• Aucun résultat trouvé

Discountinuous Galerkin methods and posteriori error analysis for heterogeneous diffusion problems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Discountinuous Galerkin methods and posteriori error analysis for heterogeneous diffusion problems"

Copied!
136
0
0

Texte intégral

Loading

Figure

Table 2.1: Convergen
e rates of the SWIP method, p = 1
Figure 2.1: Graphi
al 
omparison between the methods SWIP and IP-A. The test 
ase with ǫ 1 = 5 e-2
Figure 2.2: The norm k·k 0,Ω and the indi
ator (2.49) (denoted by M ) are plotted for the
Figure 2.3: Test 
ase with genuine anisotropi
 properties. On the left, an illustration of the
+6

Références

Documents relatifs

The next section discusses the in fl uence of Brazil’s policy network on institutional changes in the FAO and CPLP, and the third section describes the design and di ff usion of

En outre, nous avons pris le soin de dé rire les diérentes étapes de onstru tion de es indi ateurs d'erreur, e hoix étant guidé non seulement par le fait que e hapitre soit

Temps local d'une diusion en milieu aléatoire Vallée standard. 1

Then, extending some results obtained in the study of quasistatic viscoelastic problems and the heat equation, an a posteriori error analysis is done in Section 3, providing an

A posteriori error estimator based on gradient recovery by av- eraging for convection-diffusion-reaction problems approximated by discontinuous Galerkin meth- ods... A posteriori

A posteriori error estimator based on gradient recovery by averaging for discontinuous Galerkin methods.. Emmanuel Creusé,

We give an a posteriori error estimator for nonconforming finite element approximations of diffusion- reaction and Stokes problems, which relies on the solution of local problems

The error upper bound hinges on an advection-diffusion flux reconstruction and its local space-time equilibration, see Assumption 3.1, while the error lower bound requires a