• Aucun résultat trouvé

The non-parametric sub-pixel local point spread function estimation is a well posed problem

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The non-parametric sub-pixel local point spread function estimation is a well posed problem"

Copied!
19
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Table 1 summarizes some of the existing algorithms for psf estimation. It first gives the abbreviations for the five criteria characterizing calibration methods
Fig. 1: Comparison of the lower bound given by Lemma 3 and the one obtained by solving the KKT conditions for the case a = 0, b = 1
Fig. 3: Reaching theoretical bounds. A random Bernoulli bi- bi-nary image is used to generate the S s U
Fig. 4: Random Pattern Analysis. Sensitivity of the γ value to the kernel support size (a) and to the t/s zoom factor (b) s = 4
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Our asymptotic tests perform better than all competitors besides Wolf: in the latter case, we have greater Type II error for one neural dataset, lower Type II error on the Health

kernel estimate based on Epanechnikov kernel and m)n-1/5) is asymptotically minimax in F against the class of kernel estimates fn with deterministic bandwidths,

In Section 3 it is shown that the problem of estimating parameter θ in (1) can be reduced to that of estimating the mean in a conditionally Gaussian distribution with a

To summarize, our contribution is threefold: (i) a new model of multiclass prediction based on the idea of KPMs where the regularization parameter is a global dimension parameter,

In a heuristic way, the shape of the deformation formula can be explained by the Wiener representation of the heat kernel and Wick’s theorem (see [Ha4, Appendix]).. In this section,

For a given reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS), by solving the pre- image problem one seeks a pattern whose image in the RKHS is approximately a given feature..

The structural expectation is obviously not the function f , but the function f composed with the inverse φ − 1 of the expectation of H. Thus, it can be understood as the mean

Table 1 – MISE of the kernel estimators with bandwidth selected by the Goldenshluger and Lepski method (GL), and with bandwidth selected by cross-validation (CV) of the