Debate in a multi-agent system : multiparty argumentation protocols

This paper proposes the first argumentation system that computes the intentions of an agent in one step. The system is grounded on a recent work on constrained argumen- tation

2) Influence diagrams extension: IDs extension aims at representing and analyzing a decisional model to support the decision-making process. The review of the literature that treats

Abstract. Today’s industries need more flexible scheduling systems able to produce new valid schedule in response to the modifications concerning orders, production processes

Each time an agent communicates, it may receive new informa- tion that modifies its intentions; on the other hand the more an agent communicates, the more it can confirm its

In this paper we take a review of the literature about argumentative knowledge construction, analyze argumentation in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs),

This is the essence of Twitter rhetoric, and what makes it different from argumentation in a face-to-face debate: packing information and argumentation in a

The paper is organized as follows: Section II presents the Executable model of a protocol; Section III describes the architecture of the Multi Agent System Runtime

A Multi-Agent System (MAS) is composed of multiple heterogeneous intelligent software systems (called agents) which can compete, negotiate or cooperate [19]. In recent years the