Performance Limits of GNSS Code-Based Precise Positioning: GPS, Galileo & Meta-Signals

Amedyaz yebɛed ɣef yemma-s ur yezmir ad tt-yewali, maci deg ufus-is, yella dacu t-yeṭfen, limarat n usentel tettban-d deg:..

This paper will present the most up-to-date results obtained with the laser tracking system and will compare the accuracy of pose estimation of objects using either the XYZ range

These activities include: (i) performing atomic actions on information and/or physical workpieces, (ii) decomposing the manufacturing activity further, and (iii)

Au plan international, en particulier dans les pays caractérisés par des niveaux d’automobilité élevés, tels que les pays scandinaves, l’Allemagne, le Royaume-Uni,

The previous subsection has addresses the worst differential range error resulting from the range tropospheric delay over paths 2 and 3 as presented in Figure 1 As

Considering the legacy GPS L1 C/A signal as a benchmark and fast codes such as GPS L5 and Galileo E5 signals, it was shown the impact that the GNSS signal has in the different

 A local VTEC model that is such that the VTEC at any ionospheric pierce point (intersection between an assumed single-layer ionosphere and the signal path) can be

To refine the ionospheric delay estimation, one would be tempted to use dual-frequency carrier-phase pseudorange measurements since they have a very limited tracking