• Aucun résultat trouvé

Stiffness modeling of NAVARO II transmission system

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Stiffness modeling of NAVARO II transmission system"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Figure 1.   Parallel planar manipulator NaVaRo.
Figure 2.   Kinematic model of NAVARO II manipulator.
Figure 4.   Equivalent models of NAVARO II transmission.
Table 1 Components of the MSA-based model of NAVARO II manipulator and its legs  Mechanical

Références

Documents relatifs

CHECKING DIAGNOSABILITY ON CENTRALIZED MODEL OF THE SYSTEM The proposed approach is based on previous work on the diagnosability [11], it aims to avoid the construction of

In order to be able to analyse data from different autonomic tests, two configurations, showing different levels of detail of the vascular system, have been proposed: a

Therefore, it is tried to find a multiple model composed by a minimal number of submodels. This number is related to the number of premise variables, so that a quasi-LPV.. form which

The influence of both the folding angle and the fold length are extracted automat- ically from a set of experimental values exhibiting a deterministic behavior and a variability due

bilayer couple bending is not included in equation (I), as B~ is the intrinsic (or single layer) bending stiffness of the bilayer, and $~ its spontaneous curvature in single

The model given in (Moulay, Aziz-Alaoui & Cadivel 2011, Moulay, Aziz-Alaoui & Kwon 2011) takes into account the mosquito biological life cycle and de- scribes the

(5) Applicants Granted Health Waivers = INTEG − (Waiver Acceptance Rate + Waiver Approval Rate, 234,547) Units: Service Members (6) Application Rate = 251,370; Units:

La Cour mentionne néanmoins que l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant devant être pris en compte dans toute décision qui le concerne, le refus du lien de filiation dans le