• Aucun résultat trouvé

An improved resource reservation protocol

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "An improved resource reservation protocol"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1: Session blocking example
Fig. 2: Test network used to analyze the setup time  that  in  RSVPv2,  the  downstream  router  could  not  transmit  after  receiving  the  PATH  messages  even  if  resources  are  reserved
Fig. 10: Number of refresh messages sent by Router B  for RSVP, RSVPv2 and RSVP+

Références

Documents relatifs

This document accompanies the first submission of RSVP and integrated services specifications onto the Internet standards

- When a PATH message ADSPEC encounters a network element that does *not* support RSVP or implement integrated services, the break bit in the general parameters

There are 3 control packets used to open or close the session at the MATIP level for exchanging Type B data. 10.1.1 Session Open

The capability to monitor point to point traffic statistics between two routers and the capability to control the forwarding paths of subsets of traffic through a given

Note that although the explicit label control described in [RFC3471] and [RFC3473] may provide a mechanism to support specifying the egress label in the context of

Documentation of IANA Assignments for Label Distribution Protocol (LDP), Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP), and Resource ReSerVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering

updating, extending or obsoleting: messages, message formats and procedures, object classes and class types, object formats and procedures; header formats, error codes

If an MSRP endpoint receives a SEND request that it cannot process for some reason, and the Failure-Report header field either was not present in the original request or had