D2114
Aspergillus fumigatus
détection
by
PCR
in
Bronchoalveolar Lavag
e Flui
d
M.P. HAYETTE
, P
. BOLLAND
, B
. EVRAR
D an
d P
. D
E MOL,
*
Univ. Hosp
. Liège
, Belgiu
m
Introduction
Aspergillus fumigatus
is
an
opportunisme
nosocomial pathoge
n whic
h
causes
sévère
to
fatal infectio
n i
n neutropeni
c patients
. Th
e ris
k o
f
invasive
aspergillosis
(IA) increase
s wit
h th
é duratio
n o
f neutropeni
a
and
can
reach
70%
after 5
weeks
of neutropeni
a (
1 )
.
The
diagnostic
of I
A is
one
of th
é mos
t difficul
t an
f th
é gol
d standar
d i
s
still base
d o
n cultur
e and/o
r histolog
y result
s whic
h sensitivft
y i
s ver
y
low. Recently
, molecula
r biolog
y method
s wer
e developpe
d t
o
diagnose
aspergillosis
in
urines, sérum
, bloo
d an
d BAL
.
We
used
a neste
d PCR-base
d amplificatio
n o
f A
. fumigatus
DNA
in
BAL
fluids
that target
s th
é genes-encodin
g alkalin
e protease
s o
f th
é
fungus
to
evaluate
thé
usefullness
of PC
R t
o diagnos
e IA
.
Abstract
The
usefullness
of a
nested
PCR
for détectio
n o
f Aspergillus
fumigatus DN
A wa
s
evaluated
in
bronchoalveolar lavag
e (BAL
) flui
d durin
g a
period
of tw
o year
s (1996
-1998). Th
e ai
m o
f th
é stud
y wa
s t
o asses
s th
é rôl
e o
f PC
R i
n diagnosin
g invasiv
e
pulmonarry
aspergillosis
(IPA). Methods
: a
nested
PCR-based
amplplification
of
fragments
of genes-encodin
g alkalin
e protease
s fro
m Aspergillu
s fumigatu
s wa
s
used
to
testt 16
7 BA
L samples
. A
H sample
s wer
e checke
d fo
r th
é absenc
e o
f
amplification
inhibitors. Madical
, radiological
, microbiologica
l record
s an
d autops
y
findings
were
reviewed
for assessin
g invasiv
e aspergrllosis
. Ai
l successiv
e patient
s
investigated
by
BAL
were
included
in
thé
study. The
y wer
e distribute
d i
n thre
e
groups: A
: prove
n o
r probabl
e aspergillosi
s (n=11),
; B
, colonizatio
n (n=é)
; C
: n
o
évidence
of IP
A (n=154)
. PC
R result
s wer
e compare
d t
o cultur
e détectio
n a
s gol
d
standard
and
to
clinical data
. Results
: BA
L fluid
s fro
m 1
0 patient
s o
f grou
p A
were
PCR
positive. On
e cas
e wa
s falsel
y négative
. Amon
g grou
p B
, on
e cas
e wa
s PC
R
positive, an
d th
é secon
d on
e PC
R négativ
e bu
t ha
d négativ
e BA
L culture
s (onl
y
culture
positive
sputum). N
o fals
e positiv
e wa
s detecte
d amon
g grou
p C
.
Comparing
to
culture, sensitivit
y wa
s 91%
, specificity
, 100%
, positiv
e prédictiv
e
value, 100%
, an
d négativ
e prédictiv
e value
, 99%
. Conclusions
: Aspergillu
s
fumigatus
PCR
in
BAL
fluid
was
an
accurate
test t
o diagnos
e cultur
e négativ
e
patients
with
IPA
and
to
confirm
culture
positive
samples; howeve
r i
t does'
t mak
e
différence
between
infection
and
colonization. 2
. I
t is
an
appropriate
test t
o exclud
e
Aspergillus infectio
n in
patients
at ris
k o
f invasiv
e illness
.
Bibliographv
•LRibaud
P., Esperou-Bourdea
u H.
, Devergi
e A.
, Gluckma
n E
.
Aspergillose
invasive
et allogreff
e d
e moelle
. Path
. Biol.
, 1994
, 42
,
652-655.
•2.Tang
C., Holde
n D.
, Aufauvre-Brown
, Cohe
n J
. Th
e détectio
n o
f
Aspergillus
spp. b
y th
é polymeras
e chai
n reactio
n an
d i
l s
évaluation
in
bronchoalveolar lavag
e fluid
. Am
. Rev
. Resp
. Dis.
, 1993
, 148
,
1313-1317.
Marie-Pierre
Hayette
Microbidogy
department, Universit
y Hospita
l
4000
Liege.Belgium. mphayette@ulg.ac.b
e
Methods
•Clinical data
: ai
l patient
s undergoin
g bronchoscop
y a
t th
é universit
y hospita
l
of Lièg
e betwee
n 199
6 an
d 199
8 wer
e include
d i
n th
é stud
y an
d distribute
d i
n
three
groups:
•A: prove
n o
r probabl
e aspergillosi
s (
n =
1 1)
•Bicolonization
(n=2)
•C: n
o évidenc
e o
f aspergillosi
s (n=154
)
•BAL
fluid
spécimens: ai
l lavage
s collecte
d b
y th
é microbiologica
l laborator
y
were
included
in
thé
study
and
stored
at -20°
C befor
e processing
.
Microbiological examinatio
n wa
s directl
y performe
d o
n ever
y sampl
e an
d
results
recorded.
•DNA
extraction: adapte
d fro
m Tan
g e
t coll
. (2)
.
•BAL
fluid
(250/ul) +
extraction
buffer (250/j\)
containing
proteinase
K (10
0
//g): 65°
C fo
r 6
0 m
n
•extraction
once
with
phenol:chloroform:isoamylalcool (25:24:1
) an
d the
n
with
chlorofomrisoamylalcool (24:1)
.
•Précipitation
of DN
A b
y ethano
l
•Nested
PCR: Th
e targe
t DN
A correspond
s t
o genes-encodin
g alkalin
e
proteases
from
A. fumigatus
(2).
External primers
: alp
l 1
and
alp12
(2
).
Internai primers
: alp
l 3
(5'-CTGGCATACAACGCCGCT-3')
alp
14
(5'-TTGTTGATCGCAACC-3')
Product lengt
h afte
r amplification
: 52
7 bas
e pairs
.
Mix, (50>
l volume)
: 10m
M TRIS-C
I a
t p
H 8,3
, 5
0 m
M KC
I an
d 1.
5 m
M
MgCI2
with
100
pmol o
f bot
h primer
s an
d 1.2
5 U
Taq
polymerase
(Takara
Taq, Japan)
.
Thermal cyclin
g conditions
: 3
0 cycle
s a
t 94°
C fo
r 3
0 sec.
, 63°
C fo
r
45sec., an
d 72°
C fo
r 2
min.
Products
of PC
R :
analyzed
on
1.5%
agarose
gels, staine
d wit
h
ethidium
bromide
and
visuallized
by
UV
transillumination.
case
UNDERLYiNG
DISEASE
GROUP
A: AP
I o
r probabl
e AP
I fn=11
i
Hepatic transplantatio
n
COPB
corticoids dépenden
t
Hématologie
malignancy
Cardiac transplantatio
n
Arthritis
COPB
cortcoids
dépendent
Results
COPB
corticoids
dépendent
Bone
marrow
transplantation
Hématologie
malignancy
Hématologie
malignancy
o histolog
y ye
s
es ye
s
io histolog
y ye
s
GROUP
B: colonisatio
n (n=2
J
case
UNDERLYING
DISEASE
j
1 Mitra
l valvulopath
y i
2 COP
B (n
o corticoids
} i
COPB: Chroni
c obstructiv
e pulmonar
y hronchitis
.
GROUP
C: n
o évidenc
e o
t asperoillosi
a fn=154
)
n UNDERLYIN
G DISEAS
E JP
A
154
Respiratory
disease
9 10111
2 1
3
Sensitivitv
and
soecificitv
of PC
R
IPA
NO
IPA
PCR-1
155
156
PCR+
1 0
11
1 15
6
1 1
16
7
Sensitivity:
91%
Specificity: 100
%
Prédictive
values
négative
99%
positive
100%
Figure
1.
Amplification
products
on
ethidium
stained
agarose
gel. Above
: tane
s 1-5,7,8
:
négative
BAL. Lane
s G
, 9
: patien
t 7
from
group
A.
Lane:10,11: A
. fumigatus
DNA. Lane
s 12,13
:
négative
sample
(water). Betow
: beta-globin
e
amplification
of BA
L sample
s to
assess
thé
lack
of amplificatio
n inhibitors
.
Conclusions
1 .A.
fumigatus PC
R in
BAL
fluid
was
an
accurate
test t
o diagnos
e cultur
e négativ
e patient
s wit
h IP
A an
d t
o
confirm
culture
positive
samples.
However i
t doesn'
t mak
e différenc
e betwee
n infectio
n an
d colonization
.
2. Thi
s PC
R is
an
appropriate
method
to
exclude
Aspergillus infectio
n i
n patient
s a
t ris
k o
f invasiv
e illness
.