• Aucun résultat trouvé

Bridging the gap between human visual anticipation and autonomous systems through the use of a vector addition model

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Bridging the gap between human visual anticipation and autonomous systems through the use of a vector addition model"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ISAE-SUPAERO Conference paper

The 1st International Conference on Cognitive Aircraft

Systems – ICCAS

March 18-19, 2020

https://events.isae-supaero.fr/event/2

Scientific Committee

Mickaël Causse, ISAE-SUPAERO

Caroline Chanel, ISAE-SUPAERO

Jean-Charles Chaudemar, ISAE-SUPAERO

Stéphane Durand, Dassault Aviation

Bruno Patin, Dassault Aviation

Nicolas Devaux, Dassault Aviation

Jean-Louis Gueneau, Dassault Aviation

Claudine Mélan, Université Toulouse Jean-Jaurès

Jean-Paul Imbert, ENAC

Permanent link :

https://doi.org/10.34849/cfsb-t270

Rights / License:

(2)

ICCAS 2020 Bridging the gap between human …

Bridging the gap between human visual anticipation

and autonomous systems through the use of a vector

addition model

Content

Visual anticipation is an essential cognitive function in that it is necessary for action and is consid-ered a key feature of Endsley’s situational awareness model (1995, 2015). In recent decades, both research and industry have shown a growing interest in autonomous vehicles and, in this context, anticipation raises new questions. Indeed, human performances in automation situations decrease (e.g., complacency, degradation of skills and loss of situational awareness). Various causes are de-scribed by Victor et al. (2018), but an important one is the operators’ gap and misconceptions in their mental models of automated systems (Sarter & Woods, 1994). Surprised by automation; they do not know what behaviour the system will produce (Parasuraman et al., 2008), leading to inappropriate and therefore dangerous reactions. The objective is then to identify the mechanisms of visual anticipation to model how individuals anticipate events. Such modelling will facilitate the implementation of autonomous system anticipation algorithms that are more compatible with the mental model of users. The anticipation mechanism that has been firmly identified is called representational momentum (RM). Numerous studies have shown that the RM is sensitive to factors present in the context of driving a vehicle. And while some factors promote anticipation, others hinder it.

Blättler et al. (2010, 2011) have shown that specific experience in driving and aviation domains facil-itates anticipation in these specific contexts unlike inexperience that strongly degrades it. Blättler et al. (2012) have shown that involvement in the driving action is also a facilitating factor. People tend to be distracted by dual-tasks that affect their attention level, but studies on anticipation and attention do not yet give clear results. While Hayes and Freyd (2002), Joordens et al. (2004) and Blättler et al. (2019) show a facilitating effect of divided attention, other research (Kerzel, 2004; Hubbard et al., 2009) show different effects. Furthermore, Blättler et al., (2019) show a facilitating effect if one has experience in the situation and an opposite effect if one is inexperienced. According to Hubbard’s (2010) model, the RM is a mechanism allowing to extrapolate the move-ment of a moving object or scene in the direction of its movemove-ment based on a variety of factors. Each influencing factor is represented by a vector coding for the direction and magnitude of the extrapolation. If the context provides several vectors coding for a direction opposite to the motion, the result of the process should be a spatial representation shifted not forward but backward. Con-versely, vectors fostering an extrapolation in the direction of movement, then anticipation should occur.

Therefore, it is first necessary to identify in autonomous vehicle contexts which vectors are in-volved and what will be the result of the anticipation process in individuals (model definition). Then, it will be necessary to test the most appropriate configurations of the driver’s cab to favour the expression of anticipation (model test). Finally, the reactions of an individual in an autonomous vehicle against an appropriate and inappropriate configuration will be tested to measure the risks of the inappropriate configuration for anticipation.

Mr KHOURY, Jason (CREA (centre de recherche de l'école de l'air) Freanch Air Force)

;

Dr BLÄTTLER, Colin (CREA (centre de recherche de l'école de l'air) Freanch Air Force)

Références

Documents relatifs

If having received additional contact with the human prior to the test conditioning phase modifies the emotional state of piglets, we would expect a different anticipatory

Model Driven Engineering (MDE) benefits software development (a.k.a. Model Driven Software Development) as well as software processes (a.k.a. Software Process Mod-

In order to illustrate our explanation, we present three recommendations according to our UAV-an prob- lem.(ii) From partial policy to a new model: We explain how the partial policy

There are two reasons for this difference in computation times. With the classical methods, the number of updated states is bigger than the number obtained with the GBMDP

De par les diverses contraintes décrites au sein des objectifs et de la méthodologie, le défi lié à l’élaboration de la matrice budgétaire était relativement important. De ce

Starting from the influence of robot comics on both the perception and the development of robots in Japan, the Tetsuwan Atomu will now be used to help investigate the

wheels). The S IMBAD simulator provides a simulated khepera and control architecture can be switched from simulation to real world. The robot used in simulation slightly differs

The d-dimensional algorithms we describe are (a) spatial sorting of points, as is typically used for preprocessing before using incremental algorithms, (b) kd-tree construction,