• Aucun résultat trouvé

STURM-LIOUVILLE TYPE DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS IN NON SEPARABLE BANACH SPACES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "STURM-LIOUVILLE TYPE DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS IN NON SEPARABLE BANACH SPACES"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

INCLUSIONS IN NON SEPARABLE BANACH SPACES

AURELIAN CERNEA

We consider a Cauchy problem for a Sturm-Liouville type differential inclusion in non separable Banach spaces under Filippov type assumptions and prove the existence of solutions.

AMS 2000 Subject Classification: 34A60.

Key words: Lusin measurable multifunction, selection, solution set.

1. INTRODUCTION

In this paper we study second-order differential inclusions of the form (1.1) (p(t)x0(t))0 ∈F(t, x(t)) a.e. ([0, T]), x(0) =x0, x0(0) =x1, where F : [0, T]×X→ P(X) is a set-valued map,X a non separable Banach space, x0, x1∈X and p(·) : [0, T]→(0,∞) is continuous.

In some recent papers ([5, 9]), several existence results for problem (1.1) are obtained using fixed point techniques. In [4] it is shown that Filippov’s ideas ([7]) can be suitably adapted in order to prove the existence of solutions to problem (1.1). All these approaches are valid provided that the Banach space X is separable.

De Blasi and Pianigiani [6] established the existence of mild solutions for semilinear differential inclusions on an arbitrary, not necessarily separable, Banach space X. Even if the ideas of Filippov are still present, the approach in [6] has a fundamental difference which consists in the construction of the measurable selections of the multifunction. This construction does not use classical selection theorems as those of Kuratowsky and Ryll-Nardzewski [8]

or Bressan and Colombo [1].

The aim of this paper is to obtain an existence result for problem (1.1) similar to that in [6]. We will prove the existence of solutions for problem (1.1) in an arbitrary space X under assumptions on F of Filippov type. We note that similar results for other classes of differential inclusions were obtained in [2, 3].

MATH. REPORTS10(60),3 (2008), 205–211

(2)

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we present the notation, definitions and preliminary results to be used in the sequel while in Section 3 we prove the main result.

2. PRELIMINARIES

Consider an arbitrary real Banach space X with norm | · | and the cor- responding metric d(·,·). Let P(X) be the space of all bounded nonempty subsets of X endowed with the Hausdorff pseudometric

dH(A, B) = max{d(A, B),d(B, A)}, d(A, B) = sup

a∈A

d(a, B), where d(x, A) = infa∈A|x−a|,A⊂X,x∈X.

LetL be the σ-algebra of the (Lebesgue) measurable subsets of R and, for A∈ L, let µ(A) be the Lebesgue measure of A.

LetX be a Banach space and Y a metric space. An open (resp. closed) ball in Y with center y and radius r is denoted by BY(y, r) (resp. BY(y, r).

In what follows B=BX(0,1).

A multifunction F :Y → P(X) with closed bounded nonempty values is said to be dH-continuous at y0 ∈ Y if for every ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that for any y ∈ BY(y0, r) we have dH(F(y), F(y0)) ≤ ε. F is called dH-continuous if it is dH-continuous at each point y0 ∈Y.

LetA∈ L, with µ(A)<∞. A multifunctionF :Y → P(X) with closed bounded nonempty values is said to be Lusin measurable if for every ε > 0 there exists a compact set Kε ⊂A with µ(A\Kε)< ε such that F restricted toKε is dH-continuous.

It is clear that ifF, G:A→ P(X) andf :A→X are Lusin measurable then the same property is enjoyed by F restricted toB (B ⊂A measurable), F +G and t → d(f(t), F(t)). Moreover, the uniform limit of a sequence of Lusin measurable multifunctions also is Lusin measurable.

Let denote byIthe interval [0, T],T >0. Consider a set-valued mapping, F :I×X → P(X) andx0, x1 ∈X.

A continuous mappingx(·)∈C(I, X) is called a solution of problem (1.1) if there exists a Lusin measurable function f(·) ∈ L1(I, X), (Bochner) inte- grable such that

(2.1) f(t)∈F(t, x(t)) a.e.(I),

(2.2) x(t) =x0+p(0)x1 Z t

0

1 p(s)ds+

Z t 0

1 p(s)

Z s 0

f(u)duds ∀t∈I.

(3)

Note that if we denoteS(t) :=Rt 0

1

p(s)ds,t∈I, then (2.2) may be rewrit- ten as

(2.3) x(t) =x0+p(0)x1S(t) + Z t

0

S(t−u)f(u)du ∀t∈I,

We shall call (x(·), f(·)) a trajectory-selection pair of (1.1) if (2.1) and (2.2) are satisfied.

In what follows X is a real Banach space and we assume the following hypotheses.

Hypothesis 2.1. (i) F(·,·) : I ×X → P(X) has nonempty closed bounded values and F(·, x) is Lusin measurable on I for any x∈X.

(ii)There exists l(·)∈L1(I,(0,∞))such that

dH(F(t, x1), F(t, x2))≤l(t)|x1−x2| ∀t∈I,∀x1, x2∈X.

(iii) There existsq(·)∈L1(I,(0,∞)) such that∀t∈I we have F(t,0)⊂q(t)B.

Setm(t) =Rt

0 l(u)du,t∈I, andM := supt∈I p(t)1 . Note that|S(t)| ≤M t

∀t∈I.

The next technical results summarized in Lemma 2.2 are essential in the proof of our result. For the proof we refer to [6].

Lemma2.2 ([6]). (i)LetFi :I → P(X),i= 1,2, be two Lusin measurable multifunctions and let εi>0, i= 1,2 be such that

H(t) := (F1(t) +ε1B)∩(F2(t) +ε2B)6=∅, ∀t∈I.

Then the multifunction H :I → P(X) has a Lusin measurable selection h:I →X.

(ii)Assume that Hypothesis 2.1is satisfied. Then, for any x(·) :I →X continuous, u(·) :I →X measurable and ε >0,

a)the multifunction t→F(t, x(t))is Lusin measurable on I;

b) the multifunctionG:I → P(X) defined by

G(t) := (F(t, x(t)) +εB)∩BX(u(t),d(u(t), F(t, x(t))) +ε) has a Lusin measurable selection g:I →X.

3. MAIN RESULT

We are ready now to prove our main result.

Theorem 3.1. We assume that Hypothesis 2.1 is satisfied. Then for every x0, x1∈X the Cauchy problem(1.1)has a solution x(·) :I →X.

(4)

Proof. Let us note first that, ifz(·) : I → X is continuous, then every Lusin measurable selection u:I →X of the multifunctiont→F(t, z(t)) +B is Bochner integrable on I. More exactly, for any t∈I we have

|u(t)| ≤dH(F(t, z(t)) +B,0)≤dH(F(t, z(t)), F(t,0))+

+ dH(F(t,0),0) + 1≤l(t)|z(t)|+q(t) + 1.

Let 0 < ε < 1, εn = 2n+2ε . Consider an arbitrary Lusin measurable, Bochner integrable function f0(·) :I →X and define

x0(t) =x0+p(0)S(t)x1+ Z t

0

S(t−u)f0(u)du, t∈I.

Since x0(·) is continuous, by Lemma 2.2 (ii) there exists a Lusin measurable function f1(·) :I →X satisfying

f1(t)∈(F(t, x0(t)) +ε1B)∩B(f0(t),d(f0(t), F(t, x0(t))) +ε1), t∈I.

Obviously, f1(·) is Bochner integrable onI. Define x1(·) :I →X by x1(t) =x0+p(0)S(t)x1+

Z t 0

S(t−u)f1(u)du, t∈I.

By induction, we construct a sequence xn:I →X, n≥2 given by (3.1) xn(t) =x0+p(0)S(t)x1+

Z t 0

S(t−u)fn(u)du, t∈I, where fn(·) :I →X a Lusin measurable function such that (3.2)

fn(t)∈(F(t, xn−1(t)) +εnB)∩B(fn−1(t),d(fn−1(t), F(t, xn−1(t)))+εn), t∈I.

At the same time, as we saw at the begining of the proof,fn(·) also is Bochner integrable.

From (3.2), forn≥2 and t∈I we obtain

|fn(t)−fn−1(t)| ≤d(fn−1(t), F(t, xn−1(t))) +εn

≤d(fn−1(t), F(t, xn−2(t))) + dH(F(t, xn−2(t)), F(t, xn−1(t))) +εn

≤εn−1+l(t)|xn−1(t)−xn−2(t)|+εn. Since εn−1n< εn−2 we deduce that

(3.3) |fn(t)−fn−1(t)| ≤εn−2+l(t)|xn−1(t)−xn−2(t)|, n≥2.

Denoteq0(t) := d(f0(t), F(t, x0(t))),t∈I. We next prove by recurrence that for n≥2 andt∈I we have

(3.4) |xn(t)−xn−1(t)| ≤

n−2

X

k=0

Z t 0

εn−2−k

(M T)k+1(m(t)−m(u))k

k! du+

(5)

0

Z t 0

(M T)n(m(t)−m(u))n−1

(n−1)! du+

Z t 0

(M T)n(m(t)−m(u))n−1

(n−1)! q0(u)du.

We start with n= 2. By (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), fort∈I one has

|x2(t)−x1(t)| ≤ Z t

0

|S(t−s)| · |f2(s)−f1(s)|ds≤

≤ Z t

0

M T[ε0+l(s)|x1(s)−x0(s)|]ds≤

≤ε0M T t+ Z t

0

M T l(s) Z s

0

|S(s−u)| · |f1(u)−f0(u)|du

ds≤

≤ε0M T t+ Z t

0

(M T)2l(s) Z s

0

(q0(u) +ε1)du

ds≤

≤ε0M T t+ Z t

0

(M T)2(q0(u) +ε1) Z t

u

l(s)ds

du=

0M T t+ Z t

0

(M T)2(m(t)−m(s))[q0(s) +ε0]ds, i.e, (3.4) is verified for n= 2. Using again (3.2) and (3.3) we have

|xn+1(t)−xn(t)| ≤ Z t

0

|S(t−u)| · |fn+1(u)−fn(u)|du≤

≤ Z t

0

M T[εn−1+l(s)|xn(s)−xn−1(s)|]ds≤

≤εn−1M T t+ Z t

0

l(s) n−2

X

k=0

Z s 0

εn−2−k

(M T)k+2(m(s)−m(u))k

k! du+

+ Z s

0

(M T)n+1(m(s)−m(u))n−1

(n−1)! (q0(u) +ε0)du

ds=

n−1M T t+

n−2

X

k=0

εn−2−k

Z t 0

Z s 0

(M T)k+2(m(s)−m(u))k

k! l(s)du

ds+

+ Z t

0

l(s) Z s

0

(M T)n+1(m(s)−m(u))n−1

(n−1)! l(s)[q0(u) +ε0]du

ds=

n−1M T t+

n−2

X

k=0

εn−2−k

Z t 0

Z t u

(M T)k+2(m(s)−m(u))k

k! l(s)ds

du+

+ Z t

0

Z t u

(M T)n+1(m(s)−m(u))n−1 (n−1)! l(s)ds

[q0(u) +ε0]du=

(6)

n−1M T t+

n−2

X

k=0

εn−2−k

Z t 0

(M T)k+2(m(s)−m(u))k+1

(k+ 1)! du+

+ Z t

0

(M T)n+1(m(s)−m(u))n

n! [q0(u) +ε0]du=

=

n−1

X

k=0

εn−1−k

Z t 0

(M T)k+1(m(s)−m(u))k

k! du+

+ Z t

0

(M T)n+1(m(s)−m(u))n

n! [q0(u) +ε0]du, and statement (3.4) holds for n+ 1.

It follows from (3.4) that forn≥2 and t∈I one has (3.5) |xn(t)−xn−1(t)| ≤an,

where an=

n−2

X

k=0

εn−2−k

(M T)k+1m(T)k

k! +(M T)nm(T)n−1 (n−1)!

Z 1 0

q0(u)du+ε0

. Obviously, the series whose nth term is an is convergent. So, from (3.5) we have thatxn(·) converges uniformly onIto a continuous functionx(·) :I →X.

On the other hand, by (3.5) we have

|fn(t)−fn−1(t)| ≤εn−2+l(t)an−1, t∈I, n≥3,

which implies that the sequencefn(·) converges to a Lusin measurable function f(·) :I →X. Sincexn(·) is bounded and

|fn(t)| ≤l(t)|xn−1(t)|+q(t) + 1

we deduce that f(·) also is Bochner integrable. Letting n→ ∞ in (3.1) and using Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, yield

x(t) =x0+p(0)S(t)x1+ Z t

0

S(t−u)f(u)du, t∈I.

On the other hand, from (3.2) we get

fn(t)∈F(t, xn(t)) +εnB, t∈I, n≥1.

Letting n → ∞ we obtain f(t) ∈ F(t, x(t)), t ∈ I, and the proof is com- plete.

(7)

REFERENCES

[1] A. Bressan and G. Colombo,Extensions and selections of maps with decomposable values.

Studia Math.90(1988), 69–86.

[2] A. Cernea, Existence of solutions to quasi-linear inclusions in non separable Banach spaces. Math. Rep. (Bucur.)4(54)(2002), 335–342.

[3] A. Cernea, Integrodifferential inclusions in non separable Banach spaces. Demonstratio Math.36(2003), 591–602.

[4] A. Cernea, A Filippov type existence theorem for a Sturm-Liouville type differential in- clusion. Submitted to J. Applied Anal.

[5] Y.K. Chang and W.T. Li, Existence results for second order impulsive functional differ- ential inclusions. J. Math. Anal. Appl.301(2005), 477–490.

[6] F. S. De Blasi and G. Pianigiani, Evolution inclusions in non separable Banach spaces.

Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae40(1999), 227–250.

[7] A. F. Filippov, Classical solutions of differential equations with multivalued right-hand side. SIAM J. Control Optim.5(1967), 609–621.

[8] K. Kuratowski and C. Ryll-Nardzewski,A general theorem on selectors. Bull. Acad. Pol.

Sci. Math. Astron. Phys.13(1965), 397–403.

[9] Y. Liu, J. Wu and Z. Li, Impulsive boundary value problems for Sturm-Liouville type differential inclusions. J. Systems Sci. Complexity20(2007), 370–380.

Received 28 January 2008 University of Bucharest

Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Str. Academiei 14

010014 Bucharest, Romania

Références

Documents relatifs

BURKOWSKI, Existence and uniqueness theorems for differntial equa- tions with deviating arguments of mixed type, in Delay and Functional Dif- ferential Equations

Valeriu PREPELI ¸ T ¼ A 2D acausal linear systems described by di¤erential - di¤erence equations Ana Maria R ¼ ADUCAN and The CM property and comparison of risk Gheorghi¸t¼ a ZB

We consider a Cauchy problem for a semilinear second-order differential inclusion in separable and non separable Banach spaces under Filippov type assumptions and prove the existence

The origin of this paper is the following natural question: Given two Banach spaces B and E, is it possible to describe all the operators from B to E that can be extended to

We prove a relaxation theorem which reveals the connection between the solution sets of a second-order delay differential inclusion and its convexified.. version, under

Our approach is based on the fact that every Frechet space F is a projective limit of Banach spaces and on the replacement of the (non-Frechet) space C (F) by an

zeros of two linearly independent solutions of a second order linear differential. equation separate each other,

The class of operators considered in our study is a non-linear gene- ralization of a bounded self-adjoint operator, namely the class of abstract variational