Arguments by definition : Felipe Calderón’s war on drugs and the power to persuade
Texte intégral
(2) ±± ±±± ±ǯǣ. ArgumentsbyDefinition: FelipeCalderón’sWaronDrugsandthePowertoPersuade ±±ǣ ± ± ±±±± ±ǣ Ǧ± ̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴ ̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴ ±Ȃ ̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴̴ . .
(3) ABSTRACT ǯ Ǥ × Ȅ Ǥ
(4) ǡ ǡ × Ǥ ǡ
(5) ͳȌǯ ǢʹȌ Ǣ ͵Ȍ Ǥ
(6) ǡ
(7) × Ǥ ǣ ǡǡǡǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǤ . . . . .
(8) SOMMAIRE ± ± ± ± ±±± Ǥ ±̵ ± × ± ±± Ǥ × ± ± ° ± ̵ ǡ Ǥ ͳȌ ± ± ±± ×Ǣ ʹȌ Ǣ ͵Ȍ ± ± ±Ǥ ǡ ǯ ± ± × ± î ² ±± ±Ǥ ±ǣ ± ±ǡ ±ǡ ±ǡ ǡ ±ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ±Ǥ. . .
(9) TABLEOFCONTENTS ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ I.. IntroductionǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǤǥǤͳ. II.. TheoreticalFrameworkǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ ͳǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤ ʹǤ ǡǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤͳ͵. III.. MethodologyǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǤʹͲ ͳǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥʹͳ ʹǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤʹʹ ͵Ǥ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǤʹͷ ͶǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤʹͺ ͷǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǤͶͲ. IV.. MoralEntrepreneurs,RaceandtheUnwinnableWarǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥͶͶ ͳǤ ǡ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤͶ ʹǤ ǡ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǤͷͶ ͵Ǥ
(10) ǡ
(11) ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥ ͶǤ ǡ
(12) Ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥʹ. . .
(13) ͷǤ ǡ ǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǥǥǥͺͳ V.. PresidentialRhetoric,thePowertoDefineǥǤǤǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤͺͺ ͳǤ DzdzOperativoMichoacánǥǤǤǤǤǥǤǤǥǥǥǤǤͺͺ ʹǤ ǯWarOnDrugsǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǤǤͻʹ ͵Ǥ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǤǤǤͳͲͲ ͶǤ ǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤͳͲͻ ͷǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤͳʹͲ Ǥ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǤͳʹ͵. VI.. Discussion/ConclusionǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǤǥǤǤͳʹͻ ͳǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǤǥǥǥͳʹͻ ʹǤ ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǤͳ͵ͺ. VII.. BibliographyǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤͳͶ͵. VIII.. TablesǥǥǥǤǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥͳͷ. IX.. AnnexesǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤǤǥǥǥǤͳͻͳ. . . . .
(14) LISTOFTABLES ͳǤͳ. ȋ ̵Ȍ. ͳǤʹ. ȋ ̵Ȍ. ͳǤ͵. ȋ Ȍ. ͳǤͶ. ͳǤͶ ȋ Ȍ. ͳǤͷ. . ͳǤ. . ͳǤ. . ʹǤͳ. . ʹǤͳ ʹǤʹ. . ʹǤʹ Ȁ ʹǤ͵. . ʹǤ͵ Ȁ ʹǤͶ. ̶ ̶ . ʹǤͶ ̶ ̶ ʹǤͷ. . . .
(15) ʹǤͷ ʹǤ. . ʹǤ ʹǤ. . ʹǤ ʹǤͺ. . ʹǤͺ . . . .
(16) LISTOFANNEXES ͳǤ ʹǤ Ȃ ͵Ǥ . . . .
(17) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ±ǡ Ó ǡ ï Ǥ ± ǡ Ǥ ǡǡǡ ǡǤ ǡ ǡï ±Dz ×dzǤ ±± ǣ ǡ À Ǥǩ± Ǩ ± ǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡǡǡǡǯǤ
(18) ǯǯ Ǥ Ǧ± ǡ ° ° ǯ± Ǥ À × ± Ǥ. . .
(19) ǡ ǡ Àǡ Ǥ
(20) Ǥ ǡ ȋȌ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ÓǤ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ × À Àǡ × ± Ǥ
(21) Ǥǡ × ×Ó ×Ǥ × Ǥ ° ǡ Ǥ
(22) ±±°± Ǥ Àǡ Ǥ ǡǡ ǡ ± ×À Ǥ. . .
(23) I.INTRODUCTION
(24) ʹͲͲ
(25) ǯ ǡ
(26) ǡ Ǥ
(27)
(28) ǡ
(29) ǡ Ǥ
(30) ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(31) ǡ Ǥ ǯǤ . war on drugǡ ǡ . × Ǥ ǣ ǡǡ Ǥ
(32) ǯ ǡ war on drugsǤ ǡ Dzdz Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡǡǡ. . ͳ.
(33) Ǥ ǡ ȋ ǡ ʹͲͳʹȌǤ
(34) ǡ Dzdz ǡ ǡ Ǧ Ǥ
(35) ǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋʹͲͳʹȌ ǡ ǡ×ǯǣDz Ǥ
(36) ǯdzȋǤ ʹ͵ͺǡȌǤ ǫ ǯ ǫ ×ǯ ǡ DzdzǤ
(37) ǡ Ǥ Ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ Ǥ . Ǥ. ǡ. . ʹ.
(38) ȋ ǡʹͲͲͺȌǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǡ Ǥ ǡ Ǥ
(39) ǡ ȋǡ ǡ ͳͻͻͷǢ ǡ ʹͲͲͶȌǤ
(40) ȋͳͻͻ͵ǡ ʹͲͲ͵Ȍ ȋͳͻͺͶǡͳͻͻȌdefinitions Ǣ ǡ ǡ ȋǡʹͲͲͶǢ ǡʹͲͲ͵ǢǡͳͻͺͳȌǤ ǡǤ
(41) ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(42) ǡ
(43) ͳȌ ×ǯ ǡ ʹȌ ×ǡ ×ǯ Ǥ
(44) × ǣ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ
(45) Ǥ. . ͵.
(46) war on drugs Ǥ
(47) × DzdzǤ ǡ ǤǤǡ Ǥ ǡdzdz Dzdz Ǥ warondrugs ǯ Ǥ ×ǯ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ × ǯ war on drugsǤ
(48) ǯ Ǥ Dz dz × ǡ Dz dz Ǥ ǡ ×ǯ Ǥ ×warondrugs Ǥ × ǡ ǡ ǡ . . Ͷ.
(49) Ǥ ǡ Ȅ Ǥͳ . . . ͳǤ
(50) . Ǥ. . ͷ.
(51) II.THEORETICALFRAMEWORK Ǥ
(52) ȋǡǡͳͻͻͷǢǡʹͲͲͶȌǤ ͳǤ
(53)
(54)
(55) ǡ Ǥ ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲͺǢ ǡ ʹͲͲͶǢ ǡ ʹͲͲǢ ǡ ʹͲͲͶȌǡ ȋǡͳͻͻͷǢǡʹͲͳʹǢ ǡʹͲͳʹǢ ǡʹͲͲǢǡͳͻͺͲǡͳͻͺͶȌǡ ȋȂǡ ʹͲͲǢ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵ǢǡʹͲͳ͵ǢǡʹͲͲͺǢǡʹͲͲȌǤ ǡ ȋʹͲͳͲȌDz ǡ ǡ dzȋǤͳʹʹȌǤ ȋʹͲͲͺȌǡ ǡ Ǥ ǡ Dz dzDz. . .
(56) dzȋ ǡʹͲͲͺǡǤʹȌǤ ǤǤ ǡ ǤǤ ǤǤǦ Ǥ ǤǤ Ǧ Ǣ ǡ Ǥ Ǣ ǡ Ǥ À ȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǡ ǤǤ ǡ Ǥǡ
(57) ǤǤ Ǥ Dz ǡ ǡ dzȋ ǡʹͲͲͺǡǤȌǤȋͳͻͻͷȌDz Ǥ ǡ dzȋǤͺͻȌǤȋʹͲͲͶȌ Dz ǥ dz ȋǤ ͲȌǤ
(58) ǡ . . .
(59) Dz ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ dz ȋ ǡ ʹͲͳʹǡ Ǥ ʹͷȌǤ ǡ ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲͶȌǤ ǡ ȋʹͲͲͶȌǯ ǣDz ȋ ȌdzȋǤͷͷȌʹǤ
(60) ǡ Dz ǥǤ dzȋǡͳͻͻͷǡǤͺͻȌǤ .
(61) ǡ. ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(62) ǡǤ
(63) ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǯ ǡȋͳͻͻͶȌǤ ǡ Ǥ ǯ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻͷȌǡ Ǥ ʹ
(64)
(65) ǤǡDz dzǤ . ͺ.
(66) ǡ ȋ ǡ ͳͻͺ͵Ǣ ǡ ͳͻͺǢ ǡͳͻͻ͵ǢǡͳͻͺͻȌǤ ǡȋͳͻͻͷȌ ǡǯ ȋǡ ͳͻͺ͵Ǣ ǡ ͳͻͻ͵Ǣ ǡ ͳͻͻ͵Ǣ Ǣ ͳͻͻʹȌǤ ǯ ǡ ȋǡͳͻͻͷȌǤ Dz Ǥ dzȋǡͳͻͻͷǡǤͺͻȌǤ ǯ ǡ ǡ Ǧ ǡ ǡ ȋǡͳͻͻͷȌǤDzȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍǡ ȋʹͲͲͲȌǡ ǡ ȏ Ȑ dzȋǡʹͲͲͶȌǤ ȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǡ ǡ Dz dz ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲͶǡ Ǥ ͲȌǤȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǯǤ ǡ ȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǡ ǣ. . ͻ.
(67) ȋ Ȍ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǥ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǤȋǤͲͻȌǤ . ǡ ǡ Ǥ
(68) ȋǡǡ ͳͻͻͷȌ Ǥ ǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǡǤǤ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ Dz dz ȋǤ ͷͷͺȌǤ
(69) ǡ ȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǡ ȋ Ȍǡ Ǧ Ǥ ǡȋʹͲͲͷȌǡ ǡ Dz dzȋǤʹʹͻȌǤǡ ȋʹͲͲͶȌ ǡ Dz . . ͳͲ.
(70) ȏ Ȑ͵ Ǥ dzȋǤͷͲȌǤȋͳͻͻͷȌ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ȋʹͲͲʹȌ ǡ Dz Ǥ dz ȋǤ ʹ͵ȌǤ ǤǤ ǤDz ǡ ǡ ǣ dzȋǡʹͲͲʹǡǤʹ͵ȌǤ ǡ ȋʹͲͲʹȌ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǯ Dz dzȋǤ ͵ͺȌǤ ǡ Ǥ
(71) ǡ Ǥ ǡ ȋǡ ͳͻͻͷȌǤ ͵ Dz dzǡ
(72) Dz dz Ǥ . ͳͳ.
(73) ǡ ȋͳͻͻͷȌ Ǥ ȋ ǡͳͻͻͷȌ Ǥ Dz dzȋǤͻͷȌǤ ǡǡDz ǡ ǡ ǡ dz ȋǤͻͷȌǤ
(74) ǡ ȋͳͻͻͷȌ ǡ Dz ǡ are Ǥ ǡǡ dzȋǤͻͷȌǤ
(75) ǡ ǡ ǯ ȋǡʹͲͲͶȌǤDz ȏ Ȑ ȏ Ȑ ǡ ǡ ǡ dzȋǤͳͳȌǤ Ȅ Ȅ Dz ǡ dzȋǡʹͲͲͶǡǤͳʹȌǤ ȋʹͲͲȌǯ ǡ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻͷȌ Ǥ ǡ ǡDzǮ . . ͳʹ.
(76) ȏ Ȑ ǯǡ Ǯ ǯ ǯ dz ȋǤ ͻ͵ȌǤ ǯ Dz dzǡȋͳͻͻͷȌǡDz ǡ ǡ dz ȋǤ ͻ͵ȌǤ ȋ ǡ ͳͻͻͷȌ Ȃ ǯ ǡ ǯ ǤDz
(77) ǡ dzȋǤͻͷȌǤ Ǥ
(78) ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ ȋǡ ͳͻͻͷȌǤ ʹǤ
(79)
(80)
(81) ǡ ȋͳͻͻ͵ǡ ʹͲͲ͵Ȍ ǡ DzdzǤ ǡ ȋͳͻͻ͵Ȍ ȂȂǡ Ǥ Dz things ƮƲ ǡ ǡǮ ǫǯdzȋ ǡͳͻͻ͵ǡǤͶͳͲȌǤ ǡ Ǥ. . ͳ͵.
(82) Dz ǡ ȏȐ dz ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵ǡ Ǥ ȌǤ ǡ Dzdz Dz dz ȋ ǡ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵ȌǤ ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵Ȍ ǡ Ǥ ǯ Dzdz ǣ Dz Ȃ dzȋǤ ȌǤ ǡ ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ ȂǢǤ . ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ Ǥ. ǡ ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍ Dz dzȋǤȌǤǡ ǡ ǡ ǡDz dz Ǥ ǡ Dz ǫdz Ǥ ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲȌDz dz ȋǤʹȌǤ ǡ ȋͳͻͻ͵Ȍ ǡDz ǥ ǡ dz ȋǤ ͶͲͶȌǤ ǡ Dz Ǥdzǡ Dz. . ͳͶ.
(83) ǡǡǡ dzȋ ǡʹͲͲ͵ǡǤͳͳ͵ȌǤ ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍǣ whatǡ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡǡǡ ǡ ȋǤȌǤ . ǡ ǤͶ areǤ ȂǤ Dz ǡ dz ȋ ǡ ʹͲͲ͵ǡǤ ͶͲȌǤ ȋͳͻͺͳȌ Dz dzDz ǡdz ǡ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻȌ ǯ ǡ Ǥ Dz ǯ ǡ ǡdzȋǡͳͻͺͳǡǤʹͲͲȌǤȋʹͲͲͶȌǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ. Ͷ Dz. dzǡǡ Dz dzȋʹͲͲ͵ǡǤʹͻȌǤ. . ͳͷ.
(84) ǡ ǤȋǤͳʹȌ. ȋʹͲͲ͵Ȍǡ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻȌǡ ǡ ǡ Ǣ ǡ ǡ ǡ ǯ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻͶȌǡ ȋͳͻͻȌ ǯ ǡ Ǥ ȋͳͻͻȌ ǡ Ǥ ǡ ǯ ȋͳͻͺͳȌ ǤDz ǡ ǡ dzȋǤȌǤͷ ȋǡͳͻͻͷȌ ǣ ǡ Ǥ Ǣ Ǥǥ ǯ ƮƲǡǡ dzȋǤͻͶǦͻͷȌǤ . ͷ . ǡ ȋǡͳͻͻȌǤ. . ͳ.
(85) ȋ ǡͳͻͺȌǤ ȋͳͻͻȌ aboutǡfromǡ by Ǥ about Dzdz Ǥ from Dz dzȋǤͶȌǤ ǡDzdzȋǤͶȌǤ ǡ by Dz ǡ dzȋǤ ͷȌǤǣDz ǡ Ǥ dzȋǤͷȌǤ Ǥ ȋʹͲͲͻȌ ǡ Dz ǡ dzȋǤʹͺͳȌǤ
Documents relatifs
the Interrupt Service Subroutine to response to interrupts is- sued by the SID, read the status of the SID and then set ap- propriate software flags; the Main ( ) Subroutine to
17: Cross-correlograms for pair 1-22 obtained from the simulation of the I&F dynamics of the two cells with couplings and currents inferred from the analysis of Dark (left)
This over-inflated image of civil war as the self-destruction of nature, order, representation (“And let this world no longer be a stage”) and the body politic can be
After the initial accusation in the Story-Present conditions, the experimenter proceeded to tell the participant a story from a previous cheating incident (the same story was used
When the receiver prefers validation ex ante, however, more complexity makes the receiver less selective, and we provide sufficient conditions that lead to complexity inflation
However, the formal framework in Dung (1995) does not make this relation between the doxastic state (the agent’s beliefs) and the agent’s arguments explicit.. We have set it as our
In the symmetric two-member committee, when p − < p < p 0 < p, ˆ stochastic mechanisms strictly dominate the optimal deterministic (persuasion cascade) mechanism;
The paper discusses the value of a creative toy design framework for ideating toys and play patterns that support the coping skills, give solace, strengthen resili- ence, and