video, audio, image

[r]

the quarries present their own specific characteristics (upper soil layer fertility, soil profile vertical

Since the main input to the production of recycled materials is the stock of scrap, the emergence of recycling activities may affect the dynamics of both the extraction of