• Aucun résultat trouvé

Tradeoffs between ecosystem services : From landscapes to stakeholders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Tradeoffs between ecosystem services : From landscapes to stakeholders"

Copied!
213
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1.3: Contribution of different ES categories to human wellbeing. Source: Geijzendorffer et al
Figure 1.4: Cascade framework for linking ecosystems to human wellbeing. Source: de Groot et al
Figure 1.6: Number of publications related to ecosystem services and tradeoffs on the 1999-2017 period
Figure 1.7: Examples of methods used to assess ES relationships. (a) Analysis of ES co-occurrence  using ① correlation analysis and ② spider diagrams
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Figure 3: Sum up of the PII method for stakeholders participation Synthesis of normative frameworks Study of social representations Literature review on well-being issues Analysis

Thus, in this paper, we allocated the listed ecosystem services to three value categories (economic (8 services), biological (8 services) and heritage (12 services)) and,

– An unfavorable institutional culture which is characterized by hierarchical decision making, by not being used to working in partnership, by harboring prejudice against

In doing so, we longitudinally examine the phase-wise transience of stakeholders’ salience vis-à-vis a change in the number of their salience attributes by addressing the

From the analysis of the gray literature of the WBCSD (world business council on sustainable evelopment) and a series of interviews with key players in the process of the

From long-term monitoring of biodiversity and evaluation of ecosystem functioning to stakeholders viewpoint and ecosystem services provisioning : field socio- ecological experiments

Annual Meeting of the European Associationfor Animal Production (EAAP), Aug 2017, Tallinn, Estonia.. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Annual Meeting of the European Association

In addition, while focusing on two case studies and putting together different stakeholders (project holders, public institutions, waste management companies,