• Aucun résultat trouvé

Precise positioning in multi-GNSS mode

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Precise positioning in multi-GNSS mode"

Copied!
37
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Precise positioning

in multi-GNSS mode

(2)
(3)

POSITIONING

(4)

Limited view angle

POSITIONING

(5)

POSITIONING ALTERATIONS

Low number of visible satellites

(6)

Poor geometry: visible satellites gathered in a limited space

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(7)

Poor geometry: visible satellites gathered in a limited space

High PDOP

Good geometry: visible satellites spread around the receiver

Low PDOP

The impact of the

geometry on positioning is characterized by the PDOP: Position Dilution Of Precision

(8)

PDOP

=

P

osition

D

ilution

O

f

P

recision = Impact of satellite geometry

The

geometry

of the satellites affects the positioning precision :

High PDOP values degrade the positioning precision

2

𝜎𝑃𝑂𝑆 = PDOP . 𝜎𝑂𝐵𝑆

POSITIONING

(9)

Forest, city

-Signal obstructions = multipath

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(10)

Receiver quality

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(11)

Cécile Deprez & René Warnant - Université de Liège

How could

multi-GNSS

improve

(12)
(13)

±

(14)

±

(15)

±

• •

(16)
(17)

POSITIONING ALTERATIONS

Low number of visible satellites

(18)

Low number of visible satellites MULTI-GNSS

(19)

Poor geometry: visible satellites gathered in a limited space

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(20)

Cécile Deprez & René Warnant - Université de Liège MULTI-GNSS IMPROVEMENTS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 GPS Galileo BDS PD OP 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

E1/L1 E5a/L5 E5b/B2 Poor geometry: visible satellites

gathered in a limited space

PDOP evolution

(21)

Forest, city

-Signal obstructions = multipath

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(22)

Forest, city

-Signal obstructions = multipath MULTI-GNSS

IMPROVEMENTS

(23)

Receiver quality

What are the factors impacting satellite positioning?

POSITIONING

(24)

u-blox image

RECEIVER’S

FEATURES

Low-Cost receivers

Geodetic receivers

$$$ (Thousands USDs ) $$ (Hundreds USDs)

 Multi-GNSS  Multi-Frequency  Multi-GNSS  Single-Frequency Septentrio image Trimble image

(25)

E5a E6 L2 B2 B3 Lower L-Band L5 E1 L1 B1 Upper L-Band Frequency (Mhz) GPS Galileo BeiDou E5b

G

NSS constellations are

compatible

COMPATIBILITIES

(26)

Positioning with

Galileo

Galileo E1:

Galileo E1

Position 2D: 0.71 m Position 3D: 1.10 m

(27)

Galileo E1:

GPS L1

Position 2D: 0.81 m Position 3D: 1.32 m

Galileo E1

Position 2D: 0.72 m Position 3D: 1.13 m

Positioning with

GPS

GPS L1:

(28)

Positioning with Galileo +

GPS

Galileo E1

+

GPS L1 :

Galileo E1

+

GPS L1

Position 2D: 0.43 m Position 3D: 0.85 m Overlapping frequencies = single-frequency

(29)

Positioning with Galileo +

GPS

Galileo E5a

+

GPS L5 :

Galileo E5a

+

GPS L5

Position 2D: 0.45 m Position 3D: 0.73 m Overlapping frequencies = single-frequency

(30)

Cécile Deprez & René Warnant - Université de Liège

Drawbacks

of multi-GNSS

(31)

Differences

lead to

additional biases!

Time systems

Coordinate systems

Hardware delays

between GNSS

Cécile Deprez & René Warnant - Université de Liège

DRAWBACKS

= Inter-System Biases

= ISBs

(32)

Mixed-receiver pairs 2 1 Me ter s 32

ISBs

are

receiver-dependent

Identical-receiver pairs Mean: 1.52 m Mean: 0.00 m

+

+

0.2 0 0.2 Me ter s 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 24:00 Hours (a) (b)

Trimble NetR9 Septentrio X4

Septentrio X4 Septentrio X4

(33)

2 1 Me tr es 4 2 1 4 2 1 4 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 Hours 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 Hours 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 Hours 33 2014 2015 2016

ISBs

are

stable

over time

Mean: 2.84 m Mean: 2.82 m Mean: 2.86 m (a) (b) (c) ISBS

(34)

34

Firmware updates for phases

ISBs

might be

affected

by

After

Before

04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 Hours

Receiver multipath filter for codes After Before 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 Hours -2 -3 -4 -1 0 1 Cen tim et er s 3 4 5 6 7 Me ter s ISBS

(35)

P

OSITIONING

WITH

/

OUT

ISB

S

IMPACT OF ISBS 0.638 0.85 2.47 0.274 0.47 1.15 0 1 2

Obs. Pos 2D Pos 3D

ISBs ignored ISBs removed

Me

tr

es

ISBs removal on a DD SB 5.6 m on DOY 32 of 2018 (E1) between u-blox and Trimble R9 :

- Geodetic antennas

- 30s. data

- Min elevation: 10°

- Multipath filters OFF

(36)

Multi-GNSS improves positioning solutions  Higher number of visible satellites

 Lower PDOP values

 Signals of new GNSSs (BeiDou, Galileo) designed to be more robust to multipath  Position precision improved regardless of

the receiver brand

Cécile Deprez & René Warnant - Université de Liège

C

ONCLUSIONS

Multi-GNSS solution affected by additional biases  ISBs are receiver-dependent

 Most of these biases reveal constant in time => they can be estimated and removed from positioning equation

(37)

Cécile Deprez

Doctorante en GNSS et géodésie

Unité de Géomatique - Université de Liège Phone : +32 4 366 58 80

Email: cecile.deprez@uliege.be LinkedIn

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 4 Percentage of missing data for station ONSA (See Figure 2 for map). Red line is the time series of Percentage of missing data caused by the obstruction scenario in

The actual values for all stations in each mode are provided in the supporting information (Table S1), and the average accuracy for all data processing modes are summarized in

ça me permet quand j’ai un entretien difficile de facilement pouvoir aller solliciter un collègue libre. Cela va dans le sens contraire également, ma porte est ouverte à

Power spectra of position time series (stacked from all stations in Figure 1) for the combined GPS+GLONASS (GNSS) solution using ESA products for all (left panel) and high

To evaluate the gain provided by the optimal use of Doppler information, through the matched WLS procedure, we assess the positionig performance in 3 representative scenarios: (i)

Précisons que cette somme est déduite des ressources du couple pour le calcul du montant de l’APA en établissement ou d’une éventuelle prise en charge du tarif hébergement au

Nous venons de voir comment des nouveaux paramétrages préconisant des modifications de l'ordre des expressions d'une conjonction ou un regroupement d'expressions

The results demonstrate that the LiF detector, coupled with an X-ray backlighter source, represents an improve- ment on the experimental X-ray radiography platform, boasting