• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives"

Copied!
46
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1: Liability assignment function
Table 1: Burden of Proof
Figure 2: Rules of proof
Table 2: Ine¢ cient Equilibria
+2

Références

Documents relatifs

This raises the question of whether lower domestic court judges of developing post-colonial States, themselves not so experienced in determining complex International Law

Because Article 38(1)(d) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice contemplates a significant role for judicial decisions of national courts in identification of rules

Delano¨e [4] proved that the second boundary value problem for the Monge-Amp`ere equation has a unique smooth solution, provided that both domains are uniformly convex.. This result

Abstract —The main task of any trader is the se- lection of profitable strategies for trading a financial instrument. One of the simplest ways to represent trading rules is

Notwithstanding the 2008 update ii of the Italian Rules of Evidence by the enforcement of the 2001 Budapest Convention on Cybercrime iii , a remote computer search or

for proofs and refinements of these assertions. It is in general a very difficult problem to determine the irrationality exponent of a given transcendental real number ξ, unless ξ

Roughly speaking, this random path is obtained by concatenation of elementary paths randomly chosen among the vertices of the crystal graph B associated to V following a

State the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the Euclidean product of E and precise the condition under which the inequality becomes an equality2. Recall the definition of