• Aucun résultat trouvé

Biogas Recognition over Landfill with MOS Gas Sensors Array and PCA-quantile Regression

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Biogas Recognition over Landfill with MOS Gas Sensors Array and PCA-quantile Regression"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Biogas Recognition over Landfill with MOS Gas Sensors Array and PCA-quantile Regression

Eric Martial TAGUEM, Anne-Claude ROMAIN

[email protected]; [email protected]

Sensing of Atmospheres and Monitoring (SAM) University of Liège, Belgium

Se

ns

in

g

of

A

tm

os

ph

e

re

s

an

d

Mo

ni

tor

in

g

Objectives

The biogas monitoring over a landfill has become a matter of interest because of Climate change and CH4 emissions control. On the other hand, MOS gas sensors have brought the possibility to build low-cost instruments for intensive monitoring. However, it is important to check the performance through a test on the field. This poster presents the result of a field monitoring test of a MOS gas sensors array (instrument) with a PCA-quantile regression (Prediction Model).

Materials and methods

Results and discussion

➢ Array of four MOS sensors (Portable e-nose)

TGS2610, TGS2611, TGS2620, GGS1330.

➢ Field samples collected in a municipal solid waste site (Landfill) in October 2019

➢ Labs calibration: MOS sensor’s conductance Data paired with FID methane analyser Data.

➢ PCA-Quantile regression (PCA for extracting new features) + Median regression (robust against outliers).

➢ Field test over an area with known biogas source.

➢ The PCA-quantile regression model showed good predictions with lab data (MAPE = 7.29%).

➢ Lab predictive model (2019) compared with the field one made after experimentation in 2017, suggest that field prediction might be subject to additional error due to unknown field factors. Although this mixed results, the predictions looked acceptable.

Conclusions

➢Acceptable methane predictions in field experimentation and clear distinction between areas with

emissions and area with no emissions.

➢Perspectives: intensive monitoring over all the landfill and more attention to local factors.

Portable electronique Nose (e-Nose) with MOS gas sensors and Linkit One card as acquisition system.

The 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM 2021), Vienna-Austria | 4-6 February, 2021

Quantile model Prediction performances.

➢ The monitoring over a part of landfill showed two distinct zones of emission: area with biogas emission ([CH4] between 1.45 and 48.44 ppm) and area with low emission ([CH4] between 3.46 and 4.62 ppm).

➢ However, there was necessary to do several trials before getting correct data for the spatial interpolation. We suspected perturbations during the experimentation due to environmental factors as the wind turbulences.

Références

Documents relatifs

In the classical case, where Y is scalar, VQR reduces to a version of the classical QR, and CVQF reduces to the scalar conditional quantile function.. An application to multiple

Section 1.2 considers the estimation of the extreme value index and integrated skedasis function in the proportional tail model and our results of asymptotic nor- mality are similar

QR model has been generalized to several models for panel or longitudinal data, xed eects model [3], instru- mental variable model [11], linear mixed model [10], penalized xed

Numerical experiments. On all problems, we consider four sample sizes. Those sizes depend on the dimension and are empirically chosen so that the smallest size corresponds to

Factors. Three factors are explicit in our benchmark system: the number of training points, the problem dimension and the quantile level. The other factors depend on the

Finally, instead of imposing Assumption 2’, one may …rst test for which coe¢ cients the hypothesis of constant e¤ect is rejected or not in typical quantile regression estimation, so

To introduce the Bayesian framework for the Tobit censoring model, that is, to derive a parametric distribution based likelihood for any posterior inference, let us recall

Table 3 provides estimates of the model parameters for the median case (τ = 0.5) as well as a comparison with the results obtained by three different estimation approaches, namely