• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ways of farming and ways of thinking: do farmers' mental models of the landscape relate to their land management practices ?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Ways of farming and ways of thinking: do farmers' mental models of the landscape relate to their land management practices ?"

Copied!
24
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1. Location of  the study area. Inset: France.
Fig. 2. Conceptual framework developed to compare individual mental models (IMMs) and land management practices (LMPs) illustrating the main steps of the approach used to generate a “shared” group map (GM) for a group of farmers with similar LMPs
Table 1. Land management practices indicators.
Table  3.  Descriptive  statistics  for  the  three  types  of   semi-natural areas management practices identified for typology 2 (mean ± SD for GRASS and HEDGE_D; % of farmers in each group with the identified  practice  for  the  other  indicators)
+7

Références

Documents relatifs

Farming system management - Implications of R&D (3) Herd management Off farm Activities Opportunities Market Social&Institutional & policies environment Cropping

Our results show that the diversity of land-use practices can be summed up by ten practices related to three management domains: (i) livestock management, that is, splitting herds

farmers’ socioeconomic characteristics, perceptions of soil fertil- ity status, viewpoints on its indicators, constraints to and actual use of SFMPs, and viewpoints on the importance

Citizen science involving farmers as a means to document temporal trends in farmland biodiversity and relate them to agricultural practices.. Journal of Applied Ecology, Wiley,

Cette capacité d’adaptation contribue à la durabilité de l’exploitation en lui permettant de composer avec un contexte variable, mais constitue également un élément de plus

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of

farmers’ socioeconomic characteristics, perceptions of soil fertil- ity status, viewpoints on its indicators, constraints to and actual use of SFMPs, and viewpoints on the importance

Leaf and rachis analysis average, standard deviation and planting density per farmer type (SLF = Small Local Farmers, MLF = Medium Local Farmers, LRF = Large Resident Farmers, SMF